Skip to content Skip to footer

Who we are

Our website address is: https://shipip.com.

What personal data we collect and why we collect it

Comments

When visitors leave comments on the site we collect the data shown in the comments form, and also the visitor’s IP address and browser user agent string to help spam detection.

An anonymized string created from your email address (also called a hash) may be provided to the Gravatar service to see if you are using it. The Gravatar service privacy policy is available here: https://automattic.com/privacy/. After approval of your comment, your profile picture is visible to the public in the context of your comment.

Media

If you upload images to the website, you should avoid uploading images with embedded location data (EXIF GPS) included. Visitors to the website can download and extract any location data from images on the website.

Contact forms

Cookies

If you leave a comment on our site you may opt-in to saving your name, email address and website in cookies. These are for your convenience so that you do not have to fill in your details again when you leave another comment. These cookies will last for one year.

If you visit our login page, we will set a temporary cookie to determine if your browser accepts cookies. This cookie contains no personal data and is discarded when you close your browser.

When you log in, we will also set up several cookies to save your login information and your screen display choices. Login cookies last for two days, and screen options cookies last for a year. If you select "Remember Me", your login will persist for two weeks. If you log out of your account, the login cookies will be removed.

If you edit or publish an article, an additional cookie will be saved in your browser. This cookie includes no personal data and simply indicates the post ID of the article you just edited. It expires after 1 day.

Embedded content from other websites

Articles on this site may include embedded content (e.g. videos, images, articles, etc.). Embedded content from other websites behaves in the exact same way as if the visitor has visited the other website.

These websites may collect data about you, use cookies, embed additional third-party tracking, and monitor your interaction with that embedded content, including tracking your interaction with the embedded content if you have an account and are logged in to that website.

Analytics

Who we share your data with

How long we retain your data

If you leave a comment, the comment and its metadata are retained indefinitely. This is so we can recognize and approve any follow-up comments automatically instead of holding them in a moderation queue.

For users that register on our website (if any), we also store the personal information they provide in their user profile. All users can see, edit, or delete their personal information at any time (except they cannot change their username). Website administrators can also see and edit that information.

What rights you have over your data

If you have an account on this site, or have left comments, you can request to receive an exported file of the personal data we hold about you, including any data you have provided to us. You can also request that we erase any personal data we hold about you. This does not include any data we are obliged to keep for administrative, legal, or security purposes.

Where we send your data

Visitor comments may be checked through an automated spam detection service.

Your contact information

Additional information

How we protect your data

What data breach procedures we have in place

What third parties we receive data from

What automated decision making and/or profiling we do with user data

Industry regulatory disclosure requirements

Russia Claims to Have Chased U.S. Navy Out of Pacific Exercise Area

admiral tributs destroyer
The crew of the Russian destroyer Admiral Tributs, as seen from USS Chafee, Oct. 15 (USN)

PUBLISHED OCT 18, 2021 6:55 PM BY THE MARITIME EXECUTIVE

 

The U.S. Navy is pushing back on Russian claims that the destroyer USS Chafee was ejected from the area of a recent Russian-Chinese joint naval exercise.

On Friday, Russia’s Ministry of Defense claimed that a Russian destroyer forced the Chafee to alter course after Chafee attempted to “violate the state border of the Russian Federation in the Peter the Great Bay.” When the Russian Navy challenged Chafee’s movements “in an area closed to navigation due to exercises with the use of artillery weapons,” the Chafee raised colors for aviation operations, according to the ministry. After a warning, the Russian destroyer Admiral Tributs approached Chafee to within 60 meters and successfully “stopped [her] attempt to violate the state border,” according to the ministry.

“After becoming convinced of the Russian warship’s resolve to prevent the violation of the state border, the guided missile destroyer Chafee reversed its course at 5:50 p.m.,” the ministry said in a statement.

In a response, the U.S. Navy asserted that the run-in occurred differently. USS Chafee was in international waters in the Sea of Japan, according to the Navy, and was preparing for flight ops when a Russian destroyer approached. No Russian military exercise notices were in effect at that time for the area, and Chafee “conducted operations in accordance with international law and custom,” the Navy said.

Though the Russian destroyer approached to within about 65 yards – a clear close-quarters situation – the Navy said that “the interaction was safe and professional.”

The incident occurred in the middle of a four-day joint exercise for Russian and Chinese naval forces. The exercise involved mine countermeasures; joint tactical maneuvering; artillery fire at mock targets, including a towed “surface combatant” target; and air defense operations.

In addition to the Admiral Tributs, the exercise involved the the large anti-submarine destroyer Admiral Panteleev; the corvettes Aldar Tsydenzhapov and Gromkiy; two minesweepers; and the improved Kilo-class sub Ust- Bolsheretsk. The PLA Navy was represented by the destroyers Kun Ming and Nan Chang; the corvettes Bin Zhou and Liu Zhou; and one diesel-electric submarine.

Previous run-ins with Russian forces

The destroyer USS John S. McCain had a similar run-in with Russian Navy forces in the Sea of Japan last year. When the McCain conducted a freedom of navigation operation (FONOP) near Peter the Great Bay on November 24, 2020, the Russian anti-submarine destroyer Admiral Vinogradov responded to the scene and warned McCain to depart “Russia’s territorial waters.” After the Vinogradov threatened to ram McCain and altered her course, McCain departed, the Russian Defense Ministry asserted.

The U.S. Navy denied this claim. “USS John S. McCain was not ‘expelled’ from any nation’s territory. McCain conducted this FONOP in accordance with international law and continued to conduct normal operations in international waters,” the service said in a response.

The Royal Navy destroyer HMS Defender had a similar encounter with Russian forces off Crimea in June 2021. Using a charted traffic separation scheme, Defender passed close by Russian-occupied Sebastopol during a transit between ports in the Black Sea. Her route prompted an angry response from the Russian Defense Ministry, which claimed that an Su-24M fighter dropped four bombs “on the course” of the vessel to force her to depart. The Royal Navy denied that any shots were fired or bombs were dropped nearby, except for a previously-scheduled Russian gunnery exercise some distance away.

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/russia-claims-to-have-chased-u-s-navy-destroyer-out-of-exercise-area