POST STATE CONTROL Archives - Page 13 of 21 - SHIP IP LTD

Responding to media reports, Global Ports has confirmed it has been approached by MSC with a potential cash offer for all shares of the cruise ports operator.

By Tommaso Ebhardt and Ercan Ersoy (Bloomberg) —

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Co. SA is considering taking a controlling stake in the world’s largest cruise port operator, Global Ports Holding Plc, according to people familiar with the matter.

The maritime container group has been holding exploratory talks over a deal for Global Ports, owned by Turkish businessman Mehmet Kutman, the people said, asking not to be identified discussing confidential information.

Shares in London-listed Global Ports have fallen around a third in the last 12 months, giving it a market value of £53 million ($63 million). The company may look to pay down its debt pile, which stood at $435 million net at the end of March, after any deal with MSC, the people said.

Global Ports operates 26 cruise ports in 14 countries and has been recovering from the impact of Covid-19 pandemic travel restrictions. It returned to profit in the 12 months ended March 31.

Deliberations are ongoing and there’s no certainty they’ll result in an offer from MSC, according to the people. Representatives for Global Ports and Kutman’s Global Yatirim Holding AS declined to comment, while a spokesperson for MSC couldn’t immediately be reached for comment.

Geneva-based MSC, owned by Italian billionaire Gianluigi Aponte, has been on an spending spree on the back of booming cargo demand during the pandemic. In April, it agreed to acquire African transport and logistics business of Bollore SA for 5.7 billion euros ($6 billion). It’s also planning to take a stake in ailing Italian ferry operator Moby SpA and bid with Deutsche Lufthansa AG to buy ITA Airways, the successor to failed carrier Alitalia.

–With assistance from Luca Casiraghi.

© 2022 Bloomberg L.P.


The Port of Savannah, the second-busiest port on the East Coast, recorded an all-time cargo record in May as strong consumer demand and shifting inbound trade continued to drive record productivity at the port.

The Georgia Ports Authority reported Wednesday that Savannah moved an all-time high 519,390 TEU in May, breaking the previous record of 504,350 TEUs set in October 2021. May volumes grew by 8.5 percent, or 40,770 TEUs, compared to the same month last year.

“Despite global supply chain challenges, the Port of Savannah continues to be an economic driver, providing reliable, world-class service for port customers across our state and nation,” said Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp.

GPA Executive Director Griff Lynch noted Garden City Terminal is handling more business during the current influx of trade than during the previous spike experienced last fall. The additional trade is driven in part by vessels diverting to Savannah from other East and West Coast ports, the GPA said.

“Strong consumer demand continues to drive higher volumes at the Port of Savannah,” Lynch said. “The infrastructure improvements and pop-up yards approved by the GPA Board have enabled our operations to maintain the flow of cargo across our terminal, despite unprecedented container volumes passing through the port.”

May’s cargo numbers follow the port’s third busiest month on record in April, when it handled just shy of 500,000 TEUs. Unfortunately, these higher volumes have caused the backup of ships waiting at the port’s anchorages to swell in recent weeks. The Georgia Ports Authority website showed 26 containerships waiting at anchor as of this morning, up from around just 3 ships waiting as of mid-May and approaching the levels experienced during peak congestion last Fall. Savannah also dodged a bullet this week after a large containership ran aground—and was later freed—on the Savannah River.

May’s cargo volumes highlight challenges the Biden Administration faces in reducing congestion and backlogs at ports that have pushed shipping freight rates higher throughout the pandemic, raising costs for American consumers and contributing to inflation. The recently-passed Ocean Shipping Reform Act, which gives the Federal Maritime Commission greater authority to regulate foreign ocean carriers’ practices and promote exports, is unlikely to help much as cargo volumes continue to exceed port capacity.

That’s not to say the Georgia Ports Authority has not making an effort. The GPA website says the Port of Savannah is the “single largest and fastest-growing container terminal in America.” In 2021, the port blew past the 5 million TEU mark (5.6 million TEU) for the first time in its history, handling about 20% more containers than it did in 2020. After last year’s record, Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp called the port “an example to the nation in solving the supply chain crisis” for its efforts to reduce congestion by adding capacity by undertaking short and long-term projects and initiatives to tackle congestion, such as using “pop-up” container yards.

As of April, the port authority has added 900,000 TEUs of annual capacity to the Garden City Terminal, and another 300,000 are expected to come online in July for a new total of more than 7 million TEUs of container handling space.

Phase I of the Garden City Terminal West expansion has added a 25-acre container yard adjacent to the primary truck route approaching the main terminal. Phase II will add up to 1 million TEUs of annual capacity, which will begin coming online in 2023.

“By increasing container space at Garden City Terminal, GPA is accommodating the expansion in global commerce that supports job growth in Georgia,” said GPA Board Chairman Joel Wooten. “Industries from logistics to auto manufacturing, and agriculture to retail depend on Georgia’s ports for reliable supply chain solutions.”

The Port of Savannah completed 327,400 truck gate moves in May, counting loaded import and export containers, as well as the movement of empty chassis. Thanks in part to expanded night gate hours, the Garden City Terminal facilitated more than 15,000 truck moves between the hours of 7 and 11 p.m. last month, up from just over 10,000 in April. Another 48,000 containers (approximately 88,000 TEUs) moved by rail in May.

In addition to the container trade, GPA achieved a 28 percent increase in breakbulk cargo for the month. Breakbulk commodities including iron and steel, rubber, and forest products reached 320,722 tons in May, up 70,780 tons.


By Augusta Saraiva (Bloomberg) Employers and the union representing more than 22,000 dockworkers at 30 US ports on the West Coast are unlikely to reach a wage deal by the time the current contract expires next month but neither side foresees disruptions that would hobble supply chains.

“Neither party is preparing for a strike or a lockout,” the International Longshore and Warehouse Union and the Pacific Maritime Association, which represents more than 70 terminal operators and ocean carriers, said in a joint statement Tuesday.

A collapse of the negotiations would risk a work stoppage during the busiest time of year at the nation’s largest ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, one that would snarl US supply chains still suffering pandemic disruptions.

The sides’ commitment to keeping cargo moving throughout the process would avoid a repeat of the delays and congestion that hampered ports from San Diego to Bellingham, Washington during the 2014 talks that extended into 2015.

The labor talks take place as the US recovers from an unprecedented supply-chain crisis sparked by the Covid-19 pandemic. At stake in the negotiations is no less than the recovery of the world’s biggest economy, already dealing with the most pernicious inflation in four decades, shortages of products ranging from baby formula to air-conditioner parts, and growing fears that another shock could tilt the country into a recession.

The current collective bargaining agreement expires at 5 p.m. on July 1, the parties said. Talks for a new agreement began May 10 in San Francisco and will continue until an accord is reached.

Officials from the ILWU and PMA met with President Joe Biden during his visit to the port of Los Angeles Friday, discussing issues “including supply-chain congestion and their shared commitment to reach a collective bargaining agreement that is fair to both parties,” they said.

By Augusta Saraiva © 2022 Bloomberg L.P.


The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Maritime Administration (MARAD) announced that up to $684.3 million is now available for Port Infrastructure Development Program (PIDP) grants, to be awarded on a competitive basis to projects that improve the safety, efficiency, and reliability of the movement of goods into, out of, around, or within a port. This marks the most, annual funding for PIDP in history and will help improve our supply chains, speed up the safe, efficient, and reliable movement of goods, and ultimately work to make goods more affordable for Americans.

On February 23, 2022, MARAD issued a notice of funding opportunity (NOFO) announcing the availability of $450 million for the PIDP program under the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law. The FY 2022 Appropriations Act appropriated an additional $234.3 million in funding for the program and this money has been added to the NOFO.

“Under President Biden’s leadership, we are making a once-in-a-generation investment in our ports and intermodal infrastructure to move goods faster, strengthen supply chain resiliency, support economic vitality at both the national and regional levels, and address climate change and environmental justice impacts,” said Acting Maritime Administrator Lucinda Lessley.

The $684.3 million in funding for FY 2022 PIDP grants is the highest level of funding ever made available for the program. Projects that improve the movement of goods to, through, and around ports at coastal seaports, inland river ports, and Great Lakes ports are eligible to receive funding. In addition, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law also expanded the list of eligible projects to explicitly include projects that reduce or eliminate port-related criteria pollutant or greenhouse gas emissions.

Overall, the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law will invest $17 billion in ports and waterways, as well as rebuild America’s roads, bridges and rails; upgrade and expand public transit; modernize the Nation’s ports and airports; improve safety; help tackle the climate crisis; advance environmental justice; and invest in communities that have too often been left behind. It will drive the creation of good-paying jobs and grow the economy sustainably and equitably to help everyone get ahead for decades to come.

Applications for the grants continue to be due on May 16, 2022 by 11:59 p.m. EST, and previously submitted applications can be revisited due to the amendment following the increase in funding.


Digitalization undeniably results in significant efficiency gains, safer and more resilient supply chains, and lower emissions. The impact would also extend far beyond the maritime sector given the strategic role of the shipping industry. However, this has also brought about the digital divide between more economically developed ports and those in emerging economies.

Digital transformation has the potential to bring wide-ranging economic benefits and contribute to a stronger, more sustainable recovery from the global Covid-19 pandemic, particularly in low and middle-income countries.

Port hierarchy

Eleanor Hadland, senior analyst in Drewry’s Ports and Terminals practice, noted in a recent industry update, “There’s increasingly a requirement for high-quality digital infrastructure, specifically extensive internet and mobile data networks and digital supply chain networks.”

So, ports and terminals, she said, need to “pay as much, if not more, attention to digital infrastructure as they do to physical infrastructure. The shift to e-commerce reinforces the business case for port-centric logistics in many places. And, most importantly of all, failure to invest in digital connectivity could result in a loss of physical connectivity.”

According to the consulting firm Deloitte, only the top few ports around the world, those Tier 1 ones with resources and financial capabilities, can be said to have achieved a “smart port” status, hence enjoying the benefits of digitalization.

On the other hand, over 80 percent of the ports in the world are in “Tier 2 and below”, implying that they do not have the kind of access to digital technology, or it is out of their financial capabilities.

Boston Consulting Group said that many ports, in particular, the small to medium sized ones “remain firmly anchored in the past”, with paper-based documentation and manual labour. This, in turn, creates an unbalanced landscape within the global port sector.

The “old fashioned way” leaves them not only vulnerable to delay from supply chain disruption, as witnessed during the recent and still ongoing pandemic but perhaps more importantly, vulnerable strategically as they are less able to compete in an increasingly digital maritime world.

Refusal to share data

In the Future of Shipping 2021 webinar by Lloyd’s List, during a panel discussion, it was agreed that data sharing is fundamental to digital progression in the industry.  However, electronically sharing data, an important component of digitalization, is still not widespread in the maritime industry.

“Dare to share data,” said Søren Christian Meyer, CEO of ZeroNorth and a panelist. “[This is] a big, big change that we are now seeing in the industry. People are beginning to realize [that] we cannot build all the technology ourselves, we have to find out what are our angles, and then we need to collaborate with others.”

The industry value of real-time operational data collected onboard digitally-integrated ships increases enormously if the data is shared and used strategically for big data analysis, benchmarking and performance optimization across companies and authorities.

The International Maritime Organization (IMO) has made it mandatory for all its member states to exchange key data electronically under the Facilitation of International Maritime Traffic (FAL) Convention.

Unfortunately, a recent International Association of Ports and Habors (IAPH) survey revealed that only a third of over 100 responding ports comply with that requirement. This poses a barrier to the collaboration and sharing community that enables a smooth transition to digitalization and ultimately delivers industry-wide advantages.

Interestingly, the main barriers cited by the ports are the legal framework in their countries or regions, human capital limitations, and failure of the multiple private-public stakeholders to collaborate, but not the technology itself.

And it is not just ports and terminals that need to bridge the digital gap. The container carrier industry, which is known to be opaque due to a lack of open data, would need to close the gap too.

The Digital Container Shipping Association (DCSA) pointed out in its digital standards report that “track and trace data is not aligned or digitalized across carriers and their logistics partners, which means that multi-modal transport chains often appear as ‘black boxes’ to customers, and containers are lost from view at certain points in the supply chain.”

“Standardizing data handling practices,” the DCSA report said, “is equivalent to installing modern plumbing in a city. Without it, good quality water – in this case, accurate and actionable data – simply cannot flow freely to every household.”

So, the industry needs, among other things, to embrace what the DCSA advocates, a standards-based digital innovation imperative that will set the industry’s course into the future.

According to the World Bank, in the short term, countries that are left behind may experience shortages of essential goods and higher prices, as was illustrated at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. In the medium to long term, delaying the digital transition of the maritime supply chain could lead to higher trade costs, lower competitiveness, lower economic growth, and lower employment.

The digital divide may eventually widen the gap between developed and developing economies and exacerbate the isolation of the poorest countries.


Ports are increasingly taking steps to support the decarbonization of shipping. In addition to the initiatives looking at the formation of green shipping corridors, individual ports are introducing green incentives providing incentives for ships that meet emission standards or employ alternative green fuels to reduce emissions.

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore announced as of May 1, 2022, that it was introducing enhancements to its Green Port Program to encourage environmental sustainability among ocean-going vessels calling at the Port of Singapore as well as for licensed harbor craft operating in the port.  Part of the Maritime Singapore Green Initiative, this program is an adjunct to its Green Ship Program.  In April, Singapore announced it would offer financial incentives to ships entering the Singapore flag registry or currently registered in Singapore that adopts IMO efficiency standards or green fuels. New ships registering in Singapore can qualify for reductions ranging between 50 and 100 percent for their initial registration fee and annual tonnage tax while currently registered ships that adopt the new standards qualify for reductions between 20 and 100 percent.

Under the Green Port Program Singapore is now also offering reductions in port dues. Ships calling at the port can receive a 30 percent reduction by using zero-carbon fuel ranging from hydrogen to synthetic, non-carbon fuels derived from renewable electricity based on solar, wind, or hydropower. Ships can qualify for a 25 percent reduction in port dues for using low carbon fuels including LNG and 20 percent or greater biofuel blends.

ingapore is also extending its incentives to licensed harbor craft operating in the port. Newly-built vessels using low or zero-carbon fuels or operating fully electric once they register will receive a five-year waiver of their port dues.

The Halifax Port Authority in Canada announced that it is also now offering incentives to container and RoRo vessels that voluntarily register and meet the International Association of Ports and Harbors’ (IAPH) Environmental Ship Index’s requirements for reducing greenhouse gas emissions. The ESI formula evaluates the amount of nitrogen oxide (NOx), sulfur oxide (SOx), and carbon dioxide (CO?) emitted by a vessel providing a score for each vessel. The index assists in identifying ships that proactively go beyond the emission standards required by the International Maritime Organization.

Halifax announced that it is joining the World Port Climate Initiative as an incentive provider. The WPCI was launched initially in 2008 by the IAPH and regional port organizations to provide ports worldwide with a framework to mitigate their impact on climate change. Ports in North and South America, Europe, the Middle East, Asia, and Australia have all become incentive provider ports,

The HPA will administer, and rebate annually, an ESI Harbor Dues Incentive of C$500 for vessels with an ESI-assigned Index score between 20 and 49.99, and C$1,000 for vessels with an ESI-assigned Index score of 50 or higher per port call.

The IAPH recently announced that an initiative is underway to introduce a second generation of the index as well as a new at-berth module. The proposals will be presented at the IAPH World Ports Conference later this month. Starting in 2023 with cruise ships as a pilot for a two-year period, the at-berth module is then expected to expand to other types of traffic rewarding actual performance related to each port call.

 


The Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MoU) will launch an inspection campaign to verify compliance with the requirements of the Polar Code, according to Standard Club’s release.

The inspection campaign will be held from 13 June to 1 July 2022 (first period) and from 1 to 19 August 2022 (second period).

The inspection campaign is additional to the regular CIC and is held in a different time of the year due to the seasonal voyage plans of the ships sailing to the Polar region.

Reasons for such a campaign include:
The polar waters have a unique polar ecosystem that is vulnerable to human influences such as ship operation;
The polar waters impose additional navigational demands beyond those normally encountered in non-polar waters;
The polar waters impose additional demands on the ships, their systems and operations beyond the existing requirements for normal operations at sea.

The goal of the Polar Code inspection campaign is:
to determine the level of compliance with the requirements of the Polar Code within the shipping industry;
to create awareness amongst ship crews and ship owners with regard to the importance of compliance with the provisions of the Polar Code, the increased risk to ships operating in polar waters and the protection of the vulnerable polar environment;
to send a signal to the industry that safety- and pollution prevention related requirements are mandatory and enforcement with the applicable requirements is high on the agenda of the Paris MoU member authorities; to underline the responsibility of the Port State Control regime regarding harmonised enforcement of compliance with the requirements of the Polar Code, thus improving the level of compliance and ensuring a level playing field.

A ship will be subject to only one inspection related to this inspection campaign during this period. Port State Control Officers (PSCOs) will use a pre-defined questionnaire to assess whether the information and equipment provided onboard complies with the relevant conventions. Of course, Polar Code elements in SOLAS and MARPOL will also be taken into account.


The Maritime Anti-Corruption Network (MACN) has launched a one-of-a-kind online platform that shows the frequency with which corruption is reported at individual ports. The Global Port Integrity Platform (GPIP) is based on MACN’s catalogue of incident data, including more than 50,000 incident reports collected since 2011. It also draws on external data sources to allow MACN’s members to compare individual ports’ integrity risks.

“GPIP will be a gamechanger in the fight against maritime corruption. Currently, there are no international standards, or systematic methods of measuring integrity within and between ports,” said MACN Associate Director Martin Benderson. “GPIP will allow charterers, cargo owners, and shipping companies to compare ports’ integrity performance and identify risks when trading. For seafarers and shipping companies, GPIP will provide dynamic data that will help empower the industry to ‘Say No’ to corruption.”

The platform currently includes data on 106 ports from over 50 countries, but MACN’s ambition is to double the number of ports in the system by the end of the year. Access is available for MACN members, select stakeholders and port sector partners, like investors and international donors.

MACN also sees the portal as a tool for “evidence-based” conversations among governments, industry stakeholders, and port operators – a new way to share information about corruption and to compare and contrast performance

The petty corruption found at certain ports and strategic waterways is an impediment for global trade. Solicitations for bribes – typically for cigarettes, alcohol or cash – are routinely encountered in official interactions at some ports, and refusing to pay often results in delays for the ship.

“The cost of corrupt demands, and the repercussions for refusing them, have massive consequences for the industry and trade,” said MACN CEO Cecilia Müller Torbrand.

Thanks in part to efforts by campaigners like MACN, port corruption has been on the decline for many years. The drop-off was especially pronounced during the height of the pandemic, when vessel quarantine restrictions made it more difficult for port officials to come aboard and solicit bribes in person.


Panama announced that it has entered into a new agreement with an investment group that is partnering with an affiliate of Mediterranean Shipping Company (MSC) to complete and operate the long-delayed Panama Canal Container Port. The project had started eight years ago by a Chinese company but after the 2019 elections in Panama, the new government canceled the concession.

Under the new agreement, Notarc Management Group, a private investment and asset management company active in Panama, Latin America, and the Caribbean will take over the project which was 40 percent completed before the prior contract was canceled.  The group acquired the rights to the project and will finalize the plans and complete construction at the container terminal which will be located in Colon, new the Caribbean entrance to the Panama Canal. Terminal Investment Limited, an affiliate of MSC joined the project and will also undertake management and oversee operations at the facility.

“Panama is an ideal gateway hub in the Americas and the world,” said Dion Bowe, Managing Partner of NMG Latin America and the newly appointed CEO for the Panama Canal Container Port. “This acquisition is a strategic opportunity for us to further develop and integrate a regional logistics platform while investing in assets which are synergistic to our investment model and where innovation and location offer an incomparable business footprint in the region.”

The new group said it would review the designs and resume construction at the location before the end of 2022. They estimated that the total investment will have grown to $1.4 billion for the creation of the port facility versus the original $900 million in the agreement with the Chinese. The modernized transshipment facility is expected to handle 2.5 million TEUs in its initial years and grow to a capacity of 5 million TEUs.

In addition to the transshipment port, Notarc has entered into a memorandum of understanding with U.S.-based SGP BioEnergy to construct and develop a bioenergy facility and other logistics infrastructure at the Colon project.

 


Amid the gloom of spiralling energy costs, inflation, war, and the recent United Nations IPCC report which revealed that global carbon emissions are still rising, and governments are not following through on COP 26 assurances, shipping’s own endeavours to cut carbon emissions are in sharp focus. Congested ports, broken supply chains, and Covid-related hold-ups more generally, compound the concerns.

Yet the customers of many container lines – large and small – tell a different story. They can’t wait to speed up shipping’s decarbonisation journey and, what’s more, they say “We’ll pay for it!” Many are already engaged in a series of pilot projects. Others have set up new lobby groups, such as coZEV – Cargo Owners for Zero Emission Vessels – to further the cause by aggregating demand.

Singapore is the latest signatory to the Clydebank Declaration, agreed at COP 26, to which 23 countries have now pledged their commitment. The Clydebank Declaration aims to establish six green corridors where trailblazing shippers, carriers and fuel providers cooperate to cut emissions and try out new sources of ship energy. I see these six green corridors multiplying fast in the months ahead.

At LR, we believe that having the right metrics to measure is an essential component of the fuel transition process. So we’ve built a model – First Movers Framework – designed to assess all of the variables in the equation – well-to-wake emissions, fuel production, supply, transport and infrastructure, safety, regulation, technology readiness, financial implications, and societal response.

Putting this model into practice, we have also launched a new project in Asia – the Silk Alliance – based on container trade between Singapore and Hong Kong. It’s a fine example of the collaboration that is essential in the fuel transition process.

Our partners include MSC, Wärtsilä, Wan Hai Express Feeders, PIL, Keppel Offshore & Marine, Asian Development Bank etc. We expect other stakeholders to become involved – perhaps including one or more signatories to the Poseidon Principles initiative which now accounts for about 50% of global ship finance lending.

To me, two aspects of the Silk Alliance stand out. One, it’s not open-ended. It’s a 12-month project building on our First Movers Framework and a completed pilot study. And two, it’s not limited to new ships and fuels which are not yet available, we can address the challenge of retrofits and decarbonising existing vessels.

I believe that the container sector should be the primary focus for several reasons. In terms of monetary value, the world’s container trades are estimated to account for about 60% of global seaborne trade. Not only do carriers operate ships on specified routes with fixed schedules, but they also carry cargoes for many different customers.

No single shipper, therefore, bears the brunt of dramatically higher fuel costs. Analysts often use trainers as an example. A 20-foot container has capacity for about 3,000 boxes of trainers. For every additional $100 of freight charged for the box to cover more expensive fuel, that’s three cents per pair. Admittedly, most white goods are larger and take more space. But extra fuel costs would still mean only a few extra dollars.

It is logical to start small, with the Silk Alliance and green corridor projects. But these initiatives will spill over to other routes in other regions, and we can scale up fast. The world’s largest liner trade between Asia and Europe offers the most impact potential of any single route, for which the intra-Asia focus of the Silk Alliance provides a good foundation!

We must also manage the enthusiasm of shippers. They may wish to commit their products to ships running on zero-carbon ammonia, for example, but the technology does not yet exist. The first ammonia internal combustion engine is under development and not expected until late 2024 or 2025.

Having shipping’s customers onside is very encouraging, but the testing and assurance of new fuel technologies is essential and cannot be rushed. However, if such fuels were now available, shippers would be seeking RFPs – Request for Proposals – and committing significant volumes of cargo on five- or ten-year deals. That would, in turn, enable shipowners to consider switching to sustainable marine fuel, in the knowledge of a reliable payback.

But we must be realistic. Let’s not forget the regulatory process. Scrutiny of and compliance with competition rules, and approvals from the authorities that oversee them, can take a long time. The liner sector is no stranger to regulatory probes into its business models.

Yet, despite these challenges, I am optimistic. In the container business, the collaboration that is necessary to meet shipping’s unprecedented challenge is now even stronger than it was because we have many of our leading customers onside.


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED