Maritime Safety News Archives - Page 45 of 260 - SHIP IP LTD

Fire erupted in engine room of ferry HOLIDAY ISLAND at around 1100 LT (UTC -3) Jul 22 when ferry was entering Wood Islands Harbor, on arrival from Nova Scotia, Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. It was decided to ground the ship to avoid negative developments. Fire was contained by crew, understood extinguished as of morning Jul 23. 182 passengers on board were evacuated, no injures reported. 18 crew is said to remain on board to fight fire jointly with firefighters. HOLIDAY ISLAND according to track, was still aground as of 0050 LT Jul 23, evacuated passengers waiting for their cars remaining on board. Ferry is said to block entrance channel, i.e. Wood Islands port is blocked.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


Offshore supply ship THUNDER in the afternoon Jul 23 reported water ingress in Gulf of Mexico some 65 nm south of Port Fourchon, Louisiana. The ship is returning to Port Fourchon after carrying out offshore works, with ETA Jul 24. THUNDER was disabled and went adrift at around 1900 UTC Jul 23, as of 0345 UTC Jul 24 she was dead in the water, drifting in southern direction, with US Coast Guard ship USCG MORAY nearby. THUNDER sister ship of the same company, MV SQUALL, was approaching drifting THUNDER.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


The global seaborne coal market has grown yet again, over the course of the first half of 2022, following the significant rise of 2021. In its latest weekly report, shipbroker Banchero Costa said that “following a disastrous 2020, with the world hit by lockdowns and recession pretty much everywhere, global seaborne coal trade managed to rebound to some extent in 2021. In the full 12 months of 2021, global seaborne coal exports increased by +4.5% y-o-y to 1149 mln tonnes, from 1099 mln tonnes in 2020, according to vessels tracking data from Refinitiv. This however was still well below the levels we had in pre-Covid times, being -10.0% down from the 1276 mln tonnes shipped during 2019. In the first half of 2022, global coal trade was a bit of a mixed picture. In the January to June period of 2022, global coal loadings increased by +1.5% y-o-y to 572.7 mln t, from 564.1 mln t in the first half of 2021, but still well below the 637.9 mln t in 1H 2019. However, the worst was at start of the year, and the trend in recent months has been very positive. In 1Q 2022, global coal loadings were down -5.1% y-o-y to just 258.5 mln t. In 2Q 2022, coal loadings were a strong +7.7% y-o-y at 314.2 mln t. The month of June 2022 was actually a record 111.6 mln t, +12.3% y-o-y.

 

Source: banchero costa &c s.p.a

According to the shipbroker, “the European Union is now the fifth largest seaborne importer of coal in the world, after India, China, Japan and South Korea. In 1H 2022, the EU accounted for 10.4% of global seaborne coal shipments. The EU’s seaborne coal imports in the 12 months of 2021 increased by +30.3% y-o-y to 87.1 mln tonnes. This was mostly a rebound from a massive -32.9% y-o-y decline in 2020 caused by Covid lockdowns. Previous years also saw a negative trend, with European coal imports declining by -18.3% y-o-y in 2019 and by -7.6% y-o-y in 2018, as European countries progressively abandon coal as a source of energy and embrace natural gas and renewables. In the first 6 months of 2022, coal imports into the EU further increased by +49.6% y-o-y to 57.6 mln tonnes. Europe accelerated its coal imports as a direct reaction to the threat of a reduction in gas supply from Russia. This compensated for the sharp drop in demand from Mainland China”.

Banchero Costa added that “in 1H 2022, China’s seaborne coal imports declined by -26.0% y-o-y to 87.8 mln t, from 118.6 mln t in the same period of 2021. The main coal import terminals in the European Union (27) are: Rotterdam in the Netherlands (14.6 mln tonnes discharged in 1H 2022), Amsterdam Netherlands (6.8 mln tonnes), Hamburg Germany (3.0 mln tonnes), Gdansk Poland (3.0), Gijon Spain (2.8), Dunkirk France (1.9), Fos France (1.9), Ljmuiden Netherlands (1.6), Ghent Belgium (1.2), Vlissingen Netherlands (1.2), Plonce Croatia (1.2), Taranto Italy (1.1), Wilhelmshaven Germany (1.1), Koper Slovenia (1.0), Antwerp (1.0), Algeciras Spain (0.8). In terms of sources of the shipments, Europe was and still now remains heavily dependant on Russia. In the whole of 2021, as much as 44% of the EU’s seaborne coal imports were sourced from Russia. In 1H 2022, as a result of the war in Ukraine, this proportion has declined. Nevertheless, Russia was still the source of 31.5% of the EU’s coal imports this year, and remains as the top supplier of coal to Europe. In 1H 2022, coal imports to the EU from Russia increased by +0.2% y-o-y to 18.2 mln tonnes. Of this, 9.1 mln tonnes were imported in the first quarter of 2022 (-1.6% y-oy), and 9.0 mln tonnes were imported in the second quarter (+2.1% y-o-y)”.

Source: banchero costa &c s.p.a

“The second most important supplier to Europe is now the USA, accounting for 19.4% of Europe’s imports in 1H 2022. In 1H 2022, imports from the USA surged by +91.6% y-o-y to 11.2 mln t. The third largest supplier to Europe is Australia, accounting for 17.6% of the EU’s seaborne imports in 1H 2022. In 1H 2022, imports from Australia increased +27.3% y-o-y to 10.2 mln t. In fourth place was Colombia, with a 12.7% share of Europe’s coal imports. In 1H 2022, 7.3 mln tonnes were imported from Colombia to the EU, up +113.6% y-o-y. In fifth place was South Africa, with a 5.6% share of Europe’s coal imports. In 1H 2022, the EU imported 3.2 mln tonnes from South Africa, up +764.4% y-o-y from just 0.4 mln t in 1H 2021”, the shipbroker concluded.
Nikos Roussanoglou, Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide


Tug BLUE DRAGON 12 suffered explosion and subsequently, sank, in the afternoon Jul 23 in Semoi Setawir, Sungai Sepaku river, upstream from Balikpapan, Eastern Kalimantan Makassar Strait, Indonesia. Of 12 people on board, 4 suffered burns (their condition unknown), 1 went missing, 7 escaped. The tug was waiting for barge Sea Dragon 2712 to be loaded with coal. There were wielding works taking place in stern area, shortly after works started an explosion came about.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


Capesize

 

A mixed week for the Capesize sector, but it ended on a positive note. The timecharter average of the five routes rose above the $20,000 level and closed at $22,362 on Friday. Activity was largely seen from the Pacific, including coal from Indonesia and iron ore from West Australia to China. The latter maintained above $11 with a marginal improvement compared to the end of last week. Tonnage availability looked tight for ballast trades for first half of August. As the week finished, the Brazil market saw more second-half August enquiry and settled at $32.111 for iron ore from Tubarao to Qingdao. In the North Atlantic, fronthaul and transatlantic business appeared to be less active than recently, declining week-on-week to $30,278 and $47,083 respectively.

Panamax

Something of a midweek push gave the Panamax market a much needed boost. However, the week did end on a somewhat subdued note as market players adopted a cautious approach. The north Atlantic began the week brightly with a glut of transatlantic deals concluded basis delivery APS load port in the low $30,000s. This equated for BKI types to circa $17/18,000 delivery this side, whilst East Coast South America saw better demand for second-half August arrival dates. An 82,000-dwt delivery Passing Muscat Outbound achieved just over $20,000 for a trip via EC South America redelivery Singapore-Japan midweek. Asia, for weeks, has been primarily Indonesia coal centric. But the market was marginally better supported this week by Australian coal, which was primarily destined for India. A 81,000-dwt giving delivery South China fixed at $19,000 for a trip via Indonesia to India. Period news included an 81,000-dwt delivery China achieving just shy of $20,000 for a five to eight month period.

Ultramax/Supramax

Overall a slightly more positive week than of late. The Atlantic saw improved activity from the US Gulf region and also stronger demand from East Coast South America for August dates. A good amount of enquiry helped sentiment gain ground from South East Asia. However, there was ample supply of tonnage. On the period front, limited activity was seen. A 61,000-dwt was rumoured to have fixed a short period around $26,000. The Atlantic saw a 58,000-dwt fixing a US Gulf fronthaul redelivery Japan at $28,000 and a 52,000-dwt fixing from Mobile for a trip to East Coast South America in the low $27,000s. From Asia, A 52,000-dwt fixed delivery Singapore for a trip via Indonesia redelivery China at $24,000. For Australian business, a 58,000-dwt was heard fixed delivery Singapore via Australia redelivery Singapore-Japan at around $25,000. From the Indian Ocean, 63,000-dwt open East Coast India was heard to have fixed a trip to West Africa with bagged rice in the upper $20,000s.

Handysize

A positive week in both basins despite limited visible activity. East Coast South America remained buoyant, with a 32,000-dwt fixing from Santos to Morocco at $27,000 and a 35,000-dwt rumoured to have fixed from South Brazil to Morocco at $29,000. A 37,000-dwt was fixed from Fairless Hills via North Brazil to Norway with alumina at $17,500. From the Mediterranean/Continent, a 32,000-dwt fixed from Safi to Chittagong with fertilizer at $19,000. Also, a 32,000-dwt fixed from Canakkale via the Black Sea to Algeria at $18,000. From Asia, it was a mixed bag. A 38,00-dwt was rumoured to have been covered for a trip from CJK via Australia to China at $20,500. A 37,000-dwt was also rumoured to have been placed on subjects for a trip delivery Singapore via Australia redelivery China at $22,500. Period activity remained sparse, but a 38,000-dwt open Santos was rumoured to have fixed for three to five months trading at $27,500.
Source: The Baltic Exchange


When a vessel changes ownership and/or manager, it can take some considerable time before the new crew and management are fully familiar with the vessel. Familiarisation starts as soon as ship’s staff get onboard and must be completed before sailing.

 

The ISM Code requires that all crew receive a proper familiarisation on the vessel prior to sailing.

ISM Code 6.3 The Company should establish procedures to ensure that new personnel and personnel transferred to new assignments related to safety and protection of the environment are given proper familiarization with their duties. Instructions which are essential to be provided prior to sailing should be identified, documented and given.

Members are reminded that to sail the vessel safely, be ready for the possible PSC inspection at the first port and the Club’s required condition survey, below are some essential areas to be familiar with.

Crew-familiarisation

General Routines– all Officers and Crew:

  • PPE Matrix
  • All alarm signals – General, Fire, MOB, Abandon Ship, CO2, etc.
  • All accesses and emergency escape routes
  • All watertight doors – all locations and alarm panel
  • Emergency muster – all emergency duties explained
  • Boat muster – lifeboat, liferaft, Marine Evacuation Systems launching procedures and duties explained
  • Fire detection system – locations of fire alarm panel and fire detectors and operation procedure
  • Automatic door release mechanisms on fire doors
  • Fire-fighting appliances – all locations and uses
  • Life-saving appliances – all locations and uses
  • First aid equipment
  • Pollution control
  • Security duties
  • Internal communication system
  • Enclosed space locations and entering procedure
  • Safety Data Sheets – all locations and uses
  • Location of SMS Manual and Safety Training Manual
  • DPA contact details

Deck Officer

  • Navigational Systems and Equipment
  • Telegraph and Bridge control of Main Engine (Changeover procedure to engine room control)
  • Thruster(s) control
  • Steering system – Manual, Auto-pilot, changeover to Emergency
  • Manoeuvring characteristics and stopping distances
  • Whistle controls
  • Navigational lights, signalling lamp and bridge search lights
  • Deck, overside and bridge lighting panels
  • GMDSS Equipment including VHF equipment
  • Course and Engine telegraph recorders
  • VDR
  • Bridge alarms and indicators
  • Cargo securing arrangement
  • Ballast system and ballast water management plan
  • Cargo space bilge system and water ingress alarm system
  • Fixed gas detection system
  • IG system
  • Ventilation system shutdowns
  • Deck machineries and lifting appliances control and emergency stops
  • Hatch covers operation
  • Mooring system

Engineering Officer

  • Main Engine start (from bridge, ECR and locally), changeover of Main Engine control
  • Generators (remote and local control, paralleling operation) and emergency diesel generator
  • Steering gear – Manual and changeover to Emergency mode
  • Oily water separator and engine room bilge system
  • Boilers
  • Purifiers
  • Main and emergency air compressors
  • Pumps start (Manual/Automatic/Stand-by)
  • Fuel and lub. oil transfer and bunkering procedure
  • M.E / D.G / Boiler fuel change
  • Engine room monitoring and alarm system
  • Restoring from electrical circuits trip
  • Quick closing valves and emergency shutdowns
  • Ballast system and ballast water management plan
  • IG system
  • Ventilation system
  • Deck machineries and lifting appliances control and emergency stops
  • Hatch covers operation

Deck Crew

  • Deck machineries and lifting appliances control and emergency stops
  • Hatch covers operation
  • Steering system
  • Mooring system
  • Cargo securing arrangement
  • Sounding arrangements of bilge and ballast

Engine Crew

  • Engine room equipment
  • Main and emergency air compressors
  • Quick closing valves and emergency shutdowns
  • Ballast system
  • Sounding arrangements of bilge

*Additional safety equipment as per vessel type: Polar Vessels, Oil Tankers, Chemical Tankers, Gas Tankers, Passenger Vessels, Helicopter operations, Fast Rescue Craft, Ro-Ro (Ventilation System), Ro-Ro Pax (Means of Access)

Familiarisation for a 100% change of crew requires extra attention. Bearing in mind all vessels are unique, Members should make sure they have the correct routine for their own vessels.
Source: West P&I Club


Last week, a Royal Navy warship picked up and tracked two Russian along the Norwegian coast. HMS Portland monitored the state-of-the-art Yasen-class missile sub Severodvinsk and the Akula-class attack sub Vepr as they headed southbound from Russia’s Arctic bastion.

The Type 23 frigate shadowed the submarines as they surfaced separately in the North Sea, northwest of Bergen, on July 16 and 19. NATO and NATO-applicant forces took over tracking duties as the subs continued to St Petersburg for Russian Navy Day celebrations, which will be held on July 31.

The Yasen-class sub Severodvinsk with HMS Portland. The Yasen-class is a modern design and is reportedly difficult to track (Royal Navy)

One of the Royal Air Force’s new P-8 Poseidon maritime patrol aircraft worked closely with HMS Portland to hunt and track the submarines.

“The cohesiveness of Royal Navy, RAF and our allies’ capabilities ensures that we are capable of conducting and sustaining these types of anti-submarine operations in the North Atlantic,” said HMS Portland CO Commander Tim Leeder.

Training under way

Back home, the Royal Navy is busily training up Ukrainian Navy personnel to get ready for mine warfare. Britain is sunsetting its minehunting fleet and going completely automated with unmanned minehunting systems, so its Sandown-class minehunters are no longer needed. Two of the previous-generation vessels will be sold to Ukraine, and 80 Ukrainian sailors have traveled to Britain to train to operate them.

“The intensity with which the Ukrainian soldiers and sailors are training is something to behold. They work with the focus of troops who know they’ll be fighting in a war in just a few short weeks’ time,” said UK Armed Forces Minister James Heappey. “Delivering training that matches that intensity and focus is not straightforward. The Royal Navy and the British Army are working long hours and drawing on all their operational experience.”

Around Britain, more than 1,000 UK service personnel are involved in training Ukraine’s armed forces. In addition to specialized trainings for the crews for the Sandown-class, British Army units are providing basic training for thousands of recruits for the front lines.

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/royal-navy-tracks-russian-subs-off-coast-of-norway


Insurers will only be willing to cover ships sailing through a proposed corridor to get Ukrainian grain out if there are arrangements for international navy escorts and a clear strategy to deal with sea mines, underwriters and brokers say.

Russia, Ukraine, Turkey and the United Nations are expected to sign a deal later this week aimed at resuming the shipping of grain from Ukraine across the Black Sea.

Ukraine’s ports have been closed since Russia’s invasion in February, which Moscow calls a “special military operation”, with marine insurers based in Lloyd’s of London and the wider London commercial insurance market awaiting more assurances given the potential losses involved with every ship.

Insurance for the ships would be possible “if a sensible solution were offered”, said Rory Colacicchi, a partner at insurance broker McGill and Partners.

“There would have to be escorts, mine sweepers, so an underwriter could say ‘that’s given us the satisfaction that it’s not just a gamble’. At the moment, that’s just a gamble, you wouldn’t be able to go.”

An acceptable escort could be provided by joint Ukrainian and Russian ships, or by the United Nations or a neutral power such as Turkey, insurance sources said.

An aide to mine sweeping could be the use of satellite technology to identify the locations of the mines, said a marine war insurer who declined to be named due to the sensitivity of the issue.

Countries such as the United States, Britain or France may have that technology, the insurer added.

The initial problem is that there are over 80 ships stuck in Ukraine – many with cargoes onboard including grain – which need to get out before new ships can go in, sources said.

A second UK-based broker, who declined to be named, said his firm had worked to get an “insurance framework” in place for a ship willing to go into Ukraine to bring out grain, once a corridor is in place.

“The client is on standby to go in from a humanitarian perspective,” the broker said.

Additional premiums charged to go into the broader Black Sea area have dropped, reflecting more confidence to provide insurance since February, industry sources said.

The additional premiums paid to go into Black Sea waters have dropped to 2% of the value of the ship from 5% shortly after the invasion, said Marcus Baker, global head of marine at broker Marsh.
Source: Reuters (Reporting by Carolyn Cohn and Jonathan Saul, editing by Sinead Cruise and David Evans)


Plastic waste is a major part of the global pollution crisis, affecting marine organisms and ecosystems and, in turn, posing a threat to human health. To support efforts to mitigate the issue it is vital that marine plastic can be monitored effectively, however this is challenging given the scale, complexity and time required to do so manually.

As such, a team of scientists from Plymouth Marine Laboratory have ‘trained’ an Artificial Intelligence (AI) model to recognize and classify the different types of marine plastic captured in images shot by a video camera mounted on the side of a boat.

Funded by the PML internal research program and the European Space Agency (ESA), the innovative study – titled “Detection and Classification of Floating Plastic Litter Using a Vessel-Mounted Video Camera and Deep Learning” – was carried out as part of an undergraduate placement project, with the results now published in the journal Remote Sensing.

The AI model itself was trained using the MAGEO supercomputer (Massive GPU Cluster for Earth Observation) which is based at PML and operated by the Natural Environment Research Council Earth Observation Data Acquisition and Analysis Service (NEODAAS).

The model was able to classify the presence or absence of plastic in an image with an accuracy of 95% and capable of differentiating different types of plastic – for example a plastic bag or bottle – with an accuracy of 68%.

It is now envisaged that the technique could be more widely applied using crewed or autonomous vessels, such as PML’s proposed long-range autonomous research vessel, the Oceanus, thereby revolutionising existing capabilities to monitor floating plastic litter.

“In situ harmonized and simplified observations of floating marine plastic debris are currently very limited in the literature,” said
Dr Victor Martinez Vicente, Senior Scientist at PML. “We have aimed to tackle the scarcity of these observations through our research on low-cost automated observations. We hope that this initial step will lead to an increase of in situ observations everywhere, but especially in poorer countries where marine litter is usually a great problem.”

With the increase of these observations, we expect to support the validation of algorithms from current sensors and the development of future satellite missions. Properly validated satellite algorithms will allow us to use remote sensing techniques to monitor the progress towards Sustainable Development Goals (in particular index SDG 14.1.1.b) at global scale.”

Source:https://www.marinetechnologynews.com/news/floating-plastic-litter-detected-621239


The Coast Guard recognized liquefied natural gas expert Ed Carr for his contributions to Coast Guard marine safety and homeland security missions during a ceremony at Coast Guard Sector Houston-Galveston, Tuesday.

Capt. Aaron Demo, chief traveling inspector with the Coast Guard’s Traveling Inspection, Training Support & National Center of Expertise Staff in Washington, D.C., recognized Carr with a Meritorious Public Service Award for supporting the Coast Guard’s LGC National Center of Expertise from 2014 to 2019.

During his tenure as senior vice president of the LNG division at Mitsui O.S.K. Bulk Shipping (USA) LLC, Carr bolstered the Coast Guard’s LNG ship rider training program and facilitated over eight professional exchanges, resulting in more than 2,000 hours of training for Coast Guard personnel on advanced LNG equipment, operations and crew requirements.

Additionally, in support of the merchant marine industry training program, Carr established and fostered five mutual training agreements with diverse groups of maritime stakeholders and developed an inaugural training approach with Korean-built vessels.

“Ed Carr built cohesive relationships between the Coast Guard and maritime community during a pivotal time when the LNG industry was experiencing tremendous growth,” said Lt. Cmdr. William J. Hickey, detachment chief, LGC NCOE. “His efforts honed the technical prowess of our marine inspectors and strengthened communication with our partners in the Marine Transportation System community.”

The Coast Guard Meritorious Public Service award is the second highest civilian award of its kind, and is used to recognize substantial contributions to Coast Guard missions and public safety.

Source: https://www.hstoday.us/subject-matter-areas/maritime-security/coast-guard-recognizes-lng-expert-for-supporting-marine-safety-homeland-security/


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED