Maritime Safety News Archives - SHIP IP LTD

The maritime industry in 2025 is experiencing significant financial shifts, impacting purchasing expenses for commercial ships. Several key factors contribute to these changes:​Ship Universe

1. Increased Freight Rates

Freight rates on major routes have risen by 3% to 8%, driven by heightened demand and geopolitical tensions. For instance, the Asia-US West Coast route has seen an 8% increase, reaching $4,825 per forty-foot equivalent unit (FEU).Ship Universe

2. Regulatory Compliance Costs

The implementation of the FuelEU Maritime regulation on January 1, 2025, mandates emission reductions for ships over 5,000 gross tonnage at EU ports. Compliance requires investments in monitoring equipment and potential vessel retrofitting, leading to increased operational expenses.Marine Leads+2Reuters+2Ship Universe+2Ship Universe

3. Supply Chain Disruptions

Geopolitical events have caused port closures and vessel rerouting, resulting in delays and increased fuel consumption. These disruptions further elevate operational costs for shipowners.Ship Universe

4. Inflation and Rising Operational Costs

Inflation has led to higher fuel prices, labor costs, and equipment expenses. Fuel price volatility, labor shortages, and increased maintenance costs are challenging shipowners to adapt while maintaining profitability.Ship Universe

Strategies for Cost Management

To mitigate these rising expenses, ship operators are adopting several strategies:

  • Bulk Purchasing: Procuring supplies in larger quantities to benefit from economies of scale.Ship Universe

  • Supplier Diversification: Engaging multiple suppliers across different regions to reduce dependency and negotiate better pricing.Ship Universe

  • Energy Efficiency Measures: Investing in technologies and practices that lower fuel consumption and associated costs.Ship Universe

  • Advanced Planning: Utilizing predictive analytics for better route planning and inventory management, thereby reducing waste and ensuring timely replenishment.Ship Universe

By implementing these strategies, shipowners can navigate the financial challenges of 2025, ensuring operational continuity and financial stability.Ship Universe


crew-fatigue.png

Recent Developments in Maritime Crew Fatigue and Related Challenges

Maritime crew fatigue continues to be a pressing concern, with recent incidents highlighting the severe impact on seafarers’ well-being and safety.

Rising Cases of Seafarer Abandonment

In the past month, reports have emerged detailing the increasing trend of ship abandonment, leaving crews stranded without pay or essential resources. For instance, the tugboat Navimar 3 has been anchored off Kutubdia Island near Bangladesh since March last year. The crew, including an Indian engineer officer, have been maintaining the vessel without means to return home, as their documents have been withheld by the local agent for the Dubai-based company Middle East Marine (MEM). This situation exemplifies the recurring issue of seafarer abandonment in the maritime industry.AP NewsLatest news & breaking headlines+1The Guardian+1

Similarly, the Grand Sunny cargo ship has left its crew stranded and unpaid off the coast of China for over a year. This situation is becoming increasingly common in the industry, where vessels, part of the “shadow fleet,” evade sanctions and enforcement by operating under complex ownership structures and turning off tracking devices. In 2024, a record 282 ships have been abandoned, far surpassing pre-pandemic years, with many involved in illicit trade due to sanctions on Russia.WSJ+1AP News+1

Alarm Fatigue Compromising Maritime Safety

A recent report by Lloyd’s Register has brought attention to the issue of alarm fatigue among maritime crews. The study reveals a 197% increase in bridge alarms per hour over the past two decades, with peak rates reaching 74 alarms per hour during critical navigation periods. In engine rooms, certain vessels experience an average of 2,500 machinery alarms daily, with peaks up to 22,500. This overwhelming number of alarms can desensitize crew members, leading to slower response times and increased safety risks. The report emphasizes the need for rationalizing alarm systems to support crew welfare and enhance operational safety.LR+1NafsGreen.gr+1NafsGreen.gr+1LR+1

International Efforts to Address Crew Fatigue

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is reviewing its fatigue guidelines in light of recent studies highlighting the long-term effects of tiredness on crew members. The MARTHA project, a comprehensive study on seafarer fatigue, found that prolonged periods at sea lead to increased fatigue and stress, negatively impacting seafarers’ health and performance. The IMO’s human element, training, and watchkeeping sub-committee is considering these findings to update and improve fatigue management guidelines.Riviera Maritime Media

Conclusion

The maritime industry faces significant challenges related to crew fatigue, exacerbated by issues such as ship abandonment and alarm overload. Addressing these concerns requires coordinated efforts from international organizations, shipping companies, and regulatory bodies to ensure the safety and well-being of seafarers worldwide.AP News+1Latest news & breaking headlines+1

crewexpress stcw rest hours software


new-regulations.png

Upcoming Maritime Regulations Effective Until September 2025

The maritime industry is set to implement several new regulations by September 2025, aimed at enhancing safety, environmental protection, and operational efficiency. Below is a summary of these forthcoming regulations along with guidance for compliance:​

1. STCW – Electronic Certificates

Effective Date: January 1, 2025

Amendments to the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification, and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) will permit the use of electronic certificates, provided they meet specific criteria. These digital certificates must display essential information as outlined in IMO circular MSC.1/Circ.1665.Marine Mirror+1Hellenic Shipping News+1Hellenic Shipping News+1Marine Mirror+1

Guidance: Seafarers and shipping companies should ensure that any electronic certificates comply with the stipulated requirements and are readily accessible for verification purposes.Marine Mirror+1Hellenic Shipping News+1

2. IMSBC Code Amendments

Effective Date: January 1, 2025

Amendments 07-23 to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) Code, adopted through resolution MSC.539(107), will become mandatory.Marine Mirror+1Hellenic Shipping News+1

Guidance: Operators must familiarize themselves with the updated code to ensure safe handling and transport of solid bulk cargoes.

3. MARPOL Annex I – Special Area Designation

Effective Date: January 1, 2025

The Red Sea and Gulf of Aden will be designated as special areas under MARPOL Annex I. Ships transiting these regions must adhere to stricter regulations concerning the discharge of oily waste, necessitating the use of approved oil filtering equipment with alarms and automatic stopping devices when oil content exceeds 15 parts per million.Hellenic Shipping News+1Marine Mirror+1

Guidance: Vessels should ensure that their oil filtering equipment meets the specified standards and that crew members are trained on the enhanced discharge requirements in these areas.Marine Mirror

4. MARPOL Annex VI – Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) Phase 3

Effective Date: January 1, 2025

EEDI Phase 3 mandates a minimum 30% reduction in energy consumption for new vessels over 400 GT, compared to the baseline.Hellenic Shipping News+1Marine Mirror+1

Guidance: Ship designers and builders should integrate energy-efficient technologies and designs to comply with these stricter efficiency standards.

5. FuelEU Maritime Regulation

Effective Date: January 1, 2025

The FuelEU Maritime regulation aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by promoting the use of renewable and low-carbon fuels. Applicable to commercial ships over 5,000 GT operating within EU waters and ports, the regulation targets a 2% reduction in emissions compared to 2020 levels.Marine Mirror+1Hellenic Shipping News+1

Guidance: Shipping companies should assess their current fuel usage and explore alternative fuels or technologies to meet the emission reduction targets.

6. Ballast Water Management Convention (BWM) – Record Book Updates

Effective Dates:

Guidance: Ship operators should update their record-keeping practices in line with the new format and seek necessary approvals if transitioning to electronic record books.

7. MARPOL Annex VI – Mediterranean Emission Control Area (ECA)

Effective Date: May 1, 2025

The Mediterranean Sea will be designated as an Emission Control Area, requiring vessels to use fuels with a maximum sulfur content of 0.1% or to have approved exhaust gas cleaning systems installed.Marine Mirror

Guidance: Vessels operating in the Mediterranean should plan for fuel changes or install compliant emission reduction technologies ahead of the enforcement date.

8. Hong Kong Convention on Ship Recycling

Effective Date: June 26, 2025

This convention ensures that ships are recycled in an environmentally sound and safe manner. Ships over 500 GT flagged by or operating under a party to the convention must maintain an Inventory of Hazardous Materials and undergo surveys to verify compliance.Marine Mirror+1Hellenic Shipping News+1Hellenic Shipping News+1Marine Mirror+1

Guidance: Shipowners should prepare and maintain the required inventory and schedule necessary surveys to demonstrate compliance with the convention’s standards.DNV

9. EU Measures Against Under-Insured Tankers

Implementation Date: Ongoing through 2025

European authorities have agreed to enforce stricter measures ensuring that tankers, particularly those carrying Russian oil, possess adequate accident insurance. Coastal states will request insurance documentation from ships transiting key European waters, with potential sanctions for non-compliance.Financial Times

Guidance: Operators should ensure that all vessels have valid and adequate insurance coverage and are prepared to present documentation when requested by authorities.

10. Singapore’s Digital Bunkering Mandate

Effective Date: April 1, 2025

Singapore will require marine fuel suppliers to provide digital bunkering services and issue electronic bunker delivery notes. This initiative aims to enhance efficiency and transparency in ship fueling processes.Reuters+1Marine Mirror+1

Guidance: Companies operating in Singapore’s port should transition to digital bunkering systems and ensure compliance with the new electronic documentation requirements.

Conclusion

The maritime industry is undergoing significant regulatory changes aimed at improving safety, environmental sustainability, and operational efficiency. Stakeholders should proactively assess their current practices, invest in necessary technologies, and train personnel to ensure seamless compliance with these upcoming regulations.

crewexpress stcw rest hours software


Recent Developments in the Maritime Industry

The maritime sector has witnessed several significant events over the past five days, encompassing policy changes, strategic initiatives, and geopolitical discussions. Below is a summary of these developments:

U.S. Proposes Fees on Chinese-Built Ships

The Trump administration has introduced a proposal to impose substantial fees on vessels constructed in China that enter U.S. ports. This initiative aims to counter China’s dominance in shipbuilding. However, a diverse coalition of American businesses, including farmers, dockworkers, and shipowners, has voiced opposition, citing concerns over increased freight rates, delivery delays, and heightened supply chain costs. The proposed fees range from $500,000 to $1.5 million per port call, depending on the percentage of Chinese-made ships in a carrier’s fleet. Critics argue that these fees could raise transportation costs, burden consumers, risk job losses at U.S. ports, and disadvantage American farm exporters. Nearly 300 companies and individuals have expressed their opposition during hearings in Washington.Financial Times+2WSJ+2Reuters+2Reuters+1WSJ+1

Challenges in Meeting U.S. Shipbuilding Demand

In response to the U.S. proposal to levy fees on China-linked ships, concerns have emerged regarding the capacity of Japan and South Korea to fulfill increased U.S. demand for non-Chinese shipbuilding. Japanese shipyards are operating near full capacity until 2028, while South Korean shipbuilders face financial constraints after years of hardship. U.S. shipbuilders also require substantial investments and technological advancements to enhance capacity. Currently, China, South Korea, and Japan account for 90% of global shipbuilding, with China alone capturing over 50% of the market share for merchant vessels.Financial Times+2Reuters+2WSJ+2

U.S. Navy Deployments for Border Security

The U.S. Navy has deployed the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Spruance to support operations at the U.S. southern border. This deployment aims to assist in curbing maritime-related criminal activities, such as weapons smuggling and illegal immigration. The USS Spruance, along with the USS Gravely, had previously engaged in combat against Houthi missiles and drones in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden. Equipped with significant firepower and advanced electronic warfare capabilities, these ships are now tasked with new roles along the U.S.-Mexico border, underscoring the Pentagon’s strategy to strengthen border security and control drug trafficking.maritimeoptima.com+2Business Insider+2New York Post+2

U.S.-Russia Talks on Black Sea Ceasefire

U.S. and Russian officials have engaged in discussions in Saudi Arabia to seek progress towards a ceasefire in Ukraine, focusing on establishing a Black Sea maritime ceasefire to ensure safe navigation. These talks follow U.S. President Trump’s recent engagements with Ukrainian President Zelenskiy and Russian President Putin. The conversations covered bilateral issues and confidence-building measures, such as the safe return of Ukrainian children from Russia. Russia indicated a temporary halt on attacking Ukrainian energy facilities. The talks are part of broader efforts to revive the Black Sea Grain Initiative, which previously facilitated the export of Ukrainian grain despite ongoing conflict.


The U.S. Coast Guard is set to publish this week its final rule covering maritime security regulations by establishing minimum cybersecurity requirements for U.S.-flagged vessels, outer continental shelf facilities, and facilities subject to the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 regulations. This final rule addresses current and emerging cybersecurity threats in the marine transportation system by adding minimum cybersecurity requirements to help detect risks and respond to and recover from cybersecurity incidents.

In a final rule scheduled for publication in the Federal Register, the Department of Homeland Security through the Coast Guard aims to enhance cybersecurity within the marine transportation system. The proposal includes mandates to create and uphold a Cybersecurity Plan, appoint a Cybersecurity Officer, and implement various strategies to ensure cybersecurity is maintained. Additionally, the Coast Guard is inviting feedback on a possible extension for the implementation timelines for U.S.-flagged vessels.

The final rule aims to protect the marine transportation system from cybersecurity threats by establishing minimum cybersecurity requirements. These requirements are designed to detect, respond to, and recover from risks that could lead to transportation security incidents (TSIs). The rule specifically targets risks arising from the increased interconnectivity and digitalization of the marine transportation system, addressing current and emerging cybersecurity threats to maritime security.

The Coast Guard noted that with this final rule, it has to finalize the requirements that were proposed in the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM), ‘Cybersecurity in the Marine Transportation System,’ published last February 22. The agency also responded to the public comments that we received to the NPRM and made several clarifications regarding the regulatory framework.

The Cybersecurity Plan must include seven account security measures for owners or operators of a U.S.-flagged vessel, facility, or outer continental shelf facility enabling of automatic account lockout after repeated failed login attempts on all password protected IT systems; changing default passwords (or implementing other compensating security controls if unfeasible) before using any IT or operational technology (OT) systems; and maintaining a minimum password strength on IT and OT systems technically capable of password protection.

It also covers implementing multi-factor authentication on password-protected IT and remotely accessible OT systems; applying the principle of least privilege to administrator or otherwise privileged accounts on both IT and OT systems; maintaining separate user credentials on critical IT and OT systems; and removing or revoking user credentials when a user leaves the organization.

The U.S. Coast Guard outlined that the Cybersecurity Plan also must include four device security measure requirements. They are developing and maintain a list of any hardware, firmware, and software approved by the owner or operator that may be installed on IT or OT systems; ensure that applications running executable code are disabled by default on critical IT and OT systems; maintain an accurate inventory of network-connected systems including those critical IT and OT systems; and develop and document the network map and OT device configuration information.

Additionally, the Cybersecurity Plan must include two data security measure requirements that ensure that logs are securely captured, stored, and protected and accessible only to privileged users, and deploy effective encryption to maintain confidentiality of sensitive data and integrity of IT and OT traffic when technically feasible.

The U.S. Coast Guard prescribed that owners or operators of U.S.-flagged vessels, facilities or outer continental shelf facilities must also prepare and document a Cyber Incident Response Plan that outlines instructions on how to respond to a cyber incident and identifies key roles, responsibilities, and decision-makers amongst personnel.

Furthermore, owners or operators must also designate a Cybersecurity Officer (CySO) who must ensure that U.S.-flagged vessel, facility, or outer continental shelf facility personnel implement the Cybersecurity Plan and the Cyber Incident Response Plan. The CySO must also ensure that the Cybersecurity Plan is up-to-date and undergoes an annual audit. The CySO must also arrange for cybersecurity inspections, ensure that personnel have adequate cybersecurity training, record and report cybersecurity incidents to the owner or operator, and take steps to mitigate them.

The Coast Guard estimates that this final rule creates costs for industry and government of about US$1.2 billion total and $138.7 million annualized, discounted at 2 percent (2022 dollars). This increased estimate from the NPRM is primarily driven by increases to our estimates of costs related to cybersecurity drills, exercises, and penetration testing. Cost estimates are also increased due to updated affected population data.

The final rule also notes that its benefits include reduced risk and mitigation of cyber incidents to protect impacted entities and downstream economic participants, and improved protection of marine transportation system business operations to build consumer trust and promote increased commerce in the U.S. economy. Additional benefits include improved minimum standards of cybersecurity to protect the marine transportation system, which is vital to the nation’s economy and national security, and to avoid supply chain disruptions.

The U.S. Coast Guard also requires owners and operators of U.S.-flagged vessels, facilities, and outer continental shelf facilities to segment their IT and OT networks, and log and monitor connections between them. Based on information from CGCYBER, CG-CVC, and NMSAC, network segmentation can be particularly difficult in the marine transportation system, largely due to the age of infrastructure in the affected population of U.S.- flagged vessels, facilities, and outer continental shelf facilities. The older the infrastructure, the more challenging network segmentation may be.

The document also laid down that it will require owners and operators of U.S.-flagged vessels, facilities, and outer continental shelf facilities to limit physical access to IT and OT equipment; secure, monitor, and log all personnel access; and establish procedures for granting access on a by-exception basis.

Last July, the DHS’ Office of Inspector General (OIG) published a final report identifying that the U.S. Coast Guard has made progress in enhancing the cyber posture of the marine transportation system by establishing maritime cybersecurity teams over the past two years, in line with statutory requirements. Based on its findings, the report proposes four recommendations to improve the Coast Guard’s cyber readiness and precautions to secure the U.S. supply chain. The DHS has concurred with four recommendations.

 

Source : Industrial Cyber


As Industry 4.0 continues to redefine operations, the lines between Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) systems are increasingly blurred. Marine terminals now face unique cybersecurity risks to both types of systems, each requiring tailored defenses.

IT Systems: Protecting Data and Networks

IT systems manage critical business data and communication infrastructure. Cybersecurity risks for IT systems include malware, phishing attacks, and data breaches. Employing strong network security protocols, regular software updates, and staff training are essential for safeguarding sensitive data.

OT Systems: Securing Operational Processes

OT systems, which control equipment and automation at marine terminals, face distinct risks. These include attacks on Industrial Control Systems (ICS) and vulnerabilities in legacy systems. Protecting OT involves ensuring real-time monitoring, regular upgrades, and physical security to prevent unauthorized access.

Best Practices for Marine Terminals:

  • For IT systems: Implement multi-factor authentication, regularly update software, and train employees to spot phishing attempts.
  • For OT systems: Maintain an inventory of all assets, update outdated systems, and ensure secure remote access.

With both IT and OT systems now interconnected, a unified approach to cybersecurity is crucial. Protecting these systems is not just about safeguarding data but also ensuring the continued safe operation of critical infrastructure.


Modern commercial ports are a critical infrastructure which is highly dependent on information systems. The security of a port thus relies on the integrity of both physical and cyber assets. Despite evidence that ports are becoming targets for hackers, whose attacks can affect both cyber and physical assets and halt operations, too many ports have inadequate cybersecurity. Physical threats, incidents, and accidents to the physical assets (e.g., terminals, gates, buildings) of the maritime infrastructures or cyber threats and attacks to the cyber assets (e.g., Port Community Systems, navigation systems) can jeopardise the maritime operations, disrupt supply chains and destroy international trade and commerce.

 

https://rusieurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/cybersecurity-in-maritime-critical-infrastructure-crimson-report-english.pdf


  • IMO Adopts Revised Action Plan to Combat Marine Plastic Litter
    On February 6, 2025, the International Maritime Organization’s Sub-Committee on Pollution Prevention and Response agreed on the draft 2025 Action Plan to Address Marine Plastic Litter from Ships. The plan is set for approval by the Marine Environment Protection Committee in April 2025.

  • Nine Countries Join IMO’s GreenVoyage2050 Program
    Announced on February 6, 2025, nine nations have been selected as partners for the IMO’s GreenVoyage2050 program, which supports the implementation of the 2023 IMO Greenhouse Gas Strategy.

  • IMO Secretary-General Urges Enhanced Efforts to Reduce Shipping Emissions
    In October 2024, IMO Secretary-General Arsenio Dominguez called for increased action from the shipping industry to cut carbon emissions, emphasizing the need for immediate and comprehensive measures to meet the IMO’s emission reduction targets.

  • IMO Mandates Reporting of Containers Lost at Sea
    Starting January 1, 2026, the IMO will require mandatory reporting of all containers lost at sea, aiming to enhance maritime safety and environmental protection.

  • IMO Condemns Attacks on Ships in the Red Sea
    In May 2024, the IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee adopted a resolution condemning attacks on vessels in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden, calling for an immediate end to these “illegal and unjustifiable” actions.


Shipbuilding and Deliveries

  • Fincantieri Delivers LNG-Powered Cruise Ship to TUI Cruises: Fincantieri has handed over the first of two low-carbon cruise ships to TUI Cruises. The vessel is powered by liquefied natural gas (LNG), marking a significant step toward sustainable cruising.

Market Trends

  • South Korea Leads in January Shipbuilding Orders: South Korean shipyards secured orders totaling 900,000 compensated gross tons (CGT) for 13 ships in January, accounting for 62% of global orders. This surge is attributed to contracts for LNG dual-fuel container ships.
  • Decline in Ship Recycling Prices Anticipated: The ship recycling market is experiencing downward pressure on prices due to ongoing tariffs and counter-tariffs. Industry experts predict a continued decline in the first half of 2025.

Environmental Initiatives

  • Canadian and European Ports Collaborate on Energy Transition: Canada’s Halifax Port Authority has announced an investment of up to $17 million, including $15 million dedicated to developing the Halifax-Hamburg green shipping corridor, aiming to enhance sustainable maritime practices.

Regulatory and Political Developments

  • Trump Administration Plans 25% Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum Imports: The U.S. government has announced intentions to impose a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports, including those from Mexico and Canada, potentially impacting shipbuilding and repair costs.

Security and Incidents

  • Tanker Explosion at Russian Port of Ust-Luga: A tanker suffered an engine room explosion at the Russian port of Ust-Luga. Investigations are ongoing to determine the cause and assess the impact on port operations.

🔒 Strengthening Maritime Cybersecurity: The Importance of OT Inventory for Ships 🚢

With evolving cybersecurity regulations like the IMO’s MSC-FAL.1/Circ.3 and upcoming EU NIS2 Directive, ships must enhance their Operational Technology (OT) security to prevent cyber threats. A crucial step in compliance and risk mitigation is maintaining an accurate OT inventory.

📌 Why is OT Inventory Important?

Regulatory Compliance – Authorities require clear documentation of OT assets onboard.
Vulnerability Management – Knowing what systems exist helps identify security risks.
Incident Response – A complete inventory speeds up recovery from cyber incidents.
Network Segmentation – Mapping OT systems helps separate critical assets from IT networks.

🔹 How to Build an Effective OT Inventory?

Identify & Categorize – List all OT systems (e.g., ECDIS, VDR, engine control, ballast systems).
Document Connectivity – Map each device’s network connections to spot potential weak points.
Assess Cyber Risks – Regularly evaluate vulnerabilities and update security measures.
Monitor & Update – Keep inventory updated to reflect new installations or modifications.

🌍 Take Action Now!
With cyber threats rising in maritime operations, a well-managed OT inventory is a key first step to ensuring compliance and safeguarding your vessel. Start today to protect your fleet from cyber risks!


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED