Dublin, Dec. 31, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — The “Europe Maritime Cybersecurity Market: Focus on End User, Solution, Service, Threat Type, and Country-Wise Analysis – Analysis and Forecast, 2023-2033” report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com’s offering.

The Europe maritime cybersecurity market is projected to reach $3.49 billion by 2033 from $972.3 million in 2023, growing at a CAGR of 13.64% during the forecast period 2023-2033

Protecting digital assets and networks in the maritime industry from online threats is the main goal of maritime cybersecurity in Europe. As maritime operations depend more and more on digital technologies, cybersecurity has become crucial to ensuring efficiency, safety, and risk mitigation. These dangers range from widespread cyberattacks like viruses and scams to more complex attacks that target shore-based infrastructure and vessel systems. Serious repercussions, including interruptions in business operations, monetary losses, harm to the environment, and even death, can result from cybersecurity breaches. Shipping firms, port authorities, regulatory agencies, and trade associations are important participants in the European maritime cybersecurity market.

Techniques like risk assessment, access control, incident response planning, and continuous employee training are necessary for effective cybersecurity management. Global rules, like those established by the International Maritime Organization (IMO) and the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code, provide frameworks for improving cybersecurity within the maritime sector. Collaboration between public and private sectors, along with technological innovation and information sharing, is crucial to address cyber threats effectively. As the maritime industry continues its digital transformation, robust cybersecurity measures will be vital for ensuring resilience and sustainability across European maritime operations.

Market Introduction

The maritime sector’s growing dependence on digital technologies for communication, navigation, and operations is driving a notable expansion in the European maritime cybersecurity market. Strong cybersecurity is crucial to protecting ships, ports, and associated infrastructure because of the increased susceptibility to cyberattacks that comes with this increased digitization. These dangers can cause operational disruptions, monetary losses, environmental harm, and threats to human safety. They range from viruses and phishing scams to more sophisticated attacks that target vital systems.

The increasing use of cloud computing, automation, and Internet of Things (IoT) devices in the maritime industry is propelling the market. In order to adhere to international standards like the ISPS Code and the regulations of the International Maritime Organization (IMO), major industry participants, including shipping companies, port authorities, and regulatory bodies, are concentrating on fortifying their cybersecurity frameworks. Furthermore, tackling changing cybersecurity challenges requires cooperation between the public and private sectors, improvements in threat detection, and continual staff training. The need for efficient cybersecurity solutions is anticipated to increase as Europe continues to embrace digital transformation in the maritime industry, guaranteeing safer and more robust operations.

How can this report add value to an organization?

Product/Innovation Strategy: The product segment helps the reader understand the different types of services available for deployment and their potential in Europe region. Moreover, the study provides the reader with a detailed understanding of the Europe maritime cybersecurity market by products based on solution, service, and threat type.

Growth/Marketing Strategy: The Europe maritime cybersecurity market has seen major development by key players operating in the market, such as business expansion, partnership, collaboration, and joint venture. The favored strategy for the companies has been partnerships to strengthen their position in the Europe maritime cybersecurity market

Competitive Strategy: Key players in the Europe maritime cybersecurity market analyzed and profiled in the study involve maritime cybersecurity products and service offering companies. Moreover, a detailed competitive benchmarking of the players operating in the Europe maritime cybersecurity market has been done to help the reader understand how players stack against each other, presenting a clear market landscape. Additionally, comprehensive competitive strategies such as partnerships, agreements, and collaborations will aid the reader in understanding the untapped revenue pockets in the market.

Companies Featured

  • SAAB AB
  • Thales
  • Leonardo S.p.A.
  • Airbus SE
  • BAE Systems
  • Terma
  • Westminster Group Plc
  • Kongsberg Digital
  • Smiths Group plc
  • Nettitude Ltd.
  • HGH

Key Attributes:

Report Attribute Details
No. of Pages 73
Forecast Period 2023 – 2033
Estimated Market Value (USD) in 2023 $972.3 Million
Forecasted Market Value (USD) by 2033 $3490 Million
Compound Annual Growth Rate 13.6%
Regions Covered Europe

Key Topics Covered:

1 Markets
1.1 Trends: Current and Future Impact Assessment
1.1.1 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Cybersecurity
1.1.2 Increased Connectivity
1.1.3 Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA)
1.2 Supply Chain Overview
1.3 Regulatory and Environmental Considerations
1.3.1 Regulatory Implications
1.4 Ecosystem/Ongoing Programs
1.4.1 Series of Assessments, including Threat Modeling and Open-Source Intelligence, Performed by NCC Group
1.5 Startup Funding Summary
1.6 Market Dynamics Overview
1.6.1 Business Drivers
1.6.1.1 Increasing Cyber Threats and Attacks
1.6.1.2 Digitalization of Maritime Operations
1.6.1.3 Global Supply Chain Reliance on Maritime Transport
1.6.2 Business Challenges
1.6.2.1 Lack of Trained Personnel
1.6.2.2 Complex Regulatory Environment
1.6.3 Business Opportunities
1.6.3.1 Cybersecurity for Autonomous Vessels
1.6.3.2 Integration of Internet of Things (IoT) and Operational Technology (OT) Security

2 Regions
2.1 Regional Summary
2.2 Drivers and Restraints
2.3 Europe
2.3.1 Regional Overview
2.3.2 Driving Factors for Market Growth
2.3.3 Factors Challenging the Market
2.3.4 Application
2.3.5 Product
2.3.6 U.K.
2.3.7 Application
2.3.8 Product
2.3.9 Germany
2.3.10 Application
2.3.11 Product
2.3.12 France
2.3.13 Application
2.3.14 Product
2.3.15 Rest-of-Europe
2.3.16 Application
2.3.17 Product

3 Markets – Competitive Benchmarking & Company Profiles
3.1 Next Frontiers
3.2 Geographic Assessment
3.2.1 Overview
3.2.2 Top Products/Product Portfolio
3.2.3 Top Competitors
3.2.4 Target Customers
3.2.5 Key Personnel
3.2.6 Analyst View
3.2.7 Market Share, 2022

4 Research Methodology

For more information about this report visit https://www.researchandmarkets.com/r/h66vja

About ResearchAndMarkets.com
ResearchAndMarkets.com is the world’s leading source for international market research reports and market data. We provide you with the latest data on international and regional markets, key industries, the top companies, new products and the latest trends.

 

 

Source: Research and Markets


Vallianz Hit by Cyberattack: Quick Actions Taken to Mitigate Impact

Vallianz, a Singapore-listed OSV owner and operator, recently suffered a cyberattack that granted unauthorized access to its servers. The incident, identified as a ransomware attack, prompted Vallianz to act swiftly to assess, contain, and resolve the situation.

The company enlisted the help of external cybersecurity experts and immediately activated its business continuity plan to minimize disruptions. Relevant authorities were promptly notified of the breach.

In its initial assessment, Vallianz stated that the incident has caused “no significant impact” on its business operations.

This marks the second cyberattack reported by a Singapore-listed company within a week, raising concerns about the growing frequency of such incidents in the region.

Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.


IMDG code amendments (42-24) – MSC.556(108)

These amendments to the International Maritime Dangerous Goods (IMDG) code are in line with the 23rd edition of the UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, and will enter into force on 1 January 2026. However, some contracting governments may apply these amendments (or parts thereof) on a voluntary basis from 1 January 2025. A summary of the significant changes are listed below for reference:

  • Lithium batteries continue to be a major focus, given their widespread use and associated risks. Key changes include:
    • Lithium cells and batteries are now more prominently classified under “articles containing dangerous goods, N.O.S. (Not Otherwise Specified).”
    • All lithium batteries must meet the stringent testing requirements outlined in the Manual of Tests and Criteria, including for pre-production prototypes.
    • New entries under Class 9 have been introduced:
      • 3556: Vehicle, lithium-ion battery powered.
      • 3557: Vehicle, lithium-metal battery powered.
    • Damaged or defective lithium batteries must be removed from articles and packaged separately under specialized instructions.
    • UN 3171 has been revised to exclude lithium batteries, applying now only to vehicles powered by wet batteries, metallic sodium batteries, or sodium alloy batteries.
  • Charcoal and Carbon cargoes: Changes in this category aim to reduce the risk of misdeclared shipments and fire hazards:
    • Special Provisions (SP) 925 and 223, which previously exempted some carbon products, are no longer applicable.
    • New provisions (SP 978 and SP 979) introduce stricter rules for packaging, stowage, and maintaining safe temperatures during transport.
  • Sodium-ion batteries, gaining popularity as an alternative to lithium-ion batteries, are now officially classified under Class 9. This ensures they adhere to the same safety standards, including testing and stowage requirements, to ensure safety during transport.
  • Expanded Definitions and Documentation Requirements: Improved clarity in definitions and documentation is another focus area:
    • Recycled plastics must now include detailed information about their previous use and contents as part of quality assurance programs.
    • New definitions, such as ‘Degree of Filling’, ‘Explosive or Pyrotechnic Effect’ and ‘Metal Powders’, have been introduced.
    • Stowage plans must be more detailed, clearly outlining both primary and subsidiary hazards, ensuring that everyone handling the cargo understands the risks involved.
    • Data loggers and tracking devices used with cargo must now be securely installed to prevent damage during transit.
  • Packaging and Labelling Enhancements:
    • For vehicles equipped with lithium batteries, additional packaging is not required if they are stable and secure for transport. For other cases, specialized bracing or framing may be needed.
    • Labelling and marking requirements have been strengthened to ensure all hazards are clearly visible and easy to identify, even for items in fully enclosed packaging.

Members involved in the transport of dangerous goods in packaged from a recommended to ensure compliance with the latest amendments.

IMSBC code amendments (07-23) – MSC.539(107)

Updates to the International Maritime Solid Bulk Cargoes (IMSBC) code, which has been applicable on a voluntary basis since 1 January 2024, will enter into force on 1 January 2025. These include, but are not limited to, the following changes:

  • The shippers are now required to declare the ‘bulk density’ of cargo, as required by SOLAS regulation XII/10 (MSC.1/Circ.1664).
  • The following changes have been affected in Appendix 1 (individual schedule of solid bulk cargoes):
    • New cargo entries
Bulk cargo shipping name (BCSN) Group Hazard
BARYTE, FLOTATION CHEMICAL GRADE A  
BROWN FUSED ALUMINA C  
CRUSHED GRANODIORITE FINES A  
DIRECT REDUCED IRON (D) (By-product fines with a moisture content of at least 2%) A and B MHB (WF and/or SH)
DUNITE C  
DUNITE FINES A  
ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST, PELLETIZED A and B MHB (TX and CR)
GROUND GRANULATED BLAST FURNACE SLAG POWDER A  
MAGNESITE FINES A  
POTASSIUM NITRATE C  
SODIUM NITRATE C  
SODIUM NITRATE AND POTASSIUM NITRATE MIXTURE C  
CELESTINE CONCENTRATE (under Mineral Concentrates schedule) A  
FISH MEAL (FISH SCRAP), STABLISIZED ANTI-OXIDANT TREATED B MHB (SH)
  • Deleted cargoes from the solid bulk cargo list:
Bulk cargo shipping name (BCSN) Group Hazard
FISH MEAL (FISH SCRAP), STABILIZED UN 2216 ANTI-OXIDANT TREATED B This cargo has effectively been reclassified from Class 9 dangerous goods to an MHB cargo. The IMSBC Code carriage requirements remain the same, but ships will no longer require a dangerous goods certificate to carry the cargo.
  • The list of non-cohesive cargoes (Appendix 3 of the IMSBC Code) has been amended to include the following cargoes:
    • BARYTE, FLOTATION CHEMICAL GRADE
    • CRUSHED GRANODIORITE FINES
    • DUNITE
    • DUNITE FINES
    • ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST, PELLETIZED
    • POTASSIUM NITRATE
    • SODIUM NITRATE
    • SODIUM NITRATE AND POTASSIUM NITRATE MIXTURE
    • SUPERPHOSPHATE

This means that the angle of repose for the above cargoes must be determined prior to loading so that the relevant trimming provisions under section 5 of the IMSBC Code are applied accordingly.

  • The list of Solid Bulk Cargoes for which a Fixed Gas Fire Extinguishing System may be exempted has been updated to its 6th revision to include the new cargo “ELECTRIC ARC FURNACE DUST, PELLETIZED” that can be exempted from having a fixed CO2 fire-fighting installation on board ships (MSC.1/Circ.1395/Rev.6).

Members involved in transporting solid bulk cargoes are recommended to ensure compliance with the latest IMSBC Code amendments.

Amendments to the STCW Convention and Code on Electronic Seafarers’ Certificates – MSC.540(107) & MSC.541(107)

To support the global digitalisation trend, these amendments to the STCW Convention (regulations I/1 and I/2) and STCW Code (section A-I/2) allow seafarers’ certification to be issued in electronic form and specify the minimum information that must be included on these certificates.

Members are recommended to refer to the MSC.1/Circ.1665 for guidelines on the use of electronic certificates of seafarers.

Amendments to MARPOL Annex I, Regulations 15.3, 15.5 and 34.3 to 34.5, on the establishment of the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden as Special Areas – MEPC.381(80)

Due to their significant marine ecological and environmental conditions, as well as their importance as a major route for maritime commerce, the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden regions were recognised as a ‘Special Area’ under regulation 1.11 of MARPOL Annex I. However, for the ‘Special Area’ status to take effect, adequate reception facilities had to be provided in the relevant ports of the coastal State Parties.

MEPC-80 confirmed that States in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden areas, such as Djibouti, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Saudi Arabia, Somalia, and Sudan, now provide adequate reception facilities and arrangements, including treatment facilities for oily wastes and residues at ports and terminals in these areas. Accordingly, the effective date for MARPOL Annex I Special Areas in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden is set to be 1 January 2025.

Members with ships of 400 GT and above are advised that from 1 January 2025, the discharge of oil or oily mixtures into the sea will be prohibited within this region, except under the following conditions:

  1. The ship is enroute.
  2. The oily mixture has been processed through oil filtering equipment that meets the requirements of regulation 14.7 of Annex I.
  3. The oil content of the effluent, without dilution, does not exceed 15 parts per million.
  4. The oily mixture does not originate from cargo pump room bilges on oil tankers.
  5. In the case of oil tankers, the oily mixture is not mixed with oil cargo residues.
    • Fuel consumption per consumer, both while underway and at anchor

Additionally, members operating oil tankers in this region are informed that from 1 January 2025, any discharge of oil or oily mixtures from the cargo area of an oil tanker will be prohibited while in the Red Sea and Gulf of Aden Special Areas. This requirement does not apply to the discharge of clean or segregated ballast.

Amendments to MARPOL Annex V, Regulation 6, on the establishment of the Red Sea as Special Areas – MEPC.382(80)

The Red Sea area was recognised as a Special Area under Annex V (regulation 1.14.4) of MARPOL. However, for the ‘Special Area’ status to be effective, adequate reception facilities had to be provided in the relevant ports of the coastal State Parties.

At MEPC-80, the special area status was confirmed based on information about the necessary reception facilities for MARPOL Annex V wastes and residues at all ports and terminals in the region.

Members with ships transiting through the Red Sea area are advised that from 1 January 2025, the discharge of garbage into the sea shall only be permitted while the ship is enroute and in accordance with Regulation 6 (Discharge of garbage within special areas) of MARPOL Annex V.

 

SOURCE : https://www.ukpandi.com/news-and-resources/news/article/imo-regulatory-update-2025/


MARPOL Annex VI

Emissions Control Ara (ECA)

Effective from 1st May 2025, the Mediterranean sea will become part of an emissions control area under the IMO, reference MEPC.261(79). Vessels transiting this area will now require adherence to ECA regulations on sulphur oxides and particulate matter, burning compliant fuels of 0.1% Sulphur or having an approved EGCS in place. Vessels will need to obtain clear bunker delivery notes stating the sulphur content as well as recording this accurately into the Oil Record Book Part I.  Vessels will require a written procedure describing how the fuel changeover is to be carried out, taking into consideration the time taken to entirely change over to compliant fuel within the complete fuel system pipelines.

Further Amendments

Further amendments have been made to MARPOL Annex VI as per IMO resolution MEPC.385(81) which will come into force on 1st August 2025.

  • Regulations 2, 14 and Appendix I has been revised to bring clarity to the definition of gas fuels as well as stating that the onboard sampling points do not apply to gas/low flashpoint fuels.
  • Regulation 18 has been revised to include gas/low flashpoint fuels into the bunker delivery note (BDN) requirements. Vessels operating on gas/low flashpoint fuels should ensure the BDN received includes all required information as per Appendix V of MARPOL Annex VI.
  • Regulation 13.2.2 clarifies that replacing a steam engine with a diesel engine is considered a major conversion. Replacement engines must comply with Regulation 13 for Nitrogen Oxides. In the event that a Tier III engine is not possible, a Tier II engine can be used in line with resolution MEPC.396(81). The flag administration must report this to the IMO.
  • Regulation 27 – Amendments to this regulation allow the IMO to share ships fuel oil consumption data with analytical consultancies and research entities with the companies consent under strict confidentiality. Additionally, Appendix IX has been updated for the information to be submitted to the IMO. This allows for further granularity regarding fuel consumption and voyage data. Vessels over 5000GT should ensure their SEEMP Part II, for data collection, is modified to meet the new updates.

The International Maritime Organisation’s (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee has recently formally adopted new amendments to its Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) regulations.  and will require mandatory reporting of all containers lost at sea from 1st January 2026.

SOLAS Regulation 31 now mandates that the master of a ship involved in the loss of containers must immediately reports specific details to nearby ships, the nearest coastal state, and the vessel’s flag state. The flag state is then responsible for passing this information to the IMO via a new module in the Global Integrated Shipping Information System (GISIS). SOLAS Regulation 32 outlines the reporting process, stipulating that reports of containers lost at sea must be made as soon as possible, with updates provided as more information becomes available. A final count of lost containers must be confirmed after a thorough inspection. Mandatory details include the position of the lost containers, the number lost, and whether any contained dangerous goods.

 

Source: The Loadstar


Notice to: Ship Owners / Managers/ Operators / Surveyors / Auditors

This Circular is issued to advise that IMO Resolutions MSC.540(107) and MSC.541(107) entered into force on 01 January 2025. Both these Resolutions concern amendments to the International Convention and the Code on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers (STCW).

Regulation I/1 of the STCW Convention – Definitions and clarifications

A new definition has been added:

  • Original form means a paper or an electronic form of any certificate required by the Convention, issued in the format approved by the Administration, provided that the minimum information, as required in paragraph 4 of section A-I/2 of the STCW Code, is readily available.”

 

Regulation I/2 of the STCW Convention – Certificates and Endorsements

Paragraph 11 has been replaced by:

  • Subject to the provisions of regulation I/10, paragraph 5, any certificate required by the Convention must be kept available in its original form on board the ship on which the holder is serving. If an electronic form is used, the minimum required data must be accessible as defined by the Administration in accordance with the STCW Code, which is necessary to initiate a verification procedure.”

 

Section A-I/2 of the STCW Code – Certificates and endorsements

Paragraph 4 has been replaced by:

  • In using formats which may be different from those set forth in this section, pursuant to regulation I/2, paragraph 10, Parties shall ensure that in all cases:
    1. all information relating to the identity and personal description of the holder, including name, date of birth, photograph and signature, along with the date on which the document was issued, shall be displayed on the same side of the documents;
    2. all information relating to the capacity or capacities in which the holder is entitled to serve, in accordance with the applicable safe manning requirements of the Administration, as well as any limitations, shall be prominently displayed and easily identified;
    3. the terms “front”, “back” and “overleaf”, as referred to in these provisions, are not applicable for certificates and endorsements in electronic form; and
    4. an official seal, photograph and signature of seafarer are not necessary for certificates and endorsements in electronic form.”

Act now

Ship Owners/ Managers/ Operators/ Surveyors/ Auditors should note the above and be guided accordingly.

Source : Dromon Bureau of Shipping (DBS) – Home

crewexpress stcw rest hours software


The U.S. Coast Guard proposes to update its maritime security regulations by adding regulations specifically focused on establishing minimum cybersecurity requirements for U.S.-flagged vessels, Outer Continental Shelf facilities, and U.S. facilities subject to the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002 regulations. This proposed rule would help to address current and emerging cybersecurity threats in the marine transportation system. In this Maritime Matters: The Marinelink Podcast, we host a live panel discussion with five experts from the Coast Guard, classification, vessel owners and connectivity leaders to discuss what the rules may look like, as well as what work boat owners should do now to protect themselves, and the consequences not preparing.

Source : https://www.marinelink.com/news/cyber-security-maritime-sector-need-know-520822

Cyber Security Manual


DALL·E-2025-01-10-15.48.45-A-professional-depiction-of-a-crew-member-onboard-a-modern-commercial-vessel-sitting-at-a-desk-in-front-of-a-computer.-The-setting-includes-nautical-e.png

A three-year exhaustive study has shown that the structures supporting the implementation of work/rest regulations at sea are being broken, with nearly two-thirds of seafarers adjusting their work/rest records.

Under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC), a seafarer has the right to regulated work and rest. A three-year exhaustive study has revealed that the structures supporting the implementation of work/rest regulations at sea are breaking down, with nearly two-thirds of seafarers adjusting their work/rest records. Under the Maritime Labour Convention 2006 (MLC), a seafarer has the right to regulated work and rest hours. Hours of work are defined as either maximum or minimum hours of rest. The maximum work hours must not exceed 14 hours in any 24 hours and 72 hours in any seven days. The minimum hours of rest must be at least 10 hours in any 24 hours and 77 hours in any seven days.

A record of a seafarer’s daily hours of rest or work must be kept onboard in the ship’s working language and English, signed by the seafarer and the master or other authorized person, with a copy provided to the seafarer. In his PhD dissertation for the World Maritime University, funded through support from the ITF Seafarers’ Trust, Bikram Bhatia surveyed 6,304 seafarers, interviewed 55 port state control (PSC) officers, and analyzed data from 16,551 PSC inspections. The research findings include that 64.3% of seafarers adjusted their work/rest records, while PSC officers needed help to detect non-compliance.

More concerning is the coercion from shore-based management. 66.7% of respondents had their reports questioned by their company, 60.1% felt compelled to adjust their reports, and 49.1% were explicitly instructed to do so. The high compliance rates reported by PSC inspections mask the reality of seafarers’ non-compliance, creating what Bhatia describes as a “false narrative at policy levels.”

Reconciling wellness with excessive demands seems implausible, suggested Steven Jones, founder of the Seafarers Happiness Index, in a recent article for Splash. “Crews face overwhelming demands while grappling with chronic underreporting of work hours and the threat of punishment for infractions,” Jones argued, adding: “Seafarers face a difficult choice: being honest about overwork can lead to punishment, while dishonesty may allow them to escape consequences, this creates a troubling lack of incentive for proper, effective, open, and transparent recording of work hours.”

Souce: Splash 247

crewexpress stcw rest hours software


DALL·E-2025-01-10-10.42.04-A-visually-appealing-illustration-showcasing-maritime-inventory-and-hazardous-material-maintenance.-The-image-features-a-ships-deck-with-organized-in.png

On June 26, 2025, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) will implement the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (Hong Kong Convention). This pivotal treaty aims to regulate ship recycling practices, prioritizing the safety of workers and the protection of the environment from risks associated with hazardous materials found on ships.

Improper handling of hazardous substances can lead to severe health issues and environmental degradation, including oil spills, toxic leaks, and contamination of soil and water. Such consequences pose a threat to marine life, local ecosystems, and even vital water supplies for human consumption.

Annually, around 500 commercial vessels conclude their operational life and undergo dismantling for recycling. The Hong Kong Convention mandates that ships exceeding 500 gross tonnage (GT) maintain an Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM). This inventory serves as a detailed record of hazardous substances onboard, such as asbestos and heavy metals, ensuring proper handling and disposal during the recycling process.

With the convention’s enforcement, ships over 500 GT must prepare and have an IHM approved by the implementation date. This requirement applies to vessels registered under countries that have ratified the treaty. Flag Administrators are tasked with ensuring compliance, and the convention outlines specific hazardous materials that must be managed, including asbestos, heavy metals, chromium-6, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Proper identification and control of these materials are vital to reducing risks during ship dismantling.

Historically, the ship recycling industry has witnessed numerous incidents due to inadequate safety measures. The HKC seeks to address these issues by enforcing regulations and requiring the IHM, a critical tool for promoting best practices in hazardous materials management across the shipping and recycling sectors.

The IHM involves several stages throughout a ship’s lifecycle:

  • Approval and Certification (PART I): Creating and certifying the initial inventory.
  • Maintenance and Renewal: Updating the inventory at regular intervals, typically every five years.
  • Dismantling and Recycling (PART II and III): Managing final inventories during the shipbreaking process.

Certified hazardous materials (HAZMAT) inspectors are responsible for conducting these assessments and providing guidance to shipowners on compliance. When hazardous substances are identified, remediation can be undertaken with professional oversight, including the substitution of non-hazardous materials.

As the enforcement date of the Hong Kong Convention approaches, it marks a significant step towards safer ship recycling practices and the preservation of marine environments. Comprehensive IHM implementation ensures that vessels are dismantled responsibly, minimizing risks to workers and the environment. By monitoring hazardous materials throughout a ship’s operational life, the maritime industry demonstrates its commitment to sustainability and public well-being. The convention and its associated measures stand as a testament to the industry’s dedication to fostering safer and more sustainable practices worldwide.

SHIPIP INVENTORY OF HAZARDOUS MATERILA MAINTENANCE


New Requirements for Ballast Water Record Books (BWRBs)

Starting in 2025, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) will implement two resolutions introducing changes to ballast water record-keeping and electronic record book approval. These updates aim to streamline compliance with the Ballast Water Management (BWM) Convention and clarify record-keeping practices for ship operators.

Key Changes Effective 1 February 2025

From 1 February 2025, updated guidelines for ballast water (BW) record-keeping will come into effect, as outlined in Circular BWM.2/Circ.80. These updates are intended to simplify the process for ship crews and include:

  1. An updated example of a ballast water reporting form (Appendix II).
  2. A voluntary tank-by-tank logging form for ballast water operations.
  3. Guidance for logging operations under challenging water quality conditions (from Circular BWM.2/Circ.80/Rev.1).

Additionally, the BWM Convention’s Appendix II has been revised by Resolution MEPC.369(80), introducing a new BWRB format. As of February 2025, all vessels with an approved BWM plan will need to:

  • Record ballast water operations using the updated codes (A to H) and item numbers specified in MEPC.369(80).
  • Ensure the new BWRB format is used for all record-keeping in compliance with Circular BWM.2/Circ.80.

Crews should become familiar with these changes, as compliance will be required by both port state and flag administrations. Importantly, the BWRB format can be updated without necessitating amendments to the Ballast Water Management Plan (BWMP), meaning no re-approval of the BWMP is expected.

Key Changes Effective 1 October 2025

From 1 October 2025, the use of electronic ballast water record books (e-BWRBs) will become mandatory when replacing hard copy versions. Regulation B-2 of the BWM Convention now permits e-BWRBs, with guidelines for their implementation detailed in Resolution MEPC.372(80). This change includes:

  1. Approval of Electronic Record Books: Electronic BWRBs must meet IMO guidelines and receive approval.
  2. Ship-Specific Declarations: A declaration must be carried on board to confirm the installation of the electronic system complies with IMO standards. This declaration must be issued by the ship’s flag administration or an authorized body.

Some flag administrations have already approved early implementation of e-BWRBs, allowing ships to transition before October 2025.

Preparing for Compliance

Ship operators should take the following actions to meet the new requirements:

  1. Update Record Books: Ensure ballast water record books comply with the new requirements effective from 1 February 2025.
  2. Approve Electronic Systems: Verify that any electronic record-keeping system meets IMO guidelines and is approved by the relevant authority.
  3. Obtain Declarations: Acquire ship-specific declarations for electronic BWRBs by 1 October 2025 or earlier, depending on flag administration policies.
  4. Request Surveys: Schedule surveys to ensure compliance with the new electronic record-keeping requirements, if applicable.

Resources and References

For further information, the following IMO documents and guidelines are recommended:

  • MEPC.369(80): Amendments to Appendix II of the BWM Convention (BWRB format).
  • BWM.2/Circ.80: Guidance on ballast water record-keeping and reporting.
  • MEPC.372(80): Guidelines for the use of electronic record books under the BWM Convention.
  • MEPC.383(81): Amendments to Regulations A-1 and B-2 of the BWM Convention regarding electronic record books.


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED