Skip to content Skip to footer

Who we are

Our website address is: https://shipip.com.

What personal data we collect and why we collect it

Comments

When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.

An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.

Media

If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.

Contact forms

Cookies

If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.

If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.

When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select "Remember Me", your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.

If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

Embedded content from other websites

Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.

These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

Analytics

Who we share your data with

How long we retain your data

If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.

For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.

What rights you have over your data

If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.

Where we send your data

Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.

Your contact information

Additional information

How we protect your data

What data breach procedures we have in place

What third parties we receive data from

What automated decision making and/or profiling we do with user data

Industry regulatory disclosure requirements

Inspection intervals

With the introduction of the ​​​New Inspection Regime (NIR), all ships operating within the Paris MoU are subdivided into three types: ​

  • Low Risk Ship (LRS)
  • Standard Risk Ship (SRS)
  • High Risk Ship (HRS)

​The type of ship is decisive

The type of ship determines how often a ship is required to be subjected to a port State control inspection in Paris MoU. Low risk ships must be inspected every third year, standard risk ships must be inspected every year, while high risk ships must be inspected every six months. When a period has expired, the ship is required to be inspected at the first subsequent port call.

The authority can choose to inspect earlier than required

However, the port State control authority can choose to inspect the ship earlier than required if it is expedient as regards the authority’s work. This means that a low risk ship can be inspected two years after the latest inspection, a standard risk ship ten months after the latest inspection and a high risk ship five months after the latest inspection.

Prioritising ships

When two years have passed since the latest inspection of a low risk ship, the ship becomes a second priority ship. This means that the authority may choose to inspect the ship, but is not required to do so.

If, however, more than three years pass since the latest inspection of a low risk ship, the ship becomes a first priority ship. This means that it is required to be inspected.

Similar rules of priority apply to standard risk ships and high risk ships, which is illustrated in this picture.

However, an unexpected factor may change the status of the ship from no priority to second priority.

Furthermore, a top priority factor may change the ship’s inspection priority to first priority.

Ships affected by unexpected factors are the following:

  • Ships that have not observed the current version of the IMO recommendation for navigating the entrances to the Baltic Sea.
  • Ships with certificates issued by a previously recognised organisation whose authorisation has been withdrawn since the latest inspection in the Community or in the Paris MoU region.
  • Ships about which pilots or port authorities or bodies have reported obvious irregularities that may affect safety of navigation or that present a risk of damage to the marine environment, cf. article 23 of this directive.
  • Ships that do not meet the relevant reporting requirements as stipulated in article 9 of the PSC directive as well as in directive 2000/59/EC (on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues) and 2002/59/EC (monitoring directive and, if relevant, regulation (EC) no. 725/2004 (on enhancing ship and port facility security).
  • Ships for which a report or complaint has been made by the master, a crewmember or by any person or organisation with a legitimate interest in the ship being operated safely and properly, in the living and working conditions on board or in preventing pollution unless the member State concerned considers the report or the complaint clearly groundless.
  • Ships that have previously been detained more than three months ago.
  • Ships for which outstanding defects and non-conformities have been reported, except ships for which the defects and non-conformities are required to be remedied within 14 days after departure or before departure.
  • Ships for which problems have been reported related to their cargo, especially harmful and dangerous goods.
  • Ships that have manoeuvred in a manner presenting a risk to persons, property or the environment.
  • Ships for which information from a reliable source has shown that their risk parameters differ from the registered parameters and that the risk level is therefore higher.
  • Top priority factors mean the following:
  • Ships that have, for safety reasons, been suspended or withdrawn from their class since the latest inspection in the Community or in the Paris MoU region.
  • Ships for which another member State has made a report or notice.
  • Ships that cannot be identified in the inspection database.
  • Ships that have been involved in a collision, grounding or stranding on their way to port.
  • Ships that have been accused of contravening the provisions on the discharge of harmful substances or waste water.
  • Ships that have manoeuvred in an irregular manner or in a manner that is not appropriate in terms of safety so that routeing measures adopted by the IMO or safe navigation practice and procedures have not been observed.​

Source: dma