eFuels are synthetic fuels that are generated from water and CO2 in a synthesis process using renewable energy sources. eFuels can replace fossil fuels and be used in most applications currently involving internal combustion engines. When eFuels are burned, they only give off the CO2 that is captured from the atmosphere to generate them. This means that their use is climate-neutral.

The debate on efficiency does nothing to achieve the aims of climate policy

Producing eFuels is energy intensive. Roughly 60 % of the cost of producing synthetic fuels is spent on the renewable electricity needed to extract the hydrogen via electrolysis. For this reason, eFuels are produced in parts of the world where conditions are particularly favourable for generating electricity from renewable sources of energy. These are generally sparsely populated regions with an abundant supply of sun and wind – as in the case of the Haru Oni project, run by HIF Global in Patagonia. On average, a wind turbine built there generates roughly four times as many full load hours as a renewable energy plant in Germany. If eFuels are produced in these preferred regions outside Europe, they do not compete with other users of Germany’s still scant supply of renewable electricity. Instead, the world’s large, unused potential sources of renewable energy can be tapped and made available around the globe in the form of eFuels. Chile, for instance, claims to have 70 times more potential renewable energy sources than it needs to meet its own energy demands. The situation is similar in other regions of North and South America, Africa and Australia. The argument that is commonly repeated without reflection – that eFuels are too inefficient in comparison with the direct use of electricity – thus obscures the question that really needs to be asked: How can we replace fossil fuels as quickly as possible, at the lowest possible cost? From a global perspective, the world does not lack the means to produce renewable energy in the long term; it has the problem that climate-friendly technologies cannot be developed in time to end our dependence on the fossil-derived energy sources that cause climate change and pose a threat to our power supply.

eFuels are not the costly “champagne of the energy transition”

There has been extensive research into the fundamentals of eFuels. The technology can be transferred to an industrial scale. Today, our members already sell eFuels from suitable regions with production costs between one and two euros per litre. In the long term, the price will fall below 1 euro a litre. eFuel prices of 4 to 10 euros are a myth and relate to eFuels produced in the lab and pilot research facilities. One key component of the retail price consumers have to pay is the Energy Taxation. This is currently being revised at the European level. The Commission has proposed clear tax advantages for eFuels that make up for almost all additional expenses. Moreover, eFuels can be admixed with fossil-derived fuels; when only small quantities are added, the initially higher production costs will have little effect on the retail price. Economies of scale mean that the production cost will fall over the long term, as we have seen in the case of wind power, photovoltaics and batteries. At the final count, the citizens will thus always remain able to heat their homes or run their cars at today’s levels.

eFuels are not a niche solution

Production has begun on an industrial scale, and many investment decisions have been, or are being made. From as soon as 2023, eFuels will become available in large quantities. As part of the Green Deal, the EU plans to bring in a mandatory quota of 2.6 to 5.7 % green hydrogen and eFuels in the European transport sector by 2030, which works out as the equivalent of 14 to 30 billion litres of diesel.

Fraunhofer IEE has studied the potential for green hydrogen and synthetic fuels, determining that up to 88,000 TWh of climate-neutral synthetic fuels could be produced outside Europe. That equates to almost three times the energy demand of the global transport sector (33,603 TWh in 2019).

Combining climate protection and energy security with eFuels

Whether it is in the aviation, shipping, rail, road and off-road sectors, the chemical industry or steel production, eFuels are used in every shape and form, from hydrogen to motor fuels, ammonia or naphtha, to meet climate targets and fight climate change. This cannot be achieved – that much is clear – with eFuels alone: in certain contexts, other technologies are of course employed, such as all-electric solutions (battery electric vehicles) or heat pumps. The more technological paths we can go down, the faster we can cut CO2 emissions and the more options are available to users. Moreover, the ultimate aim is also to be as cost-efficient as possible, so as to save resources and keep production or mobility as affordable as possible. For that reason, we support an approach that is open to different technological solutions and want to create an environment that permits as much competition as possible and requires as few regulatory interventions as necessary to achieve the climate targets. Adding 5 % of eFuels to the European fuel mix could save 60 million tonnes of CO2. At the same time, 70 % of Russian crude oil imports could be replaced. There is no technology that has only advantages or disadvantages. One-sided forms of dependence are never good, as we in Germany are currently painfully finding out. eFuels will thus help protect the climate while also safeguarding and diversifying our energy supply in the long term.
Source: eFuel Alliance e.V.

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


Following significant reduction in the threat of piracy in the Indian Ocean region, the maritime industry organisations have submitted a notification to the next meeting of IMO’s Maritime Safety Committee (MSC-106) which is scheduled to start on 31 October 2022.

As per the attached submission, it has been decided that the High-Risk Area (HRA) in the Indian Ocean will be removed at 0001 UTC on 1 January 2023.

Even though the piracy related incidents in the Indian Ocean have declined, the conflict in Yemen and increased tensions (especially off Strait of Hormuz and Persian Gulf) have introduced other security threats to vessels operating in the region.

Members trading in that region are strongly recommended to consult Maritime Global Security website, comply with BMP5 procedures and ensure that their ships are hardened prior to entering the HRA.

Members are also recommended to refer to the latest US Maritime Advisory for the region, register the ship’s transit on MSCHOA website and send daily reports to the UKMTO to ensure that the military is aware of their presence in the region, and use the Maritime Security Transit Corridor (MSTC) when transiting through the Gulf of Aden, Bab Al Mandeb, Southern Red Sea, and associated waters.

Source: https://www.standard-club.com/knowledge-news/removal-of-the-high-risk-area-hra-in-the-indian-ocean-from-1-january-2023-4552/

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


Global shipping container suppliers China International Marine Containers and Maersk Container Industry in a joint statement on Thursday said they have abandoned a merger plan, citing significant regulatory challenges.

China International Marine Containers (CIMC) in September had agreed to buy the Danish shipping company AP Moeller – Maersk’s refrigerated containers maker for $987.3 million.

The U.S. Justice Department said the deal would have combined two of the world’s four suppliers of refrigerated shipping containers and further concentrated the global cold supply chain.

The Justice Department said it “would also have consolidated control of over 90% of insulated container box and refrigerated shipping container production worldwide in Chinese state-owned or state-controlled entities.”

Assistant Attorney General Jonathan Kanter, who heads the Justice Department’s antitrust division, said the acquisition could have led to “higher prices, lower quality, and less resiliency in global supply chains” and “would have cemented CIMC’s dominant position in an already consolidated industry and eliminated MCI as an innovative, independent competitor.”

Germany’s Federal Cartel Office said in December it also had opened an investigation into the effects the takeover of Maersk Container Industry (MCI) by CIMC could have on markets.

Maersk said it was “unfortunate” the deal would not move forward, adding it “will now assess the best structural set-up to ensure the long-term development of the business.”

Founded by Maersk in 1991, MCI employs 2,300 people in China and Denmark.

Source: https://www.marinelink.com/news/shipping-container-suppliers-abandon-499026

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


James Helliwell, the winner of the Future Maritime Leaders essay competition, underlines the need to put human sustainability and seafarer safety at the forefront before introducing new zero emission fuels which bring new safety risks.

Imagine this: it’s 2030, you’re the engineer on duty in the control room of a new ship, powered with a zero-carbon fuel called ammonia. An alarm sounds. You check your control panel and you see you have a fire in your engine room and a gas leak in your main fuel system.

You race towards the back of your control room and grab your breathing apparatus. You pull on your HazMat suit. You pull the oxygen mask over your head and turn on the oxygen supply. Next, you look at each of your team members in turn, checking if they’ve got their own masks fitted correctly and their own oxygen supply turned on. Your team grabs the nearest fire extinguisher, and you sprint out of the control room towards the fire.

You get to the main engine and in the time, it has taken you to get your safety equipment on it is fully ablaze. Your team starts to fight the fire and after a short, hot battle you get the fire extinguished. But what about the fuel leak? You know there’s a leak, you can’t see it, and you know it will kill you. You start to switch on your gas detector when you notice one of your team is missing. As the smoke from the fire starts to clear up, you see your colleague and friend lying motionless on the floor. You notice that in the rush to go and fight the fire, they didn’t fit the seal on their oxygen mask properly and they died from inhaling ammonia.

This may sound like an overdramatized and unrealistic scenario, but this could be the future that our seafarers soon have to face. Even today, fires on conventional ships occur at an alarming rate. As reported by the International Institute of Marine Surveying, fires on containerships alone in 2020 occurred at a rate of one fire every two weeks.

The global maritime industry is in a marathon race to find a new zero-carbon fuel to tackle its emissions problem. That race is between two fuels: hydrogen and ammonia. Academics, industry leaders, regulators, and other key stakeholders debating the selection of a future fuel tend to limit discussions to practical items such as how to store each fuel, how to use it, and its impact on reducing emissions. Very rarely, if ever, do you hear mention of the impact of these fuels on our seafarers. The ramifications of changing to a zero-carbon fuel make some of the other human sustainability issues (working rights, wellbeing, and training) seem small in comparison.

Recent tests undertaken by the Department for Homeland Security in a desert in Utah show that just two tonnes release of ammonia remained harmful to human beings at a distance of over 800 meters away. Last year, an ammonia leak on a ship off the coast of Malaysia killed one and injured three crew members. Is this really something we want on our ships? Is hydrogen the alternative? Whilst hydrogen has its own safety challenges (high flammability and explosivity), these challenges are at least similar to the hazards of the hydrocarbon fuels we use today. With hydrogen, we can at least give our seafarers a chance in being able to respond to a hydrogen fire without fear of inhaling an invisible, toxic gas cloud.

So, what’s my point? As part of the drive to become a sustainable, low-emission industry, we can’t afford to overlook the human element in the selection of new fuels. Human sustainability needs to be put at the forefront of the decision to select a sustainable fuel. Leading stakeholders and thought leaders in our industry need to advocate for studies to be undertaken to look at how people onboard our ships interact with these new fuels. If there is a fuel leak, how will the engineer go and fix it? If there’s a fire, how do they go about fighting it? How would having an ammonia fuel onboard have changed the outcome of recent maritime incidents and disasters?

As an industry, we cannot walk blindly into choosing a new fuel purely on its carbon credentials without giving serious thought to the impact this may have on those onboard. A ship isn’t just a place of work, it’s a home for a family of people that live onboard for months at a time. Can people sleep safely in their beds at night with ammonia being pumped through piping just a few decks below? As an industry, we need to undertake the studies and research today to get to the answers to these questions.

The drive to decarbonize has the potential to be the biggest threat to ever face human sustainability. Whilst decarbonizing is vitally important, if we don’t get it right and chose the wrong fuel, every effort over the last century to improve wellbeing will have been in vain. We are at the precipice of selecting a fuel that can put thousands of people in direct harm. We need to do the research now, before it’s too late, to understand the impact these fuels have on people working every day on our ships.

Source: https://www.globalmaritimeforum.org/news/future-fuels-must-be-safe-to-seafarers

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


In April 2022, Global Maritime Forum called for young professionals across the global maritime industry to participate in this year’s Future Maritime Leaders essay competition. We asked them how the maritime industry may significantly improve its approach to human sustainability and what issues and challenges need to be addressed before 2030.

We received 188 essays from young maritime leaders from 27 different countries, with a large majority of them from Asia (74%). Countries with the most submissions included India (104 submissions), Philippines (19 submissions), and Greece (11 submissions). In terms of gender ratio, 32 participants were female and 156 were male.

Even if the essay participants came from both onshore and offshore, the vast majority of essays focused on human sustainability at sea. The essays focused on five themes: a broad discussion of human sustainability (44 essays), human wellbeing and human rights (44 essays), future skills & competences (21 essays), diversity, equity & inclusion (13 essays), and human safety (13 essays), and other (53 essays).

Addressing overall human sustainability – across topics

The human element is an essential condition for the global maritime industry to achieve the 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, in addition to the two major transformations of decarbonization and digitalization. Therefore, addressing human sustainability challenges is an imperative task for the global maritime industry.

In total, more than 40 essays discussed human sustainability more broadly, as an emerging call from young members of the industry – below the age of 30 – of much needed change following the ongoing crew change crisis, changing Covid-19 regulations, sexual harassment, piracy, human safety concerns, inadequate and outdated training setups, poor mental and physical health on board,  concerns of long working hours, payment issues and so on. Many essays have put the general wellbeing of seafarers at heart, paying attention to their limited personal and family time, crew health, skill gap, and their basic human rights.

Multiple essays call for cross-sector collaborative approaches to address the most urgent challenges.  Several young leaders for instance called for open digital platforms focused on improving human wellbeing, human rights, and for collectively working to upgrade skills and competences as well as foster a common culture aiming at collectively pursuing more safe working environments for all.

A strong focus on improving human wellbeing at sea – and securing human rights

The majority of the 44 essays addressing human rights and human wellbeing zoomed in on the current state of physical and mental health at sea. Fatigue, exhaustion, and burn-out was discussed in 12 essays, whilst the other 32 essays focused on the challenges posed by the crew change crisis, working hours, and shore leave. Many essays also pointed out that isolation from family, lack of rest time, stress, anxiety, and discrimination are making life at sea increasingly challenging. The lack of prevention and support for mental health issues, combined with poor internet access, are key challenges that need to be urgently and collectively addressed by the industry.

Multiple essays urged the industry to work together on collectively defining and identifying what kind of training is needed (for employees and their management) to ensure crew wellbeing with a particular focus on mental health. Notably the focus should be on how to ensure adequate prevention and response to stress, anxiety, crisis, and suicide thoughts. Practical proposals included the creation of a global mental health hotline, supported by an openly available online platform for training on mental health and human wellbeing to ensure adequate prevention and response.

Furthermore, several essays called for a much more flexible and fluid rotation between sea and shore as a means to improve on overall wellbeing, but more importantly to be able to address the changing needs amongst employees during different stages of their careers, especially when some seafarers would need to be located closer to home. Such proposals mostly focused on the importance of these rotations being implemented for sea-based personnel; but other essays also noted the value of sea-rotations for onshore personnel, which could help build and sustain a ‘one company’ culture between sea and shore.

Finally, in order to address the lack of compliance with work-rest regulations, an open, independent, and collective reporting system was proposed by three essays to ensure transparency on actual working and watch hours performed on board each vessel. One essay proposed the use of blockchain technology to adequately track working hours and payment data of seafarers, to secure fair payment and data validity.

Calling out the industry to improve on Diversity, Equity & Inclusion

Among the 13 essays discussing different aspects of diversity, equity, and Inclusion, gender imbalance at sea remains the predominant concern. Several essays call out the industry for discriminating female seafarers. Some companies are still reluctant to employ female seafarers, while multiple essays highlight the challenges of sexual harassment and safety threats faced by female seafarers. Other criticisms focused on companies failing to provide female cabins, sanitary bins, and proper personal protective equipment for female seafarers – and a generally safe environment for women on board ships. Other essays called out the industry for taking no responsibility in making it easier for seafarers to balance work and family – or start a family. Most essays pointed at the same root causes, including that the industry was built by and for male employees and that not enough effort has been put into making the industry more attractive to different types of employees.

Enhancing human safety at sea

Human safety was another important concern that was the primary focus of 13 essays, while also being addressed more broadly in multiple other essays. Working conditions on board, including noise, bright lights, heat, vessel movement, and rigid watch schedules, combined with intense and long work hours were pointed out to directly and indirectly lead to operational accidents that potentially endanger lives, property, and even the marine environment. Three essays specifically discussed the importance of crew safety on the journey towards decarbonization.

All 13 essays call for safer work environments for everyone, including female seafarers. Some essays called for better design of living spaces on board, as well as setting up recreational areas and improved social activities, in order to cope with safety risks caused by fatigue. Multiple essays further advocated to strengthen overall marine safety training and research as well as align maritime safety training standards with other international marine disciplines led by the IMO, while another essay highlighted psychological training and improved emergency drills to prepare seafarers for safety crisis. Two essays suggested a monitoring system for seafarers to report accidents, safety concerns, and violations like sexual harassment to an independent global entity to ensure seafarer’s wellbeing and a safe working environment.

Who will take charge for securing the necessary skills and competences of the future?

In the context of a rapidly evolving socio-economic and technological environment, outdated operational technologies in the maritime industry as well as skill gaps (both hard and soft skills) among maritime practitioners were discussed in more than 20 essays.

With young talents from Gen Z (1997-2012) and Millennials (1981-1996) amounting to more than 70% of the total global work force by 2030, the values of these younger generations and how they might clash with the traditional values of the maritime industry was discussed in seven essays. Not just in their approach to work in general, but in particular with their new skills and competences.

Several essays were concerned about the lack of digital skills and competences across the industry, and called for a more ambitious, collective focus on securing much needed upskilling across the board. Some essays proposed a more extended use of virtual reality technologies in training, education, and meeting activities overall, which they argue could enable more efficient and productive onboard communication. One essay suggested to incorporate coding and data analysis into overall maritime training to prepare young talents for digitalization and automation.

Advancing a people-centered future through collaborative effort

When looking at all the submitted essays, it is encouraging how human sustainability is not just an abstract concept for young talents below the age of 30 but is reflected in where they choose to seek employment and who they will eventually decide to work with and for. This is a shift we are already seeing now, with 80% of seafarers in a recent survey conducted by Sailor’s Society listing “how they treat seafarers” as the most important factor when choosing which shipping company to work for (for the remaining, 17% listed “pay” while 3% listed “access to Wi-Fi”).

Being able to provide a more humanly sustainable work environment before 2030, however, requires maritime industry leaders and policymakers to now engage further with these young professionals and changemakers in finding new and more ambitious ways to create a more ethical, human, and attractive maritime industry.

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


The Joint Coordination Center based in Turkey overseeing the export of grains from Ukraine announced a revision to the shipping route for the Black Sea Grain Initiative to further aid the movement of ships. As the first month of the program comes to a close, everyone agrees it has been a success and the latest effort is designed to further facilitate the safe movement of ships from the three Ukrainian ports.

“This route has been adjusted following an initial three weeks of operations. It allows for shorter transit in the maritime humanitarian corridor and easier planning for the shipping industry,” the JCC announced. The changes are effective immediately starting August 26.

The new route is 320 nautical miles long and connects the three Ukrainian ports, Odesa, Chornomorsk, and Yuzhny, with the inspection areas inside Turkish territorial waters. The JCC explains that the maritime humanitarian corridor, which makes part of this route, extends from the boundary of Ukrainian territorial seas to a southern waypoint. The new coordinates have been disseminated through the international navigation system NAVTEX with all vessels advised to alter this planning to follow the new path.

Under the UN-brokered agreement which is being implemented by Turkey, the JCC notes that “no military ship, aircraft, or unmanned aerial vehicle may approach within a radius of 10 nautical miles of any vessel engaged in the Initiative and transiting the corridor. The procedures state that any commercial vessel encountering provocations or threats while transiting the corridor should report immediately to the JCC.”

In the first three weeks of the program, data from the UN’s Black Sea Grain Initiative Joint Coordination Center shows that a total of 87 voyages have been approved by the JCC, with seven currently pending. A total of 39 voyages were approved outbound from the three ports. The majority of the vessels (23) are operating in and out of Chornomorsk with a total of 845,496 metric tons of foodstuffs having been exported from Ukraine. At the current pace of exports, they will approach the 1 million ton mark by the end of August.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres concluded his recent visit to Ukraine with a visit to first-hand see the export operations calling the food leaving Ukraine a vital supply to the world. “A powerful demonstration of what can be achieved, in even the most devastating of contexts, when we put people first,” he wrote in a social media posting.

In the last two and a half weeks, a total of 26 vessels have proceeded inbound to Ukraine with another 22 approved for the voyage and currently 14 have completed or are underway on their round trip after loading. Nearly two-thirds of the exports so far have been corn, but wheat is beginning to depart with already over 100,000 tons having been loaded for export. Other exports include soybeans, sugar beets, and sunflower seeds, oil, and meal.

As another demonstration of the importance of the efforts, the UN highlights that the exports have already gone to a dozen different countries. The list includes China, Djibouti, Egypt, Greece, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Republic of Korea, Romania, and Turkey.

The current pace of the operation shows that six to seven vessels a day are being inspected and cleared by the JCC in Turkey. Guterres call all aspects a success saying he was confident that it would make a critical difference in getting food supplies from Ukraine to impoverished nations.

 

JCC issued the revised route for the bulkers traveling to and from Ukraine

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/ukraine-black-sea-corridor-revised-to-make-passages-easier-and-shorter

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


Germany’s unionized port workers and the association representing the seaport operators agreed to terms for a new contract after one of the longest running labor disputes in Germany in decades. The tentative agreement came just three days before a cooling-off period imposed by the Hamburg Labor Court was due to expire and removes the threat of further strikes which have been disrupting operations in all the North Sea Ports since June.

“This is a very good result. Our most important goal was real inflation compensation so that employees were not left alone with the consequences of the galloping price increases. We succeeded in doing that,” said ver.di negotiator Maya Schwiegershausen-Güth after the final collective bargaining round which concluded on August 23. The union, which represents more than 12,000 workers including the major ports of Hamburg, Bremerhaven, and Wilhelmshaven, reports that it is recommending that members accept the agreement, which is due to be finalized on September 5.

The first of the so called “warning strikes” in decades was carried out by the union members on June 9 in an effort to put increased pressure on Zentralverband der deutschen Seehafenbetriebe (Association of German Seaport Operators) was talked stalled covering 58 collective bargaining agreements. In the following weeks, the trade union Ver.di (United Services Union) sought to escalate pressure further through a series of follow-up strikes.

The issue came to a head after seven failed rounds of negotiations when ZDS went to the labor court. Citing the broader damage to the economy and disruptions to the supply chain, the court ordered the two sides back to negotiating table and set a moratorium on further strikes until August 26.

According to the union, it took 10 rounds of negotiations but they finally reached mutually agreeable terms. Depending on their positions, workers in container operations will on average receive a 9.4 percent wage increase including bonuses retroactive to July 1. Workers at general cargo operations receive a smaller 7.9 percent increase including bonuses.  Effective June 1, 2023, they all will receive a further 4.4 percent increase that could be extended to 5.5 percent based on the rate of inflation next year. They also agreed if inflation is above those levels to commence further negotiations for the second year of the contract which expires May 31, 2024.

ZDS issued a brief statement at the conclusion of the negotiations saying it was pleased that the terms had been recommended for acceptance by the Federal Tariff Commission. They however noted that the terms also placed an increased burden on the seaport operators and would not only impact performance but also the competitiveness of the industry.

Compensation addressing the retail inflation rate had been one of the major sticking points during the negotiations much as it has also emerged as a key point in the negotiations in the UK. Workers at the UK’s Felixstowe struck this week over similar concerns while the workers at Liverpool have also authorized a strike focusing on compensation that matches the rate of inflation.

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/german-ports-and-workers-agree-to-terms-to-end-three-months-of-strikes

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


Russian river-sea product tanker KARAKUZ collided with small boat in Dardanelles off Burhanli at around 1800 UTC Aug 25, while transiting the Strait in southern direction, en route from Novorossiysk to Perama, Greece. 2 people in boat weren’t injured, boat sustained some damages. Tanker moved further south and was anchored at Kumkale anchorage, southern Dardanelles. Remained at anchor as of 0330 UTC Aug 26.

Source: https://www.fleetmon.com/maritime-news/2022/39297/russian-tanker-collided-boat-dardanelles/

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


The use of biofuel continues to expand across the shipping industry with TotalEnergies Marine Fuels reporting it completed both the first refueling of a COSCO Shipping Lines containership with sustainable marine biofuel in Singapore as well as its first fueling for a containership. The refueling, which was completed last month, comes as competing suppliers seek to expand the availability of biofuel in Singapore, which is the world’s largest bunker market.

The 4,250 TEU containership COSCO Houston was bunkered with TotalEnergies-supplied biofuel in Singapore waters, with a ship-to-ship transfer on July 11. The 49,900 dwt vessel, which was built 10 years ago, was supplied with Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil (VLSFO) blended with 20 percent second-generation, waste-based and ISCC-certified Used Cooking Oil Methyl Ester (UCOME). The vessel was sailing to Jakarta, Indonesia and as with others that have been supplied with the biofuel blend, it was able to use the fuel without any modifications to its fuel systems.

Total estimated that from a well-to-wake assessment, the biofuel will reduce GHG emissions by approximately 17 percent compared with conventional fuel oil. The use of biofuels was supported by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) and the involvement of local partners such as tank storage company, Vopak Terminals Singapore at Penjuru.

“This milestone bio-bunkering operation also further validates the important role of biofuels in decarbonizing conventional marine fuels, and the potential greenhouse gas reduction gains it can bring to existing vessels,” said Laura Ong, General Manager of Trading and Operations for Asia Pacific for TotalEnergies Marine Fuels.

Total started its biofuel operations in Singapore in March 2022 with the fueling of the MT Friendship, a 177,000 dwt bulk carrier owned by Seanergy Maritime Holdings and chartered by NYK Line to transport cargo provided by Anglo American. She was loaded with a 10 percent blend that was used during her two-way voyage between Singapore and South Africa. This was followed by the bunkering of a MOL-operated 19,900 dwt car and truck carrier, Heroic Ace. Like the COSCO containership, the car carrier received the second-generation 20 percent blend.

While biofuel has primarily been available in Europe, the competition for the fuel is starting to grow in Singapore. In July, a partnership between biofuel manufacturer GoodFuels and Japan’s ITOCHU also completed their first bunkering operation in Singapore. They supplied a blended VLSFO to the 12-year-old, 179,376 dwt bulker, the Frontier Explorer, during its port call on July 5 while it was sailing from Australia to India.

The emergence of biofuels in Singapore is seen as a clear sign that it is becoming an accepted near-term alternative that permits shipping companies to take immediate first steps at reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Many of the leading shipping companies have tested biofuel with all the results showing that it is a viable option for the world’s in-service fleets.

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/biofuel-competition-in-singapore-as-totalenergies-fuels-cosco-boxship

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


A recent study published by the US Army War College looks at how geography constrained the Soviet military presence in the Indian Ocean and the lessons that can be drawn for China’s efforts to become an Indian Ocean power.

Geography has a big impact on the strategic dynamics of the Indian Ocean. It is largely enclosed on three sides with few maritime entry points. The Himalayas also cut off much of the Eurasian hinterland from access to the sea.

This makes it hard for militaries to get access. The semi-enclosed geography of the Indian Ocean creates a premium for naval powers that control the maritime chokepoints and the limited number of deep-water ports for essential logistical support.

There are similar constraints in projecting airpower. Aircraft can access Indian Ocean airspace from, say, Chinese territory only by flying over other countries. Within the region, the sheer size of the Indian Ocean makes it essential to have a network of local airfields for staging and support.

In the Cold War, the Soviets struggled to overcome these constraints. The Soviet Union had no direct access to the Indian Ocean by sea or air and few reliable regional partners. Its navy had to deploy to the Indian Ocean mostly from the Pacific, transiting the straits through Southeast Asia where vessels were subject to interdiction and tracking.

This had a significant impact on the Soviet naval presence. The long transit from Vladivostok to the Arabian Gulf meant that keeping one vessel on station required ships to spend around a third of their time in transit. Long transits also limited the deployment of smaller vessels. Logistical requirements meant that a majority of deployed Soviet vessels were support and other auxiliary vessels.

There were strong imperatives to obtain local bases. The Soviet Navy developed several facilities around the Horn of Africa, and where onshore support wasn’t available, they relied on floating bases in international waters. The quest for bases was pursued opportunistically and often meant relying on politically unstable partners. Access was far from guaranteed and they were evicted from several bases.

Although Soviet ships often outnumbered the US Navy’s in the Indian Ocean, the Soviet Navy didn’t achieve meaningful or lasting naval superiority across the region. The naval balance in favor of the Soviets was quickly reversed in times of crisis.

The composition of the Soviet fleet also differed considerably from the US’s with a large number of auxiliary vessels, including intelligence and research ships.

The Soviet air presence developed with several years’ lag. Operational access was also geographically constrained. Flight distances into the region were long, and aircraft operating from Soviet territory had to fly over other countries. This created a premium for access to local air bases.

The geographic constraints faced by China in the Indian Ocean mirror those faced by the Soviet Union.

For China, the Indian Ocean has secondary importance compared with the Pacific. But Beijing still has several strategic imperatives or missions in the Indian Ocean, starting with the protection of its crucial ocean supply lines for energy. But other missions are just as important in influencing the composition, size and locations of the Chinese military presence. These include protecting Chinese citizens and investments, bolstering soft-power influence, countering terrorism, collecting intelligence, supporting coercive diplomacy towards small countries, and enabling operations in a conflict environment. The People’s Liberation Army must be capable of responding to a range of contingencies.

The PLA Navy has a leading role in the PLA’s Indian Ocean presence, reflecting the imperatives of protecting supply lines and the political advantages of a relatively transient naval footprint.

The size and composition of Chinese naval deployments to the Indian Ocean have evolved. They now include an antipiracy taskforce, hydrographic-survey and intelligence-collection vessels, and submarines. But, although the presence has grown, China has so far been relatively incremental in its approach.

It’s possible that the PLA Navy’s presence could come to resemble the US Navy’s, if Beijing wants to protect the entirety of its Indian Ocean supply lines. That would be a major undertaking, requiring the sustained deployment of large numbers of vessels, including aircraft carriers and submarines, as well as land-based aircraft. It would require multiple naval and air bases in the region.

But Beijing may judge that protecting its supply lines against the US and India is impracticable. It may choose to focus on the Pacific while pursuing limited objectives in the Indian Ocean.

The PLA Navy’s presence in the Indian Ocean over the past decade has focused overwhelmingly on antipiracy, intelligence and naval diplomacy. These will likely continue to be a major focus and might evolve to include limited, coercive diplomacy (for example, disputes over fishing rights), as has been the case elsewhere. PLA Navy assets might be supplemented by vessels from other maritime agencies.

China may also develop additional capabilities to create local superiority; respond to a limited distant blockade; provide support for local interventions; or undertake limited sea-denial operations. All of these missions would be broadly analogous to the Soviet Union’s Indian Ocean strategy. These could provide options to respond to certain contingencies at a fraction of the cost of a full sea-control strategy.

As with the Soviets, constraints on China’s access create imperatives for local support facilities. But the nature and extent of China’s basing requirements would also depend on its overall strategy. Many needs could be satisfied by relying on a ‘places not bases’ approach of using commercial facilities while minimising the need for dedicated bases. But any significant and sustained Chinese naval presence in the Indian Ocean would likely require dedicated support facilities comparable to traditional bases.

China’s approach to securing local facilities is much more deliberate and comprehensive compared with the Soviet approach. China may be seeking to build what some analysts call strategic strong points as part of a network of supply, logistics and intelligence hubs across the Indian Ocean.

But whether that would yield assured access to support facilities under wartime conditions is uncertain. Despite many ‘feelers’ for facilities in the Indian Ocean region, no potential host country has offered permanent facilities to the PLA Navy (with the exception of Djibouti). Indeed, several potential hosts have pushed back on proposed port developments.

The port at Gwadar, Pakistan, is often identified as the most likely location of another Chinese naval base in the northwestern Indian Ocean (although it has not been used by the PLA). But any comprehensive Chinese naval presence would likely also require assured access to facilities in the southwestern, central and eastern Indian Ocean.

China also needs to develop its regional airpower capabilities. Support for sustained naval operations would require substantial airpower, including maritime surveillance and strike aircraft. But the PLA Air Force doesn’t have assured airfield access in the Indian Ocean, although it could potentially use the new 3,400-meter airfield at Dara Sakor, Cambodia. China’s lack of air capabilities in the Indian Ocean places it at a major tactical disadvantage. That could become a bottleneck limiting the PLA’s strategic power projection.

One clear lesson from the Cold War is that securing local bases can be costly and uncertain. China’s relationships with Pakistan and Sri Lanka demonstrate how much Beijing has to spend, even without securing assured access. Like the Soviet Union, China may find that relationships with some countries—particularly, corrupt and autocratic regimes—are less than reliable.

The Soviet experience also suggests that the size and composition of the PLA in the Indian Ocean will principally be a function of China’s unique interests in the region. It should not be assumed that China’s future military presence and security relationships will necessarily resemble those of the US.

 

CREWEXPRESS STCW REST HOURS SOFTWARE - Paris and Tokyo MoU have announced that they will jointly launch a new Concentrated Inspection Campaign (CIC) on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW) from 1st September 2022 to 30th November 2022


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED