Tanker went out of control after engine failure and collided with general cargo ship in Kiel Canal near Kiel locks, at around 0120 LT Jul 27. The ships were transiting Canal in opposite directions, both reportedly, sustained damages and were detained. Tanker was berthed near collision site, general cargo ship according to track, exited Canal and was berthed in port outside locks. Ships weren’t identified, but according to tracks, tanker ORASUND and general cargo ship BBC PARANA were involved. ORASUND is en route from Liepaja Latvia to Ireland, BBC PARANA is en route from China to Umea Sweden. As of 1420 UTC Jul 27, both ships remained berthed in Kiel. Reportedly, ships didn’t report water ingress, nor there was any leak.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

https://www.fleetmon.com/maritime-news/2021/34681/tanker-and-general-cargo-ship-collided-kiel-canal/


The Port of Houston’s two container terminals are currently shut as a result of a “hardware failure” that began Monday morning.

In a statement, the Port of Houston made clear that the incident is not related to a cyber attack and it is working to restore systems as soon as possible. However, the two container terminals, Bayport and Barbours Cut, are not expected to open today or tonight.

The port’s executive director, Roger Guenther, explained the situation in a letter to customer and stakeholders.

“Yesterday, in advance of the truck gates opening at their normal time of 7:00 a.m. we experienced a major failure of the storage devices that support all of the applications used to operate both Barbours Cut and Bayport Container Terminals. Our staff responded immediately and moved the applications and associated data to a redundant set of storage devices and the terminals were again operational by 10:00 a.m. Unfortunately, the redundant storage devices failed at 12:00 noon and the terminals have been unable to process any transactions since then. I want to be clear that this is not a cyber-attack on the Port Houston operating system,” writes Guenther.

Ships that were already in progress have been able to continue working, but operations on new vessels “have not been possible”. Truck gates at both container facilities are also idle.

Guenther reports that the port is now in possession of necessary hardware, but configuration and restoration “has been a slow process”.

“Frankly, the outlook for reopening today is not good,” writes Guenther.

Port of Houston’s Bayport and Barbours Cut container terminals handle about two-thirds of all the containerized cargo in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. Like other container ports around the country, the port has seen a continued surge of imports since rebounding from the COVID-19 pandemic. Year-to-date through June, the Port Houston has recorded 1,607,793 TEUs for a 13% increase over last year.

Once systems are restored, Guenther said the port’s plans include daily extended gate hours as well as weekend gates. “Also, all available resources will be provided to continue vessel operations.”

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Port of Houston Container Terminals Shut Due to ‘Hardware Failure’


The U.S. Maritime Administration has awarded Crowley Maritime Corporation with a multi-year, $638 million Vessel Acquisitions Management contract.

As the Vessel Acquisition Manager, Crowley will assist MARAD in acquiring and managing vessels for the Ready Reserve Force (RRF), helping to reduce the overall age of the fleet and increase ship reliability.

Crowley says it will use a new, proprietary IT system to perform data analysis of the lifecycle of vessels and their components in order to assess and make purchasing recommendations to MARAD. It will then oversee any required re-flagging, re-classification, modification and maintenance to ensure compliance with U.S. Coast Guard, American Bureau of Shipping, and Defense Department requirements. After ships enter the fleet, it will maintain and operate the vessels on behalf of MARAD.

“A successful VAM program is important to the U.S. as a maritime nation, the maritime industry and Crowley as we mutually invest in the strength of our nation,” said Mike Golonka, vice president, government ship management in Crowley Solutions. “We want to share our innovative, successful approach to vessel ownership and lifecycle engineering with the U.S. government.”

The Ready Reserve Force (RRF) is a subset of vessels within MARAD’s National Defense Reserve Fleet (NDRF) that provide surge sealift capability to the Department of Defense. The fleet currently consists of 41 vessels, comprising 33 roll-on/roll off vessels including 8 Fast Sealift Support (FSS) vessels, 1 heavy-lift or barge carrying ships, 4 auxiliary craneships, 1 tanker, and 2 aviation repair vessels, according to MARAD’s website. The ships are owned, crewed, and maintained by MARAD, but come under control of Military Sealift Command once activated.

In September 2019, the U.S. Department of Defense’s Transportation Command ordered a large-scale turbo activation of the Ready Reserve Force to “stress test” the fleet’s ability to transition from reduced operating status to fully crewed and full operating status within 5-days. Of the 28 vessels participating, only about 60 percent were considered “ready” and 40 percent were able to get underway in the allotted time.

The contract to Crowley is another example of MARAD outsourcing project management roles to a private company. In 2019, the agency awarded TOTE Services with the contract to serve as the Vessel Construction Manager for the new National Security Multi-Mission Vessels.

Crowley will execute the contract with Stena Line, Serco and LCE (Life Cycle Engineering), services in acquisitions, naval ship architecture, engineering and applied technology.

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Crowley Awarded Contract to Manage Vessel Acquisitions for MARAD’s Ready Reserve Force


Demurrage is an issue that is necessary, but nobody likes. Simply put, it is a cost levied by the vessel owner when a vessel outstays its allowed time in port. It is a fundamental part of the contract for carriage of goods as set out in the charterparty document.

It is obviously important. An examination of charterparty documents shows that approximately 75% of the clauses are to do with in-port operations. When we look at the utilisation of dry cargo vessels, we see that over 45% of their time is spent in port. So, it’s clear that this waiting time is a commercially and contractually important issue.

Plus, it’s not something that is limited to just the vessel owner and the charterer – the charterer will charge their traders for demurrage incurred.

In fact, vessel owners have the simplest part: they need to calculate and invoice just their charterer. But behind the charterer there lies a whole supply chain of interlinked trades. For some trades there can be many buy/sell interactions where the trading company never sees the physical cargo at all, but is still a party to the demurrage claim.

They will have bought and sold on either an FOB/FOB or CIF/CIF basis. They may very well have the same terms on each side and hence will net the demurrage charge to zero. But this is not the end of the story. There are many costs to execute these supposedly zero transactions: internals costs, time value of money, banking charges. The charges can’t be re-routed from the original issuer to the end receiver as there is no direct contractual relationship.

The effect of this is twofold. First each party in the trade chain has to perform a demurrage calculation for which they need the port Statement of Facts (SOF). Without the SOF they can’t even begin to see if the calculation is valid. Each party along the trade chain will (or should) perform their own calculation. This means entering the SOF into their demurrage calculator. This is done by transcribing the SOF from its original format, most often by hand. This process is fraught with typographical errors, which creates mistakes in the claim and slows the process down.

The second effect is that, believing that they have a net zero exposure, why would anyone in the trade chain make this their most important task? It is all too easy to see such claims not having priority for demurrage analysts’ time. This means delays in the time taken to settle the claim. The claim is something that is contractually binding on the charterer to pay the owner. Though it rarely states this in the charterparty it is industry practice that each party in the trade chains doesn’t pay any demurrage invoice until they themselves have been paid.

The overall effect of this is that the vessel owner is left waiting for payment of a perfectly valid invoice, often for many months. An audit of one trading company found annual demurrage charges of around $300 million; there was at any point in time at least $75 of outstanding demurrage claims stuck in the system. Vessel owners are acting as the de facto bankers to the shipping industry – they can do only one of two things in this situation, which is to raise rates to charterers, or take the hit in an already depressed market.

Solutions for the 21st Century

There are solutions to this. The first is simple. If the vessel owning industry were to adopt digital Statement of Facts, then the whole process of handling the SOF could be reduced or in many cases eliminated altogether. Electronic documents for the SOF can be created that will integrate directly into the trading systems or standalone laytime calculators.

There is a need to improve the demurrage calculation process. By having automated calculators that understand the trade terms in the trade contract and charterer party we can approach the goal of Straight Through Processing (STP) with much reduced manual intervention. The manual processing used today simply adds friction to the process and creates errors in interpretation that delay the acceptance of claims. Manual handling of the demurrage claim should be reserved for the 20% of really complex claims that are beyond the capability of today’s systems.

Beyond this is the need to bring collaborative automation to the negotiation process. Osiris is working on solutions that will make it much easier to securely exchange and forward claims, documents and messages up and down the supply chain. By making it easier for involved parties to action requests rather than put them off until tomorrow, the whole problem of inertia can be addressed. Information can flow up and down the chain automatically.

When claims are agreed by the end parties, the use of digital currencies can make the movement of monies from the payees to the end receiver (the vessel owner) far quicker without minimal involvement from the intervening party.

The solution to the SOF problem

Anyone who has worked in demurrage knows that the Statement of Facts can be delivered in any number of formats. Some as Excel sheets, but with no standard layout or format. Some as PDF files, but not all of these are delivered as PDFs that can be easily transcribed. We’ve even seen some written longhand on plain paper and faxed to the receiver. In the 21st Century there simply has to be a better way.

SOFeXchange is the answer. Using this system all parties at the port can collaborate in real-time to create a single SOF that all can agree on. Any discrepancies can be sorted out when they happen, and not when documents are agreed some days later. By using Smart Laytime Events™ the time taken to record events is reduced – often to just a single click.

The electronic SOF is then made available to the owner, charterer and traders who can import it into their laytime calculators. By making the SOF available in a format that best suits their needs the SOF can be loaded with no need to retype. Hence, all the time costs of this process are avoided and typos are eliminated.

SOFeXchange is available from Osiris Consultants Ltd, who are specialists in optimising trade logistics. Osiris have over 40 years of business process transformation, of which 20 have been spent in the commercial maritime sector. Contact Adrian Challinor via www.sofexchange.com, by email to adrian.challinor@osiris.co.uk or by phone to +44-(0)7860-290-883

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

The Problem With Demurrage


U.S. Secretary of Interior Deb Haaland listens to a question during a hearing for a budget request for the Department of the Interior for 2022 to the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 27, 2021. REUTERS/Joshua Roberts

Interior Secretary Accused of Defying Ruling to Resume Oil and Gas Leasing

Bloomberg

Total Views: 464 

July 28, 2021

By Jennifer A. Dlouhy (Bloomberg) —

Six weeks after a federal judge ordered the Biden administration to resume selling oil and gas leases on federal land, there’s no sign it has and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland struggled Tuesday to explain why.

“We are evaluating our options,” Haaland told the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee amid sharp criticism from Republicans. “There’s a lot of work that goes into moving that forward.”

A Louisiana-based federal district judge issued a preliminary injunction June 15 against President Joe Biden’s order to pause lease sales on federal land and waters so it could be considered in light of its climate impacts. The judge ordered Interior to immediately restart leasing but the agency hasn’t scheduled any auctions or rescheduled sales postponed earlier this year.

Haaland faced withering criticism from no fewer than seven of the 20 senators on the committee amid growing bipartisan frustration with the halt of new leasing in areas that provide roughly a quarter of U.S. oil production.

“The pause is effectively defying the federal judge’s order to continue,” Senator Bill Cassidy, a Republican from Louisiana, said.

Haaland conceded that “technically, I suppose, you could say the pause is still in place.” But she insisted the agency is complying with the court order and is moving forward on releasing an interim report to guide future leasing decisions. The report is expected to recommend boosting the royalty rates companies pay to extract fossil fuels, among other changes.

Oil industry advocates have said the Interior Department can swiftly schedule lease sales by relying on the government’s earlier environmental analysis, including assessments conducted by the Trump administration. However, conservationists argue that greater scrutiny is needed to ensure those auctions comply with federal laws, including of how oil and gas development from newly sold leases will affect climate change.

“It’s not a switch you can turn on,” Haaland said. “There’s a lot of work that goes into a lease sale.”

Senators James Lankford of Oklahoma and Cindy Hyde-Smith of Mississippi pushed unsuccessfully for a more definitive timetable.

“There’s just an expectation that when a court order stepped in and said ‘hey this is not legal to just stop this indefinitely,’ that there’s actually going to be progress made toward this,” Lankford said.

Haaland’s repeated assurances that the report was coming “soon” provoked scoffing by Senator Lisa Murkowski, a Republican from Alaska.

“I’m not going to ask you when you think it’s going to be coming because I think I know what your answer is,” Murkowski said. “I hope you can sense the frustration that so many of us have in anticipating this and wondering when we will be able to expect that you’ll be in compliance with the judge’s order.”

The frustration crossed party lines. Chairman Joe Manchin, a Democrat from West Virginia, said that he “supported the administration’s desire to pause leases,” but “we are now well into the early summer timeline when we were told the review would be completed.”

“We need a plan to move forward with responsible oil and gas leasing, both onshore and offshore, to maintain our energy independence,” Manchin said.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Interior Secretary Accused of Defying Ruling to Resume Oil and Gas Leasing


port of los angeles and long beach

Shipping containers are unloaded from ships at a container terminal at the Port of Long Beach-Port of Los Angeles complex, amid the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, in Los Angeles, California, U.S., April 7, 2021. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson

FMC Presented with Interim Recommendations to Address Supply Chain Issues

Mike Schuler

Total Views: 464 

July 28, 2021

The Federal Maritime Commission has been presented with a set of interim recommendations from its fact finding investigation into challenges facing the ocean transportation supply chain brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

In an open session held Tuesday, Commissioner Rebecca F. Dye provided the Commission with eight Interim Recommendations meant to address current conditions contributing to congestion and other inefficiencies in the ocean freight system.

The Federal Maritime Commission ordered Fact Finding No. 29 back in March 2020 to investigate congestion and bottlenecks at ports and other points in the supply chain that posed a serious risk to the U.S. economy. As the Fact Finding Officer, Commissioner Dye was authorized to convene Supply Chain Innovation Teams and engage key stakeholders from all facets of the freight sector in order to identify commercial solutions to some of the worst supply chain problems facing American exporters, importers, and truckers. The recommendations include actions for the FMC to take to address many of the most common problems identified through her work.

The recommendations are aimed at minimizing barriers to private party enforcement of the U.S. Shipping Act, clarifying Commission and industry processes, encouraging shippers, truckers, and other stakeholders to assist Commission enforcement efforts, and bolstering the ability of the Office of Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services to facilitate fair and fast dispute resolution.

Commissioner Dye also reported that she plans to hold meetings of Supply Chain Innovation Teams in Memphis and the Port of Los Angeles to address supply chain disruptions and increase supply chain visibility.

“The overwhelming effects of pandemic cargo surges, fueled by online purchases, magnified the problems in our freight delivery system,” Commissioner Dye said in her remarks to the FMC.

Commissioner Dye summarized her initial recommendations as:

  1. Amending section 41104(a)(3) of title 46, United States Code, to broaden the anti- retaliation provision in the Shipping Act to respond the concerns raised by shippers, especially exporters.
  2. Amending section 41305(c) of title 46 to authorize the Commission to order double reparations for violations of section 41102(c), with Commission guidance focusing this provision on demurrage and detention violations and other types of cases or behavior.
  3. Issuing a Commission policy statement regarding three areas related to private party complaints: retaliation, attorney fees, and representational complaints, including trade associations.
  4. Revising the Commission’s website to provide clarity regarding the Commission’s existing processes to bring factual allegations to the Commission for resolution.
  5. Holding a webinar to explain Commission processes.
  6. Issuing a rulemaking concerning information on demurrage and detention billings.
  7. Thanking Commissioner Khouri for his leadership on this issue, amending sections 41109 and 41309 of title 46 to authorize the Commission to order relief in addition to civil penalties in enforcement proceedings.
  8. The Chairman is already pursuing recommendation 8, concerning designating an Export Expert in our Consumer Affairs and Dispute Resolution Services office.

Separately, Commissioner Carl W. Bentzel provided a summary of his examination of container and chassis manufacturing and the availability of intermodal equipment to support US international containerized trade. The Commissioner noted that congestion and increased demand for equipment has led to shortages of chassis and containers in the United States and other nations as well. This demand has led to increased prices for new intermodal equipment.

Commissioner Bentzel plans on completing his work by September.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

FMC Presented with Interim Recommendations to Address Supply Chain Issues


MAN Energy Solutions has won the order to supply the world’s first, low-speed, dual-fuel engine to run on methanol within the container segment.

MAN Energy Solutions has won the order to supply the world’s first, low-speed, dual-fuel engine to run on methanol within the container segment. Hyundai (HMD) will construct the 2,100teu vessel in Korea for A.P. Møller – Maersk, while HHI-EMD, which has already experience with LGIM engines (eight engines in operation and 12 engines under construction for methanol carriers), will build the MAN B&W 6G50ME-LGIM (-Liquid Gas Injection Methanol) type – also in Korea. The engine will be Tier III-compliant.

Upon launch, the newbuilding will become the very first, methanol-powered vessel that does not carry methanol as cargo. Mærsk has further announced that it expects the new vessel to be powered by green methanol with bio-fuel employed as pilot oil. The vessel is set to enter service in 2023 and will sail in the network of Sealand Europe – a Maersk company- the Baltic shipping route between Northern Europe and the Bothnian Bay.

Bjarne Foldager, Senior Vice President and Head of Two-Stroke Business, MAN Energy Solutions, said, “Maersk is displaying great leadership in adopting renewable methanol as part of its decarbonisation strategy – and well ahead of its initial 2030-ambition. For our part, we are designing dual-fuel technology that meets the growing customer demand for sustainable shipping chains and, here, our ME-LGIM engine plays an important role. It’s particularly pleasing to see it make its debut within the important container segment.”

Foldager continued, “Our other ME-LGIM references have proven methanol as a clean, efficient and safe, marine fuel that offers a clear path to decarbonisation through significant greenhouse-gas reductions, when produced from renewable energy sources. In general, as we move towards a zero-carbon future, MAN Energy Solutions’ dual-fuel engine portfolio is well positioned to handle whatever alternative fuels the market brings.”

MAN Energy Solutions states that its low-speed, dual-fuel references now exceed 408 units, with the ME-GI recording over 1.7 million operating hours on LNG alone, while the ME-LGI platform has accumulated more than 110,000 dual-fuel running hours. The ME-LGIM dual-fuel engine was developed for operation on methanol, as well as conventional fuel. The engine is based on the company’s proven ME-series, with its approximately 5,000 engines in service, and works according to the Diesel principle. When operating on methanol, the ME-LGIM significantly reduces emissions of CO2, NOx and SOx.

Additionally, any operational switch between methanol and other fuels is seamless. Tests on the engine, when running on methanol, have recorded the same or a slightly better efficiency compared to conventional, HFO-burning engines.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

MAN wins order to power first ever methanol-fuelled box ship


Shipping analyst VesselsValue has published an article on its website that forecasts an increased demand for vessels supporting offshore wind farms.

Shipping analyst VesselsValue has published an article on its website that forecasts an increased demand for vessels supporting offshore wind farms.

World Energy Reports estimate that more than 100 wind farm installation and maintenance vessels will be required over the next decade. This is due to the proliferation of Offshore wind farm projects planned for construction over the next 10 years.

Last year, for the first time ever, Offshore renewable projects spending was higher than Offshore oil and gas spending with an estimated $56Bnl sanctioned for renewables compared to $43Bn for oil and gas.

Demand for wind farm installation and maintenance vessels will be met by newly constructed vessels and re-purposed or upgraded existing OSVs. Most of the existing fleet of wind turbine installation vessels will become obsolete by 2025 due to increased wind turbine sizes to accommodate higher MW capacity, larger foundation sizes and deeper water wind farm sites. The global capacity of Offshore wind farms at present is 25GW but this will increase to an estimated 235GW by 2030, 520GW in 2040 and as much as 1000GW in 2050.

The major renewable operators at present are in Europe, with the UK having the most installed wind farms, followed by Germany, China, Denmark, Belgium and the Netherlands.  This is due to Europe being the current world leader in Offshore wind power. However, the majority of under-construction wind farms are found in China and Vietnam. This may be because the North Sea and particularly the UK/Germany sector already have many installed wind farms.

Asia has the highest number of future planned wind farm projects with China planning 69 wind farm projects followed by Japan with 55 planned projects and South Korea with 41 projects. Within China, South Korea and Japan, all wind farm installation vessels inside of wind farms (OCV/Liftboat/OSV) were from the host country which suggests governments in China/Japan/Korea will restrict access to home markets to domestic shipyards and owners only. VesselsValue’s Orderbook shows that of the 16 SOV and WTIV currently on order, half are for the European market and half are for the Far East market.

Installed gigawatt (GW) capacity at present is highest in Europe (19GW) with Asia far behind with an installed Offshore capacity of 5GW. However, when looking at predicted installed capacity for 2030, Asia pulls ahead of Europe with a GW capacity of 126 compared with 78GW in Europe. When predicted wind farm capacity for 2050 is compared, Asia will have a predicted capacity of 613GW, Europe 215GW and North America 164GW.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Wind Farm Installation: Increased demand predicted in next decade


The Panama and Florida-based International Register of Shipping (INTLREG) is expanding its regional coverage in the Middle East by providing services now in Kuwait after being officially recognised as a classification society by the oil producing GCC country.

The Panama and Florida-based International Register of Shipping (INTLREG) is expanding its regional coverage in the Middle East by providing services now in Kuwait after being officially recognised as a classification society by the oil producing GCC country.

This new approval re-enforces INTLREG’s recognition as a maritime service provider operating in this region with approvals in two other GCC countries and survey/audit stations properly established to provide service to its clients.

INTLREG is authorised by 33 flags across the globe. It is supported by a network of 98 locations providing related classification and marine services. It is able to offer ship owners and operators in the Middle East classification, statutory sand verification services.

Robert Padilla, CEO of the International Register of Shipping, believes they are ideally placed to support ship owners operating in the Middle East. “This is an important step for INTLREG and a real opportunity for ship owners in the Middle East to benefit from our comprehensive services covering classification services, maritime auditing,  training services, along with advisory support relating to both newbuild and existing vessels. We have been working in this important maritime sector for nearly 30 years and we understand the needs of ship owners and operators. Our services have been honed to provide them with the core services they need to remain in operation and on the right side of the regulatory bodies. During the past three decades we have worked closely with ship owners across the globe and this recognition by Kuwait is a testament to our continuing development. Establishing a surveyor and official representative in Kuwait re-enforces how we are able to support our clients locally”.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Newly recognised class society expands Middle East Operations


Methanol as a commercially and technically viable marine fuel is gaining greater traction over other alternative bunkers, including LNG, as more shipowners adopt the clean burning fuel as price spreads narrow and production ramps up proponents are saying.

Methanol as a commercially and technically viable marine fuel is gaining greater traction over other alternative bunkers, including LNG, as more shipowners adopt the clean burning fuel as price spreads narrow and production ramps up proponents are saying.

Speaking at a virtual conference last week, Greg Dolan, CEO of the Methanol Institute, a trade body whose shipowner members include Maersk, Stena Bulk, MSC, MOL and Oldendorff Carriers, predicts that methanol production costs will fall to become more competitively priced than traditional diesel bunker and other alternative fuels.

Dolan suggested that the move to methanol would also help shipowners avoid the proposed carbon tax on diesel, which could be between $250 and $450/t of CO2.

“There’s a call by many including the world’s largest shippers for a carbon tax on diesel fuels. That would dramatically change the pricing picture for marine fuels and the only available alternative fuel options today are advanced biofuels, LNG and methanol,” he said.

As a transitional fuel, methanol is supported by the IMO in its recent adoption of safe handling guidelines under the IGF Code for low flashpoint fuels. “This has been an important milestone in the growth of methanol as a marine fuel,” Dolan said. “And while LNG paved the way for methanol, methanol adoption can be a model for ammonia and hydrogen in the future.”

According to Dolan, methanol production increased last year to 100Mmt, doubling production in a decade. He said production could reach 500Mmt by 2050, as predicted in a joint Methanol Institute/International Renewable Energy Agency report released earlier this year.

Commenting on those shipowners that have already announced plans to include methanol within their fuel pool, Dolan told attendees at the Maritime AMC-organised Alternative Fuels webinar that first movers, such as Maersk, understand “there is little time left to wait on potential solutions that might fulfil 100% of their 2050 goals. They know we don’t have 30 years to wait.”

Maersk announced in March that its first methanol-burning vessel will launch in 2023, seven years ahead of schedule. The company also mooted an order for twelve 15,000TEU methanol-fuelled containerships.

Another advocate is Proman Stena Bulk. The joint venture between shipowner Stena Bulk and methanol producer Proman is planning to build six 50,000dwt tankers with methanol dual-fuel engines for delivery in 2023. A further three vessels owned solely by Proman, scheduled for delivery in 2022 and 2023, will be traded globally for shipping chemicals and clean petroleum products.

Anita Gajadhar, Managing Director Proman Marketing, Logistics and Shipping, said: “For us, methanol is a proven fuel capable of meeting the shipping industry’s carbon reduction targets. When you look at the long-term pricing, it is competitive when compared to alternatives, like MGO. It is easy to bunker, it is safe to bunker, and it is widely available as bunker in 122 ports.”

Gajadhar claimed that methanol is currently being traded at a price lower than LNG in some ports, and is less to bunker than biofuel, currently traded at $1,200/t or more. “Methanol is actually going to be a little bit cheaper than some of the biofuels that are available in the market today…. In terms of CAPEX, it is also a lot cheaper to modify vessels for methanol than it is for LNG,” she said.

Methanol-fuelled newbuilds also cost less than a LNG-burning ship, according to engine builders MAN Energy Solutions and Wärtsilä. Kjeld Aabo, Director New Technologies two-stroke promotion, MAN Energy Solutions, told attendees that a 54,300m3 capacity product tanker running a methanol-fuelled engine would add about 10% to the newbuild price. The same vessel running on LNG would cost 22% more than a conventional HFO-burning ship.

The engine builder, which first unveiled and tested a methanol dual-fuel engine in 2016 and has a current orderbook of 23 ME-LGIM engines, said methanol combustion emits 8% less CO2 than an HFO Tier II engine. SOx emissions are reduced by 97% and NOx up to 60%. And since the methanol molecule contains no carbon-carbon bonds, it does not produce particulate matter or soot when burned resulting in smokeless operation. “I really believe there will be a big market for methanol in the future and the technology on the engine side is there,” said Aabo.

Toni Stojcevski, General Manager, Project Sales & Development, Wärtsilä, agreed but warned “if we are going to be compliant in 2050, with a 50% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, then we need to prepare and start executing today.”

While Wärtsilä introduced a methanol engine in in 2013, Stojcevski revealed that the engine builder expects to have an ammonia-fuelled engine operating next year and a pure hydrogen engine in 2025. The company also plans to launch a new methanol-burning engine based on its proven W32 series in late 2023. This will be available for newbuilds and retrofit.

Closing the webinar Dolan said: “Methanol engines are available. The fuel is available. The infrastructure is there and it’s affordable. We can act now.”

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Methanol set to take off as marine fuel as economic case evolves


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED