culines2.JPG
The fast-growing Chinese container line provide China United Lines (CULines) is to make its debut on the transpacific trade this month, having moved into the Asia – Europe trade earlier this year.

Katherine Si | Jul 05, 2021

In the latest move by CULines seeing it shift being a regional and feeder player into the longhaul markets, the company plans to open up a new service Trans-pacific Express (TPX) on 18 July, connecting Shanghai and Los Angeles directly.

Initial vessel sizes deployed on the new service with five 1,700 teu – 4,400 teu containerships for the period of July and August, possibly reflection of the extremely tight situation in terms of available tonnage in the market. In September, TPX service will upgrade its containership fleet with larger carrying capacity.

CULines move into the transpacific trade comes at a time of record container freight rates between China and the US. Last week analysts Drewry reported that Shanghai – Los Angeles freight rates stood at $9,155 per feu, up 7% on the week before, and an increase of 272% year-on-year.

CULines made its debut on the Asia – Europe trade in January this year

The company ordered six new containerships from two Chinese shipyards of Yangzijiang and Huangpu Wenchong for fleet expansion in June and January 2021, respectively, and had opened several new export services so far this year.


A cyber insurance study finds the industry is failing to spur companies to improve their cyber security. Data sharing is poor and high opportunity costs mean cyber insurers are disinclined to cover shipping firms

CYBER insurance is failing to spur companies to improve security, according to a report by the Royal United Services Institute.

The UK-based security think tank said the emerging industry’s impact was so far “more limited than policymakers and businesses might hope” and described insurers’ inability to collect and analyse reliable cyber risk data “a potentially insurmountable challenge.”

“Interviewees from across government, industry and business consistently stated that the positive effects of cyber insurance on cyber security have yet to fully materialise,” it said. “While there are some encouraging signs, cyber insurance is still struggling to move from theory into practice when it comes to incentivising cyber security.”

The report comes amid growing concerns about cyber attacks on shipping and companies’ access to marine cyber cover.

The International Maritime Organization has adopted a resolution (IMO 2021) which requires companies to demonstrate that cyber security is an integral part of their safety management system no later than their next annual Document of Compliance check.

But the Royal United Services Institute report said most of the cyber insurance market used “neither carrots (financial incentives) nor sticks (security obligations) to improve the cyber security practices of policyholders”.

“Growing losses have also emphasized that the current reality is not sustainable for insurers either,” it added.

Cyber insurers faced an uphill battle in convincing mature businesses that they could provide expertise on best practices, the report noted. The effectiveness of cyber security products was also “open to question.”

Insurers offered customers services such as staff training, vulnerability scanning, providing threat intelligence, such as monitoring the dark web, and access to security officers.

Access to attack response teams and crisis and PR managers was one of the main benefits of cyber insurance, the report said.

But it was difficult to measure the effects of these services and several insurers said customers were not using them at scale.

The report also noted concerns that insurance providers unintentionally helped ransom payments, which could be seen to encourage more ransomware attacks.

But it cautioned that the purpose of cyber insurance was to transfer residual risk, not to improve cyber security, and it should “be one of many tools” to better manage risks.

It recommended developing guidance for minimum security standards for underwriting; more data collection and sharing; mandating cyber insurance for government suppliers; and collaboration between insurers and law enforcement on ransomware.

Robert Dorey, chief executive of Astaara, the maritime cyber risk insurer, said shipping differed from other industries in that IMO 2021 embedded cyber security within the ambit of a ship’s seaworthiness. He said shipowners or operators that failed to meet it would almost certainly be in breach of their insurance policies.

“Cyber security is a relatively new industry and the fact that the vast majority of incidents go unreported and probably undetected means that there are huge gaps in the risk data,” he said. “This will change as cyber becomes more ‘mainstream’, however companies will need to be incentivised to share this information.”

AXIS Insurance senior cyber underwriter Georgie Furness-Smith said demand for insurance was growing alongside understanding of the threat, adding that many insurers now set minimum security requirements prior to incepting a policy.

Thomas Brown, chief executive of cyber insurance policy provider Shoreline, said shipowners often knew more about the daily risks they faced than insurers did — but not in the cyber world.

This means they are not always willing to pay for cover or have been late adopters of cyber insurance, in turn driving insurers toward other, less complex industries.

“Consequently the shipping industry has thus far ceded insufficient premium to the market to cover the known frequency and severity of maritime cyber losses, which have in the main part been assumed by the larger self-insured shipping corporates,” he said.

Some of the Royal United Services Institute’s recommendations, such as minimum security requirements, partnerships with security firms and reporting of attacks to authorities, were already written into policies, he said, adding that expectations of cyber insurance differed across the industry.

Insurers whose attack losses were mitigated could be more satisfied with it than regulators or port state authorities who hoped cyber insurance would spur better cyber practices.

But he agreed the shipping industry had a poor track record on sharing claims data.

Fear of reputational damage stopped most victims of cyber crime reporting attacks. Ransomware cover tended to be shrouded in confidentiality, since companies known to have cover could make better targets.

Insurers, meanwhile, preferred to safeguard their claims data for their own commercial advantage.

“Whilst national and international regulation continues to be meted out in the form of guidance alone, most shipowners will continue to self-insure their cyber risk, rendering any objective measure of ‘expectation’ irrelevant for want of reliable data, unfortunately,” said Capt Brown.

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Cyber insurance failing to improve security (Lloyd’s List)


The current year has seen some major claims, not least Ever Given, but the secular trend towards better safety overall continues

SIX months ago, Lloyd’s List published an article under the headline “Marine insurance outlook in two words: more expensive”.

This time the outlook can basically be summarised in three words: “more expensive still”.

The reasons why have been set out in recent interviews by senior executives in both hull and machinery and P&I.

Big-picture developments include the coronavirus pandemic and ongoing natural catastrophe losses, both of which have hit the insurance market as a whole.

However, there are also marine-specific factors, the most important of which is what insurers regard as perennial underpricing.

Despite two renewal rounds characterised by rate hikes, International Group affiliates are still losing money on underwriting.

Aggregate technical losses may have hit $500m last year, on one chief financial officer’s back-of-an-envelope calculation.

Many clubs are reporting combined ratios of more than 120% and up to almost 150% and, as the noted aphorism from economists puts it, if something can’t go on forever, it won’t.

Yes, they are mutuals rather than for-profit companies, and can eat up the deficits to some extent, especially when making healthy investment returns. Yet over the long run, they need to at least break even to stay in the game.

Investment returns in 2021 will likely fall far short of the stellar performance of 2020, leaving little alternative but to ask members to put their hands in their pockets.

In addition, the IG pool scheme has hit a record high, which is another $500m strain on the clubs, thanks to some massive casualties, including WakashioHoegh Xiamen and New Diamond.

Prospects are not getting any brighter. There has been significant deterioration in the 2019 policy year.

While it is obviously still too early to call the current policy year — which commenced on February 20 — things are off to an unpromising start with Ever Given and X-Press Pearl.

Hull insurance rates are written commercially rather than on a mutual basis, and tend to be more volatile than P&I rates.

They are already up around 9% in the first half of this year and are expected to rise a further 5%-10% by the end of the year.

Part of this is down to a general hardening in the hull market after decades of losses, with the Lloyd’s market Decile 10 crackdown on underperformers one of the obvious catalysts here.

However, another driver has been high steel prices, which have doubled over the past 12 months. As a result, ship repair yards are asking for more money to do the jobs insurers pay them to do after a ship has had a prang.

On a brighter note, there has been no increase in casualty frequency — and, if anything, the trend has been benign.

Very much the main event in cargo insurance has been Ever Given, which has generated what will almost certainly be the most spectacular general average case the world has yet seen, with thousands of parties involved. Extensive litigation is taken as read.

After months of wrangling, the boxship’s P&I insurer UK Club and its Japanese market H&M insurers have reached a settlement that should have enabled the vessel to continue its ill-fated voyage by the time this is in print.

Just what that equates to in dollar terms has not been publicly disclosed, but $150m, give or take some tens of millions either way, is the approximate ballpark figure.

Reinsurance markets in general are up about 10%, largely thanks to deliberate attempts to firm rates, although things seem to have been easing up a bit in recent weeks. That adds to the pressure on primary writers.

Moreover, the massive publicity for the Ever Given grounding and the subsequent six-day closure of the Suez Canal will inevitably make reinsurance underwriters more circumspect about shipping risk.

The IG pool excess contract is negotiated on a two-year basis, and renewal this year will see two years of accumulated rises come through in one go.

Another trend identified by brokers is increasing differentiation by loss records, especially at P&I clubs that have dispensed with the notion of general increases and have moved to pricing on a ship-by-ship basis instead.

Owners whose records are deemed adverse are likely to find themselves asked for increases even higher than those set out earlier.

Conversely, those with the best safety records will still be asked for more, but not as much as some of their counterparts.

It is also the case that negotiating insurance contracts is a two-way process, especially for those whose fleet size gives them bargaining muscle.

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Marine insurance outlook in three words — more expensive still (source: Lloyd’s List)


Marseille-headquartered CMA CGM could get a reliable source of bio-LNG in its own backyard soon. The company that has invested more than any other carrier in LNG-fuelled newbuilds is now looking to help future-proof its investments, making fuel from local household waste.

EveRé, operator of a multi-process household waste treatment plant commissioned by Métropole Aix-Marseille-Provence has teamed with CMA CGM as well as Elengy, a subsidiary of Engie, operating liquefied natural gas terminals at Fos-sur-Mer and energy major TotalEnergies to study the feasibility of creating France’s first production unit for liquefied biomethane or bio-LNG.

Produced by converting the biodegradable part of household waste from the Marseille Provence region, the fuel would be made available to ports in the region.

“The project forms a circular economic system,” CMA CGM claimed in a release, adding: “Using the area’s household waste will help reduce local air pollutants (nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and fine particles), improving air quality and quality of life for people living in the region and supporting the energy transition in the shipping industry.”

Bio-LNG, combined with the dual-fuel gas engine technology developed by CMA CGM, reduces greenhouse gas emissions including carbon dioxide by at least 67% relative to well-to-wake VLSFO, the French carrier claimed in a release. On the basis of a tank-to-wake measurement, greenhouse gas emissions are reduced by 88%, CMA CGM maintained.

“Bio-LNG has particular advantages when it is produced from domestic and agricultural waste. The process can capture methane that would otherwise be vented into the atmosphere, resulting in a fuel that is not just zero GHG emissions but has the potential for negative emissions,” SEA-LNG, the lobby group promoting LNG as a marine fuel, suggested in a report from earlier in the year.

By the end of 2024, 44 of CMA CGM’s vessels will be powered by LNG.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

CMA CGM leads Marseille’s bio-LNG pitch


Drewry’s latest Container Forecaster report has carried out a massive upgrade of liner profits for the full year.

Drewry is now forecasting the container shipping industry will post a record $80bn profit in 2021, up from earlier forecasts of $35bn. If freight rates surpass expectations in the remainder of the year, Drewry said an annual profit line in the region of $100bn is not out of the question, more than three times the all-time liner record.

“2021 will be the first year in the history of container shipping when carrier profits approach $100 billion and average freight rates jump by 50%, against a background of huge operational disruptions to the port and ship systems,” the UK consultancy noted.

Drewry predicts that box volumes will continue to rise through the Q3 peak season and to end the year with annual growth of approximately 10%, cementing what has been a banner, record year for the industry.

The world has run out of white swans, and there is now a $2,000 surcharge to even secure a black swan

“We are now getting accustomed to seeing triple-digit annual growth rates for spot rates on most lanes. That these instances are no longer shocking is further proof, if needed, that the market truly is crazy right now,” the UK analysts noted.

As far as 2022 goes, Drewry suggests there will still be growth, but probably only about half as strong as consumer spending is expected to move back towards services as Covid-related restrictions are lifted. For 2022, Drewry expects EBIT to drop by a bit more than one-third due to softening freight rates and rising costs that may stay higher for longer with many carriers locking into expensive longer-term charter fixtures.

Looking further ahead, Drewry maintains the view that high levels of newbuild contracting for 2023 pose a risk of overcapacity returning to the market during that year, but future supply requirements are heavily clouded by new environment regulations due to become law at the start of 2023, that may or may not see significant chunks of the containership fleet slowdown in order to comply.

“[Carrriers] will have made so much money between 2020-22 that they will be set up for years to come. They could potentially make as much profit in this window as they could have hoped in a decade, or more,” Drewry concluded.

Looking at the $100bn profit figure posited by Drewry, Lars Jensen, CEO of container advisory Vespucci Maritime, suggested that container shipping was set to make up for 20 years of value destruction in the space of a single year.

In 2018, McKinsey published a report looking at the pprevious 20 years of profitability in the container shipping industry. The report from three years ago estimated that the liner industry had destroyed more than $100bn in shareholder value over the previous 20 years.

Shippers hoping this year was a temporary blip and a return to the low rates of the previous decade are in for a disappointment, Jensen suggested via LinkedIn.

The “new normal” for container shipping will see rates higher than before the pandemic, Jensen predicted. This new normal would feature less overcapacity thanks to the huge consolidation seen in the sector in recent years.

The decades where carriers – on average – were selling freight below full cost levels are over

“The decades where carriers – on average – were selling freight below full cost levels are over,” Jensen maintained.

Alan Murphy, founder of box consultancy Sea-Intelligence, writing in his company’s regular Sunday Spotlight newsletter, discussed today’s unprecedented liner environment.

“Economists like to refer to unpredictable and wide-impacting events as ‘Black Swans’, adopted from the epistemological challenge to inductivist philosophy that knowledge must come from more than just pure empiricism: If your world view is built on the notion ‘all swans we have ever seen are white, and, therefore, all swans must be white’, then your world is going to break when you spot a black swan, common to Australia,” Murphy wrote, adding: “Any model built to predict the future of container shipping has been designed in a world populated entirely with white swans, and suddenly, the world has run out of white swans, and there is now a 2,000 dollar surcharge to even secure a black swan.”

Patrik Berglund, the CEO of freight rate benchmarking platform Xeneta, commented today: “Carriers unquestionably have the upper hand and are in a strong position to exploit the budgets of big volume shippers.” Berglund said shippers should brace themselves for the carriers’ and forwarders’ Q2 financials.

“It will be a joyful moment for the sellers, but painful for the rest of the market,” Berglund warned.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Liners on track to secure up to $100bn profit this year


Tufton Oceanic Assets has scored a significant profit by selling a containership purchased three years ago. The London-listed firm has struck a deal to sell its vessel Kale for $21.5m, making this the company’s fourth divestment.

The vessel was acquired for $10.5m in 2018 and is being divested at over 170% of depreciated replacement cost.

The company said it expects to redeploy the proceeds promptly and is looking to invest in a bulker that will be chartered out for 2 years, a chemical tanker, or a larger containership with a 4-7 year charter already in place.

In May this year, Tufton Oceanic offloaded two handysize bulk carriers for $20.5m with plans to snap up another tanker with similar economics to the vessel Golding acquired earlier this year at 70% of depreciated replacement cost.

Tufton has also renewed a charter for its bulker Lavander for 14-17 months through early 2023.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

Tufton offloads containership for more than double the purchase price


Seaspan Corporation has entered into long-term charters worth more than $1.5bn with Israeli carrier ZIM for ten 7,000 teu LNG-powered containership newbuilds.

Seaspan said it will enter into shipbuilding agreements with a major shipyard, with deliveries expected to begin in the fourth quarter of 2023 and through 2024.

The boxship owner has announced 55 newbuild vessel orders and the acquisition of four second-hand vessels, since December 2020.

Bing Chen, chairman, president and CEO of Seaspan, commented: “We see these modern 7,000 teus to be the natural successor to the aging global pool of conventional vessels in the 4,000 to 9,000 teu range, where relatively little fleet renewal has taken place. We are experiencing strong customer interest for this vessel size.”

In addition, in February this year, ZIM and Seaspan struck a long-term charter deal for ten 15,000 teu LNG-fueled vessels.

Eli Glickman, ZIM president & CEO, stated: “With this second long-term chartering agreement, we are securing access to our core fleet while maintaining operational agility with respect to the total number of vessels we operate. Since going public, and further evidenced by this transaction, we remain committed to deploying capital prudently and enhancing shareholder value.”

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

ZIM seals another deal for 10 Seaspan newbuilds


Law firm HFW and maritime cybersecurity company CyberOwl have joined forces to provide comprehensive technology and legal services to the shipping industry around cyber risk management and compliance.

HFW’s shipping lawyers and CyberOwl’s team of data and security experts will work together to help the maritime sector prevent and actively defend against commercial, legal, technical and operational risks, including reviews of vessel cybersecurity seaworthiness, cybersecurity monitoring, and related legal and consulting advice.

This will complement HFW’s existing cybersecurity advice to clients as part of its standalone consulting business, HFW Consulting.

Paul Dean, global head of shipping, HFW said: “Cybersecurity is a growing concern for the global shipping industry, with the continued move towards digitalisation creating new vulnerabilities and IMO 2021 introducing a regulatory requirement for owners to demonstrate that cyber policies are effectively implemented.

“The reality is that traditional cybersecurity systems are not designed to overcome the unique technical, operational and commercial challenges of shipping, such as the need to demonstrate due diligence in ensuring seaworthiness and cargoworthiness to minimise disagreements around liabilities in the unfortunate event of a cyber attack. We have therefore partnered with CyberOwl, whose security experts share the deep shipping industry expertise on which we pride ourselves at HFW.

“We’re looking forward to working with CyberOwl to help our clients navigate this increasingly complex and important area.”

Daniel Ng, CEO, CyberOwl commented: “At CyberOwl, we are on a mission to leverage data and analytics to shift shipping organisations towards a more active cyber posture, and help them evidence their cybersecurity controls are actually working. We have engaged with around 100 vessel owners and managers to understand their challenges – they have expressed a real lack of confidence that the steps they have taken to comply with IMO 2021 actually helps them defend themselves technically, operationally, commercially and legally in the eventuality of a cyber attack, and to prove that due diligence was exercised to ensure vessel seaworthiness and cargo worthiness.

“When we spoke to shipping organisations to get their thoughts on us partnering with a law firm, one name kept on being recommended: HFW. Working with HFW – the world’s leading shipping law firm – means we’re able to provide clients with a broader offering combining first-rate legal and technology services. We see this as being a unique proposition – other cyber services providers are mainly focused on IMO 2021 compliance, whereas we are able to help the industry actively manage and mitigate their cyber risks.”

HFW’s global shipping team comprises 200 specialist lawyers and master mariners across the Americas, Europe, the Middle East and Asia-Pacific, advising clients on the full range of dry shipping, admiralty and crisis management, and transactional matters.

Chris O’Callaghan, director, HFW Consulting said: “Cybersecurity is becoming an increasing focus and priority for boards around the world. In these times of unprecedented change, organisations are realising that the previous ways of working are no longer fit for purpose, and are having to adapt with agility and at pace, to remain competitive and relevant in this evolving commercial landscape.

“Our partnership with CyberOwl is a significant development to our global consulting offering, and I look forward to working with their team to help our clients consider their tactics and approaches to mitigating the impacts posed by cyber risks.”

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

https://www.thedigitalship.com/news/maritime-satellite-communications/item/7393-hfw-and-cyberowl-team-up-to-help-industry-manage-cyber-threats


Maritime data analytics specialist METIS Cyberspace Technology has opened a fully owned subsidiary in Singapore to enhance service capabilities for shipping companies based in Southeast Asia using its solutions.

Continuing its global growth strategy, the Singapore operation provides a focus for regional shipowners set on the path of digital transformation. The new subsidiary is led by Chinmoy Ghose, managing director, METIS Cyberspace Technology (Singapore).

This year’s announcement of a new maritime decarbonisation centre and plans from Maritime Singapore for greener port operations offer latest evidence of the city state’s commitment to a more sustainable future.

“As one of the world’s great maritime hubs whose economy is being driven by sustainable growth, Singapore provides the ideal regional base from which to launch our expansion in Southeast Asia,” said Chinmoy.

A former chief engineer with a maritime career spanning 30 years, Chinmoy brings 13 years’ experience from shore-based technical services positions to his new role. He has worked for high profile shipping companies in the region, with previous posts including fleet technical management for large bulk carriers, tankers, Pure Car & Truck Carriers and containerships. His areas of expertise include maritime legislation, classification society requirements, marine surveys, and marine QHSE.

“Digitalisation and cloud-based analytics are already playing a key role in responding to climate change and it is vital that owners have the best tools at their disposal to meet and exceed regulatory requirements,” said Chinmoy. “The METIS portfolio of ‘industry first’ solutions include our AER emissions INDEX to support financing decisions under the Poseidon Principles and a new electrical ship profiling application for evaluating the viability of alternative energy source in-port.”

METIS Cyberspace Technology (Singapore) is the second of METIS’s overseas locations, following on from the opening of its Canadian subsidiary just last month. The company has its headquarters in Athens, Greece, as well as established partnership agreements in various maritime hubs globally.

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

https://www.thedigitalship.com/news/maritime-software/item/7394-metis-establishes-singapore-subsidiary


The Sri Lanka Ports Authority (SLPA) has gone live with Navis N4 at its Colombo Port as part of its modernisation efforts to remain competitive in the industry and optimise operations for efficiency at the port.

SLPA’s Colombo Port is a growing shipping hub in the South Asia region, acting as a gateway for cargo to Europe, East and South Asia, the Persian Gulf, and East Africa. The transshipment port operates at 2.5 million TEU annually, and was developed to accommodate deep water berths and the latest mainline vessels. As its business was growing, SLPA’s Colombo Port needed an advanced TOS to update its offerings and aid in its business goals of modernising the facility to ensure enhanced safety, efficiency and productivity at its location.

The steering committee at SLPA noted: “Working with Navis on the implementation of N4 at Colombo Port has been a collaborative effort from Access International, Navis & SLPA teams. When COVID hit last year, the organisations showed dedication to execute the project from start to finish despite the challenges brought on by the pandemic. We are thrilled to be running with N4 so we can provide the best possible service to our customers through new and automated processes which will help optimise our operations at the port.”

“One of our goals at Navis is to keep cargo flowing for our customers, and we are glad to have worked with SLPA to ensure that their team was able to implement N4 successfully during a challenging time for the industry,” said Charles Gerard, VP & general manager, Asia-Pacific at Navis. “We are looking forward to helping them reach their business goals through our innovative solutions and hope to be an asset to them as their business scales.”

 

SOURCE READ THE FULL ARTICLE

https://www.thedigitalship.com/news/maritime-software/item/7395-colombo-port-goes-live-with-navis-n4


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED