IMDG code amendments (42-24) – MSC.556(108)

These amendments to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) code are in line with the 23rd edition of the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, and will enter into force on 1 January 2026. However, some contracting governments may apply these amendments (or parts thereof) on a voluntary basis from 1 January 2025. A summary of the significant changes are listed below for reference:

  • Lithium batteries continue to be a major focus, given their widespread use and associated risks. Key changes include:
    • Lithium cells and batteries are now more prominently classified under “articles containing dangerous goods, N.O.S. (Not Otherwise Specified).”
    • All lithium batteries must meet the stringent testing requirements outlined in the Manual of Tests and Criteria, including for pre-production prototypes.
    • New entries under Class 9 have been introduced:
      • 3556: Vehicle, lithium-ion battery powered.
      • 3557: Vehicle, lithium-metal battery powered.
    • Damaged or defective lithium batteries must be removed from articles and packaged separately under specialized instructions.
    • UN 3171 has been revised to exclude lithium batteries, applying now only to vehicles powered by wet batteries, metallic sodium batteries, or sodium alloy batteries.
  • Charcoal and Carbon cargoes: Changes in this category aim to reduce the risk of misdeclared shipments and fire hazards:
    • Special Provisions (SP) 925 and 223, which previously exempted some carbon products, are no longer applicable.
    • New provisions (SP 978 and SP 979) introduce stricter rules for packaging, stowage, and maintaining safe temperatures during transport.
  • Sodium-ion batteries, gaining popularity as an alternative to lithium-ion batteries, are now officially classified under Class 9. This ensures they adhere to the same safety standards, including testing and stowage requirements, to ensure safety during transport.
  • Expanded Definitions and Documentation Requirements: Improved clarity in definitions and documentation is another focus area:
    • Recycled plastics must now include detailed information about their previous use and contents as part of quality assurance programs.
    • New definitions, such as ‘Degree of Filling’, ‘Explosive or Pyrotechnic Effect’ and ‘Metal Powders’, have been introduced.
    • Stowage plans must be more detailed, clearly outlining both primary and subsidiary hazards, ensuring that everyone handling the cargo understands the risks involved.
    • Data loggers and tracking devices used with cargo must now be securely installed to prevent damage during transit.
  • Packaging and Labelling Enhancements:
    • For vehicles equipped with lithium batteries, additional packaging is not required if they are stable and secure for transport. For other cases, specialized bracing or framing may be needed.
    • Labelling and marking requirements have been strengthened to ensure all hazards are clearly visible and easy to identify, even for items in fully enclosed packaging.

Members involved in the transport of dangerous goods in packaged from a recommended to ensure compliance with the latest amendments.

IMSBC code amendments (07-23) – MSC.539(107)

Updates to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) code, which has been applicable on a voluntary basis since 1 January 2024, will enter into force on 1 January 2025. These include, but are not limited to, the following changes:

  • The shippers are now required to declare the ‘bulk density’ of cargo, as required by SOLAS regulation XII/10 (MSC.1/Circ.1664).
  • The following changes have been affected in Appendix 1 (individual schedule of solid bulk cargoes):
    • New cargo entries
Bulk cargo shipping name (BCSN) Group Hazard
BARYTE, FLOTATION CHEMICAL GRADE A  
BROWN FUSED ALUMINA C  
CRUSHED GRANODIORITE FINES A  
DIRECT REDUCED IRON (D) (By-product fines with a moisture content of at least 2%) A and B MHB (WF and/or SH)
DUNITE C  
DUNITE FINES A  
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST, PELLETIZED A and B MHB (TX and CR)
GROUND GRANULATED BLAST FURNACE SLAG POWDER A  
MAGNESITE FINES A  
POTASSIUM NITRATE C  
SODIUM NITRATE C  
SODIUM NITRATE AND POTASSIUM NITRATE MIXTURE C  
CELESTINE CONCENTRATE (under Mineral Concentrates schedule) A  
FISH MEAL (FISH SCRAP), STABLISIZED ANTI-OXIDANT TREATED B MHB (SH)
  • Deleted cargoes from the solid bulk cargo list:
Bulk cargo shipping name (BCSN) Group Hazard
FISH MEAL (FISH SCRAP), STABILIZED UN 2216 ANTI-OXIDANT TREATED B This cargo has effectively been reclassified from Class 9 dangerous goods to an MHB cargo. The IMSBC Code carriage requirements remain the same, but ships will no longer require a dangerous goods certificate to carry the cargo.
  • The list of non-cohesive cargoes (Appendix 3 of the IMSBC Code) has been amended to include the following cargoes:
    • BARYTE, FLOTATION CHEMICAL GRADE
    • CRUSHED GRANODIORITE FINES
    • DUNITE
    • DUNITE FINES
    • ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST, PELLETIZED
    • POTASSIUM NITRATE
    • SODIUM NITRATE
    • SODIUM NITRATE AND POTASSIUM NITRATE MIXTURE
    • SUPERPHOSPHATE

This means that the angle of repose for the above cargoes must be determined prior to loading so that the relevant trimming provisions under section 5 of the IMSBC Code are applied accordingly.

  • The list of Solid Bulk Cargoes for which a Fixed Gas Fire Extinguishing System may be exempted has been updated to its 6th revision to include the new cargo “ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST, PELLETIZED” that can be exempted from having a fixed CO2 fire-fighting installation on board ships (MSC.1/Circ.1395/Rev.6).

Members involved in transporting solid bulk cargoes are recommended to ensure compliance with the latest IMSBC Code amendments.

Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code on Electronic Seafarers’ Certificates – MSC.540(107) & MSC.541(107)

To support the global digitalisation trend, these amendments to the STCW Convention (regulations I/1 and I/2) and STCW Code (section A-I/2) allow seafarers’ certification to be issued in electronic form and specify the minimum information that must be included on these certificates.

Members are recommended to refer to the MSC.1/Circ.1665 for guidelines on the use of electronic certificates of seafarers.

Amendments to MARPOL Annex I, Regulations 15.3, 15.5 and 34.3 to 34.5, on the establishment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden as Special Areas – MEPC.381(80)

Due to their significant marine ecological and environmental conditions, as well as their importance as a major route for maritime commerce, the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden regions were recognised as a ‘Special Area’ under regulation 1.11 of MARPOL Annex I. However, for the ‘Special Area’ status to take effect, adequate reception facilities had to be provided in the relevant ports of the coastal State Parties.

MEPC-80 confirmed that States in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden areas, such as Djibouti, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Sudan, now provide adequate reception facilities and arrangements, including treatment facilities for oily wastes and residues at ports and terminals in these areas. Accordingly, the effective date for MARPOL Annex I Special Areas in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden is set to be 1 January 2025.

Members with ships of 400 GT and above are advised that from 1 January 2025, the discharge of oil or oily mixtures into the sea will be prohibited within this region, except under the following conditions:

  1. The ship is enroute.
  2. The oily mixture has been processed through oil filtering equipment that meets the requirements of regulation 14.7 of Annex I.
  3. The oil content of the effluent, without dilution, does not exceed 15 parts per million.
  4. The oily mixture does not originate from cargo pump room bilges on oil tankers.
  5. In the case of oil tankers, the oily mixture is not mixed with oil cargo residues.
    • Fuel consumption per consumer, both while underway and at anchor

Additionally, members operating oil tankers in this region are informed that from 1 January 2025, any discharge of oil or oily mixtures from the cargo area of an oil tanker will be prohibited while in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Special Areas. This requirement does not apply to the discharge of clean or segregated ballast.

Amendments to MARPOL Annex V, Regulation 6, on the establishment of the Red Sea as Special Areas – MEPC.382(80)

The Red Sea area was recognised as a Special Area under Annex V (regulation 1.14.4) of MARPOL. However, for the ‘Special Area’ status to be effective, adequate reception facilities had to be provided in the relevant ports of the coastal State Parties.

At MEPC-80, the special area status was confirmed based on information about the necessary reception facilities for MARPOL Annex V wastes and residues at all ports and terminals in the region.

Members with ships transiting through the Red Sea area are advised that from 1 January 2025, the discharge of garbage into the sea shall only be permitted while the ship is enroute and in accordance with Regulation 6 (Discharge of garbage within special areas) of MARPOL Annex V.

 

SOURCE : https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/news/article/imo-regulatory-update-2025/


MARPOL Annex VI

Emissions Control Ara (ECA)

Effective from 1st May 2025, the Mediterranean sea will become part of an emissions control area under the IMO, reference MEPC.261(79). Vessels transiting this area will now require adherence to ECA regulations on sulphur oxides and particulate matter, burning compliant fuels of 0.1% Sulphur or having an approved EGCS in place. Vessels will need to obtain clear bunker delivery notes stating the sulphur content as well as recording this accurately into the Oil Record Book Part I.  Vessels will require a written procedure describing how the fuel changeover is to be carried out, taking into consideration the time taken to entirely change over to compliant fuel within the complete fuel system pipelines.

Further Amendments

Further amendments have been made to MARPOL Annex VI as per IMO resolution MEPC.385(81) which will come into force on 1st August 2025.

  • Regulations 2, 14 and Appendix I has been revised to bring clarity to the definition of gas fuels as well as stating that the onboard sampling points do not apply to gas/low flashpoint fuels.
  • Regulation 18 has been revised to include gas/low flashpoint fuels into the bunker delivery note (BDN) requirements. Vessels operating on gas/low flashpoint fuels should ensure the BDN received includes all required information as per Appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI.
  • Regulation 13.2.2 clarifies that replacing a steam engine with a diesel engine is considered a major conversion. Replacement engines must comply with Regulation 13 for Nitrogen Oxides. In the event that a Tier III engine is not possible, a Tier II engine can be used in line with resolution MEPC.396(81). The flag administration must report this to the IMO.
  • Regulation 27 – Amendments to this regulation allow the IMO to share ships fuel oil consumption data with analytical consultancies and research entities with the companies consent under strict confidentiality. Additionally, Appendix IX has been updated for the information to be submitted to the IMO. This allows for further granularity regarding fuel consumption and voyage data. Vessels over 5000GT should ensure their SEEMP Part II, for data collection, is modified to meet the new updates.

The International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee has recently formally adopted new amendments to its Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) regulations.  and will require mandatory reporting of all containers lost at sea from 1st January 2026.

SOLAS Regulation 31 now mandates that the master of a ship involved in the loss of containers must immediately reports specific details to nearby ships, the nearest coastal state, and the vessel’s flag state. The flag state is then responsible for passing this information to the IMO via a new module in the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS). SOLAS Regulation 32 outlines the reporting process, stipulating that reports of containers lost at sea must be made as soon as possible, with updates provided as more information becomes available. A final count of lost containers must be confirmed after a thorough inspection. Mandatory details include the position of the lost containers, the number lost, and whether any contained dangerous goods.

 

Source: The Loadstar


Notice to: Ship Owners / Managers/ Operators / Surveyors / Auditors

This Circular is issued to advise that IMO Resolutions MSC.540(107) and MSC.541(107) entered into force on 01 January 2025. Both these Resolutions concern amendments to the International Convention and the Code on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW).

Regulation I/1 of the STCW Convention – Definitions and clarifications

A new definition has been added:

  • Original form means a paper or an electronic form of any certificate required by the Convention, issued in the format approved by the Administration, provided that the minimum information, as required in paragraph 4 of section A-I/2 of the STCW Code, is readily available.”

 

Regulation I/2 of the STCW Convention – Certificates and Endorsements

Paragraph 11 has been replaced by:

  • Subject to the provisions of regulation I/10, paragraph 5, any certificate required by the Convention must be kept available in its original form on board the ship on which the holder is serving. If an electronic form is used, the minimum required data must be accessible as defined by the Administration in accordance with the STCW Code, which is necessary to initiate a verification procedure.”

 

Section A-I/2 of the STCW Code – Certificates and endorsements

Paragraph 4 has been replaced by:

  • In using formats which may be different from those set forth in this section, pursuant to regulation I/2, paragraph 10, Parties shall ensure that in all cases:
    1. all information relating to the identity and personal description of the holder, including name, date of birth, photograph and signature, along with the date on which the document was issued, shall be displayed on the same side of the documents;
    2. all information relating to the capacity or capacities in which the holder is entitled to serve, in accordance with the applicable safe manning requirements of the Administration, as well as any limitations, shall be prominently displayed and easily identified;
    3. the terms “front”, “back” and “overleaf”, as referred to in these provisions, are not applicable for certificates and endorsements in electronic form; and
    4. an official seal, photograph and signature of seafarer are not necessary for certificates and endorsements in electronic form.”

Act now

Ship Owners/ Managers/ Operators/ Surveyors/ Auditors should note the above and be guided accordingly.

Source : Dromon Bureau of Shipping (DBS) – Home

crewexpress stcw rest hours software


The U.S. Coast Guard proposes to update its maritime security regulations by adding regulations specifically focused on establishing minimum cybersecurity requirements for U.S.-flagged vessels, Outer Continental Shelf facilities, and U.S. facilities subject to the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 regulations. This proposed rule would help to address current and emerging cybersecurity threats in the marine transportation system. In this Maritime Matters: The Marinelink Podcast, we host a live panel discussion with five experts from the Coast Guard, classification, vessel owners and connectivity leaders to discuss what the rules may look like, as well as what work boat owners should do now to protect themselves, and the consequences not preparing.

Source : https://www.marinelink.com/news/cyber-security-maritime-sector-need-know-520822

Cyber Security Manual


DALL·E-2025-01-10-15.48.45-A-professional-depiction-of-a-crew-member-onboard-a-modern-commercial-vessel-sitting-at-a-desk-in-front-of-a-computer.-The-setting-includes-nautical-e.png

A three-year exhaustive study has shown that the structures supporting the implementation of work/rest regulations at sea are being broken, with nearly two-thirds of seafarers adjusting their work/rest records.

Under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC), a seafarer has the right to regulated work and rest. A three-year exhaustive study has revealed that the structures supporting the implementation of work/rest regulations at sea are breaking down, with nearly two-thirds of seafarers adjusting their work/rest records. Under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC), a seafarer has the right to regulated work and rest hours. Hours of work are defined as either maximum or minimum hours of rest. The maximum work hours must not exceed 14 hours in any 24 hours and 72 hours in any seven days. The minimum hours of rest must be at least 10 hours in any 24 hours and 77 hours in any seven days.

A record of a seafarer’s daily hours of rest or work must be kept onboard in the ship’s working language and English, signed by the seafarer and the master or other authorized person, with a copy provided to the seafarer. In his PhD dissertation for the World Maritime University, funded through support from the ITF Seafarers’ Trust, Bikram Bhatia surveyed 6,304 seafarers, interviewed 55 port state control (PSC) officers, and analyzed data from 16,551 PSC inspections. The research findings include that 64.3% of seafarers adjusted their work/rest records, while PSC officers needed help to detect non-compliance.

More concerning is the coercion from shore-based management. 66.7% of respondents had their reports questioned by their company, 60.1% felt compelled to adjust their reports, and 49.1% were explicitly instructed to do so. The high compliance rates reported by PSC inspections mask the reality of seafarers’ non-compliance, creating what Bhatia describes as a “false narrative at policy levels.”

Reconciling wellness with excessive demands seems implausible, suggested Steven Jones, founder of the Seafarers Happiness Index, in a recent article for Splash. “Crews face overwhelming demands while grappling with chronic underreporting of work hours and the threat of punishment for infractions,” Jones argued, adding: “Seafarers face a difficult choice: being honest about overwork can lead to punishment, while dishonesty may allow them to escape consequences, this creates a troubling lack of incentive for proper, effective, open, and transparent recording of work hours.”

Souce: Splash 247

crewexpress stcw rest hours software


DALL·E-2025-01-10-10.42.04-A-visually-appealing-illustration-showcasing-maritime-inventory-and-hazardous-material-maintenance.-The-image-features-a-ships-deck-with-organized-in.png

On June 26, 2025, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) will implement the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (Hong Kong Convention). This pivotal treaty aims to regulate ship recycling practices, prioritizing the safety of workers and the protection of the environment from risks associated with hazardous materials found on ships.

Improper handling of hazardous substances can lead to severe health issues and environmental degradation, including oil spills, toxic leaks, and contamination of soil and water. Such consequences pose a threat to marine life, local ecosystems, and even vital water supplies for human consumption.

Annually, around 500 commercial vessels conclude their operational life and undergo dismantling for recycling. The Hong Kong Convention mandates that ships exceeding 500 gross tonnage (GT) maintain an Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM). This inventory serves as a detailed record of hazardous substances onboard, such as asbestos and heavy metals, ensuring proper handling and disposal during the recycling process.

With the convention’s enforcement, ships over 500 GT must prepare and have an IHM approved by the implementation date. This requirement applies to vessels registered under countries that have ratified the treaty. Flag Administrators are tasked with ensuring compliance, and the convention outlines specific hazardous materials that must be managed, including asbestos, heavy metals, chromium-6, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Proper identification and control of these materials are vital to reducing risks during ship dismantling.

Historically, the ship recycling industry has witnessed numerous incidents due to inadequate safety measures. The HKC seeks to address these issues by enforcing regulations and requiring the IHM, a critical tool for promoting best practices in hazardous materials management across the shipping and recycling sectors.

The IHM involves several stages throughout a ship’s lifecycle:

  • Approval and Certification (PART I): Creating and certifying the initial inventory.
  • Maintenance and Renewal: Updating the inventory at regular intervals, typically every five years.
  • Dismantling and Recycling (PART II and III): Managing final inventories during the shipbreaking process.

Certified hazardous materials (HAZMAT) inspectors are responsible for conducting these assessments and providing guidance to shipowners on compliance. When hazardous substances are identified, remediation can be undertaken with professional oversight, including the substitution of non-hazardous materials.

As the enforcement date of the Hong Kong Convention approaches, it marks a significant step towards safer ship recycling practices and the preservation of marine environments. Comprehensive IHM implementation ensures that vessels are dismantled responsibly, minimizing risks to workers and the environment. By monitoring hazardous materials throughout a ship’s operational life, the maritime industry demonstrates its commitment to sustainability and public well-being. The convention and its associated measures stand as a testament to the industry’s dedication to fostering safer and more sustainable practices worldwide.

SHIPIP INVENTORY OF HAZARDOUS MATERILA MAINTENANCE


New Requirements for Ballast Water Record Books (BWRBs)

Starting in 2025, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) will implement two resolutions introducing changes to ballast water record-keeping and electronic record book approval. These updates aim to streamline compliance with the Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention and clarify record-keeping practices for ship operators.

Key Changes Effective 1 February 2025

From 1 February 2025, updated guidelines for ballast water (BW) record-keeping will come into effect, as outlined in Circular BWM.2/Circ.80. These updates are intended to simplify the process for ship crews and include:

  1. An updated example of a ballast water reporting form (Appendix II).
  2. A voluntary tank-by-tank logging form for ballast water operations.
  3. Guidance for logging operations under challenging water quality conditions (from Circular BWM.2/Circ.80/Rev.1).

Additionally, the BWM Convention’s Appendix II has been revised by Resolution MEPC.369(80), introducing a new BWRB format. As of February 2025, all vessels with an approved BWM plan will need to:

  • Record ballast water operations using the updated codes (A to H) and item numbers specified in MEPC.369(80).
  • Ensure the new BWRB format is used for all record-keeping in compliance with Circular BWM.2/Circ.80.

Crews should become familiar with these changes, as compliance will be required by both port state and flag administrations. Importantly, the BWRB format can be updated without necessitating amendments to the Ballast Water Management Plan (BWMP), meaning no re-approval of the BWMP is expected.

Key Changes Effective 1 October 2025

From 1 October 2025, the use of electronic ballast water record books (e-BWRBs) will become mandatory when replacing hard copy versions. Regulation B-2 of the BWM Convention now permits e-BWRBs, with guidelines for their implementation detailed in Resolution MEPC.372(80). This change includes:

  1. Approval of Electronic Record Books: Electronic BWRBs must meet IMO guidelines and receive approval.
  2. Ship-Specific Declarations: A declaration must be carried on board to confirm the installation of the electronic system complies with IMO standards. This declaration must be issued by the ship’s flag administration or an authorized body.

Some flag administrations have already approved early implementation of e-BWRBs, allowing ships to transition before October 2025.

Preparing for Compliance

Ship operators should take the following actions to meet the new requirements:

  1. Update Record Books: Ensure ballast water record books comply with the new requirements effective from 1 February 2025.
  2. Approve Electronic Systems: Verify that any electronic record-keeping system meets IMO guidelines and is approved by the relevant authority.
  3. Obtain Declarations: Acquire ship-specific declarations for electronic BWRBs by 1 October 2025 or earlier, depending on flag administration policies.
  4. Request Surveys: Schedule surveys to ensure compliance with the new electronic record-keeping requirements, if applicable.

Resources and References

For further information, the following IMO documents and guidelines are recommended:

  • MEPC.369(80): Amendments to Appendix II of the BWM Convention (BWRB format).
  • BWM.2/Circ.80: Guidance on ballast water record-keeping and reporting.
  • MEPC.372(80): Guidelines for the use of electronic record books under the BWM Convention.
  • MEPC.383(81): Amendments to Regulations A-1 and B-2 of the BWM Convention regarding electronic record books.


The international maritime community is placing significant emphasis on addressing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, with Port State Control (PSC) inspections focusing heavily on compliance. Certification for Engine International Air Pollution Prevention (EIAPP) and proper documentation practices have become critical as several ships have faced detention due to non-compliance.

Authorities are conducting thorough inspections of NOx Technical Files and Engine Parameter Records to verify alignment between on-board equipment and official documentation.

Over recent months, inspectors have flagged numerous deficiencies during PSC examinations, resulting in detentions. These inspections often involve checking spare parts for compliance with IMO identification requirements and may escalate to in-depth inspections, including the disassembly of diesel generators, if irregularities are suspected.

Frequent Issues Identified

Common deficiencies observed during PSC inspections include:

Code Deficiency Comments
14601 Missing or incomplete Technical Files NOx Technical File for main engine and generators was unavailable during the inspection.
14602 Incomplete Engine Parameter Records Records were missing details about the replacement of injection pump cylinder no. 1, as required by the NOx Technical File.
14606 Engine air pollution control Certain engine components, such as the charge air cooler, lacked required IMO identification numbers specified in the NOx Technical File.

Key Challenges

Past detentions were often attributed to missing documentation, incomplete records, or parts lacking proper identification. In many cases, misunderstandings or insufficient on-board procedures contributed to these shortcomings.

Preparing for PSC Inspections

To avoid detentions and ensure compliance, the following measures should be implemented:

  1. Maintain Original Documentation
    Ensure NOx Technical Files and EIAPP certificates are available on board in their original or authorized digital format. If any documents are missing, contact the engine manufacturer or relevant authority for replacements.
  2. Document Handover During Ownership Changes
    When a vessel changes ownership, it is critical to confirm that all necessary documents, such as NOx Technical Files and certificates, are transferred to the new owner.
  3. Keep Engine Parameter Records Updated
    Use a Record Book (physical or electronic) to log any changes to engine parameters, including component replacements, adjustments, or repairs that may impact NOx emissions. This log should detail dates, components, ID numbers, and any settings modified.
  4. Address Incorrect or Missing Component IDs
    If engine parts lack proper IMO identification or if discrepancies exist, take corrective action. Allow time for these corrections, and consult the engine manufacturer to determine if updates to the NOx Technical File can accommodate the components.
  5. Conduct Routine Inspections
    Regularly inspect engine components and settings to ensure they remain within the ranges specified in the NOx Technical File. Surveyors may select specific components for review during inspections.

By ensuring thorough preparation and addressing potential compliance gaps, shipowners and operators can reduce the risk of detentions and improve their readiness for PSC inspections.

 



Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping the global security landscape, with profound implications for maritime security.

From bolstering surveillance capabilities to introducing new vulnerabilities, AI presents both significant opportunities and challenges for this critical domain.

At the forefront of AI’s transformative impact is its ability to enhance situational awareness.

Traditional methods of monitoring vast oceanic expanses are labor-intensive and constrained in scope.

However, AI-powered systems are revolutionizing this process by analyzing massive datasets from satellites, drones, and automatic identification systems (AIS).

These systems can detect patterns and anomalies, such as the presence of “dark ships” engaged in illicit activities like smuggling or illegal fishing.

This capability empowers authorities to respond proactively and with greater precision, improving the efficiency of maritime law enforcement and security operations.

In naval operations, AI is driving significant advancements through the deployment of autonomous systems.

Unmanned surface vessels and underwater drones now execute high-risk tasks such as reconnaissance, mine detection, and surveillance, minimizing risks to human personnel.

Despite these benefits, the use of AI in naval warfare raises critical strategic concerns. Autonomous systems operating without human oversight could misinterpret data or act unpredictably, escalating conflicts unintentionally.

The absence of comprehensive international regulations governing AI-enabled weapons further exacerbates these risks.

Rival states deploying such systems without transparency or coordination could trigger accidental confrontations or escalate tensions in contested areas, including the South China Sea or the Arctic, where geopolitical competition is already intense.

Ports, pivotal to global trade, are also undergoing transformations driven by AI. Automated systems powered by AI enhance security measures by improving cargo inspections, detecting anomalies, and strengthening access controls.

Predictive analytics offer the ability to identify potential threats before they materialize, enabling timely interventions and safeguarding vital trade hubs from criminal or terrorist activities.

However, these advancements come with a significant downside. The growing reliance on AI-driven digital systems heightens cybersecurity vulnerabilities in the maritime domain.

While AI can bolster defenses by detecting and neutralizing cyber threats, it also provides adversaries with tools to launch increasingly sophisticated attacks.

A successful cyberattack targeting ports or shipping systems could have devastating effects, disrupting global trade and triggering cascading economic and geopolitical consequences.

As AI continues to influence the maritime sector, balancing its benefits against potential risks will require international cooperation, robust regulatory frameworks, and proactive risk management strategies.

Without these safeguards, AI’s potential to amplify existing tensions and create new vulnerabilities could outweigh its promise to enhance maritime security. END

Source: Kilgore News Herald


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED