Passenger ro-ro ship ANATOLIAN left Mogadisho Port, Somalia, on Jul 3, bound for Alang India, most probably for dismantling. On Jul 19 EUNAVFOR ATALANTA Command was alerted by distress signal or message from the ship, reporting total blackout, lack of supplies. Spanish frigate ESPS NUMANCIA and other Naval units responded, technicians teams failed to restore power and propulsion, and ANATOLIAN finally, was taken on tow, to be towed to Bosasso Somalia, Gulf of Aden. The ship arrived at Bosasso or Bosasso Anchorage on Jul 22. Navies delivered on board of distressed ship food and fresh water. Commercial towage is hampered by adverse weather. Ship’s last AIS position dated Jul 10.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


Jul 23 UPDATE: Tanker was arrested by Krasnodar Region Court Ruling on Jul 22 or Jul 21, as pledged asset to secure debt payment, after Russian Salvage Agency Morspassluzhba claim. Agency estimates salvage costs to be of some USD 900,000, including firefighting itself, cost of delivery on board equipment and teams, providing safe anchorage and other salvage services rendered. Whether Agency’s $900,000 claim is justified or not, is a question, but it does look strange, and even outrageous. After all, it wasn’t commercial salvage, it was a case of emergency salvage. One more case of State-controlled racketeering?

Initial news:
Jul 12: Fire erupted in engine room of tanker AHMET TELLI at Temryuk port, Azov sea, Russia, in the evening Jul 9. Circumstances unclear, information given in statement issued by Russian Salvage Agency is so confused that it’s almost impossible to find out how it happened, what was tanker’s status at the time of fire, and what followed. Understood tanker was taken or moved to Temryuk outer anchorage, where she lost anchor, circumstances unknown. Tanker underwent dry docking prior to fire, understood in Temryuk, so all tanks were degassed and didn’t contain any cargo or residues. Fire was extinguished with the help of Russian Salvage Agency local branch firefighters. Tanker’s Chief Officer inhaled toxic fire emissions and had to be hospitalized, injures said to be not life-threatening. AIS is on, as of 1320 UTC Jul 12 tanker remained at anchorage.

Jul 13 UPDATE: Understood tanker was to be dry docked at Temryuk port and at the time fire broke out, was entering ship repair yard basin. Fire disabled the ship, pilot on board anchored tanker in basin, but later, because of threat of explosion, took AHMET TELLI to outer anchorage, with tugs assistance. As of morning Jul 13, remained at anchor.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/

 


Fire erupted in engine room of ferry HOLIDAY ISLAND at around 1100 LT (UTC -3) Jul 22 when ferry was entering Wood Islands Harbor, on arrival from Nova Scotia, Gulf of St. Lawrence, Canada. It was decided to ground the ship to avoid negative developments. Fire was contained by crew, understood extinguished as of morning Jul 23. 182 passengers on board were evacuated, no injures reported. 18 crew is said to remain on board to fight fire jointly with firefighters. HOLIDAY ISLAND according to track, was still aground as of 0050 LT Jul 23, evacuated passengers waiting for their cars remaining on board. Ferry is said to block entrance channel, i.e. Wood Islands port is blocked.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


In a surprising announcement, the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has stated that its Covid 19 program for cruise ships is no longer in effect. Based on CDC recommendations, individual cruise lines will determine their own protocols for passengers. This is expected to increase traffic and breathe new life into the industry, which has been struggling to get back on its feet since the beginning of the pandemic, inferred from the jump in share prices of cruise stocks soon after the announcement.

Strict and elaborate protocols were placed on the vessels when sailing of cruises from US ports was resumed in the summer of 2021. At this time CDC warned of a high risk of infection and advised against cruise travel. The system was replaced by a voluntary and more lenient one in 2022, which all the cruise ships sailing from the US opted into. The newest approach is to transfer greater responsibility on the cruises with less oversight by government agencies.

Kristen Nordlund, a CDC spokesperson, has stated that they believe the cruise operators have access to the necessary tools to prevent and mitigate the spread of Covid 19. She also said that passengers are expected to do their own risk assessment as they would in other settings. However, the CDC website advises passengers to avoid cruising and undergo testing three days earlier and five days after a cruise. The CDC will continue to publish guidelines for cruise vessels, and the ships will also be required to abide by local requirements and agreements with ports.

Source: https://www.fleetmon.com/maritime-news/2022/38929/optimism-cruises-cdcs-covid-19-program-cruise-ship/


Offshore supply ship THUNDER in the afternoon Jul 23 reported water ingress in Gulf of Mexico some 65 nm south of Port Fourchon, Louisiana. The ship is returning to Port Fourchon after carrying out offshore works, with ETA Jul 24. THUNDER was disabled and went adrift at around 1900 UTC Jul 23, as of 0345 UTC Jul 24 she was dead in the water, drifting in southern direction, with US Coast Guard ship USCG MORAY nearby. THUNDER sister ship of the same company, MV SQUALL, was approaching drifting THUNDER.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


The tanker market is expected to keep on growing over the course of the coming years, until we hit the so called peak oil demand, after which it should be a constant state of decline. In its latest weekly report, shipbroker Gibson said that “the current spike in global oil prices and a tight supply situation has put the issue of peak oil demand back into focus. Those who thought the Covid-19 demand destruction of 2020 would permanently dent world oil demand were quickly proven wrong as shown by the 5.7% rebound in demand in 2021. Furthermore, demand has continued to expand despite oil prices trading firmly in the $100/bbl range since the start of the invasion of Ukraine and the looming threat of an economic recession. This calls into question when exactly peak oil demand could occur and what this might in practice look like as the demand outlook varies by region, particularly in terms of decarbonisation policies. Most current estimates place peak demand occurring between 2030 and 2040, although it is worth noting the subsequent decline in demand is unlikely to be cliff edge and oil is likely to play a role in the global economy for decades to come past 2040”.

 

According to Gibson, “in their latest monthly report, the IEA has revised down its demand growth estimates for 2022 and 2023. It now forecasts demand at approximately 99.2 mbd and 101.32 mbd respectively versus 99.43 mbd and 101.6 mbd in their June forecast. This is being driven by a combination of economic uncertainty and signs that rising prices are causing some demand destruction; a weaker than expected start to US driving season gasoline demand may be evidence of this as consumers begin to cut back their spending across the board in response to higher and more persistent inflationary pressure. Whilst Chinese demand may be showing some signs of recovery as it eases strict “Zero-Covid” restrictions; overall economic activity remains weak and oil demand is yet to fully recover to robust levels. Chinese demand will likely be a key uncertainty in at east the short-term. Since the invasion, few have dared to predict longer term oil demand given the uncertainties involved, with the IEA’s flagship oil 2022 report being understandably delayed past its original March release date. Few other forecasting agencies are willing to forecast long term oil demand with any degree of confidence”.

The shipbroker added that “nonetheless, despite this shorter-term concern, demand has been improving compared to 2020 levels. Easing mobility restrictions are increasing seasonal demand for jet and road transport fuel, particularly in emerging markets, which in turn has resulted in higher refinery runs as refiners look to capture higher margins. This has led to higher crude demand; and comes as the global crude trade continues to shift and readjust to the new trade reality following sanctions on Russian oil. Other areas of continued oil demand include power generation where European and Middle Eastern utility companies are increasingly viewing oil as a cheaper alternative to natural gas and LNG in electricity generation. The petrochemical sector also represents a key source of expected future oil demand, in particular naphtha demand has been strong in recent years, although the IEA is now forecasting a 220 kbd drop in demand in 2022 as current uncertainties reduce demand in the short term, although in the longterm future economic growth should improve this outlook”.

Source: GIBSON SHIPBROKERS LTD

“When it comes to putting an expected date on peak oil demand, a key factor is decarbonisation policy. Europe, the UK, US, and China are all scheduled to phase out the sale of new gasoline and diesel vehicles by 2040; with sales expected to decline dramatically over the course of the 2020s and 2030s in line with broader targets of net zero by 2050. This indicates peak oil demand is likely to occur between 2030 and 2040 but some regions such as Europe could peak earlier than developing economies in Asia, Africa, and the Middle East. Therefore, slower longer term oil demand growth rates and an eventual peak in demand suggests tanker owners will need to engage in lower fleet replenishment and this investment will likely concentrate on replacing older and less economical tonnage as well as ensuring regulatory compliance. Over the medium term, aside from recession risk, the oil trade is expected to continue growing before a longer-term peak and then decline once this eventually materialises”, the shipbroker concluded.
Nikos Roussanoglou, Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide


Capesize

 

A mixed week for the Capesize sector, but it ended on a positive note. The timecharter average of the five routes rose above the $20,000 level and closed at $22,362 on Friday. Activity was largely seen from the Pacific, including coal from Indonesia and iron ore from West Australia to China. The latter maintained above $11 with a marginal improvement compared to the end of last week. Tonnage availability looked tight for ballast trades for first half of August. As the week finished, the Brazil market saw more second-half August enquiry and settled at $32.111 for iron ore from Tubarao to Qingdao. In the North Atlantic, fronthaul and transatlantic business appeared to be less active than recently, declining week-on-week to $30,278 and $47,083 respectively.

Panamax

Something of a midweek push gave the Panamax market a much needed boost. However, the week did end on a somewhat subdued note as market players adopted a cautious approach. The north Atlantic began the week brightly with a glut of transatlantic deals concluded basis delivery APS load port in the low $30,000s. This equated for BKI types to circa $17/18,000 delivery this side, whilst East Coast South America saw better demand for second-half August arrival dates. An 82,000-dwt delivery Passing Muscat Outbound achieved just over $20,000 for a trip via EC South America redelivery Singapore-Japan midweek. Asia, for weeks, has been primarily Indonesia coal centric. But the market was marginally better supported this week by Australian coal, which was primarily destined for India. A 81,000-dwt giving delivery South China fixed at $19,000 for a trip via Indonesia to India. Period news included an 81,000-dwt delivery China achieving just shy of $20,000 for a five to eight month period.

Ultramax/Supramax

Overall a slightly more positive week than of late. The Atlantic saw improved activity from the US Gulf region and also stronger demand from East Coast South America for August dates. A good amount of enquiry helped sentiment gain ground from South East Asia. However, there was ample supply of tonnage. On the period front, limited activity was seen. A 61,000-dwt was rumoured to have fixed a short period around $26,000. The Atlantic saw a 58,000-dwt fixing a US Gulf fronthaul redelivery Japan at $28,000 and a 52,000-dwt fixing from Mobile for a trip to East Coast South America in the low $27,000s. From Asia, A 52,000-dwt fixed delivery Singapore for a trip via Indonesia redelivery China at $24,000. For Australian business, a 58,000-dwt was heard fixed delivery Singapore via Australia redelivery Singapore-Japan at around $25,000. From the Indian Ocean, 63,000-dwt open East Coast India was heard to have fixed a trip to West Africa with bagged rice in the upper $20,000s.

Handysize

A positive week in both basins despite limited visible activity. East Coast South America remained buoyant, with a 32,000-dwt fixing from Santos to Morocco at $27,000 and a 35,000-dwt rumoured to have fixed from South Brazil to Morocco at $29,000. A 37,000-dwt was fixed from Fairless Hills via North Brazil to Norway with alumina at $17,500. From the Mediterranean/Continent, a 32,000-dwt fixed from Safi to Chittagong with fertilizer at $19,000. Also, a 32,000-dwt fixed from Canakkale via the Black Sea to Algeria at $18,000. From Asia, it was a mixed bag. A 38,00-dwt was rumoured to have been covered for a trip from CJK via Australia to China at $20,500. A 37,000-dwt was also rumoured to have been placed on subjects for a trip delivery Singapore via Australia redelivery China at $22,500. Period activity remained sparse, but a 38,000-dwt open Santos was rumoured to have fixed for three to five months trading at $27,500.
Source: The Baltic Exchange


When a vessel changes ownership and/or manager, it can take some considerable time before the new crew and management are fully familiar with the vessel. Familiarisation starts as soon as ship’s staff get onboard and must be completed before sailing.

 

The ISM Code requires that all crew receive a proper familiarisation on the vessel prior to sailing.

ISM Code 6.3 The Company should establish procedures to ensure that new personnel and personnel transferred to new assignments related to safety and protection of the environment are given proper familiarization with their duties. Instructions which are essential to be provided prior to sailing should be identified, documented and given.

Members are reminded that to sail the vessel safely, be ready for the possible PSC inspection at the first port and the Club’s required condition survey, below are some essential areas to be familiar with.

Crew-familiarisation

General Routines– all Officers and Crew:

  • PPE Matrix
  • All alarm signals – General, Fire, MOB, Abandon Ship, CO2, etc.
  • All accesses and emergency escape routes
  • All watertight doors – all locations and alarm panel
  • Emergency muster – all emergency duties explained
  • Boat muster – lifeboat, liferaft, Marine Evacuation Systems launching procedures and duties explained
  • Fire detection system – locations of fire alarm panel and fire detectors and operation procedure
  • Automatic door release mechanisms on fire doors
  • Fire-fighting appliances – all locations and uses
  • Life-saving appliances – all locations and uses
  • First aid equipment
  • Pollution control
  • Security duties
  • Internal communication system
  • Enclosed space locations and entering procedure
  • Safety Data Sheets – all locations and uses
  • Location of SMS Manual and Safety Training Manual
  • DPA contact details

Deck Officer

  • Navigational Systems and Equipment
  • Telegraph and Bridge control of Main Engine (Changeover procedure to engine room control)
  • Thruster(s) control
  • Steering system – Manual, Auto-pilot, changeover to Emergency
  • Manoeuvring characteristics and stopping distances
  • Whistle controls
  • Navigational lights, signalling lamp and bridge search lights
  • Deck, overside and bridge lighting panels
  • GMDSS Equipment including VHF equipment
  • Course and Engine telegraph recorders
  • VDR
  • Bridge alarms and indicators
  • Cargo securing arrangement
  • Ballast system and ballast water management plan
  • Cargo space bilge system and water ingress alarm system
  • Fixed gas detection system
  • IG system
  • Ventilation system shutdowns
  • Deck machineries and lifting appliances control and emergency stops
  • Hatch covers operation
  • Mooring system

Engineering Officer

  • Main Engine start (from bridge, ECR and locally), changeover of Main Engine control
  • Generators (remote and local control, paralleling operation) and emergency diesel generator
  • Steering gear – Manual and changeover to Emergency mode
  • Oily water separator and engine room bilge system
  • Boilers
  • Purifiers
  • Main and emergency air compressors
  • Pumps start (Manual/Automatic/Stand-by)
  • Fuel and lub. oil transfer and bunkering procedure
  • M.E / D.G / Boiler fuel change
  • Engine room monitoring and alarm system
  • Restoring from electrical circuits trip
  • Quick closing valves and emergency shutdowns
  • Ballast system and ballast water management plan
  • IG system
  • Ventilation system
  • Deck machineries and lifting appliances control and emergency stops
  • Hatch covers operation

Deck Crew

  • Deck machineries and lifting appliances control and emergency stops
  • Hatch covers operation
  • Steering system
  • Mooring system
  • Cargo securing arrangement
  • Sounding arrangements of bilge and ballast

Engine Crew

  • Engine room equipment
  • Main and emergency air compressors
  • Quick closing valves and emergency shutdowns
  • Ballast system
  • Sounding arrangements of bilge

*Additional safety equipment as per vessel type: Polar Vessels, Oil Tankers, Chemical Tankers, Gas Tankers, Passenger Vessels, Helicopter operations, Fast Rescue Craft, Ro-Ro (Ventilation System), Ro-Ro Pax (Means of Access)

Familiarisation for a 100% change of crew requires extra attention. Bearing in mind all vessels are unique, Members should make sure they have the correct routine for their own vessels.
Source: West P&I Club


The global seaborne coal market has grown yet again, over the course of the first half of 2022, following the significant rise of 2021. In its latest weekly report, shipbroker Banchero Costa said that “following a disastrous 2020, with the world hit by lockdowns and recession pretty much everywhere, global seaborne coal trade managed to rebound to some extent in 2021. In the full 12 months of 2021, global seaborne coal exports increased by +4.5% y-o-y to 1149 mln tonnes, from 1099 mln tonnes in 2020, according to vessels tracking data from Refinitiv. This however was still well below the levels we had in pre-Covid times, being -10.0% down from the 1276 mln tonnes shipped during 2019. In the first half of 2022, global coal trade was a bit of a mixed picture. In the January to June period of 2022, global coal loadings increased by +1.5% y-o-y to 572.7 mln t, from 564.1 mln t in the first half of 2021, but still well below the 637.9 mln t in 1H 2019. However, the worst was at start of the year, and the trend in recent months has been very positive. In 1Q 2022, global coal loadings were down -5.1% y-o-y to just 258.5 mln t. In 2Q 2022, coal loadings were a strong +7.7% y-o-y at 314.2 mln t. The month of June 2022 was actually a record 111.6 mln t, +12.3% y-o-y.

 

Source: banchero costa &c s.p.a

According to the shipbroker, “the European Union is now the fifth largest seaborne importer of coal in the world, after India, China, Japan and South Korea. In 1H 2022, the EU accounted for 10.4% of global seaborne coal shipments. The EU’s seaborne coal imports in the 12 months of 2021 increased by +30.3% y-o-y to 87.1 mln tonnes. This was mostly a rebound from a massive -32.9% y-o-y decline in 2020 caused by Covid lockdowns. Previous years also saw a negative trend, with European coal imports declining by -18.3% y-o-y in 2019 and by -7.6% y-o-y in 2018, as European countries progressively abandon coal as a source of energy and embrace natural gas and renewables. In the first 6 months of 2022, coal imports into the EU further increased by +49.6% y-o-y to 57.6 mln tonnes. Europe accelerated its coal imports as a direct reaction to the threat of a reduction in gas supply from Russia. This compensated for the sharp drop in demand from Mainland China”.

Banchero Costa added that “in 1H 2022, China’s seaborne coal imports declined by -26.0% y-o-y to 87.8 mln t, from 118.6 mln t in the same period of 2021. The main coal import terminals in the European Union (27) are: Rotterdam in the Netherlands (14.6 mln tonnes discharged in 1H 2022), Amsterdam Netherlands (6.8 mln tonnes), Hamburg Germany (3.0 mln tonnes), Gdansk Poland (3.0), Gijon Spain (2.8), Dunkirk France (1.9), Fos France (1.9), Ljmuiden Netherlands (1.6), Ghent Belgium (1.2), Vlissingen Netherlands (1.2), Plonce Croatia (1.2), Taranto Italy (1.1), Wilhelmshaven Germany (1.1), Koper Slovenia (1.0), Antwerp (1.0), Algeciras Spain (0.8). In terms of sources of the shipments, Europe was and still now remains heavily dependant on Russia. In the whole of 2021, as much as 44% of the EU’s seaborne coal imports were sourced from Russia. In 1H 2022, as a result of the war in Ukraine, this proportion has declined. Nevertheless, Russia was still the source of 31.5% of the EU’s coal imports this year, and remains as the top supplier of coal to Europe. In 1H 2022, coal imports to the EU from Russia increased by +0.2% y-o-y to 18.2 mln tonnes. Of this, 9.1 mln tonnes were imported in the first quarter of 2022 (-1.6% y-oy), and 9.0 mln tonnes were imported in the second quarter (+2.1% y-o-y)”.

Source: banchero costa &c s.p.a

“The second most important supplier to Europe is now the USA, accounting for 19.4% of Europe’s imports in 1H 2022. In 1H 2022, imports from the USA surged by +91.6% y-o-y to 11.2 mln t. The third largest supplier to Europe is Australia, accounting for 17.6% of the EU’s seaborne imports in 1H 2022. In 1H 2022, imports from Australia increased +27.3% y-o-y to 10.2 mln t. In fourth place was Colombia, with a 12.7% share of Europe’s coal imports. In 1H 2022, 7.3 mln tonnes were imported from Colombia to the EU, up +113.6% y-o-y. In fifth place was South Africa, with a 5.6% share of Europe’s coal imports. In 1H 2022, the EU imported 3.2 mln tonnes from South Africa, up +764.4% y-o-y from just 0.4 mln t in 1H 2021”, the shipbroker concluded.
Nikos Roussanoglou, Hellenic Shipping News Worldwide


Tug BLUE DRAGON 12 suffered explosion and subsequently, sank, in the afternoon Jul 23 in Semoi Setawir, Sungai Sepaku river, upstream from Balikpapan, Eastern Kalimantan Makassar Strait, Indonesia. Of 12 people on board, 4 suffered burns (their condition unknown), 1 went missing, 7 escaped. The tug was waiting for barge Sea Dragon 2712 to be loaded with coal. There were wielding works taking place in stern area, shortly after works started an explosion came about.

New FleetMon Vessel Safety Risk Reports Available: https://www.fleetmon.com/services/vessel-risk-rating/


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED