An IHM certificate is valid for five years at a time, given that the IHM is being continuously updated and maintained. An IHM provides an inventory of hazardous materials contained in a ship’s structure or fittings, together with details of their location and quantities.

IHM Life Cycle Solution

Through  IHM Life Cycle Solution we provide a turnkey IHM (Inventory of Hazardous Materials) / Green Passport solution for shipowners that has been approved by DNV GL, ABS, Lloyd’s Register, BV, Class NK, RINA and Korean Register.

IHM Maintenance & IHM Inspection / Survey

We offer IHM maintenance as a stand-alone service when an IHM inspection is not required or has already been performed.

An IHM inspection / survey will be conducted on vessels without an IHM. An IHM Report describing the inspection and providing lab results from the onboard sampling of more than 20 materials including asbestos will be compiled after the inspection and approved by the vessel’s class society.

We then perform IHM maintenance through the vessel’s life cycle with state-of-the-art software. An introduction to IHM maintenance, the Hong Kong Convention and the EU Ship Recycling Regulation can be downloaded here.

HazMat Experts stationed around the world

IHM Inspections are performed by our certified HazMat Experts with global reach, operating out of Norway, Holland, UK, Greece, France, Spain, Turkey, Singapore, Shanghai, South Korea, USA, Canada, Brazil and Australia.

Get IHM Compliance now

Request a call-back to discuss your needs or to receive a free price quote. Optionally, send us a prefilled free price quote request by e-mail, or fill out this form.

Customers include FrontlineDOF, Torvald Klaveness, Siem Offshore, Buksér & Berging, Eidesvik, OSM, Viking Line and many more around the globe.

Metizoft handles all types of vessels, including Offshore vessels, Wind farm vessels, Tugs, Well boats, Barges, Ferries, YachtsCruise shipsFishing vesselsShipping & Cargo vessels, Rigs, FPSOs and Defence & Security vessels.

Inspector at work
One of our inspectors at work

IHM Regulations & Rules

This green ship recycling solution is in compliance with current rules, regulations and guidelines, including the EU Ship Recycling Regulation, the EMSA Guidance on Inventory of Hazardous Materials, the Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, and IMO Guideline MEPC.269(68).

IHM Newsletter

The EU Ship Recycling Regulation

The EU Ship Recycling Regulation (EU SRR) that entered into force on 30 December 2013 has the following requirements for commercial vessels above 500 GT that are operating outside the flag state’s borders:

  • EU-flagged newbuildings are required to have onboard a verified IHM with a Statement of Compliance at the earliest by 31 December 2015 and at the latest by 31 December 2018.
  • Existing EU-flagged vessels are required to have onboard a verified IHM with a Statement of Compliance at the latest by 31 December 2020 (or if the ship is to be recycled, the IHM should be on board from the date when the European list of ship recycling facilities was first published, 19 December 2016).
  • Non-EU-flagged vessels calling at EU ports are also required to have onboard a verified IHM with a Statement of Compliance at the latest by 31 December 2020.

Source: metizoft


Developed with input from the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and its members, the Inventory of Hazardous Materials was introduced in the 2009 Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships.

The inventory of hazardous materials was introduced to ensure the safety of all those who could potentially be exposed to hazardous materials (including workers in shipyards, on the ships and at recycling yards), by providing a comprehensive list of hazardous materials onboard the ship.

Briefly, the Hong Kong Convention requires ship owners to:

  • When the Convention comes into force, all ships will be required to have an initial IHM survey followed by surveys throughout the ships life
  • Ships being sent for recycling must have an up to date IHM (specific to each ship). Prior to the ship arriving at the recycling facility, the ship must have an end of life IHM
  • Shipyard recycling facilities must provide a Ship Recycling Plan that details the method used to dismantle the ship, accounting for the information provided in the IHM survey
  • The IHM must be conducted by a qualified supplier to ensure the IHM is accurate and resists unnecessary potential risks to both individuals and the environment

According to the new rules, the installation or use of certain hazardous materials on ships will be prohibited or restricted. These hazardous materials include for instance asbestos and ozone-depleting substances.

Currently the Hong Kong Convention is not compulsory. However, when the convention becomes compulsory, expected within the next couple of years, all ships weighing over 500GT will be required to carry the inventory. In the meantime the EU has introduced regulations that all ships visiting EU ports will have to have an approved IHM by December 2020.

Regulation (EU) No 1257/2013 – “Ship Recycling Regulation”

The EU Ship Recycling Regulations follow a very similar structure to HKC. The regulation, however, does set out some additional requirements for compliance which must be achieved by all vessels exceeding 500GT, carrying the flag of a European Member State, calling at a European Port or operating in European Waters, ahead of the deadline of 31 December 2020. These further obligations include consideration for additional hazards during IHM compilation. Namely; PFOS (Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid) and HBCDD (Hexabromocyclododecane).

What is included in a Lucion IHM Survey?

Hazards that are commonly found on vessels include Asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), Organotin Compounds, inc TBTs and microbiological contaminants, Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS), Heavy Metals, Polybrominated biphenyl (PBBs), Polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), Polychlorinated naphthalenes (PCN – more than 3 chlorine atoms), Radioactive substances, Certain short chain chlorinated paraffins (SCCP – Alkanes, C10-C13, chloro), Perfluorooctanesulfonic Acid (PFOS) and Hexabromocyclododecane (HBCDD).

  • Collation of necessary information
  • Visual Sampling Check Plan (VSCP) – assessment of vessel information.
  • Onboard verification and sampling survey – validates the information within the VSCP and with verification  through sampling
  • Sample Analysis
  • Interpretation of analysis results and IHM Report delivery (in Classification specific format, where required)

The survey can take place while the vessel is at sea or in port and our surveying teams are able to meet and leave the vessel at most ports internationally.

The IHM should undergo annual verification to ensure its relevance and a full re-survey of the vessel carried out every five years.

How long does an IHM Survey take?

The length of time to conduct an IHM Survey can vary depending on the size of the vessel, how the vessel is currently being used (if the vessel is live i.e. commercial passenger ship will take longer than a tanker that is largely unoccupied), the amount of potential hazardous materials on board, and any unforeseen logistical issues.

Why should I use Lucion to conduct my IHM Survey?

Whilst it is not a requirement by the Hong Kong Convention to use a qualified supplier to conduct your IHM Survey, it is recommended to do so to ensure that your vessel is comprehensively and accurately surveyed in a safe manner that resist unnecessary exposure to any onboard hazards. Sampling should be carried out by a competent IHM expert. Testing and analysis should be conducted at accredited ISO 17025 laboratories or equivelant.

As an established international Hazardous Materials testing, inspection, and consultancy provider, our team of specialist shipboard hazardous material experts are trusted to deliver our services to multiple clients throughout the world.

Lucion holds approval status with major IACS Classification Societies, including Lloyds Register, Bureau Veritas, American Bureau of Shipping (ABS) as well as having directly employed DNV GL certified Marine HazMat Experts.

What are my responsibilities?

The impact of poor ship recycling decisions has been heavily documented over recent years. To combat this negative impact on individuals and the environment, the European Union adopted the Hong Kong Convention 2009 early (in 2013) which outlines requirements that ships flying the flag of Member States of the Union and recycling facilities within the EU have to fulfil in order to make sure that ship recycling takes place in an environmentally sound and safe manner.

If you are a ship or fleet owner bearing the EU member states flag, you are required by law to conduct an initial IHM Survey by December 2020. Our team provides surveys for hazardous materials on vessels around the world, whether they are newly built, currently trading, or due to be recycled.

Source: lucionmarine


Verifier’s Perspective of 2019 Emissions Report Verification 

As the verification season for the first CORSIA monitoring period draws to an end, its magnitude dawns on us. We have just taken the monumental first step in our journey towards a cleaner and greener aviation industry. The verification of the first CORSIA baseline year was overshadowed by the pandemic which wrought havoc on the entire aviation industry. Nevertheless, airlines strove to comply with the CORSIA regulations amidst all uncertainty and hardships.

From a verification body’s point of view, we found it inspiring that despite the COVID crisis, national authorities were holding the airlines to their obligations under CORSIA albeit with prolonged deadlines. We witnessed several airlines struggle to access and provide certain documents needed for the verification due to the restrictions and mandated remote work policies. In these situations, we had to pivot and get creative under the guidance of the ISO 14064 standards and the SARPS to find other ways to manage risks and arrive at a reasonable assurance where possible.

Having concluded 188 CORSIA verifications with another 45 underway, we have learnt a lot and wish to share our experience with everyone. The purpose of this article is to share our perspective on the various issues we observed during these verifications with the intention of sharing best practices and recommended improvements that all operators can benefit from. In line with the above, find below a list of the most commonly observed “non compliances”, “misstatements” and other points of improvement. The below sections have been compiled with inputs from VERIFAVIA’s team of auditors.

Non-Compliances with the EMP

A non-compliance with the EMP arises when the monitoring, reporting was not performed according to what is declared in the Emissions Monitoring Plan.

We came across a number of varied non-compliances with the EMP. By far one of the most common one was that the EMP did not have a procedure listed for the handling of wet leased flights and their data. This is also a non-compliance with the SARPS, owing to its importance. Similarly, it was also noted that a lot of the EMPs were lacking information about the procedures concerning the handling of exempted flights, documentation and record keeping, identification and handling of data gaps. In a few cases, the source of flight data was found to be different to the actual used data and was many a times accompanied by the incorrect application of a fuel use monitoring method.

Non-Compliances of the EMP with the SARPS

A non-compliances of the EMP with the SARPS occurs when the EMP has procedures listed which do not comply with a particular aspect of the regulation (SARPs, ETM, National Regulation for CORSIA).

  • As per the SARPS, the monitoring, reporting and verification (MRV) is to take place based on an EMP approved by the national authority. We have had to conclude some verifications with this non-compliance because the operator couldn’t get their EMP approved by their authority.  As explained above there was missing necessary information from the EMPs which counts as both a non-compliance with the EMP and a non-compliance with the SARPS.
  • Some EMPs had conflicting declarations in the methods tab, with both CERT and a FUMM (fuel use monitoring method) selected as primary methods within the same period.
  • It was also noted in certain cases that the implementation of the selected fuel use monitoring method was incorrect, which reflected a lack of understanding. This was the case with operators choosing to use the fuel uplift and fuel allocation by block hour methods. On a similar note, the incorrect use of the declared data gap approach was also encountered.
Non-Conformities and Misstatements*
*These pertain solely to the Emissions Report (ER).When the process in place does not conform to the procedures described in the EMP resulting in incorrect numbers or missing information in the ER it is deemed a non-conformity. These will always result into a misstatement. Misstatements are errors in the data/report ER resulting in incorrect numbers or missing information in the ER. These misstatements can be material or non-material.

  • The wrong use of method A or method B due to an improper chronological order.
  • The use of incorrect, outdated ICAO codes for airports and in some cases the incorrect attribution of an airport to another state. On a similar note, many reports used state names that were not in line with the ICAO template.
  • In a few rare cases, missing international flights were counted as data gaps, international positioning flights were missed while some wet leased out flights were included.
  • In one particular case, the operator was unable to edit the destination airport of a flight on their system. Their IT system prevented editing of the airport codes due to linkages with several other systems. This led to a situation where when an aircraft was diverted to another airport and subsequently left from the diverted airport it would result in a break in sequence. Often this diversion would be international, which would impact the state pairs to be reported.

Other Notable Points Of Improvement

Keeping the above aside, we also encountered a diverse assortment of issues. These do not qualify for any of the above categories as long as they are corrected/rectified prior to the issuance of the verification report.

  • Perhaps the most common one was regarding filling in the Emissions report. Which aircrafts to declare in the fleet tab, how to fill the reporting/identification sheets, which dates and what is the approved aggregation were a few of the many points on which we have had to work.
  • Some operators had duplicated flights, which were discovered during the verification.
  • Most operators had breaks in sequence which upon investigation would at times reveal missing flights. It is highly recommended that all operators implement some measures to ensure that the each aircraft has a logical sequence of consecutive flights.
  • Most operators haven’t prepared a CORSIA manual or included CORSIA in their internal annual audits. This builds to the point that operators attest that they have several quality control activities in place but do not possess any documents/reports to back them up.

In conclusion, CORSIA 2019 is one small step for airlines but a giant leap for the planet. Yes, there have been many challenges along the way and most of the procedures associated with reporting and verification are novel to most operators which haven’t been exposed to the EU ETS. Admittedly, the COVID crisis will present a new set of challenges during the verification season for 2020, but with concerted efforts we can overcome them and continue growing.

Source: verifavia


Issue

The historic aircraft carrier INS Viraat, beached at Alang on September 28, will continue to stay in its place until a team of workers start dismantling it.

 

Details

  • Usually, when a vessel is beached at Alang, it uses the force of high tide as well as its own engine power to glide on to the shore at speeds ranging between 15-20 knots.
  • Viraat has been secured by iron ropes that are tied to diesel-powered wrenches. This ensures that the vessel does not tilt or change its position during tides and ebbs.
  • The owners of Shree Ram Group which bought INS Viraat from an auction said their plots were “green ship recycling” yards which have certificates from Hong Kong Convention and European Union.
  • As it is a green yard, it is ensured that the ship is not broken down in the sea and the entire vessel is broken once it is dragged to the shore. Cranes are also used to ensure that the broken parts do not fall into the sea.
  • During high tide, the sea-facing wrenches which are connected with iron ropes fastened to the aircraft carrier will be switched on. These wrenches will slowly drag the warship to the empty space on the beach.
  • The ship will need a “cutting permission” from the Gujarat Pollution Control Board and the Gujarat Maritime Board before the dismantling can commence. This will be done after a physical inspection of the ship by different agencies post-beaching.
  • The oil in engines and other machinery have to be emptied. Old batteries have to be removed. Any flammable liquids including the left-over fuel in the tanks will have to be pumped out.
  • These tanks have to be cleaned and made free of any residue gases accumulated inside the fuel tanks.
  • Once the ship comes on the shore, an independent agency will prepare an Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM). This agency will go on-board, take all samples including the persistent organic pollutants (POPs).
  • This IHM acts as a guide and the ship breaker makes marking on board the vessel indicating the hazardous portions of the ship. Then the HAZMAT (hazardous material) team of the ship breaker will remove the hazardous substances before the breaking begins.
  • Once the cutting begins, hazardous substances like asbestos, batteries, and ozone-depleting gases will have to be tackled and disposed of safely.
  • Being a naval ship, it not only has a double hull made of steel plates that are several inches thick but also has multiple small compartments which take time to cut and dismantle.
  • Parts dismantled from ships at Alang are usually recycled or sold. As far as INS Viraat is concerned, automobile companies have already contacted the ship-breaker for the steel salvaged from the warship.

Download PDF

Source: currentaffairs


Completing an Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM), is only the beginning of compliance.

It is the ship owner’s responsibility to ensure continuous conformity of the Inventory.

If you have completed the Inventory of Hazardous Material (IHM) process for your vessel, congratulations you have completed an important step to future proof your vessel’s compliance to the following regulations:

Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (2009)
EU Ship Recycling regulations (SRR)
After completion of IHM survey, obtaining SOC from Class Society will be mandatory to remain compliant. Any Class Society that has the Flag State approval may issue the SoC.

It is the shipowner’s responsibility for the maintenance of Part 1 of the IHM process during the lifetime of the vessel. Continuity and conformity of the information should be confirmed, especially if the flag, owner or operator of the ship changes.

IHM renewal survey is required for every five years after the IHM initial survey. The requirements are as below:

Ship’s existing IHM certificate and IHM Part I;
The updated IHM (Part I), reflecting any change, replacement or significant repair of structure, equipment, systems, fittings, arrangements and materials since last survey;
Ship’s IHM Part I maintenance record, MDs and SDoCs reflecting the ship’s hazardous materials management since last IHM survey;
Our offering of IHM maintenance server (VSIMS) is designed to help ship owners and managers comply with HKC 2009 and EUSRR regulations.

We believes in staying a step ahead, using data and record collection in the simplest and most economical way possible without any disruption to the day to day managerial operations.

The VS software (VSIMS) not only collects the MDs and SDoCs when items are delivered on board but it also tracks their location onboard till they are finally off landed and providing a clear audit trail of the 15 elements of the hazardous materials identified in the regulations.

At any time a clear snapshot of the vessel can be provided showing how they came on board, how they moved and their current location on board.

A historical data will also be maintained showing how and with whom they were off landed thus providing a circular record with a cradle to grave approach.

READ MORE !!

 

CLICK TO READ


The JMS Yachting management team and the crew of 90m motoryacht DAR have announced the successful certification of the Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM) list on board. The certificate was issued by Lloyd’s Register under the authority of the Government of Cayman Islands.

As of 31 December 2020, the EU Ship Recycling Regulation requires that any ship of 500gt and above, of any flag calling at an EU port or anchorage, maintains a Certificate of Compliance (if EU flagged) or Statement of Compliance (if non-EU flagged) supplemented by a verified Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM) on board.

This aims to regulate the ship-recycling industry to ensure that end-of-life vessels are dismantled safely, with minimum impact to human health and the environment. The Certificate of Compliance means, among other things, that the vessel shall only be sent to recycling facilities included in the European List of Ship Recycling Facilities at the end of its life.

The IHM then provides ship-specific information on the actual hazardous materials present on board in order to protect health and safety and to prevent environmental pollution at ship-recycling facilities. “It was a lot of work for such a large vessel, but I’m glad we delivered well ahead of the deadline,” commented Rob Pijper, operations director at JMS Yachting.

Many flag states have delegated the authority for the verification of compliance to their respective classification societies, such as Lloyd’s Register. But, with IHM compliance taking some time to achieve and only a matter of months left until the regulations come into force, there is growing concern that many superyachts are ill-prepared for the onset of these regulations.

Source: superyachtnews


Ship recycling

Worldwide hundreds of outdated ships are scrapped every year. The recycling occurs mostly in recycling facilities or yards. A lot of times, these ships are beached (driven onto a flat sandy beach at high speed) for subsequent manual dismantling often without any regards to environmental or occupational health and safety standards.

Ship Recycling Convention will set global standards

The International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships, or Hong Kong Convention, is meant to address these problems. This Ship Recycling Convention was adopted by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) in 2009 but so far has not entered into force because the agreement has not been joined by enough member states. The convention contains regulations for shipowners, ship builders, manufacturers, suppliers and for recycling yards.

The Hong Kong Convention will apply to all new and existing sea-going vessels with a gross tonnage of 500 or more.

The new convention introduces two key components to be considered in future:

  • Ship-specific Inventory of hazardous materials which lists all hazardous materials such as asbestos, PCB, ozone depleting substances and antifouling paints containing TBT as well as their location and approximate amount.
  • Authorization of recycling facilities. Sea-going vessels may only be recycled by authorized yards complying fully with all environmental and safety requirements of the Hong Kong Convention.

The convention will enter into force two years after ratification by at least 15 states representing more than 40 per cent of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping. The convention was adopted in May 2009 but has not yet entered into force. This is where you can find the current status of this and other IMO conventions (under the heading “Summary Status for each Convention”).

bild abwracken

EU Regulation already implements some of the requirements

For all ships

  • On international voyages and
  • Flying an EU flag and
  • With a size of 500 GT or more,

Regulation EU 1257/2013 on ship recycling on the recycling of ships applies and it contains among other things the following requirements:

  • These ships may only be recycled on authorized recycle yards on the EU list of recycle yards.
  • These ships must carry a ship-specific Inventory of Hazardous Materials/IHM stating as a minimum the hazardous materials on board (structure and equipment) listed in Annex II as well as their location and the approximate amount.
  • These ships must hold a Certificate on Inventory of Hazardous Materials.
  • Existing ships only require the Inventory of Hazardous Materials and the associated certificate from 31 December 2020.
  • The Inventories of Hazardous Materials and the associated certificates are approved by the respective Flag State.
  • The ships intended to be passed to be recycled must have a Ready for Recycling Certificate.

Further information can be found in  ISM Circular 03/2019.

Ships flying a flag of a non-EU State that call on a European port are required to carry an Inventory of Hazardous Materials as well as a Document of Compliance.

Source: deutsche-flagge


Inventory of Hazardous Material (IHM) is required from new ships according to the Hong Kong Convention and from existing ships after 5 years from coming into force, yet ships entering EU ports are required to have it fro  January 2021

It is made to list all the hazardous material mentioned in Appendix I of the HKC

These Hazardous materials includes all hazardous materials found in Ship constriction, equipment and machinery

In Pharaohs marine we developed our guidelines to prepare the IHM which illustrate all hazardous materials included in ships’ life cycle

In order to prepare the hazardous material for existing ships we mix both onboard visits with review of plans and docs of the ship

Development of IHM requires five steps:

Step 1 Collection of necessary information;
Step 2 Assessment of collected information;
Step 3 Preparation of visual/sampling check plan;
Step 4 Onboard visual/sampling check; and
Step 5 Preparation of Part I of the Inventory and related documentation.

Step 1: Plans we always need to extract hazardous materials are as follows:

        • Ship’s specification
        • General Arrangement
        • Machinery Arrangement
        • Spare Parts and Tools List
        • piping Arrangement
        • Accommodation Plan
        • Fire Control Plan
        • Fire Protection Plan
        • Insulation Plan (Hull and Machinery)
        • International Anti-Fouling System Certificate
        • Related manuals and drawings
        • Information from other inventories and/or sister or similar ships, machinery, equipment, materials and coating
        • Results of previous visual/sampling checks and other analysis
      • Preparation of indicative list as the total list of hazardous materials might exceed thousands of items, so the indicative list shows the possibles locations where each hazardous material mentioned in Appendix I can be found
Step 2: Assessment of collected information: every information collected in step 1, is assessed and a checklist is prepared for the ships showing the existence of hazardous materials and volume of them
Step 3: Preparation of visual/ sampling check plan: each item in step 2 is marked for check or not, if marked for check a plan has to be made to conduct the visual check and sampling if required

Step 3: Onboard visual /Sampling check: visual/ sampling check is then conducted according to plan prepared in Step 3

Step 4: Preparation of the IHM: The all information collected in previous steps are consolidated to develop the IHM as follows:

    • Development of the IHM
    • Development of locations diagrams of hazardous material

Source: pharaohsmarine


On 16th September, the UK’s first robotic ship, named the Mayflower Autonomous Ship, will embark on a transatlantic voyage from Plymouth in England to Plymouth, Massachusetts, retracing the route of the original Mayflower on the 400th anniversary of its crossing.

The transatlantic voyage of the Mayflower Autonomous Ship will be an important test-bed for emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and edge computing, and is widely expected to encourage the development of commercial autonomous ships, and for the advancement of use cases ranging from marine research and defence, to remote marine pilotage and ocean clean-up.

Mayflower is a collaborative project

The autonomous ship is a collaborative project between the University of Plymouth, ProMare, an non-profit organization, and the technology giant IBM, with project funding being provided by companies such as Rolls Royce, Honeywell, ABB and Wartsila. The solar energy-powered ship is equipped with IBM’s PowerAI engine and IBM PowerSystem servers to provide edge computing capabilities.

Edge computing is an essential feature of autonomous ships, which require continuous computer processing in environments with either intermittent or no internet connectivity. The PowerAI engine will collect real-time data from the ocean via cameras and sensors, including location information about other ships, whales, floating debris and changing weather conditions. The PowerAI engine will leverage machine learning algorithms and computer vision, along with edge computing, to facilitate real-time processing and decision-making based on the collected data.

The future of robotic ships

Although the Mayflower Autonomous Ship will use collected data for mainly navigation purposes, robotic autonomous ships are seen to offer considerable potential to further future marine research activities. Currently just five percent of the world’s oceans have been explored by scientists, partly because of the dangers that deep-sea exploration pose to human life. Therefore there are opportunities to use autonomous, crewless ships to explore uncharted parts of the oceans and to record and collect data to further marine research. Captured data could include anything from water temperatures to the level of microplastic in the ocean. In future, autonomous ships could even be used to help with ocean clean-up activities, including microplastic removal.

Other potential uses of autonomous ships include supporting military operations and utilizing remote marine pilotage. Marine pilotage occurs when specially trained mariners board ships near ports to help guide them through domestic waterways, providing local knowledge of those waters that international captains often lack.

Extending remote pilotage

Although some marine pilotage is already carried out remotely, there are opportunities to extend the use of remote pilotage with the help of autonomous ships. This use case could be particularly useful shipping companies and port authorities trying to minimize human contact as part of efforts to manage the spread of Covid-19.

Nevertheless, a number of enduring concerns suggest that the future development of autonomous ships will not all be plain sailing. They include potential regulatory and legal hurdles stemming from the current absence of international rules for granting approval for autonomous ships. In addition, their future success will be shaped by economic considerations, including the relative cost of maintaining crews for cargo and other ships relative to the cost of investing in autonomous shipping technologies.

Source: verdict


Ever since tech giant IBM joined hands with ProMare and the Finnish Wärtsilä to develop one of the world’s full autonomous ships, the internet has been abuzz with their activities.

The Mayflower Autonomous Ship (MAS) is one of the most high-profile initiatives striving to revolutionise a 10,000-year-old transportation format. Any breakthrough in this project has the possibility to massively transform the way commercial shipping operates.

Drones have replaced traditional jets in the sky. Tesla’s autonomous cars are disrupting the automobile industry. So now, the question arises: Why don’t we see the same on our waters?

While at sea, ships face far more extreme operating conditions and patchier connectivity. The push for fully autonomous shipping has generally received less attention and investment than other transport sectors, but this might soon change, according to market analysts. By 2030, the $90 billion autonomous shipping industry is poised to grow to a massive $130 billion valuation, highlighting the increasing need for such innovations. Backed by wind and solar energy and thanks to some of IBM’s groundbreaking innovation in the field of computer technology, Mayflower is now equipped with satellite navigation systems, oceanographic and meteorological instruments, sonar, radar, and lidar.

The tech giant’s vision recognition systems will track down other ships, debris, whales, and icebergs, whilst being commanded by an AI-enabled captain in the journey from Plymouth, England to Plymouth, Massachusetts, USA.

UK owned research vessel Plymouth Quest will be hosting the AI captain of the Mayflower project whilst in the trials, starting Sep 16. After successful completion, the ship will attempt to cross the Atlantic in Spring 2021 with no humans on board, as said by a senior IBM spokesperson.

photo credits: IBM

MAS will trace the route of the original 1620 Mayflower to commemorate the 400th anniversary of the famous voyage. The futuristic vessel will be officially unveiled on September 16, the exact day of the Mayflower departure.

After that, it will go on several voyages and missions over the next six months ahead of a transatlantic voyage in April 2021.

During the transatlantic voyage, the vessel will measure microplastic levels at various coordinates of the ocean as well as the algal bloom quantity, the pH of the water, and the oxygen level.

Source: fleetmon


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED