These guidelines have been developed to assist flag State administrations to effectively implement their responsibilities with respect to the ship inspection and certification duties under the Maritime Labour Convention, 2006, as amended (MLC, 2006) updated to reflect 2014, 2016 and 2018 amendments.

The guidelines are intended to provide supplementary practical information and guidance to flag States that can be adapted to specifically reflect their national laws and other measures implementing the MLC, 2006.

It must be emphasized that these guidelines are intended as a practical resource that can be used by any government that finds them helpful.

In all cases, the relevant national laws or regulations or collective bargaining agreements or other measures implementing the MLC, 2006, in the flag State should be viewed as the authoritative statement of the requirements in the flag State.

The remaining sections of Chapter 1 provide general information on the structure, key concepts and terminology used in the MLC, 2006.

Chapter 2 is divided into two sections. The first section provides an overview of the flag State inspection system obligations in the MLC, 2006, and contains information with respect to actions or determinations that flag States or the competent authority in the flag State may take for ship inspection and certification. The second section provides more specific guidance on the process of maritime labour inspection and certification under the MLC, 2006.

Chapter 3 addresses the requirements of the MLC, 2006, that are to be inspected and, if required, certified, on all ships covered by the MLC, 2006. It contains guidance as to what a flag State inspector (or a recognized organization (RO) that has been delegated this task by a flag State) would check in verifying compliance. It also provides some examples of deficiencies.

Chapter 4 outlines a range of actions that can be taken if deficiencies or non-conformities are identified by flag State inspectors (or reported to the flag State by ROs acting on its behalf).

 

Source: kassidiaris


Genting Hong Kong’s German shipbuilder MV Werften is reportedly teetering on the brink of insolvency as the company finds itself in protracted negotiations with the German federal and state government over long-promised financial assistance. Earlier today, January 7, Genting Hong Kong requested a suspension in trading of its stock pending an announcement, while in Germany its shipyard management informed employees that it would not be making December wage payments scheduled for today.

In meetings with the labor unions, MV Werften stressed that the company still had significant cash balances, but that due to loan covenants it was forced to postpone wage payment till next week. “The heart would have liked to do it and the cash register would have allowed it,” Carsten Haake, Managing Director of MV Werften told German media after a meeting with the unions. “We have 30 million euros ($34 million) in liquidity, but there are legal frameworks under which we were not able to pay the wages today.”

A spokesperson for the German unions at the shipyard said that they believe the future hangs in the balance with the financial talks that are also complicated by politics. The shipyards currently have approximately 2,000 workers with 1,600 reportedly working on a giant new cruise ship called Global Dream that is being built for Genting’s Dream Cruises. Work on the 208,000 gross ton cruise ship has been delayed several times first by the pandemic and then the financial troubles but it was expected to be delivered this year.

On January 2, 2022, Genting Hong Kong apprised shareholders of the situation in what it called a voluntary announcement. The company said that the continued pandemic, and specifically the emergence of the Delta and now Omicron variants, had impacted the recovery of its cruise operations. Genting Hong Kong is the parent company of U.S.-based Crystal Cruises, which resumed operations in the summer of 2021, as well as Dream Cruises, which is operating cruise ships on restricted programs from Singapore, Hong Kong, and as of last week Taiwan, as well as Star Cruises, which just started cruises from Malaysia.

Genting and MV Werften’s financial difficulties began in the summer of 2020 when all of their operations were suspended due to the pandemic. Genting Hong Kong completed a recapitalization which in part was based on loan guarantees from the state government where the shipyard is located as well as the federal government’s Economic Stabilization Fund. An initial bridge loan supplied in 2020 was used to complete construction of the Crystal Endeavor, an expedition cruise ship, and in June 2021, Genting reported that it had reached agreements with Germany for financial support to be used to run the shipyard and complete the construction of the Global Dream.

In mid-December 2021, in danger of breaching its minimum liquidity covenant, MV Werften sought to draw down $88 million from a “backstop loan” provided by the State of Mecklenburg Vorpommern and the WSF stabilization fund.  The state informed Genting that it did not believe the company had met the conditions required to access the loan while Genting contends it “satisfied all drawdown conditions.”

Genting went to court seeking an injunction to force the release of the monies. The court initially sided with Genting, but later lowed the amount that Genting could draw and then ruled to suspend any immediate payments and ordered a further hearing scheduled for January 11. Pending the outcome of the hearing and the negotiations, Genting Hong Kong reported that it will continue to consider various options to address the potential liquidity needs of the group.

Speculation in Germany is that MV Werften will be declared insolvent, which could begin a protected recapitalization of the shipyard operation. Work would likely be curtained at the company’s three shipyards with the mayor of Mecklenburg Vorpommern reporting that he expects the shipyard would close permanently and that he was planning to buy the location to convert it into a multi-use industrial park. The situation is continuing to evolve, with late today the German media outlet Oostee-Zeitung reporting that the former owner of the shipyard has expressed interest in buying the locations in Stralsund and Warnemünde for use with the emerging offshore wind power industry.

 

Source: maritime-executive


The Club would like to draw to Members’ attention that the World Health Organization (WHO) has just released ‘An implementation guide for the management of Covid-19 on board cargo ships and fishing vessels’. The target audience of this guide includes port operators and ship operators.

The guide is recommended for use with WHO’s Handbook for management of public health events on board ships. The purpose of this handbook is to assist competent authorities at the local level to manage potentially internationally significant public health events at ports.

 

Source: ukpandi


We are sure you must have heard about container ships, and have surely seen a shipping container once in your life, irrespective of your age, gender, nationality, occupation, or whatever be the case.

In this article, we wish to take you deeper into the world of container ships, and let you know about it’s fascinating history, the types of container ships, it’s working, the design of container ships, and the future of container shipping.

Before going any further, we must first know about what exactly is a container ship:

What Are Container Ships?

As the name indicates, a ship structured specially to hold cargo in a container (containerized cargo) is called a container ship. Transportation of cargo in special containers is known as containerization. Container ships are responsible for the transportation of heavy containers in a large number. Some of the biggest container ships these days can ship approximately 24,000 containers in a single go!

Container ships are used for the transportation of non-bulk cargoes, making it possible to transfer big and gigantic quantities of goods from one place to another. The introduction of container ships have rightly changed the face of global trade forever.

Currently, there are more than 17 million shipping containers in circulation globally, with more than 5 million active shipping containers. Additionally, 90% of the world’s cargo is transported with the help of container ships. Every shipping container which is manufactured and transported around the world is of a standard size of 20 foot or 40 foot respectively, which is why the capacity of container ships is measured in TEUs or FEUs, which stands for ‘Twenty-foot Equivalent Unit’ and ‘Forty-foot Equivalent Unit’ respectively. This standardization exists to facilitate transfer the containers, which are shipped by container ships easily at anywhere around the world with various modes of transport, with trucks and trains being the most common transfer method available.

 

Source: thehaulagenews


Over the past two years, China has adopted a “Zero-Covid” approach to the coronavirus. Rather than acknowledge that Covid will be with us forever as an “endemic” disease, China believes it can beat and eradicate the virus by shutting down huge swathes of its economy when there is an outbreak. Those shutdowns threaten shipping and commerce especially, with the latest outbreak is no exception.

China has reported an outbreak of Covid in the Chinese city of Ningbo, home to a major strategic port and one major part of the Chinese supply chain.

The outbreak comes as two days ago, China confirmed over 30 Covid cases in Ningbo. The Port of Ningbo-Zhoushan is a major port that handled over 365,000 TEUs of cargo since the New Year less than a week ago. If it shuts down due to the Covid outbreak and cannot be staffed, Chinese exports will be affected again on a large level.

Back in August 2021, the Port of Ningbo-Zhoushan shut down after a case of Covid at the port and fears of a widespread outbreak among port workers. Now, cases have increased in the city, making a shut down more likely. Back in August, the port was closed for over two weeks. As of yesterday, no port workers had tested positive yet, a potentially hopeful sign. However, trucking operations in the city are already known to have been affected, as the city shut down many areas due to the outbreak.

The threat of another port shut down in China comes as the supply chain remains overloaded and under close scrutiny.

China appears to have chosen a Zero-Covid strategy instead of putting its business concerns first. Recently, the Chinese city of Xi’an, with 13 million residents, locked down over a Covid outbreak. Starting on December 22nd, the lockdown remains in effect, pointing to the longest period of lockdown since the original virus outbreak in Wuhan two years ago. With the Chinese government under intense pressure to prevent a wider Covid outbreak in the country, all ports are not out of the crosshairs yet. With this in mind, supply chain issues may be further aggravated by the latest developments.

 

Source: morethanshipping


The Global Autonomous Ships market research report represents major insights on the current growth dynamics as well as the primary revenue generation elements that are available in the Autonomous Ships industry along with various other factors over the predicted period 2022-2028. The report on the Autonomous Ships market is focusing on a series of parameters including top manufacturing strategies, Autonomous Ships industry share, prime opportunities, industrial channel, and profit margin, etc. The research study on the global Autonomous Ships market is liable to showcase essential development in the distinct regions including the United States, Europe, Asia Pacific, and China.

On the basis of strategic aspects, the report represents the detailed profile of the major vendors and meanwhile, evaluates their discrete business-driven strategies and other development plans. In this study, we have used an extraordinary perspective during the COVID-19 pandemic period to closely inspect the development and growth of the Autonomous Ships industry.

 

Source: industrialit


Cruise players fear carbon-cutting measures that come into force next January will create “unintended consequences”, potentially driving up the sector’s absolute emissions.

Shipping as a whole has 12 months to prepare for the International Maritime Organization’s Energy Efficiency Existing Ship Index (EEXI) that it adopted last June, which will require vessels to meet the current Energy Efficiency Design Index standards for newbuildings.

But it is the regulator’s plan for annual monitoring of the carbon intensity of vessels that is uniquely proving a sticking point for passenger ships.

The Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII), also adopted last summer, will rate vessel efficiency between A and E and require those rated D and E to lower their emissions.

Although none of the leading cruise operators would be drawn on the detail of their plans to meet the new ratings, Cruise Lines International Association (CLIA) has graded the current CII proposals an F, and is calling for them to be revised.

“The IMO’s recent adoption of the CII, while well-intentioned, requires further refinement to be truly useful,” the association told TradeWinds. “The focus on carbon intensity, without also considering its relationship to overall carbon output, could generate unintended consequences.

 

Source: tradewindsnews


In the winter of 2020-2021, five vessels lost nearly 3,000 containers into the stormy Pacific. In just two months, those post-Panamax vessels accounted for more than twice number of lost containers in the previous year. Across widespread media coverage, a kneejerk reaction was to blame supersized vessels or increasingly unpredictable weather. But environmental conditions and vessel design are only part of the picture. Understanding this complex issue, and why losses are incredibly challenging to wholly avoid, holds the key to reducing losses not just from container vessels but across all cargo shipping sectors.
First, some context. According to the Word Shipping Council, international liners transported around 226 million containers in 2019, the last year for which figures are available. From 2008-2019, total container losses averaged 1,382 a year, representing around a thousandth of a percent of containers moved. And until the recent spate, the number of incidents has stayed relatively stable year-on-year, undermining the view that bigger ships and worsening weather are key factors.
Why spend time and resources analyzing such an infrequent occurrence? Because, according to Holger Jefferies, Head of DNV’s Container Ship Excellence Centre, even these few incidences can have a big impact. While the value of goods lost each year is difficult to calculate, there are much more damaging and wide-ranging consequences than the direct financial considerations on ship operators and cargo owners. Rogue containers can put lives, vessels, shoreside infrastructure and the environment at risk.
“Every incident has the potential to cause a lot of damage. Then there is a huge cost in finding the containers, cleaning them up, cleaning the beaches where they land and the extra measures that need to be taken when a dangerous cargo is lost.” says Holger Jefferies, Head of DNV’s Container Ship Excellence Centre.
Those consequences and clean-up costs typically spread much further than the ship owner, contributing to another reason for addressing the issue: reputational damage. In a consolidated market with just a handful of recognizable companies, maintaining a high safety record is a competitive advantage for container liners. And that perception can be easily negated by images of a broken container washed up on a once pristine beach.
As class rules and IMO regulations seeking to minimize container loss show, there is a motivation to tackle the problem on an industry level.
Design dilemma 
Incorrect stowage is one basic factor contributing to container loss. The lashing systems used to hold stacks of containers in place are complex. On a large vessel they can comprise ten thousand of locks, rods and other components that all need to be used in an exact way. If they are not, container stacks can collapse and boxes can be lost overboard.
Lashing systems are designed to consider the weather that container vessels might encounter.  The key factors are probability and risk. No ship or lashing system can be designed such that it will not lose containers in any weather scenario. Arne Schulz-Heimbeck, Programme Manager for Containership Development at DNV, draws a parallel with grounding.
“Ships are not usually designed to withstand grounding without damages. Of course, they could be, but it would lead to extremely heavy and expensive ships. The cost of transport would be so high that society worldwide would not accept them.”
Source: xindemarinenews

1. Instructions

You are required to go through these notes before filling the application form in GoBusiness. Please retain this set of notes with you for future reference.

The application form for Hazardous Substances Licence/Permit can be used to apply for a

  • Hazardous Substances Licence issued under the Environmental Protection and Management Act for the import, use, storage and supply of hazardous substances controlled under the Act.
  • Hazardous Substances Permit issued under the Environmental Protection and Management (Hazardous Substances) Regulations for purchasing hazardous substances controlled under the Regulations from local supplier for own use and/or for storage.

2. Guidance Notes

(To be read together with the application form)

Section 1 – Purpose of Application (for Hazardous Substances Licence Only)

Please tick the relevant box to indicate the reason for your application.

Section 1 – Particulars of Company

The company name and registered address shall be the same as the name and address that your company filed with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority.

Section 1 – Particulars of Applicant

Applicant’s name shall be the same as in NRIC, PR status, work permit or employment pass.

Applicant for a Hazardous Substances Licence should be a professional in his field or a senior management staff in his company. His academic qualification must be at least a technical diploma. He will be required to sit and pass the Management of Hazardous Substances (MHS) course. MHS course is not required for applicant dealing with only (i) Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS) and Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) other than Methyl Bromide, (ii) Restriction of Hazardous Substances (RoHS) in Electrical and Electronic Equipment and (iii) paints in which the total lead exceeds 0.009% by weight of the paint.

Applicant for a Hazardous Substances Permit should be a management staff in his company.

Section 2 – Purpose of Hazardous Substances

Please tick the relevant box to indicate the purpose for the hazardous substances in your application. You may tick more than one box. Please specify the use of the Hazardous Substances in Section 3 and/or 4 for each and every substance.

Section 3 – Details of Storage Premises/Facilities

Address of Store:
Please state address of storage premises.

If you propose to store the hazardous substances at more than one premises, you may add new storage premises at Section 3 of the application form

If storage is not required, please update Section 4 with the hazardous substance and its respective transaction modes of import, transport, sales and/or use of hazardous substances that will be carried out (e.g. deliver direct from port to customer’s store or from supplier’s store to port, etc).

Industrial Allocation / Industrial Siting Consultation Letter

The letter shall be submitted along with the respective Hazardous Substances Licence/Permit application relating to a new site premises. The letter shall include details of the proposed activity at the listed industrial premises.

No-objection letter (for storage at a 3rd party warehouse)
If your company proposes to store hazardous substances at an approved chemical warehouse, please attach a letter of consent from the warehouse (along with company letterhead) stating the name, percentage and maximum quantity of hazardous substances to allow for storage at the stated premises.

No. and Capacity of Fixed Storage Tanks
Please indicate the number and capacity of the tank(s), along with the hazardous substances intended to be stored in the bulk tank. The Certificate of Statutory Completion (CSC) for the bulk tank shall be uploaded along with the application as a supporting document. Alternatively, a certification of the fixed bulk tank from a Professional Engineer is acceptable as well.

Emergency Response Plan to Mitigate a Spill/Release of Hazardous Substances

The plan needs to address the containment/mitigation procedures, the equipment used for mitigation of any incidents involving a spill/release of hazardous substances, the collection and disposal of contaminated waste generated from the incident.

 

Source: nea.gov.sg


The Partnered Carrier program allows you to send your Fulfillment by Amazon (FBA) inventory from India to fulfillment centers in the US. The program enables you to commercially ship your FBA shipments in a cost-effective manner. Once the partnered carrier picks up your shipment, they will handle shipping from customs clearances to delivery to an Amazon fulfillment center. Doorstep pickup and drop-off at a carrier facility in India is available.

Below is a detailed list of program features:

  • Integration into Seller CentralYou can book shipments, enter customs information, schedule pickup by the carrier, and pay logistics freight charges directly in Seller Central while creating your FBA shipment.
  • Amazon-facilitated shippingYou don’t need to create a separate account with the carrier or do any credit checks to use the Partnered Carrier program for global shipments. Just make sure that your shipment documents and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) documents are ready at the time of pickup. KYC documents establish your proof of identity and address.
  • Commercially clearedPartnered carrier shipments will be commercially cleared, with the carrier taking care of both origin and destinations customs clearance.
  • Amazon-negotiated rates and seamless paymentsYou can rely on Amazon’s negotiated rates along with seamless Seller Central integrated payments.
  • Door-to-door pickup and deliveryOnce you schedule pickup from your location, the carrier will come to your door for pickup and will take ownership for delivery to a US fulfillment center.
  • End-to-end trackingYou can track the status of your FBA shipment within Seller Central.
  • Express shipping solutionThis program offers an express shipping solution. The average delivery time will be 6 to 8 business days for FedEx International (Priority) and 14 to 16 business days for FedEx International (Economy).

 

Source: sellercentral


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED