A Marshall Islands flagged livestock carrier listing from hull damage off Australia’s western coast was directed to the Port of Geraldton.

On Monday night, the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) tasked its Challenger search and rescue jet to fly over the vessel Barkly Pearl, and it was able to confirm damage to the starboard side of the vessel, which was listing to port.

AMSA General Manager of Response Mark Morrow said there were significant concerns for the integrity of the vessel and its ability to safely reach Indonesia, its planned destination. The 1993-built vessel had been sailing from Jakarta, India.

“We held concerns about the integrity of the vessel and the potential for environmental issues” Morrow said. “As a result, AMSA issued a direction for the vessel to make its way to safety in the Port of Geraldton.”

AMSA officials are currently working with Western Australian authorities to ensure that the vessel arrives safely in the Port of Geraldton. This includes managing any COVID-19 risks on arrival in line with state protocols.

Source: marinelink

 


More vessels are being detained by port state control (PSC) because of ecdis deficiencies. The Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) has detained eight ships in the first five months of this year for having deficiencies in ecdis set-up and crew competence on the electronic navigation device. This is double the amount as the second half of last year.

In response, AMSA released Marine Notice 8/2016 about the proper operation of ecdis, and advised shipowners that this will be a priority for its inspectors. The main deficiencies AMSA inspectors are finding are:

  • the latest version of electronic navigational charts (ENCs) are not used for preparing a voyage plan before departure of the vessel
  • large scale charts are not used for preparing a passage plan
  • a disk of ENC is delivered by the shipowner or management company agent after arrival of the vessel in port
  • the degree of crew’s familiarisation with ecdis is insufficient
  • description in the Safety Management System (SMS) on operation of ecdis is insufficient.

Shipowners should ensure the latest versions of ENCs are installed on ecdis and the crew can demonstrate to inspectors the necessary operation for safety navigation. AMSA said this should include demonstrating under keel clearance, safety depth and manual position fixing.  If a crew member has a training certificate for ecdis but cannot demonstrate such operations, the PSC inspector could detain the vessel due to a lack of skills for important navigation equipment.

Classification societies have recommended that shipowners and managers should ensure crew members are familiar with the proper operation of ecdis and ships are ready to meet the PSC requirements before arrival in any Australian port. AMSA is not alone as other PSC authorities have raised similar comments concerning ecdis.

In response to PSC concerns, Da Gama Maritime has reiterated steps that shipowners and managers should conduct to ensure vessels continue to meet IMO requirements and do not cause a navigation incident. Da Gama recommends ecdis alerts should be set up correctly to reduce alarm fatigue on the bridge. The safety contour is the most important alert to set up correctly. “The safety contour needs to be of greater value than the draft of your vessel, but low enough to provide safe water to navigate,” it said in a newsletter.

Da Gama warned against overloading ecdis with data. It recommends crew should consider whether they need so much information on the primary ecdis for navigaion. Some of the weather information could be displayed instead on the back-up ecdis or route planning station. For good ecdis housekeeping, Da Gama recommended operators only load ENCs they expect to use and updates in areas they are operating in. They should back-up the routes, tracks and settings regularly and not switch off ecdis in port. They should also respond to requests from service desk emails in a timely manner.

In the longer term, shipowners and managers should ensure onboard ecdis is updated with the new presentation library standards from the International Hydrographic Organization. Crew will need to be familiarised in the changes to software and operation of ecdis once these updates are installed.

Source: rivieramm


Industry experts predict an imminent spike in vessel detention rates as inspections and surveys resumed, on 20 July, as COVID-19 restrictions ease, with crew wellbeing and rights issues expected to be one of the top reasons for detentions.

Following the UK Maritime Coastguard Agency (MCA) announcement of a phased resumption of inspection activities, beginning 20 July, Mark McGurran, group managing director AqualisBraemar, told SAS he expects to see an increase in Maritime Labour Convention (MLC) deficiencies caused by lack of crew changes due to COVID-19 travel restrictions.

“MLC deficiencies might also be more frequent in the immediate future as many seafarers have been stuck on board longer than the usual maximum periods due to travel restrictions, closed borders and unfortunately sometimes the lack of compassion and cooperation from local authorities,” said McGurran.

Capt. Matt Turner AFNI, a former Paris MoU PSC Officer (UK), agreed with McGurran that MLC violations will be “high on the ‘detainable deficiencies’ list” as more inspectors begin making their way on board ships. Turner also predicted a rise in International Safety Management (ISM) Code failures, as certain shipping companies have exploited the widespread use of extensions and dispensations granted by Flag States, and will expect them to be automatically accepted by Port State Control Officers (PSCO).

“I think we will see a large increase in vessels being detained by PSC MoU’s, partly due to the attempt at wholesale disregard of Conventions by the commercially focused Flag States,” Turner told SAS. “[Such Flag States] continue to issue dispensation and exemption letters well beyond the scope that the Conventions allow, to suit their commercial objectives”. One may question, at what point would a Flag State withdraw certification if a vessel is not in compliance, Turner put forward.

Due to the suspension of ship surveys and inspections, three-month short-term certificates were issued to ensure vessel compliance. The MCA in its announcement on 6 July stated that these would remain valid until their expiration, but specified to SAS that going forward such certificates would only be issued in exceptional circumstances beyond the 20 July resumption of inspection activities.

Claudia Ohlmeier, maritime group leader PSC, DNV GL, estimated that, as well as MLC and ISM issues, PSC regimes will probably focus on the implementation of new requirements that entered into force in 2020. “For example, since March 2020 high-Sulphur fuel oil cannot be carried in fuel oil tanks unless the vessel is fitted with a fully operational exhaust gas cleaning system or other approved equivalent arrangement e.g. a fully operational scrubber,” explained Ohlmeier.

McGurran also predicted that deficiencies in relation to certification might also be on the rise as, due to backlogs, shipping companies may not have been able to arrange for surveys and the renewal of certain statutory trading certificates.

The suspension of PSC inspections was announced by all 10 PSC regimes at a virtual summit hosted by the International Maritime Organization, on 8 April. The regimes agreed to a more targeted approach during COVID-19, to ensure the safety of their surveyors and inspectors. As such, inspections were greatly reduced; according to data provided by DNV GL, on average there were 70 vessel detentions a month under the Tokyo MoU in the last quarter of 2019, which fell to between 14-20 detentions during the months of the COVID-19 outbreak. DNV GL data also shows a resumption of inspection activities, inspection rates under the Tokyo MoU rose from 1117 in April to 1640 in May 2020.

The announcement made by the MCA may be the first of many and signal a return to normalcy when it comes to inspections. The phased approach means that currently only survey and inspection of UK flagged vessels will be carried out, with PSC inspections expected to be resumed imminently.

During the COVID-19 restrictions there has been a reliance on remote surveys to protect crew and inspectors from spreading or contracting the virus. Questions have arisen over whether this trend will continue, as well as over the effectiveness of remote surveys.

“The real observed situation onboard by a PSCO [port state control officer] may differ greatly from the video streamed attendance that a Class Society or Flag State may have been involved in,” commented Turner. He also raised concerns over the use and scope of checklists to provide the same level of inspection that a formally trained PSCO with the freedom to wander around and ‘smell’ deficiencies will be able to.

McGurran agreed stating that remote surveys were limited in effectiveness. “Physical attendance where possible is of paramount importance, especially for more critical issues; no technology has yet been invented that can effectively replace the basics. The intuition and senses of an impartial, experienced surveyor remains the best means to assess any situation,” he said.

Ohlmeier, on the other hand put forward that remote surveys are equal to in-person surveys in their assurance and scope and that it is only in the delivery that they differ. However, all three agreed that remote surveys will not fully replace the role of a physical surveyor on board yet. “We do not, however, view remote surveys as being a solution for all surveys. In most cases, we will still prefer an in-person survey to benefit from the professional judgment and instinct of our highly experienced surveyors,” concluded Ohlmeier.

Source: safetyatsea


During July, there were zero new detentions of foreign flagged vessels in a UK port.

1. In response to one of the recommendations of Lord Donaldson’s inquiry into the prevention of pollution from merchant shipping, and in compliance with the EU Directive on Port State Control (2009/16/EC as amended), the Maritime and Coastguard Agency (MCA) publishes details of the foreign flagged vessels detained in UK ports each month.

2. The UK is part of a regional agreement on port state control known as the Paris Memorandum of Understanding on Port State Control (Paris MOU) and information on all ships that are inspected is held centrally in an electronic database known as THETIS. This allows the ships with a high risk rating and poor detention records to be targeted for future inspection.

3. Inspections of foreign flagged ships in UK ports are undertaken by surveyors from the Maritime and Coastguard Agency. When a ship is found to be not in compliance with applicable convention requirements, a deficiency may be raised. If any of their deficiencies are so serious, they have to be rectified before departure, then the ship will be detained.

4. All deficiencies should be rectified before departure.

5. When applicable, the list includes those passenger craft prevented from operating under the provisions of the EU Directive on a system of inspections for the safe operation of Ro-Ro passenger ships and high-speed passenger craft in regular service and amending directive 2009/16/EC and repealing Council Directive 1999/35/EC (Directive EU 2017/2110).

Notes on the list of detentions:

• Full details of the ship: The accompanying detention list shows ship’s International Maritime Organisation (IMO) number which is unchanging throughout the ship’s life and uniquely identifies it. It also shows the ship’s name and flag state at the time of its inspection.
• Company: The company shown in the vessel’s Safety Management Certificate (SMC) or if there is no SMC, then the party otherwise believed to be responsible for the safety of the ship at the time of inspection.
• Classification society: The list shows the classification society responsible for classing the ship only.
• Recognised organisation: Responsible for conducting the statutory surveys: and issuing statutory certificates on behalf of the flag state.
• White (WL), grey (GL) and black lists (BL) are issued by the Paris MoU on 01 July each year and shows the performance of flag state.
• Deficiencies: The deficiencies listed are the ones which were detainable. Further details of other deficiencies can be provided on request.

SHIPS DETAINED IN JULY 2020
DETENTIONS CARRIED OVER FROM PREVIOUS MONTHS
Vessel Name: MARCO POLO

GT: 22080

IMO: 6417097

Flag: Bahamas (white list)

Company: Global Cruise Lines Ltd

Classification society: DNV GL

Recognised organisation: DNV GL

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: DNV GL

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: DNV GL

Date and place of detention: 19th June 2020 at Avonmouth

Summary: Six deficiencies with one ground for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: VASCO DA GAMA

GT: 55877

IMO: 8919245

Flag: Bahamas (white list)

Company: Global Cruise Lines Ltd

Classification society: Lloyd’s Register

Recognised organisation: Lloyd’s Register

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: DNVGL

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: Lloyd’s Register

Date and place of detention: 19th June 2020 at Tilbury

Summary: Five deficiencies with three grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: ASTOR

GT: 20704

IMO: 8506373

Flag: Bahamas (white list)

Company: Global Cruise Lines Ltd

Classification society: DNV GL

Recognised organisation: DNV GL

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: DNV GL

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: DNV GL

Date and place of detention: 19th June 2020 at Tilbury

Summary: Two deficiencies with two grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: ASTORIA

GT: 16144

IMO: 5383304

Flag: Portugal (white list)

Company: Global Cruise Lines Ltd

Classification society: BV

Recognised organisation: BV

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: BV

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: BV

Date and place of detention: 19th June 2020 at Tilbury

Summary: Five deficiencies with four grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: COLUMBUS

GT: 63786

IMO: 8611398

Flag: Bahamas (white list)

Company: Global Cruise Lines Ltd

Classification society: Lloyd’s Register

Recognised organisation: Lloyd’s Register

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: DNVGL

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: Lloyd’s Register

Date and place of detention: 19th June 2020 at Tilbury

Summary: Five deficiencies with four grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: LIVA GRETA

GT: 851

IMO: 8801072

Flag: Latvia (white list)

Company: Regulus SIA

Classification society: RINA

Recognised organisation: RINA

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: RMRS

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: RMRS

Date and place of detention: 11th January 2020 at Birkenhead

Summary: Nine deficiencies with two grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: POSEIDON

GT: 1412

IMO: 7363217

Flag: Iceland (White list)

Company: Neptune EHF

Classification society: NA

Recognised organisation: NA

Recognised organisation for ISM Doc: DNV-GL

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: N/A (SMC issued by Flag)

Date and place of detention: 19th July 2018 at Hull

Summary: Ten deficiencies with two grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: TECOIL POLARIS

GT: 1814

IMO No: 8883290

Flag: Russian Federation (Grey list)

Company: Tecoil Shipping Ltd

Classification society: RMRS

Recognised organisation: RMRS

Recognised organisation for ISM DOC: RMRS

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: RMRS

Date and place of detention: 6th June 2018 at Immingham

Summary: Twenty-seven deficiencies with six grounds for detentions

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Vessel Name: CIEN PORCIENTO (General Cargo)

GT: 106.

IMO No: 8944446.

Flag: Unregistered.

Company: Open Window Inc.

Classification society: Unclassed.

Recognised organisation: Not applicable.

Recognised organisation for ISM DOC: Not applicable.

Recognised organisation for ISM SMC: Not applicable

Date and place of detention: 4 March 2010, Lowestoft

Summary: Thirty deficiencies including seven grounds for detention

This vessel was still detained on 31st July 2020
Source: Maritime and Coastguard Agency


One of numerous possible ways to comply with the IMO’s strategy on the reduction of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from ships is to use biofuels or biofuel blends. This statutory news aims to clarify the regulatory status and other considerations on the use of these new fuels.

Technical and Regulatory news No 21/2020

Relevant for ship owners and managers as well as yards, design offices, suppliers and flag states.

DNV GL has received many requests regarding safe operation and how to comply with international regulations for the use of biofuels and/or biofuel blends. Below is a summary of regulatory issues, safety, and other operational aspects:

1. Types of biofuel

  • FAME (fatty acid methyl aster): FAME is produced from vegetable oils, animal fats or waste cooking oils by transesterification, where various oils (triglycerides) are converted to methyl esters. This is the most widely available type of biodiesel in the industry and is often blended with regular marine diesel. The marine fuel specification standard ISO 8217:2017 includes additional specifications (DF grades) for distillate marine fuels containing up to 7.0 volume % FAME. The FAME used for blending shall meet specification requirements of EN 14214 or ASTM D6751. FAME-diesel blends with up to 30% BTL content are also used in automotive applications and referred to as B20 or B30.
    International standards: EN 14214, ASTM D6751, EN 590
  • BTL (biomass to liquid fuels): BTL is a synthetic fuel produced from biomass by means of thermo-chemical conversion. The end product can be fuels that are chemically different from conventional fuels such as gasoline or diesel, but can also be used in diesel engines.
    International standards: EN 16709, EN 15940
  • HVO (hydrotreated vegetable oil): HVO or HDRD (hydrogenation-derived renewable diesel) is the product of fats or vegetable oils – alone or blended with petroleum – refined by a hydrotreating process known as fatty acidsto-hydrocarbon hydrotreatment. Diesel produced using this process is often called renewable diesel to differentiate it from FAME biodiesel. The overall production process is typically more costly than for FAME biodiesel, however HVO/HDRD is a drop-in fuel which can be directly introduced in distribution and refuelling facilities as well as existing diesel engines without any further modification.
    International standards: ASTM D 975

Regulatory items on biofuels to be observed

MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 18, “Fuel Oil Availability and Qualities”, applies to using both fuels derived from petroleum refining and derived by methods other than petroleum refining*, e.g. biodiesel. In the latter case, the fuel shall, among others, not exceed the applicable sulphur content. Moreover, such fuels shall not cause an engine to exceed the applicable NOx emission limits. Meeting the sulphur limits is normally not a challenge for biofuels, however the NOx emissions might be higher than with fossil diesel oils, due to possibly high oxygen content.

To meet the requirements of MARPOL Annex VI, evidence must be made to confirm that the diesel engine complies with the applicable NOx emission limits (which depend on the keel laying date of the vessel and the operational area) also when biofuels are used for combustion purposes. To demonstrate this, depending on the biofuel used, the evidence may be a challenge and it may require on-board emission testing where the results should be presented in g/kWh (not only concentrations in ppm). Due to the complexity of the required tests, DNV GL recommends performing the emission tests on stationary test beds.

In case test bed measurements cannot be made, and on-board tests must be performed, an application for exemption from Regulation 18 of MARPOL Annex VI is required. An application format can be found in MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 3: “Trials for Ship Emission Reduction and Control Technology Research”. Exemptions for the testing of the biofuels can be granted up to 18 months for smaller engines, up to five years for larger engines with cylinder displacements over 30 litres. DNV GL can assist you in approaching the flag administrations for applying such exemptions.

As an alternative to the measurements, and in case it can be proven by either analysis or reference to a known international standard that the emission properties of the biofuel are equivalent to that of conventional diesel, this evidence might act as proof that the biofuel does not cause the engine to exceed the applicable NOx emission limits.

If additional alterations, which are beyond the limits in the approved NOx Technical File, the engine(s) are required to optimize the combustion when using the biofuel, and the NOx Technical File needs to be formally amended.

Technical challenges and solutions

Below is a summary of items to be observed for the use of biofuels and a few words on how to prevent damages on board:

  • Microbial growth: Bacteria and mould may grow if condensed water accumulates in biodiesel fuel. Microbial growth leads to excessive formation of sludge, clogged filters and piping. Frequent draining of tanks and the application of biocide in the fuel may reduce or mitigate microbial growth.
  • Oxygen degradation: Biodiesel can degrade over time, forming contaminants of polymers, and other insolubles. Deposits in piping and engines could form, compromising operational performance. In advanced stages, this could lead to increased fuel acidity, which could result in corrosion in the fuel system and accumulation of deposits in pumps and injectors. It is therefore recommended not to bunker the fuel for long-term storage before use, but to treat the fuel as fresh goods and to use it within a relatively short period of time. Adding antioxidants to the fuel at an early stage may improve the ability of a somewhat longer time of storage without degradation.
  • Low temperature: Biodiesels in higher concentration usually have a higher cloud point than diesel (depending on feedstock), leading to poor flow properties and the clogging of filters at lower temperatures. It is therefore important to know the product’s cold flow properties and to keep the storage and transfer temperatures above the cloud point.
  • Corrosion: This is most critical for biodiesel in higher concentration (B80-B100). Some types of hoses and gaskets could degrade, leading to loss of integrity and interaction with some metallic material such as copper, brass, lead, tin, zinc, etc. It could also result in an increased formation of deposits. Hence, it is important to verify that these components in the fuel system are endurable and can be used together with biofuel.
  • Possible degeneration of rubber sealings, gaskets and hoses: It is important to verify that these components in the fuel system are endurable and can be used together with biofuel.
  • Conversion: Biodiesel has shown to have a solvent property, so when switching from diesel to biofuel it is expected that deposits in the fuel system will be flushed, clogging fuel filters. It is recommended to flush the system and/or to monitor filters during this period.

DNV GL support

DNV GL provides support for the supervision using the specific biofuel on the main and auxiliary engines. Depending on your individual needs, we offer the following services:

  • Review of specific instructions and risk analysis for the trials with biofuels.
  • Review of a verification procedure to comply with MARPOL Annex VI, Reg. 13, 14 and 18 (e.g. measurement equipment and data to be measured or, alternatively, a check of equivalence of specific biofuel to conventional diesel).
  • Review of relevant reports (incl. calculations) and the results of the sea trials.
  • Communication, including a recommendation towards the ship’s administration.
  • Exhaust emission measurements by DNV GL Envilab (see link below).

Source: dnvgl

 


The thirteen P&I Clubs which comprise the International Group (the “Group”) between them provide marine liability cover (protection and indemnity) for approximately 90% of the world’s ocean-going tonnage.

Through the unique Group structure, the member Clubs, whilst individually competitive, share between them their large loss exposures, and also share their respective knowledge and expertise on matters relating to shipowners liabilities and the insurance and reinsurance of such liabilities.

Each Group Club is an independent, not-for-profit mutual insurance association, providing cover for its shipowner and charterer members against third party liabilities arising out of the use and operation of ships. Each Club is owned by its shipowner and charterer members, and its operations and activities are overseen by a board of directors, or committee, elected from the membership. The day-to-day operations of the Clubs are handled by professional managers, either “in-house” or external, who are appointed by and report to their Club board/committee.

The Clubs cover a wide range of liabilities, including loss of life and personal injury to crew, passengers and others on board, cargo loss and damage, pollution by oil and other hazardous substances, wreck removal, collision and damage to property. The Clubs also provide a wide range of services to their members including claims handling, advice on legal issues and loss prevention, and they regularly play a leading role in coordinating the response to, and management of, maritime casualties.

Source: ukpandi


A key element of the MARPOL regulations is the requirement to record discharges of shipboard substances and materials which could cause pollution to the environment. Traditionally, these record books have been maintained in paper form.

On 17 May 2019, IMO’s MEPC 74 adopted the resolutions below to allow for ERBs to be used. Guidelines to support the use of ERBs were also adopted by the Committee. These amendments, which will reduce the heavy burden associated with paperwork and which are thus to be welcomed, will enter into force on 1 October 2020;

Resolution MEPC.314(74) – Amendments to MARPOL Annexes I, II and V (Electronic Record Books)
Resolution MEPC.316(74)– Amendments to MARPOL Annex VI (Electronic Record Books and EEDI regulations for ice-strengthened ships)
Resolution MEPC.317(74) – Amendments to the NOx Technical Code 2008 (Electronic Record Books and Certification requirements for SCR systems)
Resolution MEPC.312(74) – Guidelines for the use of Electronic Record Books under MARPOL

The Guidelines are only applicable to the use of ERBs on board to meet the requirements of the following record books and recording requirements under MARPOL Annexes I, II, V & VI and the Technical Code on Control of Emission of Nitrogen Oxides from Marine Diesel Engines (NOX Technical Code):

  • Oil Record Book, parts I and II (MARPOL Annex I, regulations 17.1 and 36.1);
  • Cargo Record Book (MARPOL Annex II, regulation 15.1);
  • Garbage Record Book, parts I and II (MARPOL Annex V, regulation 10.3);
  • Ozone-depleting Substances Record Book (MARPOL Annex VI, regulation 12.6);
  • Recording of the tier and on/off status of marine diesel engines (MARPOL Annex VI, regulation 13.5.3);
  • Record of Fuel Oil Changeover (MARPOL Annex VI, regulation 14.6); and
  • Record Book of Engine Parameters (NOX Technical Code, paragraph 6.2.2.7).

An ERB is defined in the Guidance as a device or a system used to electronically record entries. When an ERB is to be used as an alternative to an official hard copy record book onboard a ship, the State’s Administration is required to assess the device or system and to issue a “Declaration of Marpol Electronic Record Book”. A copy of this declaration must be kept onboard the ship. The procedures related to the use of ERBs must be documented in the ship’s Safety Management System (SMS).

To comply with MARPOL requirements, an ERB should have the capability to retain all records made for the minimum period as specified in each Annex of MARPOL. The ERB should also have the capability to produce a hard copy of verified records for the master to certify as a true copy, upon request from relevant authorities, and to allow automatic backup of data in its system to offline storage.

Source: ukpandi


LabTest is the industry leader in assisting manufacturers in acquiring approvals for marine products.

Our friendly and knowledgeable staff will provide you with the knowledge and assessments you need to get your marine products approved for your intended market.

Our extensive network and experience in the marine industry offers our clients easy access to CE Marking, Classification Agency Type Approval, and the Wheel Mark for the Marine Equipment Directive.

At LabTest, we favor a single test plan.

This proven approach provides you with a One-Stop-Solution for your product approvals. For your next marine equipment approval, let us assist you with the approval process.

We can make it an easy, efficient, and affordable experience.

LabTest is a recognized Testing Laboratory for the Recreational Craft Directive by IMCI for the following ISO standards: 8846, 8847, 8848, 8849, 9097, 10133, 10239, 10240, 10592, 11105, 11192, 12216, 13297, 13929, 14895, 15083 & 29775

Type Approvals

LabTest’s approach to Type Approval is with a Single Test Plan, thereby reducing your time to market and your testing costs. With our established network of classification agencies, we can help you get your desired classification (Type Approval). Here is a list of Classification Agencies we work with:

Wheel Mark

Products within the scope of the Marine Equipment Directive (96/98/EC) shall apply as equipment for use on board ships:

(a) a new Community ship whether or not the ship is situated within the Community at the time of construction;marine product testing wheel mark

(b) an existing Community ship
— where such equipment was not previously carried on board
or
— where equipment which was previously carried on board the ship is replaced, except where international conventions permit otherwise, whether or not the ship is situated within the Community when the equipment is placed on board.

Coast Guard

Canadian Coast Guard

LabTest evaluates products in accordance to CSA Standards and TP Specifications, as required by the Canadian Coast Guard.Canadian Coast Guard

United States Coast Guard

LabTest evaluates products in accordance to the ABYC Standards and the CFR Specifications, as required by the US Coast Guard.US Coast Guard

Recreational Craft Directive

LabTest evaluates products in accordance to the standards published in the Official Journal of the European Union, as per the Recreational Craft Directive. LabTest is listed as a Recognized Testing Facility by the International Marine Certification Institute for the Recreational Craft Directive.

Source: labtestcert


The shipping industry, like many others, continues to suffer as a result of the global spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Whilst hope remains that the outbreak can be managed and brought under control, the spread of the pandemic may stimulate or accelerate the adoption of autonomous technology onboard vessels and drive interest in the commercial use of MASS. During lockdown, we have been approached by numerous owners and charterers to advise on the impact of COVID-19 on conventional shipping, including issues regarding crew changes, repatriation, interpretation of force majeure clauses and the doctrine of frustration, insurance coverage issues, completion of the sale and purchase of vessels, ship building issues, refit and repair contracts and navigational restrictions. Whilst all of these issues will also be relevant for autonomous vessels, some MASS are, by design, insulated from the current crewing challenges facing the conventional shipping industry.

The impact of COVID-19 on crews should not be understated. The International Chamber of Shipping has estimated that every month roughly 100,000 seafarers reach the end of their employment contract and need to be repatriated. However, most jurisdictions have implemented restrictive rules for seafarers transiting their jurisdiction, either to return home or to join a vessel. Guy Platten, the International Chamber of Shipping’s Secretary-General, recently warned that there are “currently 1.2 million seafarers at sea … limitations on crew changes have potential to cause serious disruption to the flow of trade”.

Depending on the level of autonomy displayed by a MASS, these crewing issues are less likely to impact the vessel’s operational performance and, with the uncertainty surrounding when a worldwide vaccine will become available, we expect that there is likely to be increasing interest in MASS.

The spread of COVID-19 has also forced shipping companies to implement remote working and digital technologies for business continuation and fleet optimisation. For example, suppliers of unmanned aerial vehicles and remote-control services have found new markets in ship inspections. Further, shipping companies and original equipment manufacturers are using artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance, intelligent scheduling, real-time analytics and improving performance. Digitalisation has also opened new services and connectivity for class. For example, DNV GL now issues an e-certificate every four minutes and 80% of its customers have indicated they would use a digital tool for smart survey bookings. DNV GL has completed 17,400 remote surveys since 2018, over half of which have taken place in the past 6 months, with DNV GL conducting on average 300 remote surveys per week since coronavirus-restricted travel was implemented.

COVID-19 has, however, caused a number of MASS-related projects to be put on hold. Regular readers of our bulletins will recall that we have reported previously on the Yara Birkeland. The hull was launched in Romania in February 2020 and was expected to arrive at the Vard Brevik shipyard in Norway in May where it was due to be fitted with control and navigation systems and undergo testing. As a result of the pandemic and the change in the global shipping outlook, Yara International has paused further construction. We may see other projects being put on hold until the economic impact of COVID-19 is fully understood.

MASRC20

At the 5th annual MASRC, held at the UK Chamber of Shipping on 15-16 January 2020, stakeholders discussed the opportunities and issues associated with MASS, including costs, growth and performance. Despite there being more than 1,000 autonomous vessels operating in international waters, together accumulating tens of thousands of incident-free days at sea, there were differing views as to just how successful MASS will be. Operators of small autonomous vessels were optimistic. However, larger shipping operators were more sceptical, for example as to the reliability of software and systems, and the costs of modifying conventional vessels to enable autonomous capabilities.

The event featured a number of presentations, covering a range of aspects in relation to autonomous shipping. These included presentations on the IMO’s Regulatory Scoping Exercise, cyber risks and autonomous navigation. In a keynote speech, Nusrat Ghani MP discussed the UK Government’s Maritime 2050 strategy, which aims to make the UK a global maritime leader and grow the industry over the next few decades. The speech focussed on technology, digitalisation and the environment, with clear support being expressed for autonomous maritime technologies. It is unclear if the financial issues caused by the current pandemic will impact this plan.

Advantages of autonomy on the transport modes

A recent TT Club online forum broached the subject of ‘Drones and autonomous vehicles: The future… now?’. During the forum, the panel examined the barriers to growth of autonomous freight transport. Speakers included Svilen Rangelov (Co-Founder and CEO at Dronamics); Pranav Manpuria (CEO of autonomous truck developer, Flux Auto) and Hussain Quraishi (Strategic Innovation Manager at Wärtsilä).

The panellists suggested that increased automation at sea would lead to improved safety and voyage optimisation (which had already been realised). In the medium-term, reduced crewing was expected to impact upon coastal trade the most as crew expense forms a greater percentage of operating costs.

The lack of uniform regulation across national governments and even within countries was described as a major block to autonomous vehicle and drone deployment. The level of investment required was not, however, high on the list of obstacles.

Environmental hazards (such as bad weather affecting autonomous ships) were seen as challenges that technology could cope with, while the avoidance of human error will improve safety. However, the forum concluded that vulnerability to cyber-attack was perceived to increase with the use of computer-controlled vehicles and was therefore a strong disincentive to adoption.

Investments in MASS projects

Some stakeholders see significant market potential in autonomous vessels, with such vessels expected to promote safe, efficient and sustainable operations around the world. An example is Kongsberg, which has designed a project to test and develop a wide range of autonomous technologies in collaboration with a number of partners. This includes navigation and intelligent machinery systems, self-diagnostics, prognostics and operation scheduling capabilities, and communication technology. The project will receive a €20.1m grant from the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme to equip two vessels with such technologies, so that they can be autonomous and controlled remotely.

Separately, Kongsberg has recently announced that, as part of a collaboration with Bastø Fosen and the Norwegian Maritime Authority (NMA), the world’s first adaptive ferry can demonstrate automatic control. By integrating autonomous technology onto the Bastø Fosen VI, the vessel is able to transport passengers and vehicles between docks, and is also able to perform all docking and crossing functions to a high degree of accuracy. However, it remains manned by a full crew and is currently not fully autonomous. For example, in the event that the vessel is on a collision course, an alarm will sound to signal that human intervention is required to avoid objects or other vessels. Nevertheless, the benefits of the technology are clear, and include optimised fuel consumption, operational cost savings, improved timekeeping and higher customer satisfaction. A six-month trial period is currently underway, and an anti-collision system is expected to be installed and tested later this year. Although regulations will need to keep pace, it is encouraging that bodies such as the NMA are facilitating developments in the autonomous shipping space.

A 27m harbour tug owned and operated by PSA Marine has also been equipped with technology (made by Wärtsilä) to enable it to navigate autonomously. Initial sea trials were successfully completed in Singapore in mid-March 2020, having commenced in September 2019, and work will continue throughout 2020. It was confirmed that the technology is capable of avoiding obstacles, including both real-life moving vessels and virtual obstacles. A smart navigation system allowed for routes to be planned in real time, also sending track and speed commands to Wärtsilä’s dynamic positioning system that sailed the vessel at varying speeds. The trials represent a first for commercial MASS using the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore’s regulatory sandbox, and are part of an initiative to promote the development of MASS.

A Japanese consortium consisting of Marubeni Corporation, Tryangle, Mitsui E&S Shipbuilding, and the City of Yokosuka is to launch a pilot project that will aim to establish the technology for autonomous ship operation in Yokosuka City. A pilot project is being trialled on a voyage route between Mikasa Pier and Sarushima Island in Yokosuka City. The autonomous ship technology, which is being developed by Mitsui E&S Shipbuilding, is to be retrofitted onto an existing small-sized passenger boat operated by Tryangle. Autonomous ship operations will include berthing and unberthing. The ship crew will, however, remain onboard. The retrofitting will be completed by the end of 2021, and the autonomous operation will start before the end of March 2022.

The Royal Navy has begun trials of an autonomous model of the Pacific 24, a rigid inflatable vessel which has been in service for 25 years. The autonomous model has been developed by Navy X, the Royal Navy’s innovation wing, and BAE Systems. The Pacific 24’s control system and sensors have been upgraded and the Royal Navy will be able to programme the vessel to fulfil an order. The vessel will then be able to calculate the best way to carry out the task.

Wärtsilä have announced that they will provide a high-speed, high-resolution K-band radar system designed to provide high levels of situational awareness – especially in densely populated marine environments to the Mayflower autonomous vessel. As discussed in our January bulletin, the Mayflower will undertake the same voyage as its namesake during which it will conduct oceanographic research. The Mayflower is 15 metres long and weighs 5 tonnes. Sea trials began in March 2020 and the transatlantic voyage is scheduled to take place in April 2021.

A consortium made up of C-Job Naval Architects, LISA, seazip Offshore Service, Sea Machines, MARIN, and el-Tec elektrotechnologie has released a concept design for an autonomous guard vessel (AGV). These vessels are designed to protect offshore windfarms and the ships trying to navigate around them. By removing the vessels’ crew, the design is smaller and lighter than current guard vessels allowing it to be battery powered. When other vessels approach the asset protected by an AGV, the AGV is designed to take action to secure the area in order to avoid collisions and damage to the offshore infrastructure. The AGV can communicate with an intruding vessel, send information on how to safely navigate the area and also physically escort intruding vessels away from the site while recording the encounter to provide video footage in case of any incident.

Abu Dhabi Ports has begun to work with naval architects at Robert Allan to develop autonomous port vessels, including tugs for unmanned towage and harbour operations. The vessels will be capable of remote control operations and could potentially become fully unmanned, enabling the vessels to operate in more adverse weather conditions.

South Korea has announced the launching of a project to develop MASS by 2025. The aim is to build vessels with the third level of autonomy as defined by the IMO (i.e. Remotely controlled without seafarers on board). The Korean Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy and the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries have set up a specific working group and have allocated 160 billion won (US$132 million) to the project. The project’s aim is to capture 50% of the market share of the global autonomous vessel market by 2023.

India-based Cochin Shipyard Ltd (CSL) has signed contracts for the construction and supply of two autonomous electric freight ferries for Norway-based ASKO Maritime AS, a subsidiary group of Norges Gruppen ASA, with an option to build two more identical vessels. The 67-metre long vessels will initially be delivered as fully-electric transport ferries, powered by an 1,846 kwh capacity battery. The ferries are being built with the help of NOK119m ($12.8m) in Norwegian Government funding as part of a project to provide emissions-free transportation of goods across the Oslo Fjord. They will be operated by Massterly AS, a joint venture between Kongsberg and Wilhelmsen. Massterly was set up to take technical management and operate autonomous vessels. After commissioning of autonomous equipment and field trials in Norway, the vessels will operate as fully autonomous ferries, able to transport 16 fully loaded standard EU trailers in one trip across the Fjord.

South Korea-based shipbuilder Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) has signed an agreement with the Port of Rotterdam Authority to develop ship-related smart technologies.

The two companies will study how to develop smart ships suitable for digitalised ports over the next three years with a significant focus on autonomous operations.

At the recent Netherlands Forum for Smart Shipping, Kotug International, Rotortug and tech start-up Captain AI demonstrated a novel piece of dispatch planning software which enables real-time optimised route planning for autonomous vessels. The system uses AIS data and artificial intelligence, connected to the autonomous tug’s autopilot. The software, Captain AI Route Planner, acts as a “Google Maps for waterways” and plans the route which the tug follows autonomously, using the Captain AI Autopilot software. By using the software, autonomous vessels are anticipated to save fuel and reduce CO2 emissions by following the optimal route. The software builds on Kotug International and Rotortug’s 2018 demonstration of a tug in the Port of Rotterdam being operated remotely from Marseille, France.

Regulatory and software developments

The Russian Maritime Register of Shipping has published guidelines on the classification of MASS. The guidelines address the survey of MASS under design and construction stages, conversion into MASS and manufacturing of materials and products for MASS. The focal areas include the situational awareness systems, radio and data communication, navigation and manoeuvring, and propulsion. The document also specifies the track marking and remote control centre that play an important role in the MASS monitoring and safe navigation.

A UK based company called Windward has released Maritime Artificial Intelligence Analytics (MAIA) 4.0 which it describes as software that is capable of screening, searching and analysing dynamic maritime data to connect data and discover potential risks and “questionable business partners”. The intention is that the software will use dynamic predictive intelligence based on a vessel’s identity, cargo, location and voyage patterns (amongst other data) and then link this to patterns and profiles. One aspect that the software has been designed to spot is voyage irregularities. Windward hopes that its software will be able to profile activity in the shipping market so that stakeholders will be able to easily ascertain whether they are dealing with businesses that are compliant with the latest regulations.

Data sharing

Solis Marine and maritrace have developed an online platform to demonstrate how complex datasets derived from a multitude of sources at a single port can be consolidated into one distribution system. The platform is part of the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s (MCA) marlab project, and allows MASS to access data collected from the test site, Portland Harbour in Dorset, on demand. The datasets cover, for example, information regarding maritime traffic, seabed and weather conditions. It is hoped that the sharing of data between the MCA and other organisations will further the development of MASS, such as in relation to the programming of MASS. However, Dr. Katrina Kemp from the MCA has said that the UK needs a clear regulatory pathway for MASS.

In January 2020, the project team had invited stakeholders to test the prototype, in order to provide marlab with valuable feedback. A five month period of testing at Portland Harbour enabled the development of a technology stack to demonstrate how multiple data sources from a single port could be consolidated into a single location for MASS operators to then access the data on demand.

HFW involvement

HFW had been intending to participate in a number of events, such as the Autonomous Ship and Technology Symposium, but some of these have been postponed until next year.

Notwithstanding this, HFW have been asked by BIMCO to take part in a project to adapt SHIPMAN 2009 to provide third party management services for autonomous ships. The drafting sub-committee includes Massterly, NYK, Anglo Eastern, Gard and HFW. The project is ongoing, with meetings taking place remotely and good progress has been made.

Finally, certain events have been moved online and HFW have recently been involved with the Swansea Colloquium at Swansea University in which Paul Dean gave a paper on Autonomous Systems and looked at the impact of cyber risks and seaworthiness of MASS. The paper examined recent cyber security breaches and provided an insight as to how the courts are likely to consider an owner’s failure to adequately prevent a cyber-attack.

Conclusion

Since our last bulletin, the continuing development of MASS has proven to be resilient, albeit not immune, to the challenges of COVID-19. While the pandemic continues, one can see MASS becoming increasingly attractive, if only to avoid the crewing challenges caused by the pandemic. However, it is the fear of another virus – cyber – which remains one of the biggest obstacles facing the development of MASS. HFW continues to advise in this area, including drafting one of the first bespoke cyber insurance policies and playing a key role in the BIMCO drafting sub-committee for the BIMCO Cyber Security Clause 2019.

Source: lexology


COVID-19 is accelerating technological advances across just about every industry, from robotic baristas that promote social distancing to AI and remote collaboration tools that help manual laborers get back to work. The pandemic has had a direct impact on the transport realm, with social distancing measures calling traditional modes of travel into question. Demand for ride-hailing services quickly plummeted with the advent of the pandemic, leading Uber to double down on food delivery and micromobility, while drone deliveries soared. And while autonomous vehicle companies have faced significant obstacles to real-world testing, early signs suggest the crisis could hasten the adoption of driverless vehicles.

But automobiles, trucks, and drones are only part of the autonomous transport picture. Ships and other seafaring vessels play a huge role in the global economy. As lockdowns ease and the world adapts to a new paradigm, maritime automation could gain significant traction.

Not shipshape

According to the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS), maritime vessels constitute around 90% of all international trade — making them, as ICS puts it, the “lifeblood” of the global economy. But boats are also floating petri dishes.

In The Geography of Transport Systems (2020), Dr. Jean-Paul Rodrigue and coauthors drew correlations between transportation and pandemics, with specific reference to the Spanish Flu. They highlighted one of the key reasons 100 million people died and 30% of the world’s population became ill:

One important factor why the Spanish Flu spread so quickly and so extensively was through modern transportation, which at the beginning of the 20th century offered global coverage. The virus was spread around the world by infected crews and passengers of ships and trains, and severe epidemics occurred in shipyards and railway personnel.

In short, transportation plays a pivotal role in the spread of viruses, which is why airlines, trains, subways, taxi services, and boats saw such huge drops in usage following outbreaks of COVID-19.

Cargo and passenger ships around the world have been turned away from ports by local authorities, with as many as 300,000 merchant sailors stranded at sea for months, far beyond their contractual agreements. In April, ICS and the International Air Transport Association (IATA) issued a joint call demanding governments “take urgent measures” to facilitate crew change flights.

While the implementation of autonomous technology is not yet widespread enough to turn the tide on COVID-19, many are already looking to the future. And companies that have been working to bring automation to the shipping industry are now poised to enter a world wary of pandemics.

Avoidance

Tel Aviv-based Orca AI is developing a collision avoidance system that is currently being piloted by a number of shipping companies globally, CEO and cofounder Yarden Gross told VentureBeat. The company applies its algorithms to data extracted from multiple sensors installed on a vessel, including thermal and low-light cameras, to detect and measure the distance to other vessels and objects in the water. “We then provide [a] risk assessment of any detected object and vessel to enable the crew to be more aware of potentially dangerous situations,” Gross said.

Above: Orca AI

While radar and other systems have long been used at sea, they may require constant monitoring and can’t always alert crews to a hazard or issue actionable recommendations. This problem becomes particularly pronounced when multiple vessels or obstacles are in close proximity. Throw into the mix crowded or narrow waterways and low-light conditions and it’s easy to see why at least three-quarters of maritime accidents are caused by human error, at least according to liability claims data.

Orca AI is banking on technology to turn the tide. “The shipping industry is one of the most conservative industries in the world, and the pandemic is creating an increased demand for digital tools, automation, and connectivity, in order to reduce the number of people involved in the whole process,” Gross said.

Above: Orca AI’s collision avoidance system at work

The transition to fully autonomous ships will take time, particularly for large vessels that travel thousands of miles between continents. This shift could mirror the evolution of autonomous cars and trucks, beginning with semi-autonomous technologies, such as collision avoidance systems, and initially focusing on narrow use cases on predefined routes.

The vast majority of maritime accidents happen in ports, straits, and canals, which is where Orca AI is currently focused. “This is where the existing equipment is lacking in efficiency and accuracy,” Gross said. “Today, systems don’t take full control over vessels, but gradually there will be more autonomous capabilities. It will be similar to aviation, where there is still a pilot, but most of the time the computer is controlling the plane and the pilot is supervising and doing other tasks. In autonomous shipping, there will still be a crew, but there will be more and more tasks done autonomously.”

“Marine pilotage” is a term for specially trained mariners who board ships near the port to guide them through domestic waterways, often providing local knowledge of water-based thoroughfares that the captain doesn’t have. This task is sometimes carried out “remotely,” particularly during adverse weather conditions, with pilots on smaller boats guiding a big ship to safety or offering instructions from a control center. However, the COVID-19 crisis could be expediting such efforts, as a number of ports have been forced to embrace remote pilotage for ships or crew arriving from high-risk countries.

In late March, the Italian cruise ship Costa Diadema reported 65 cases of COVID-19 on board. To pass through the Suez Canal without a pilot physically boarding the ship, a team on tug boats maneuvered it using radar and information from monitoring stations along the route. Similarly, a U.K. fishing port in April introduced remote pilotage for vessels entering its harbor.

While remote pilotage might not entirely replace traditional methods, technology can make the work more efficient and safe. Orca AI promises to help pilots do their work remotely by “streaming the data from the cameras and other sensors back to shore in real time,” Gross said. “Orca is in discussion with a few ports regarding this.”

Going local

Norwegian chemical company Yara International and technology group Kongsberg have been working on the Yara Birkeland Autonomous Ship Project since 2017, with plans to put an electric, autonomous container ship into service. This effort would span three ports and 12 nautical miles in southern Norway.

Above: Yara Birkeland’s proposed route in southern Norway

Above: Yara Birkeland

The ship, which sports various sensors, including radar, lidar, and infrared cameras, has an automatic mooring system — berthing and unberthing will be done without any human intervention. Along the route, operation centers will be equipped to handle emergency situations remotely and support the onboard AI’s decision-making.

Above: Kongsberg’s operational control center for the Yara Birkeland

The Yara Birkeland will have a crew initially, and the transition to full autonomy will be done in stages, thanks in part to the development of a detachable bridge (command center).

“Even before the vessel starts its operation, there will be a level of automated capabilities for maneuvering, positioning, moorings, and supporting the crew,” An-Magritt Tinlund Ryste, product director for next-generation shipping at Kongsberg, told VentureBeat. “We foresee that we will be required to implement new autonomous functionality gradually to verify the performance in real-life operational scenarios before we arrive at the final stages where the vessel, the connectivity solution, and the remote operation center are sufficiently tested to allow for unmanned operation.”

While the Yara Birkeland was scheduled to transition to full automation by 2022, the COVID-19 crisis has forced developers to “pause” work on the project. Such setbacks are not ideal, but Ryste suggested the pandemic could accelerate the broader autonomous ship movement, as “ship owners and operators have an increased incentive to invest in new technology for the future, with a focus on support and surveillance from land.”

The Yara Birkeland represents part of Kongsberg’s wider effort to bring more autonomy to seafaring vessels. The company has already developed and demonstrated autocrossing and autodocking technology, and the first “adaptive transit” passenger ferry service traveled from dock to dock earlier this year. This was done through a collaboration between the Norwegian Maritime Authority (NMA), shipping company Bastø Fosen, and Kongsberg. The launch kick-started a six-month trial, during which Kongsberg’s system controlled the ferry’s journey from start to finish, with a captain overseeing the trip from inside the bridge. The next step is to install an anti-collision system, and tests are scheduled for later this year.

Kongsberg partnered in 2018 with maritime industry group Wilhelmsen to launch a joint venture called Massterly, designing land-based operation centers to monitor and control autonomous ships in Norway and further afield. This echoes what we’re seeing in the broader autonomous vehicle realm. Sweden’s Einride recently showcased remote driving stations where teleoperators — many of them former truck drivers — can take control of Einride’s autonomous trucks when required, with an operator able to control multiple vehicles from a single station.

Einride operators will be able to control multiple autonomous trucks from a single remote drive station

Above: Einride operators will be able to control multiple autonomous trucks from a single remote station

Einride demonstrates that while some jobs will be lost to AI and automation, new ones will be created. For autonomous shipping, this could mean new roles for staff overseeing ships remotely. This shift will also expand the talent pool to include people in new locations.

“Remote services are here to stay,” Ryste continued. “We see it working well for people working from home, and with more sensors and connected vessels, the need for having a service engineer on board also decreases. This gives you access to an expert in a time zone convenient for the vessel crew.”

The pandemic will likely accelerate efforts to incorporate autonomous technology in shipping. “I think that what has happened during the COVID-19 crisis will strengthen the argument for the push toward autonomous ships,” Kongsberg research and innovation manager Jason McFarlane told VentureBeat. “In particular, in relation to the restriction of people’s movement and the challenges with crew changes. Autonomous shipping, especially for unmanned vessels, should allow freight and cargo to be transported internationally and across borders without being affected by restrictions on people’s movement.”

We’ve already seen similar activity in other industries — from the passage of laws to updated corporate work-from-home policies and the adoption of new technologies. In the shipping industry, as with others, such changes could open the door to a more permanent shift.

“The focus has changed, and we see that even if restrictions are lifted temporarily, opening up for testing new solutions might just become a permanent solution as we adapt to new methods or technology,” Ryste added.

Research in motion

Next year, Promare — a U.S.-based marine research and exploration organization — is scheduled to send a crewless ship across the Atlantic Ocean on the route the original Mayflower traveled 400 years ago.

Mayflower Autonomous Ship route map

Above: Mayflower Autonomous Ship route map

The Mayflower Autonomous Ship (MAS) is chiefly propelled by solar power, with a diesel generator on board as backup. IBM will power an onboard “AI Captain,” with the ship leveraging edge computing for its AI and navigational smarts. All the data processing must be available on the ship because a vessel in the middle of the ocean can’t rely on satellites or cloud connectivity.

The team behind the new Mayflower has trained the ship’s AI models using millions of maritime images collected from cameras in the Plymouth Sound, among other open source data sets. The Mayflower’s AI Captain is built to detect and identify ships and buoys — as well as other hazards — and to make decisions about what to do next. An onboard automatic identification system (AIS) can also access specific information about any vessels ahead, including their class, weight, speed, and cargo type, while the AI Captain can accept and interpret radio broadcast warnings from a cargo ship.

The Mayflower Autonomous Ship's AI Captain in operation

Above: The Mayflower Autonomous Ship’s AI Captain in operation

This ship will carry research pods to gather data about ocean health, while simultaneously showcasing how an autonomous research vessel can manage on its own for two weeks at sea. It also sets the stage for further use cases, from defense and commercial shipping to marine insurance.

“Right now, we are focused on increasing the reliability of our autonomous systems and developing an ecosystem of partners — from IBM to equipment manufacturers to telecoms providers to insurance providers — to figure out how to commercially deploy the systems we have on [the] Mayflower,” Mayflower Autonomous Ship director Brett Phaneuf said. “What we are doing here is very much a research project for something much bigger than this one ship.”

AI and autonomy could certainly provide utility beyond cargo vessels. Research ships may spend weeks or months at sea collecting data about the ocean, and removing crews would facilitate longer missions by taking food storage and personal well-being out of the equation. In terms of the COVID-19 crisis, more automation could mean fewer people on board, which should help with social distancing efforts.

“We are already seeing the early examples of autonomous ferries, cargo ships, and research vessels like the Mayflower Autonomous Ship,” Phaneuf continued. “But perhaps the greater, more immediate need for autonomy is on manned vessels. This may sound counterintuitive, but there is an important role for autonomous systems on the manned ships of today, acting as a cocaptain, maintaining situational awareness, [and] providing recommendations and decision support to the human crew.”

We’re talking about “augmented intelligence,” as Phaneuf puts it, with machines helping people accomplish core tasks and reduce risks.

“A trusted autonomous system can reduce the stress on the bridge by consistently monitoring the overall navigational situation of the vessel,” Phaneuf added. “This will allow humans to get their heads up and out of the computer screens and instead looking out the window and doing what humans do best — making complex decisions swiftly and accurately.”

It might not make sense for certain types of vessels to become completely autonomous, whether for logistical, regulatory, or financial reasons. “This is not likely to be a zero-sum game, but more of a hybrid approach,” Phaneuf continued. “For example, it may not make sense to replace the whole crew of a container ship with a fully autonomous system because the cost of the crew actually represents very little in the overall value of the ship and its cargo. As such, there may not be an economic driver for this level of change. However, there are other factors to take into consideration — such as the well-being of the crew and equipping people with the skills they need for the shipping industry jobs of the future.”

The future of autonomous shipping

Many newer ships are already highly automated, at least in terms of being able to passively gather performance metrics for remote analysis, and technology can also enable diagnostics and repairs from afar. But the pandemic has highlighted the role automation can play.

Global trade today relies on ships and crews traversing vast oceans, and fully autonomous cargo vessels that can cover these distances are likely still a long way off, if they ever arrive. Barriers include technological and regulatory constraints, not to mention practical obstacles, such as the need to carry out maintenance on longer voyages. Domestic journeys are a natural starting point for autonomous ships because they don’t require international cooperation, and a vessel that remains relatively close to shore — such as the Yara Birkeland on its proposed route in southern Norway — can adhere to safety standards with on-shore personnel able to physically (or remotely) intervene in an emergency.

“From a regulatory perspective, the challenge (with longer, international automated routes) lies within the fact that the IMO (International Maritime Organization) does not have a common and internationally acknowledged way of granting approval [for] such vessels as the Yara Birkeland,” Ryste said. “This means there is a likelihood of encountering varying rules and regulations between flag states and port authorities. This is manageable for point-to-point operation but will be a too-demanding administrative task when more parties are involved — at least, at the moment.”

As COVID-19 shifts global structures and accelerates innovation, we’re already seeing how autonomous tools could help ships continue operating through future pandemics. And while some jobs will likely be lost as automation takes hold, technology is unlikely to replace humans across the board.

“For decades, autonomous systems have been used to assist humans in dangerous work, such as clearing up after accidents or dealing with highly dangerous substances or infectious diseases,” Phaneuf noted. As autonomous systems improve, their role “will likely increase, but [it] will need to be part of a larger, interconnected network of manned, unmanned, automated, and autonomous systems on water, in air, and on land.”

Source: venturebeat


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED