MARITIME CYBER SECURITY Archives - Page 5 of 40 - SHIP IP LTD

The Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA) has said it will continue developing industry-wide capabilities by strengthening research and development, piloting maritime technologies (MarineTech), and developing maritime cybersecurity capabilities. This is expected to bolster the country’s resilience and capacity to deal with disruptions.

During the recent MarineTech Conference, MPA signed two memoranda of understanding (MOUs) with industry partners. The MarineTech Conference is held from 5 to 6 April and brings together global industry leaders and stakeholders to speak on key growth areas for investment, emerging technology trends, start-up showcases, and demand outlooks for maritime technology. Experts will also put forward a roadmap on developments in maritime cybersecurity, data analytics, and the latest applications for smart port and shipping automation.

At the conference, the Senior Minister of State for Transport, Chee Hong Tat, announced the launch of the Maritime Singapore Additive Manufacturing Landscape Report to provide a roadmap for companies to experiment with new practices in additive manufacturing. Titled ‘Charting the Way Forward’, the landscape report provides an overview of maritime additive manufacturing capabilities in Singapore and shares learning points from previous trials and adoption processes. This is the first joint publication developed by MPA together with the National Additive Manufacturing Innovation Cluster and Singapore Shipping Association (SSA), according to an MPA press statement.

Further, at the event, SSA announced an MoU with MPA and seven industry partners. Under the agreement, a Maritime Cybersecurity Roundtable will be established where participants will recommend initiatives to improve maritime cybersecurity collaboration through information sharing, growing a leading talent pool for maritime cyber skills in Singapore, and facilitating greater awareness and access to maritime cyber solutions and talents. The first roundtable meeting will be held later this year.

At the event, the Sea Transport Industry Development Plan (IDP) was expanded to include all subsectors in Sea Transport, such as ship chandlers, shipbrokers, marine surveyors, ship management, and ship operators. The Sea Transport IDP for Ship Agency, Harbour Craft, and Bunkering was first launched by MPA in 2020 to encourage digital transformation by companies, through a step-by-step guide on digital solutions to adopt at each stage of their growth. It is a joint initiative with the Infocomm Media Development Authority, Enterprise Singapore, and SkillsFuture Singapore as part of the SME Go Digital Programme.

MPA will also extend funding support for the adoption of pre-approved digital solutions beyond 31 December 2022 to benefit-eligible maritime companies on an ongoing basis. With the expansion, more than 3,000 SMEs in the Sea Transport subsectors will be eligible to apply for co-funding.

Tat stated that the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of new technologies by businesses and individuals and opened up new collaborations across geographies and sectors. This provides opportunities for MarineTech companies to start-up and scale-up. “With support from our tripartite partners and research institutions over the years, Singapore is now home to a thriving MarineTech ecosystem. We will build on this momentum to achieve our aspiration of becoming the Silicon Valley for MarineTech, focusing on digitalisation, innovation, and partnerships,” he said.

Source: https://opengovasia.com/singapore-explores-plans-to-develop-maritime-tech-cybersecurity/


Japanese shipping company ‘K’ Line has introduced a new AI-based cyber security platform, to safeguard ship-shore communications on its managed fleet and strengthen its infrastructure as it moves forward with its ongoing digitalisation strategy.

The company will use the Cybereason system from Cybereason Japan Corp, a local affiliate of the Boston-based cyber defence firm, adopting its monitoring and analysis service for detection and response to cyber threats.

Cybereason builds machine learning engines and processing systems that analyse large amounts of data within organisations to deliver a cyber-attack prevention platform that visualises and prevents various cyber threats.

“Nowadays, it has become quite difficult to prevent highly sophisticated cyber-attacks by the ship’s conventional security solutions such as anti-virus software and firewalls, which have been the main security measures for ships,” ‘K’ Line said, in a statement.

“In order to enhance the ship’s preventive security measures against intrusions and strengthen the response after intrusions, we have introduced a new cyber security platform, Cybereason. It includes NGAV (Next Generation Anti-Virus), which can prevent all types of malware, and EDR (Endpoint Detection & Response), which is able to detect and respond to cyber threats that have slipped through conventional security solutions.”

“In addition, the cyber security experts monitor the shipboard security 24/7 through Cybereason MDR service. This unified cyber security platform and security monitoring service surely help to enhance the shipboard cyber resilience of our vessels both before and after any threat intrusions.”

Source: https://smartmaritimenetwork.com/2022/07/05/k-line-rolls-out-new-cyber-platform/


“We are ensuring that different parts of our digital system will talk to each other in one smart network”

 

 

How do you visualise the UAE maritime sector growing in the post-pandemic world? What role will RAK Ports play here?

 

Despite the many challenges the maritime sector faced during the global Covid-19 pandemic, RAK Ports saw its volumes reach record highs. Although current market volatilities and commodity price swings are challenging, our growth trajectory continues and 2022 is set to be another outstanding year. This consistent uptick in volumes is great news for RAK Ports, but it means our business must adapt quickly.

 

The UAE will continue to be a critical hub for global shipping in the years ahead, and RAK Ports is ideally poised to play a leading role. Sustainability will be a key theme, and the UAE will again be at the forefront. We are already assessing how stricter emissions regulations may affect vessels operating in our waters and how we can best integrate alternative energy strategies at RAK Ports. The UAE recently showcased its Hydrogen Leadership Roadmap to promote the country’s maritime energy transition, as we work towards net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. That plan includes our industry producing green hydrogen and processing it as the basis for bunker fuel for ships and for export.

 

 

RAK Ports has made significant investments in expansion in the past few years. What are the key areas of investments?

 

We are not only investing into physical infrastructure with a massive land reclamation project already well underway at Saqr Port/Freezone, which will provide much needed space for new industrial investment to support the diversification of the local economy and more opportunities for skilled employment; we are also working on a full digitisation strategy to increase efficiencies. While many ports are implementing standalone digital systems, we are taking a more connected approach at RAK Ports. This will ensure that different parts of our system will talk to each other in one smart network. For example, our German-engineered dry-bulk cranes already use IoT technologies to submit automated reports that allow our customers to see the status of their cargo loading in real-time.

 

Ramesh S. Ramakrishnan
Image Credit:

 

“Future challenges for companies would include strengthening digital capabilities and protecting against cyberattacks”

 

 

Ramesh S. Ramakrishnan | Chairman, Transworld

 

 

Congratulations on the MoU signed between Transworld and eShipper! What does this deal signify for Transworld and the UAE shipping and logistics sector in general?

 

With this Joint-Venture with eShipper, Transworld Group further augments its services to its customers by providing end-to-end services using a combination of advanced infrastructure, multimodal fulfilment and last mile delivery. The strong legacy, brand and service synergies of both the organisations coming together will offer a unique service offering to our esteemed customers and Transworld Group becomes one of the few companies in the UAE to provide services ranging from shipping to last mile operations. eShipper has a very specific expertise and have been building it up in Canada and North America over the last 15 years.

 

We have entered JV with them to enhance our e-commerce delivery, in the Middle East to start with, which will eventually come to India. Online buying is here to stay. It is a good space for somebody like us, having the right technology, people, and skill sets. This also compliments a lot of what we do as a logistics company.

 

 

As a sector pioneer, what is the toughest challenge you foresee for shipping and logistics in a post-pandemic scenario and how do you see Transworld surmounting, it?

 

One of the biggest challenges during the pandemic for companies was to abruptly take their operations digital. Thankfully for Transworld Group, we started the process of digitalisation few years ago and we were successfully able to adapt during the pandemic. Going forward, one of the biggest challenges for the companies would be to quickly adapt and strengthen their digital capabilities to be able to align with the industry and also protect themselves from cyberattacks.

 

 

What are Transworld’s expansion plans over the next five years?

 

The essence of Transworld growth trajectory has been innovation and getting into new frontiers. There are lots of different areas within the logistics and supply chain space offering us score to evolve and build new business ideas. Our supply chain business, for example, the sea freight, air freight, warehousing, 3PL, 4PL, business, has been growing. The plan now is to refocus our energies on increasing the pace of growth.

 

We are also looking at enhancing our global footprint in the Americas, Europe, Africa and Far East. So, be it through our asset-owning or asset-light businesses, we are focused on serving our customers better. Our focus is on becoming a complete solutions provider for our customers. Today if a customer asks for any service from Transworld, we can provide first mile to last mile solutions.

 

 

As a philosophy TW group is driven by the higher purpose of delivering prosperity to humanity.

 

While we are in the business to make profits for our shareholders, employees and associated partners, the sublime goal is to use this wealth as a medium to share and create prosperity for the entire ecosystem and be a catalyst for positive change. Our corporate responsibility activities are spread across all sections of the society and environment. The employees and their respective families are all involved in our social activities, thereby spreading the culture of compassion and giving.

 

We are also setting ourselves a goal at the Transworld Group where by taking a pledge to work towards being a carbon-neutral organisation by 2043. To reach that aim, over the next few years, we will start with focusing on reducing our greenhouse gas emissions to meet these goals in a more measurable manner.

 

UAE-Maritime-Captains-of-Industry-Laurance-MFC-for-web
Laurance Langdon
Image Credit:

 

“The wider challenge is that the global shipping industry needs to catch up and embrace change”

 

 

Laurance Langdon | General Manager, Modern Freight Company (MFC)

 

 

How much in your view as an industry pioneer has the industry changed since the early years and what is its scope for expansion going forward?

 

With the vision of the UAE leaders, the move to digital and paperless and the implementation of blockchain, change is happening fast in the logistics sector. It’s clear that JAFZA wants to be the region’s central point for business and their openness to listen to their customers enables this change, and MFC has for decades always been a go-to partner for JAFZA to discuss and test these new ideas. There is a wider challenge, and perhaps the bottleneck is that the industry needs to catch up and embrace many of these changes so globally everyone is connected, but for now the UAE is definitely well positioned for the future.

 

 

Enhancing business procedures is an obstacle for shipping firms, how is MFC evolving to counter this?

 

Covid sent out a message to businesses — evolve or die, demanding a different work ethic. So, MFC overhauled its processes, investing in a new ERP, a system built in-house for our customers. Visibility and customer connectivity is in demand, and now we are more efficient, which improves our customer experience.

 

UAE-Maritime-Captains-of-Industry-Waleed-Tasneef-for-web
Waleed Abdulla Mohamed al-Tamimi
Image Credit:

 

“We are considered to be the largest maritime classification office in the UAE”

 

 

Waleed Abdulla Mohamed al-Tamimi | General Manager, Tasneef Maritime

 

 

As the first UAE maritime body to apply the GCC Code, how is Tasneef Maritime guaranteeing the safety of the UAE maritime environment?

 

The GCC Code is a set of guidelines developed by the GCC nations for Non-Convention Vessels that are smaller than 500 tons, and are not obliged to follow International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Conventions. The code focuses on the safety of the small vessels and ensures that they don’t cause marine pollution, using this code as a reference. Tasneef inspects these vessels for their compliance and issues certifications to enable them to obtain navigation licenses from the UAE Flag Administration.

 

Without Tasneef Certification, these vessels cannot operate in UAE waters. With over 70 professional staff, we are considered the largest maritime classification office in the UAE.

 

 

What classification and advisory services do Tasneef offer?

 

Tasneef can provide Classification and Statutory Services for all types of commercial vessels that require certification by law., such as tankers, bulk ships, container ships, etc. We also provide certification services for naval vessels and private yachts that include the UAE Yacht Code. The advisory services are numerous. One of the services we introduced uses Artificial Intelligence in the inspection of assets to ensure their integrity. Assets can be large civil structures like ports or complicated offshore structures such as production rigs for oil and gas.

 

 

“The industry saw a steep learning curve through 2020-21, with massive increase in freight costs”

 

UAE-Maritime-Captains-of-Industry-Rosh-Manoli-CSS-for-web
Rosh Manoli
Image Credit:

 

Rosh Manoli | Vice President – Freight Forwarding, Consolidated Shipping Services Group

 

 

As an industry head, in your view how has ocean freight management changed post-pandemic?

 

The industry had a steep learning curve through 2020-21, while witnessing a massive increase in freight costs, with container and shipping prices reaching up to ten times higher than before the pandemic. Congestions in major ports have also played a huge role and we still cannot ascertain if this will reduce, seeing that the pandemic is not over yet. The successive waves of Covid have impacted a drop in personnel as well – right from a shortage of professional truck drivers to logistic operators in key markets causing difficulties in optimised operation of ports, terminals, and warehouses. As an organisation, CSS has been resilient to withstand these changes.

 

 

What are CSS’ expansion plans?

 

CSS is expanding its operations into Saudi Arabia, in line with the KSA vision of 2030 that also focuses on logistics as a key economy driver. We are also expanding into East Africa this year. CSS also invested in tech, ramping up our IT capabilities to maintain a 360-degree control for operational cohesiveness.

 

 

Original Source link


National Security Advisor Ajit Doval has said that in the current complex and challenging geopolitical situation, it’s necessary to focus on maritime security. He said, “he trajectory of this nation is well defined, we know where we’re going. And when our time comes, India will not be able to become the power it deserves to be unless it has a very strong maritime system. This is perfect timing for it.”

He said, “in the national security discourse importance of land and maritime borders are very different. You cannot fence them, put 24×7 vigilance, the concept of sovereignty in land borders is territorial and well-defined.”

Doval said this on Thursday while addressing the first meeting of the Multi-agency Maritime Security Group to discuss important policy matters affecting maritime security. The meeting was presided over by the National Maritime Security Coordinator, Vice Admiral Retd. Ashok Kumar.

He said, “Indian ocean is a great asset to us. With the cardinal principle of security, our vulnerabilities are directly proportional to our assets. More we develop, the more assets we create; the more prosperous we get, the greater would be vulnerability and greater would be the need for security.

Ajit Doval presiding over the meeting of multi-agency Maritime Security Group

During the meeting, Doval said,” In the changing geopolitical scenario, the Indian ocean which has been an ocean of peace is gradually becoming competitive. We see a potential of having a clash of interest, we need to protect it and be vigilant.”

Ajit Doval said, “We have responsibility towards neighbours be it disaster management or security for them, we’ve been doing it. We recently had an example of countries coming together when Colombo Security Conclave was held to tackle maritime threats in Indian ocean.”

We have a responsibility towards our neighbours, whether it is disaster management or safety for them, we have been doing this. We had an example of countries coming together recently when the Colombo Security Conference was held to deal with maritime threats in the Indian Ocean. We know where we are going… If India does not have a very strong maritime security system, it will not be able to become the power it deserves. This is the perfect time for it. Intelligence agencies provided important information about smuggling, gun running, counter-terrorism, and espionage.”

Source: https://www.awazthevoice.in/india-news/nsa-doval-says-maritime-security-a-priority-area-for-india-13106.html/


(www.MaritimeCyprus.com) The International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) has recently published new Unified Requirements for cyber security: E26 and E27. These will be be mandatory for classed ships and offshore installations contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2024.

The new IACS Unified Requirements (URs) are based on recognized international standards for the cyber security of industrial automation and control systems, such as IEC 62443. In brief, the new IACS URs cover the following main topics:

  • Scope of applicability, including OT systems for important vessel functions
  • Identification and protection against cyber threats
  • Detection of incidents
  • Means to respond and recover
  • Hardening and security capabilities of systems and components

The URs will be mandatory for classed ships and offshore installations contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2024.

Recommendations

Until the new URs are in force,  product suppliers, shipyards, and ship owners are encouraged to implement cyber security into control systems, ship design and relevant management systems on board. Special attention is recommended for product suppliers of systems within the scope of the URs, as these systems may need further development and design changes to comply with the URs.

These URs will be applied to new ships contracted for construction on and after 1 January 2024 although the information contained therein may be applied in the interim as non-mandatory guidance.

IACS Secretary-General, Mr. Robert Ashdown stated “These two URs on cyber safety provide minimum goal-based requirements for the cyber resilience of new ships and for the cyber security of onboard systems and equipment.  In an increasingly connected and digitised maritime world, these URs represent a significant milestone in IACS’ work to deliver safer shipping in the face of continuously evolving technological developments.”

Source: IACS


The International Association of Classification Societies (IACS) has recently published new Unified Requirements for cyber security: E26 and E27. These will be be mandatory for classed ships and offshore installations contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2024. Find out more about the Unified Requirements in this statutory news.

IACS unified requirements for cyber security mandatory from 1 January 2024_358x250

Relevant for ship owners and managers, design offices, shipyards and suppliers.

The new IACS Unified Requirements (URs) are based on recognized international standards for the cyber security of industrial automation and control systems, such as IEC 62443. In brief, the new IACS URs cover the following main topics:

  • Scope of applicability, including OT systems for important vessel functions
  • Identification and protection against cyber threats
  • Detection of incidents
  • Means to respond and recover
  • Hardening and security capabilities of systems and components

The URs will be mandatory for classed ships and offshore installations contracted for construction on or after 1 January 2024. Consequently, the DNV class notation Cyber secure(Essential) will be mandatory from this date.

The technical security requirements of the IACS URs E26 and E27 are fully aligned with DNV’s class notations for cyber security and are covered by the current edition of the DNV class notation Cyber secure(Essential).

For customers who would like, on a voluntary basis, to implement the new IACS cyber security requirements before 1 January 2024, the following items outline how to achieve this in line with the current DNV rules:

  • Systems type approval (TA) in accordance with the current edition of DNV rules for the class notation Cyber secure(Essential) / security profile 1 will meet the IACS URs E26 and E27. The TA process will be amended with the audit of the relevant additional development activities in accordance with IACS UR E27 section 5.
  • Ships and offshore installations assigned the class notation Cyber secure(Essential, +) as per the current edition of DNV rules, will meet the IACS URs E26 and E27. The additional qualifier (+) is needed to extend the scope of systems in accordance with the scope of applicability in IACS UR E26.

DNV will arrange a webinar on the upcoming IACS URs for cyber security on 23 August 2022. The invitation will follow in mid-August.

Source: IACS

New You can now listen to the Insurance Journal articles!

 

In February 2019, a large container ship sailing to New York identified a cyber intrusion on board that surprised the US Coast Guard. Although the malware attack never controlled the vessel’s movement, authorities concluded that weak defenses exposed critical functions to “significant vulnerabilities”.

A maritime disaster did not occur that day, but an alert was raised over an emerging threat to global commerce: computer hacking capable of penetrating shipboard technology that replaces old methods of steering, propulsion , navigation and other key operations. Such leaps in hacking capabilities could cause huge economic damage, especially now when supply chains are already stressed by the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, experts including a senior custodian have said. -ribs.

“We’ve been lucky so far,” said Rick Tiene, vice president of Mission Secure Inc., a cybersecurity firm in Charlottesville, Virginia. “More and more incidents are happening and hackers have a better understanding of what they can do once they have taken control of a working technology system. In the case of maritime – be it the ports or the ships themselves – there is an awful lot that could be done to harm both the network and the physical operations.

Rear Admiral Wayne Arguin, deputy commander of Coastguard Prevention Policy, said shipping faces similar cyber risks to other industries – it’s just that the stakes are much higher given that almost 80% of world trade is carried out by sea. Although Arguin declined to put a figure on the frequency of break-in attempts, he said: “I’m very confident that daily networks are being tested, which really reinforces the need to have a plan.”

Anti-stress system

“A potential intentional attack could really stress the system and we’re definitely thinking about how to consolidate that,” Arguin said in an interview. “When you couple that with the sensitivity of supply chain disruptions, it can be devastating to the shipping system.”

This universe includes not only ship operators, but also port terminals and the thousands of logistical links of increasingly interconnected global supply chains.

BlueVoyant, a New York-based cyber defense platform that recently analyzed 20 well-known shipping companies, said progress has been made since 2021, but “there are more cyber defense actions the industry can take to make things more secure”. A broader third-party cyber risk survey showed that 93% of respondents acknowledged having experienced direct breaches related to supply chain weaknesses, with the average number of intrusions rising from 2.7 in 2020 to 3.7 last year, according to Lorri Janssen-Anessi, director of BlueVoyant. external cyber-assessments.

Hackers have hit several major logistics operations already this year. Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust, India’s busiest container port, suffered a ransomware attack in February. A targeted attack on Washington Inc.’s Expeditors International, a large freight forwarding company, crippled its systems for approximately three weeks and resulted in $60 million in expenses. Blume Global Inc., a Pleasanton, Calif.-based supply chain technology company, said in early May that a cyber incident temporarily rendered its asset management platform inaccessible.

“Vulnerable areas”

“You picked an industry that has a lot of vulnerable areas,” said Jennifer Bisceglie, CEO of Arlington, Va.-based Interos, a supply chain risk management firm.

The shipping industry is the backbone of global trade in goods, but when it comes to cyber vulnerabilities, its wide reach is an Achilles heel. The biggest companies are catching up and, after years of struggling to make money, now have the resources to invest in improved ship-to-shore technology.

Hapag-Lloyd AG, Germany’s largest shipping company, announced in April that it would become the first carrier to equip its entire container fleet with real-time tracking devices. Most major container lines use remote sensors for functions such as monitoring engine performance, maintaining cooling systems or opening a pump valve. Electronic charts and collision avoidance mapping can be updated ashore and shared remotely. Many new ships ordered during this peak profitability period will be equipped with greater online connectivity for shore operations.

Such advancements add visibility and efficiency, but they also potentially make it easier for hackers to work, experts said.

“Vessels were quickly connected to the internet using satellite communications, but without all the other security checks necessary to be safe and secure at sea,” said Ken Munro, security specialist at Pen Test Partners, a cybersecurity company with clients in the maritime industry. . “So now maritime operators are frantically trying to reinstate those controls, but are struggling with decades-old equipment on board that can be very difficult to secure.”

To help guard against threats, the International Maritime Organization, a United Nations agency responsible for safety and security, issued guidelines that companies were supposed to adopt from 2021. Some analysts said these regulations had not had enough of the intended effect and led to a wide range of responses.

System patchwork

“Some have been very proactive and started working long before the regulations,” said Captain Rahul Khanna, global head of maritime risk advisory at Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, a unit of the Munich-based financial services firm, Allianz SE. “On the other end of the spectrum, you had people who are aware and just doing the bare minimum to get the certificate on their records.”

Even modern ships have a patchwork of systems from different manufacturers that have taken cybersecurity to varying degrees of seriousness, said Andy Jones, the former head of information security at AP Moller-Maersk A/S. , the world’s number 2 container ship. “Some operators have taken this seriously, but with large fleets and vessels that are probably over 30 years old, this is a very heavy order.”

Jakob Larsen, maritime security specialist at Bimco, one of the world’s largest associations representing shipowners, defended the industry’s position on cyber protections as “relatively strong” and on par with other sectors. Although increased digitization brings “more and more attack surface,” he said, instances where operational controls have been hacked are rare and technically difficult to achieve.

“This idea that someone can take over a ship and do all kinds of things, when it might be technically possible for a really skilled hacker who has the time to do it, in reality it’s not really something we see,” Larsen said. “Theoretically, yes, it can happen and of course we have to constantly stay up to date with our defenses and watch out for new threats.”

“Huge under-reporting”

Khanna said there was “huge under-reporting” when ships are attacked and “those who say they weren’t just don’t know”.

There is consensus within industry and government that there needs to be more information sharing. “Everyone has to be all in on this game and understand when there are vulnerabilities — getting this information out quickly will be one thing that will continue to help use closed doors,” the Coast Guard’s Arguin said.

For some observers, a wake-up call about the stakes at stake came in March 2021, when the Ever Given – one of the world’s largest container ships – ran aground and blocked traffic in the channel. from Suez for almost a week. The crash, attributed in part to high winds, cut off much of Europe’s trade with Asia and upended supply chains for several weeks.

“The Suez incident made everyone realize that global supply chains are actually quite vulnerable,” Munro said. “It’s not that Suez was a hack – it wasn’t – but it so easily could have been.”

Source: https://rushhourtimes.com/cyber-hackers-prowling-ship-controls-threaten-another-big-shock/


The maritime industry serves a critical role in the global supply chain. But the industry also relies on its own supply chain. In the part-3 of our cyber risk management series, we will take a look at how the maritime supply chain works and how cyber risks can arise from the imbalance of responsibilities, the ship operator’s lack of control and the disconnect in regulation.

The maritime industry serves a critical role in the global supply chain. But the industry also relies on its own supply chain. Everything from fuel for the engines to food for the crew needs to be delivered to ships around the world for the industry to function. This supply chain extends to the supply and maintenance of onboard computing equipment and applications that support vessel operations. The ship owner and operator frequently relies on the supply chain to ensure such equipment and applications are always up to date, well maintained and secure. Every software component onboard a vessel creates some cyber risk, but this research has identified specific areas of concern including the imbalance of responsibilities, the ship operator’s lack of control and the disconnect in regulation.

Every software component onboard a vessel creates some cyber risk, but this research has identified specific areas of concern including the imbalance of responsibilities, the ship operator’s lack of control and the disconnect in regulation.

RESPONSIBILITY

Under a charterparty, the ship owner has an express obligation to ensure the ship is seaworthy before, at the beginning of and throughout the voyage. The owner must demonstrate that they have exercised due diligence to ensure seaworthiness of the vessel.

The obligation on seaworthiness cannot be delegated to third parties. This means that the ship owner must demonstrate they have exercised the due diligence to ensure that any onboard systems must be secure enough not impact the seaworthiness of the vessel, even if the system is supplied, installed or maintained by a third party.

According to our industry survey, conducted as part of this research, 78% of shoreside employees at shipping companies have cyber risk management procedures in place for dealing with third parties such as suppliers. However, the same survey found that just 55% of industry suppliers are asked by customers to prove they have cyber risk management procedures in place. This statistic demonstrates a clear gap in the industry’s due diligence of managing supply cyber risk.

Cyber experts interviewed in compiling this report repeatedly pointed to significant risks that exist across the maritime supply chain caused by suppliers not working to an acceptable standard of security. This spans everything from developing systems that are vulnerable even to basic cyber intrusions in the first place, poor practices during installation to insecure practices when visiting the vessel for system maintenance.

The responsibility of the supply chain in relation to cyber risk management of vessel operations is not clear. Equipment or service supply contracts generally clarify responsibilities and obligations in relation to defects in the supplied equipment or deficiencies in the service. However, responsibilities requiring the supplier to ensure a reasonable level of cyber risk management are not explicitly stated in most cases. To make matters worse, shipping cyber emergency response plans are not often developed in cooperation with key suppliers. Where they are, it is rare that exercises or drills are performed involving the supply chain, so lessons on the critical actions that ship owners need their suppliers to perform during a cyber incident are never uncovered, tested and improved.

CONTROL

Though a ship’s hull and machinery may remain the same throughout its life, the average commercial vessel has at least 50 distinct systems that contain computing and software components. To the ship operator and their crew, these components are often “black boxes” and there is very little technical knowledge beyond the minimum necessary to operate them, identify a fault or make minor fixes. Certainly, the ship operator is not able to integrate any cybersecurity controls, such as deploying antivirus software or test for any existing defenses, without explicit permission from the equipment manufacturer. Any attempt to do so is generally considered to violate conditions for warranty.

Operators are not entirely powerless. There are actions they can take to regain some control of securing the supply chain of onboard systems.

Of those maritime organisations that reported being the subject of a cyber attack in the last three years, 3% said the attack resulted in them paying a ransom. The average ransom paid was US$3.1 million.

While a small number of system manufacturers have proactively taken steps to shore up the cyber protection of the equipment they manufacture and the applications that are provided alongside these, the vast majority of shipping equipment manufacturers have done very little to provide ship operators assurance around this.

This problem is exacerbated by integrators that are not sufficiently knowledgeable in cybersecurity, making decisions leading to insecure configurations and integrations that may undo the security designed into the equipment in the first place. The nature of shipping operations means that when equipment breaks down and needs replacing or repair, it must be dealt with quickly and efficiently as delays can be incredibly costly. Replacements are frequently bought on short order, and purchases are determined by convenience, not security.

This results in a major disconnect between the exposure for the ship operator and their ability to control the risks. However, operators are not entirely powerless. There are actions they can take to regain some control of securing the supply chain of onboard systems. Getting a clear understanding of the inventory of these computing systems and how they are connected is an excellent starting point.

According to data from CyberOwl, 54% of the ships monitored by CyberOwl have between 40 and 180 connected devices onboard. This includes expected devices such as business workstations, PCs, printers and company phones. Most alarming is that on many vessels monitored by the company, systems that were thought to be isolated, such as cargo computers and engine monitoring systems, were found to be connected to the onboard business IT network somehow.

REGULATION

The main regulation for cyber risk management in shipping relates to the IMO resolution MSC.428(98) on Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management System (SMS). The resolution gives effect to a requirement for an approved SMS to incorporate cyber risk management. Shipping administrations must ensure that cyber risks are appropriately addressed in the SMS no later than the first annual verification of the company’s Document of Compliance (DoC) after 1 January 2021.

Though a ship’s hull and machinery may remain the same throughout its life, the average commercial vessel has at least 50 distinct systems that contain computing and software components.

As this regulatory instrument is implemented via the DoC, it places the burden of regulatory compliance solely on the ship owner. This also follows in the majority of maritime cyber risk management guidelines, that are mainly focused on the actions ship owners can take to cyber secure their ships. For the manufacturer of onboard systems and provider of software based services for shipping systems, the requirements are a lot less clear.

Several Classification Societies have developed some type approvals specifically relating to incorporating minimum cyber security standards within the design of ship equipment and systems. However, unlike for equipment such as voyage or safety critical apparatus, these are voluntary and do not affect the certification of the ship. At the time of writing, based on a search of the public databases of the type approvals granted, there is minimal uptake of these voluntary type approvals.

Interviews conducted during this research suggest the lack of clarity and some level of prescription is creating confusion and frustration. It results in a level of subjectivity for the ship owner who is now required to ensure their SMS incorporates appropriate cyber risk management of their supply chain in order to be granted their DoC, but cannot point to any minimum standards that their supplier must comply with.

Download the full report here

CYBER SECURITY MANAGEMENT SERIES

In the last few years, the maritime industry has made great progress in improving its approach to cyber risk management, but significant gaps remain. This report developed in collaboration with CyberOwl and HFW explores the gaps that exist between the industry’s perceptions of cyber security and reality, taking into account the views of more than 200 stakeholders from across the industry, including cyber security experts, seafarers, shoreside managers, industry suppliers, and C-suite leaders.

Over the coming weeks, we will be sharing a series of articles on the state of cyber risk management in the maritime industry, and we will also uncover the great disconnects that exist across the industry where expectations and reality don’t match up, cyber risk management efforts are lacking, or risks that are unique to maritime exist.

Source: https://thetius.com/3-things-that-make-the-maritime-supply-chain-vulnerable-to-cyber-threats-and-what-to-do-about-them/


Cyber pirates hijacking on-board technology for key operations appear to be an emerging threat to world trade. The current economy, following the pandemic and the commencement of a war in Ukraine, is particularly vulnerable.

In February 2019, a large container ship sailing for New York identified a cyber intrusion on board that startled the US Coast Guard. Though the malware attack never controlled the vessel’s movement, authorities concluded that weak defenses exposed critical functions to “significant vulnerabilities.”

A maritime disaster didn’t happen that day, but a warning flare rose over an emerging threat to global trade: cyber piracy able to penetrate on-board technology that’s replacing old ways of steering, propulsion, navigation and other key operations. Such leaps in hacking capabilities could do enormous economic damage, particularly now, when supply chains are already stressed from the pandemic and the war in Ukraine, experts including a top Coast Guard official said.

Source: https://shippingwatch.com/carriers/article14193887.ece

Five years ago this week, Maersk said a cyber attack crippled its computer network, affecting its port terminal operations from India to the Netherlands, rippling across to nearly 60 countries and eventually causing as much as $300 million in damages.

It was, as Andy Jones refers to it in the parlance of cyber security experts, an “extinction event.”

Jones is the former chief information security officer at Maersk Line, and he has a podcast that recounts the event that unfolded and is worth listening to for advice on how to deal with hacking threats and actual intrusions.

The NotPetya attack in 2017 that hit Maersk and other global businesses seems so long ago given the bust-to-boom wave the shipping industry has ridden since then. Imagine if something that widespread happened today, as ports still struggle with economic imbalances caused by the pandemic.

Cyber threats are nothing new to maritime shipping and logistics more broadly. Every month seems to bring another event. Last week, UK delivery giant Yodel said its systems were compromised, though a spokesman said Monday the delivery network and customer service functions were fully operational.

Warning Flare

Now some experts, including a top US Coast Guard official, are sounding the alarm again about the rising risks not just on land, but on ships themselves. Such potential breaches of operational technology could do huge economic damage at a time when global supply chains are already frayed. (Click here for the full story today.)

Shipping is using much of its windfall profits from the pandemic era to upgrade technology, creating more digital linkages from land to water that are both a welcome step in a paper-laden business and a worry unless cyber precautions are taken.

“Ships and their systems were never designed to be connected in this manner and even a modern ship is a patchwork of different systems from different manufacturers who have all taken cyber security in various degrees of seriousness,” Jones said via email. “Some operators have taken this seriously, but with substantial fleets and ships that are probably over 30 years old, it is a very tall order.”

Across industry and government, there’s agreement that there needs to be more unified approach and more information sharing.

“Everybody needs to be all-in in this game and understand when there are vulnerabilities — getting that information out quickly is going to be thing that continues to help us close doors,” US Coast Guard Real Admiral Wayne Arguin told Bloomberg.

Brendan Murray in London

Source: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2022-06-28/supply-chain-latest-ships-embracing-tech-upgrades-see-cyber-risks-rise


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED