The Ocean Voyages Institute has completed its latest transit of the Great Pacific Garbage Patch, collecting 96 tonnes of plastic fishing nets, lines, buoys, trash and other waste from one of the world’s largest concentrations of ocean plastic.

“Keeping our ocean healthy is vital to ocean life and our own health. Our clean up missions give me great hope for the future of our ocean because change is possible.” said Mary T. Crowley, the president and founder of the nonprofit.

Ocean Voyages Institute uses the Kwai, a 130-foot sail freighter, to carry out cleanup missions in the North Pacific. The 2022 mission brings the group’s total to over 692,000 pounds of plastic removed from the ocean since 2009, including 340,000 pounds recovered in 2020 alone.

All images courtesy of Ocean Voyages Institute

“Many of my crew are from the Pacific Islands, and we all do this good work for our children, so they will benefit from healthy oceans,” said Captain Locky MacLean.  “Marine areas cover more than two thirds of our planet and are the main component of our life support system here on Earth, absorbing carbon and generating the very air we breathe, they cannot continue to be taken for granted.”

The effort involves contributions from many nations. Kwai is owned by the government of the Marshall Islands; the crew hails from Republic of the Marshall Islands, USA, Kiribati, Fiji, Canada, South Africa, UK and Germany; and the mission collaborates with researchers from the University of Hawaii.

The organization’s ultimate goal is to remove one million pounds of debris from the North Pacific Gyre. It is designing two more purpose-built sailing cargo vessels for this long-term mission, and hopes to raise funds for their construction.

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/sailing-vessel-kwai-cleans-up-96-tonnes-of-trash-from-the-pacific


The Dutch government has suffered another setback in its already widely criticized plan to use chartered ferries or cruise ships to help alleviate the overcrowding in refugee centers across the country. After initially announcing the plan last week, it has been met with a barrage of critics both from residents and local government to aid organizations, yet at least one of the ships is believed to already be sailing to the Netherlands due to start its role as a floating accommodations center next week.

The local council in the municipality of Zaanstad near Amsterdam today withdrew its permission to dock one of the chartered ferries at their pier. City officials said the 21,500 gross ton ferry, Aurelia could not be accommodated at their facilities. They said the 42-year-old ferry registered in Cyprus would produce “too much nitrogen,” and that under the regulations the port would not be able to handle the pollution coming from the ship. In May, the local council had said it was looking into the idea of accepting a ship to address the housing crisis.

Similarly, the port of Vlissingen had also been suggested as another location for one of the vessels. The southern city near the border with Belgium however this week said that it would not be able to accept one of the vessels. Residents had demanded that the city government reject the ship after the widespread criticism of the plan in recent days.

The Dutch government, however, has called the current situation an asylum crisis. The country has accepted an estimated 40,000 refugees from Ukraine in addition to other nationalities that have sought refuge in the country. Reports indicate that the centers are overflowing across the country unable to provide shelter for some of the new arrivals. One report said people are sleeping outside at least one center on the lawn with no shelter from the elements.

Last week, Eric van der Burg, a justice minister who is charged with dealing with refugees, was quoted in the media saying that they had come up with the idea of chartering three vessels, which he referred to as cruise ships, to temporarily house a few thousand of the refugees. Asked where the ships would dock he said that was still under discussions suggesting that the ships might be anchored offshore. He said they were exploring using shuttle services to transport the residents to shore but still aid groups compared the plan to imprisoning the people. An aid group described the idea of placing asylum seekers offshore as absurd.

The minister said last week that the government had already chartered the vessels and that they were heading to the Netherlands. He said they had acted quickly to ensure the availability of the vessels. The AIS signal for the one vessel that was identified for the program, the Aurelia, shows that it is docked in Marseille, France but was expected to depart for Spain and presumably continue on to the Netherlands.

In April, city officials in the Netherlands chartered a Holland America Line cruise ship as one of their first temporary housing locations along with two river cruise ships from AmaWaterways. The charter for the Holland America Volendam was extended through the summer but the cruise line reports the vessel will not extend the charter and will return to cruising in late September.

Other countries have also turned to the use of ferries to accommodate some of the influx of people. Estonia chartered a ferry in the spring and recently another one arrived in Scotland. Groups in Scotland also criticized the effort for the small size of the cabins, but the shipping company responded by saying that the people accommodated aboard would also have the use of the lounges and public spaces. Estonian officials in the spring said the ships worked well with the public spaces and meeting rooms providing the ability to provide counseling and services aboard the ship and the cafeterias or restaurants made it possible to provide basic meal services.

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/dutch-plan-to-use-ferries-to-house-refugees-suffers-setbacks


Two of the U.S. Coast Guard’s newest fast response cutters made an unusual visit yesterday, July 25, arriving in Beirut, Lebanon for a scheduled port visit. The port calls mark their arrival to the Middle East after departing the United States and transiting the Mediterranean Sea as part of an ongoing strategy between the Navy and Coast Guard to coordinate operations.

Fast response cutters USCGC John Scheuerman and USCGC Clarence Sutphin Jr. are the newest additions to a slate of Coast Guard ships supporting the U.S. 5th Fleet from Bahrain. Both of the vessels will be homeported in Manama, Bahrain replacing aging Island-class patrol boats. The Scheuerman was commissioned in February in Tampa, Florida as the 46th Sentinel-class fast response cutter and the fifth of six fast response cutters assigned to the Middle East mission. Her sister ship Sutphin was commissioned in April in New York City.

“The John Scheuerman crew is excited to begin operations in U.S. 5th Fleet where we will have the opportunity to collaborate with our partners in the region,” said Lt. Trent Moon, commanding officer of Scheuerman. “I am extremely proud of this crew and they have proved that we are ready for the opportunities ahead.”

While in Beirut, crewmembers will meet with Lebanese Navy counterparts on subjects related to shipboard operations, safety, and damage control. Coast Guardsmen will also participate in cultural exchange opportunities planned ashore.

The Sentinel-class cutters are the final two of six that are overseen by Patrol Forces Southwest Asia, the Coast Guard’s largest unit outside of the United States. The ships are forward-deployed to U.S. 5th Fleet to help ensure maritime security and stability across the Middle East. The Patrol Force was established 20 years ago in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and continues to be a vital part of the operations in the region. In May 2021, two USCG patrol boats were part of a 5th fleet exercise when they were harassed by vessels from the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Navy. The USCGC Maui fired warning shots at the Iranian vessels when they came within 150 yards of the cutter while it was underway. Last month, the Navy reported that one of the USCG patrol boats completed a heroin seizure in the Gulf of Oman during one of its regular patrols.

“The crew and I are thrilled to arrive in Lebanon en route to our new operating station,” said Lt. David Anderson, commanding officer of Clarence Sutphin Jr.

Measuring at 154-feet, the fast response cutters have a flank speed of 28 knots, C4ISR suite (Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance), and a stern launch and recovery ramp for a 26-foot, over-the-horizon interceptor cutter boat. The Navy also noted that the new cutters feature advanced communications systems and improved surveillance and reconnaissance equipment.

The U.S. 5th Fleet operating area includes 21 countries, the Arabian Gulf, Gulf of Oman, Red Sea, parts of the Indian Ocean, and three critical choke points at the Strait of Hormuz, Bab al-Mandeb, and Suez Canal.

Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/new-uscg-cutters-arrive-in-lebanon-for-middle-east-deployment


The BIMCO Emission Trading Scheme Allowances Clause has been published with the aim of allowing owners and charterers to allocate responsibility for vessels complying with, inter alia, the EU’s emissions trading scheme (ETS). The application of the EU ETS to shipping is still under discussion but expected to take effect from either 1 January 2023 or 2024. 

Further to our update of 31 May 2022, BIMCO’s Emission Trading Scheme Allowances Clause for Time Charter Parties 2022 has been published (the ETSA Clause). It is set out in full below and is available from BIMCO’s website along with its guidance notes.

The ETSA Clause has been drafted with the EU’s ETS specifically in mind, as it will likely be the first scheme that will apply to shipping. The clause will also be applicable to other schemes that take effect. There are several such schemes under development, for example, in China, Japan and the UK.

In this article, we build on our previous general commentary, outline the scope of the ETSA Clause and mention briefly some practical considerations for owners and charterers.

Scope

The ETSA Clause governs parties’ rights and obligations in relation to any applicable “Emission Scheme”, which is defined as a “greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme … imposed by applicable lawful authorities that regulate the issuance, allocation, trading or surrendering of Emission Allowances.”

The broad scope of the clause ought to ensure that it remains relevant as more schemes are implemented to target carbon emissions, but also any other greenhouses gases.

Rights and obligations

The application of an ETS to shipping will vary, and there are many different ways in which the compliance obligations could be imposed. Variables include – who is to report emissions to the ETS authority, how the reported data is to be verified, and who is responsible for purchasing and surrendering allowances. As an example, under some schemes a vessel manager may be responsible for measuring and reporting, in others it may be owners, and in another it may be the party making commercial decisions about the vessel’s employment, which, depending on definitions, could be owners, a pool manager, or the Charterer.

As there is no one solution to these questions, and the ETSA Clause is intended to be capable of broad application, it contains no general provision stating how the parties ought to comply with their individual obligations. Thus, it is likely that each party will have to comply with the regulations as imposed on them. Some parties may wish to include appropriate wording and expressly address circumstances where all or some of a party’s compliance may be outsourced to third parties.

Cooperation

Sub-clause (a) obliges the owner and charterer to “co-operate and exchange all relevant data and information in a timely manner to facilitate compliance with any applicable Emission Scheme and enable the Parties to calculate the amount of Emission Allowances in respect of the Vessel…”. The aim here is to ensure that no matter how an ETS is applied, one or the other party can comply.

Although “soft” types of obligations, such as a duty to “co-operate”, and “in a timely manner”, do not always help dispute resolution, their flexibility is necessary given the broad scope of the clause. As emissions trading schemes and reporting systems mature, and where perhaps a vessel is agreed to be traded only within certain known ETS areas, the parties may wish to include more specific annexes defining precise documentation and timeframes that may be required within those trading areas.

article-img

Source: GARD

Monitor and report emissions

Sub-clause (b) obliges owners to monitor and report the relevant data to an “independent verifier”. This assumes there will be an obligation on Owners to do this, which, as suggested by the BIMCO guidance notes, is likely influenced by the EU and the UK models. However, it may not be, in fact, applicable to all emissions trading schemes around the world. The parties may wish to consider revising the wording to a more general obligation to monitor and report the relevant data “as required by, and in accordance with, the applicable Emission Scheme.” with, potentially, a right to appoint jointly a neutral party to verify the data and/or the calculations.

Allowances

As BIMCO’s guidance notes explain, sub-clause (c) is the main provision concerning accounting for the emission allowances between the parties. There is an obligation on charterers to “provide and pay for the Emission Allowances…”. This is to be done by charterers making the transfer within 7 days of owners notifying charterers of the quantity of emission allowances for the previous month. The parties will therefore have to maintain their own separate accounts for the allowances. As expected, charterers are entitled to set-off in respect of any off-hire periods which, in the case of disputed off-hire periods, adds to owners’ overall credit risk.

Suspension for breaches

If Charterers fail to transfer “any of the Emission Allowances…” [emphasis added – noting lack of any express de minimis] as required by the clause, sub-clause (d) gives owners “the right to suspend the performance of any or all of their obligations…until such time as the Emission Allowances are received in full by the Owners…”. A safety mechanism against a wrongful suspension of service appears to be built into the 5 days’ notice that needs to be served on charterers prior to suspending. Nonetheless, in practice, suspending service of a vessel comes with risks – including potential claims under bills of lading and further exposure by owners to credit risk.

Some owners may wish to explore additional wordings where the emission allowances are to be put into an escrow account by charterers in advance based on reasonable pre-estimates or the quantity of Charterers’ bunkers on board. The escrow account could also be used to hold the emission allowances in the event of disputed off-hire periods, pending settlement, a judgment, or an arbitration award.

Conflicting provisions

Starting with the words “[n]otwithstanding any other provision in this Charter Party…”, the clause is designed to take priority over any other conflicting provisions.

In recent months, we have seen amendments being made to standard form charters and inclusion of references to reimbursement of charges, costs and/or fees that owners may incur in relation to compliance with environmental regulations as a result of charterers’ instructions. We can understand the aim of such clauses, particularly when charterparties were being agreed at a time with no standard published clauses to cover environmental costs. When using an ETS allowance clause, parties should ensure that the intended priority of any negotiated terms is made clear to avoid arguments over conflicting provisions.

ETS – EMISSION TRADING SCHEME ALLOWANCES CLAUSE FOR TIME CHARTER PARTIES 2022

Notwithstanding any other provision in this Charter Party, the Owners and the Charterers (the “Parties” and each individually a “Party”) agree as follows:

“Emission Allowances” means an allowance, credit, quota, permit or equivalent, representing a right of a vessel to emit a specified quantity of greenhouse gas emissions recognised by the Emission Scheme.

“Emission Scheme” means a greenhouse gas emissions trading scheme which for the purposes of this Clause shall include the European Union Emissions Trading System and any other similar systems imposed by applicable lawful authorities that regulate the issuance, allocation, trading or surrendering of Emission Allowances.

(a) The Owners and the Charterers shall co-operate and exchange all relevant data and information in a timely manner to facilitate compliance with any applicable Emission Scheme and enable the Parties to calculate the amount of Emission Allowances in respect of the Vessel that must be surrendered to the authorities of the applicable Emission Scheme for the period of the Charter Party.

(b) The Owners shall monitor and report the relevant greenhouse gas emissions of the Vessel for verification by an independent verifier in accordance with the applicable Emission Scheme.

(c) (i) Throughout the Charter Party period the Charterers shall provide and pay for the Emission Allowances corresponding to the Vessel’s emissions under the scope of the applicable Emission Scheme:

(1) Within the first seven (7) days of each month, the Owners shall notify the Charterers in writing of the quantity of Emission Allowances for the previous month; and

(2) No later than fourteen (14) days prior to the expected date of redelivery the Owners shall notify the Charterers in writing of the estimated quantity of Emission Allowances for the final month or part thereof.

(ii) The Owners’ notifications in subclause (c)(i) shall include the relevant calculations and the data used to establish the quantities.

(iii) Within seven (7) days of notification under subclause (c)(i), the quantity of Emission Allowances notified by the Owners above shall be transferred by the Charterers and received into the Owners’ nominated Emission Scheme account. If the estimated quantity of Emission Allowances for the final month or part thereof is higher or lower than the actual quantity calculated by the Owners as at the time and date of redelivery, any difference in Emission Allowances shall be transferred by the Charterers or returned by the Owners, as the case may be, and received into the nominated account of the receiving Party within seven (7) days of written notification from that Party.

(iv) During any period of off-hire, the Charterers shall have the right to offset against any Emission Allowances due or require the Owners to return a quantity of Emission Allowances equivalent to the emissions that the Charterers would otherwise have been responsible for, had the Vessel remained on hire.

(d) If the Charterers fail to transfer any of the Emission Allowances in accordance with subclause (c), the Owners shall, by giving the Charterers’ five (5) days’ notice, have the right to suspend the performance of any or all of their obligations under this Charter Party until such time as the Emission Allowances are received in full by the Owners. Throughout any period of suspended performance under this subclause, the Vessel shall remain on hire and the Owners shall have no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences arising out of the valid exercise of this right. The Owners’ right to suspend performance under this Clause shall be without prejudice to any other rights or claims they may have against the Charterers under this Charter Party.
Source: GARD


The port of Venice and Italian authorities continue to seek a solution to the challenges of accommodating cruise ships while also honoring their commitment to ban large ships from the sensitive Venice Lagoon and fragile canals. In a controversial move, the port for the first time, last weekend approved a test of anchoring a large cruise ship outside the lagoon and tending passengers ashore for a day’s long visit.

Norwegian Cruise Line received permission from port officials to anchor the 93,500 gross ton Norwegian Gem near Venice on Saturday, July 23 on the last day of a 7-day cruise in the Eastern Mediterranean and Greek Islands. The cruise ship, which reportedly traveling with approximately 1,500 passengers, arranged for three excursion boats from Venice to shuttle passengers to the city center.

Last year, Italian officials ordered a ban on all large cruise ships from entering the canal and traveling to the passenger terminal after years of protests by environmentalists and conservationists who contended the waves from the cruise ships were damaging historic buildings. Venice in recent years has been experiencing increasing flooding, especially at high tides made worse by the wake from large ships. To reach the cruise ship terminals, vessels were required to sail past historic St. Mark’s Square.

Cruise lines were told that their ships could divert to the nearby industrial port of Marghera, which however lacks facilities for cruise passengers. Many of the cruise lines, including Norwegian Cruise Line, opted instead to begin and end their cruises in the port of Trieste, which has terminal buildings but is a longer bus ride to reach Venice.

Under the pilot tested with the Norwegian Gem, embarkation and disembarkation for the cruise continues to happen on Sundays in Trieste, while on Saturday they made a port call on the last full day of the cruise so that passengers could tour Venice. This approach only works for cruise ships making port calls and not for homeporting cruises.

Critics however were quick to reject the test. Simone Venturini, the city’s tourism councilor told local reporters, “It’s not the type of tourism we want for the city.” He represents one side of the argument that seeks to focus on tourists that visit the city for days and stay in hotels. Venturini has warned against what he calls “hit and run” tourism.

The cruise lines said that they were left without a solid alternative when Italy suddenly announced the ban last July. At the time, Italy said it was requesting proposals for a new cruise terminal near Venice that would provide facilities while meeting the objective of keeping the large ships out of the local waterways and canals. The cruise industry points out that it will take years for the new facility to be developed.

Starting in 2023, Venice also will impose a daily fee for all visitors to the city. The cost for tourists will vary based on the number of people booked to visit the city with officials saying it should help to control crowds and provide an important source of revenue for the maintenance of the city. In 2019, they calculated that 19 million people visited the city with as many as 80 percent staying only for a single day.

The efforts at managing tourism are continuing to spread in many popular destinations around the world. In 2020, residents of Key West voted to ban large cruise ships with controls on the number of people that could come to the city each day aboard the ships, only to have the state’s governor retroactively override their vote. In Bar Harbor, Maine residents are now demanding the town council also put limits on the daily number of cruise victors, while in 2022 French Polynesia imposed restrictions to limit cruise ships to certain ports.
Source: https://www.maritime-executive.com/article/venice-tests-tendering-cruise-passengers-to-permit-large-ships-in-port


The International Association of Ports and Harbors (IAPH) welcomes the international agreement reached last Friday July 22 to establish a humanitarian maritime corridor which should enable ships to export essential cargoes of grain and foodstuffs from Ukrainian seaports. These products are critical in terms of addressing the global food crisis and alleviating the suffering of millions of people around the world.

IAPH commends Ukrainian port workers, represented through the Maritime Transport Workers’ Trade Union of Ukraine and the Ukrainian Sea Ports Authority, who are making every effort to prepare the ports of Odesa, Chornomorsk and Pivdennyi for the resumption of maritime traffic under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.

The missile attacks which struck the port of Odesa less than 24 hours after the signature of the international agreement gravely undermine these efforts and seriously jeopardize the reliability of such an accord.

The terms of Friday’s agreement determines that the Russian Federation should not undertake any attacks against port facilities and merchant vessels engaged in the export of critical cargoes.

The safety and security of all port workers and seafarers who enable maritime traffic from Ukrainian seaports should be absolutely guaranteed if the agreement is to achieve results within the planned deadline.

IAPH and The Seafarers’ Charity appeal to maritime industry to support Ukrainian port workers
IAPH has been working to support port workers and their families impacted by the humanitarian disaster caused by the war in Ukraine. This emergency appeal is being coordinated by IAPH and The Seafarers’ Charity. Funds raised are being distributed to appropriate delivery partners operating in Ukraine including the Maritime Transport Workers Trade Union of Ukraine (MTWTU) and its welfare fund Mortrans.

Call by Ukrainian Seaports Authority for applications to join cargo convoys
The Ukrainian Seaports Authority have in the meantime issued a communique advising that preparations are being made at the Ukrainian ports of Odesa, Chornomorsk and Pivdennyi for cargo operations, requesting applications for the inclusion of those vessels which will be led by convoy to and from these ports.

Source: https://maritimefairtrade.org/russia-attacks-odesa-port-after-signing-agreement-casting-doubts-on-its-reliability/


Earlier this year, a group of female students at Korea Maritime & Ocean University filed a complaint with the Human Rights Committee against the university for gender discrimination.  They alleged they were not given a fair opportunity to participate in the field exercise program for marine technicians.

This work placement program is run by shipping companies partnered with the university.  Traditionally, the ratio of female students has always been lower than male students. However, in the past five years, 80 percent of the male applicants received an offer while only 39 percent of female applicants did.

This led to a disparity in the employment rate between the genders. During the same period, the employment rate of male graduates reached over 80 percent but the rate of female graduates recorded just above 61 percent. The rate of female graduates who completed the field exercise program was way above that at 85.2 percent.

The university told the Human Rights Committee during investigation that the inclination to select more male candidates is due to the “vocational characteristics of the shipping industry”. As the shipping industry has long been a male-dominated one, it is claimed the companies running the program do not have sufficient facilities for women, such as toilets or locker rooms on their ships.

On June 13, the Human Rights Committee found that the university’s “sexist customs” are “systematically excluding women in the maritime labor market” and therefore, made the recommendation for the school to be more inclusive via a change of policy.  The Committee also recommended that the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, which has a seat at the university’ board, to conduct a check on the partnering shipping companies and report on the gender ratio of crew members who have marine technician licenses.

The university accepted the Committee’s finding and said it will work towards a sustainable solution.

Deep-rooted male-dominant culture

Han Chul-hwan, international logistics professor at Dongseo University, pointed out that this case showed the “very anachronistic tradition” in the industry. “It’s appalling that an educational institution that trains aspiring marine technicians keeps an outdated, sexist tradition like that,” he said during an interview with Maritime Fairtrade.

Prof. Han attributed this tradition to Confucianism.  He also suggested that the labor-intensive nature of the shipping industry, where perceived male qualities such as strength, toughness and stamina are valued, could have worsen the situation.

“South Korea is a society where the male-centered Confucianist culture is deep-seated,” he said. “The culture has been long established in many industries, and the shipping industry is one of them. So-called ‘macho’ culture still exists throughout the industry, for example, frequent after-work gatherings and drinking sessions led by men. It is not an environment that welcomes women.”

He added: “The shipping business has traditionally been about sailing in the ocean, by fighting against any bad weather conditions. This is why men, who are considered to be stronger than women, have been more preferred. Many of the existing cabins and facilities on ships are built for men. If shipping companies were to hire more women, they need to pay an extra cost to build facilities for them.”

Prof. Han said it will take time to change mindset as the process involved upending long-held tradition and culture.

“I admire the committee’s decisions, but we all need to have a new mindset to solve the gender inequality problem in the industry,” he said. “We hear about gender equality or diversity, but many businesses, even educational institutions, still maintain male-centered traditions.”

He noted that there is now less demand for manual work because of automation and technology advancements and this development is good for leveling the gender discrimination playing field.

“Ports and ships are becoming smarter than before with the help of information technology,” he said. “Traits like being careful and multi-tasking abilities, other than just brute strength, are now prioritized in the field. The shipping companies also should find ways to actively hire more female talents following the changing trends.”

Han added that hiring more female talents will also be a solution to the labor shortage caused by the aging population and low birth rate in South Korea.

Source: https://maritimefairtrade.org/korean-female-maritime-students-file-complaint-against-university-for-gender-discrimination/


The United States government, through the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA), in partnership with the National Coast Watch System (NCWS), concluded July 15, its one-week review of facilities, equipment, and training programs provided to enhance the Philippines’ maritime domain awareness.

The in-depth review allowed DTRA to better understand the various aspects of the NCWS and further enhance DTRA experts’ knowledge of specific regional maritime security challenges through meetings with personnel from the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG), Coast Guard Weapons, Communications, Electronics, and Information Systems Command (CGWCEISC), and NCWS in Manila, Negros Oriental, Palawan, and Cebu.

These site visits also enabled DTRA to witness the integration and cooperation between NCWS personnel and PCG District Visayas Stations and observe the effectiveness and condition of communication and sensor equipment to guide future upgrades for each site.

During a visit to the National Coast Watch Center (NCWC) in Manila, DTRA briefed CGWCEISC Coast Guard Deputy Commander Arnoldo M. Lim on the outcomes of the visit which are expected to contribute to a more effective and capable NCWS.

“Our common goal is to achieve optimum maritime domain awareness,” NCWC Director Rear Admiral Roy Echeverria said.

“This review’s outcomes are critical because maritime domain awareness requires precise coordination and communication to execute the mission successfully. Optimal enforcement often requires cooperation between multiple agencies within the Philippine Government or foreign partners,” DTRA International Project Officer U.S. Navy Commander Bryan Kroncke said.

“DTRA understands these requirements and is proud to partner with the Philippines, through the NCWS, to provide the tools necessary to address maritime security threats.”

A long-time partner of the Philippine government, DTRA played an important supporting role in establishing the NCWS. DTRA was responsible for constructing the NCWC in Manila, Regional Coordination Centers (RCCs) in Cebu and Palawan, and many other manned and unmanned sites around the archipelago.

DTRA also worked closely with the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) and the Coast Guard Weapons, Communications, Electronics, and Information Systems Command (CGWCEISC) to ensure that the NCWS can meet current and future maritime security challenges.

Since 2012, DTRA has provided more than $64 million to the NCWS for the acquisition of advanced equipment and the training of personnel, enabling it to become the premier maritime security entity in the Philippines.

“This successful review would not have been possible without the cooperation of NCWC and their impressive and professional personnel,” Commander Kroncke added. “DTRA looks forward to continue supporting the NCWS in their efforts to become a regional maritime security leader.”

Source: https://maritimefairtrade.org/philippines-u-s-conduct-maritime-security-review/


Yesterday marked the second anniversary of the grounding of the Wakashio bulk carrier off Mauritius, the most high profile shipping casualty of the decade so far. Two years on, legal cases continue to mount.

A coalition of around 1,700 citizens living around where the giant vessel broke up are filing a case to the Supreme Court in Mauritius demanding the Japanese owner of the newcastlemax pay more in damages than the earlier agreed sum of $16.8m.

Latest data shows 2,321 local claims out of around 5,000 filed have been processed.

Preliminary findings of the Japan Transport Safety Board (JTSB) on the accident, which saw more than 1,000 tons of bunker fuel wash ashore when the ship broke in two, show a long list of errors. The captain hove to shore so his crew could get a wifi signal. Investigators also believe the ship did not have the right chart onboard. Moreover, the wrong chart was used and with the wrong scale as well.

Source: https://splash247.com/wakashio-claims-row-escalates/


Finally, after 10 years the Italian Republic will honor the late Costa Cruises crew member Giuseppe Girolamo, with the highest award for Civil Valor. The award honors Giuseppe’s act of exceptional courage that clearly manifest solidarity, recognizing his heroic act to save others during the Costa Concordia disaster.

The official announcement from the Italian Government about the recognition was received on 12 July, two days after what would have been Giuseppe’s 40th birthday.

“The medal finally gives dignity and value to the generous and grandiose gesture of this extraordinary young man,” said Michele Longo – former mayor of the Municipality of Alberobello.

Giuseppe Girolamo was a 30-year-old musician and was among the 32 victims of the Costa Concordia shipwreck. He did not hesitate in the panic following the sinking of Costa Concordia to give his seat in the lifeboat to a family with two children, despite not being able to swim.

Giuseppe played as a drummer aboard the cruise ship, he enjoyed dancing and entertaining passengers and officers.  That fateful evening, after the ship struck rocks off the coast of Giglio Island, following the abandon ship signal, Giuseppe managed to find a place on one of the lifeboats. However, a family remained, with two small children. The young Italian drummer didn’t hesitate for a moment and left his place on the lifeboat by letting them board and save themselves.

Giuseppe’s father said that his son was aware of two things; That this was the last lifeboat and that he did not know how to swim. However in that tragic moment, he reasoned with his heart, he gave his life to save two young children.

The mother of the saved children Antonella Bologna describes Giuseppe as an angel who descended to help her in that desperate moment.

“There was a man dressed in black, in a corner, and I remember saying to him: Please, you have to pick us up, I have two children. In the widespread panic he managed to stay calm and help us. I think he was an angel or he seemed one to me. Because it was only thanks to him that we were able to get into the third lifeboat and take the final seats. After that he disappeared.

Giuseppe drowned, sucked by the water that night.

Ten years later, the citizens of Alberobello and his fellow shipmates still mourn Giuseppe Girolamo and celebrate his heroic gesture.

Source: https://crew-center.com/costa-concordia-crew-member-honored-gold-medal-civil-valor-giuseppe-lost-his-life-save-two-children


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED