With the introduction of the ​​​New Inspection Regime (NIR), all ships operating within the Paris MoU are subdivided into three types: ​

  • Low Risk Ship (LRS)
  • Standard Risk Ship (SRS)
  • High Risk Ship (HRS)

​The type of ship is decisive

The type of ship determines how often a ship is required to be subjected to a port State control inspection in Paris MoU. Low risk ships must be inspected every third year, standard risk ships must be inspected every year, while high risk ships must be inspected every six months. When a period has expired, the ship is required to be inspected at the first subsequent port call.

The authority can choose to inspect earlier than required

However, the port State control authority can choose to inspect the ship earlier than required if it is expedient as regards the authority’s work. This means that a low risk ship can be inspected two years after the latest inspection, a standard risk ship ten months after the latest inspection and a high risk ship five months after the latest inspection.

Prioritising ships

When two years have passed since the latest inspection of a low risk ship, the ship becomes a second priority ship. This means that the authority may choose to inspect the ship, but is not required to do so.

If, however, more than three years pass since the latest inspection of a low risk ship, the ship becomes a first priority ship. This means that it is required to be inspected.

Similar rules of priority apply to standard risk ships and high risk ships, which is illustrated in this picture.

However, an unexpected factor may change the status of the ship from no priority to second priority.

Furthermore, a top priority factor may change the ship’s inspection priority to first priority.

Ships affected by unexpected factors are the following:

  • Ships that have not observed the current version of the IMO recommendation for navigating the entrances to the Baltic Sea.
  • Ships with certificates issued by a previously recognised organisation whose authorisation has been withdrawn since the latest inspection in the Community or in the Paris MoU region.
  • Ships about which pilots or port authorities or bodies have reported obvious irregularities that may affect safety of navigation or that present a risk of damage to the marine environment, cf. article 23 of this directive.
  • Ships that do not meet the relevant reporting requirements as stipulated in article 9 of the PSC directive as well as in directive 2000/59/EC (on port reception facilities for ship-generated waste and cargo residues) and 2002/59/EC (monitoring directive and, if relevant, regulation (EC) no. 725/2004 (on enhancing ship and port facility security).
  • Ships for which a report or complaint has been made by the master, a crewmember or by any person or organisation with a legitimate interest in the ship being operated safely and properly, in the living and working conditions on board or in preventing pollution unless the member State concerned considers the report or the complaint clearly groundless.
  • Ships that have previously been detained more than three months ago.
  • Ships for which outstanding defects and non-conformities have been reported, except ships for which the defects and non-conformities are required to be remedied within 14 days after departure or before departure.
  • Ships for which problems have been reported related to their cargo, especially harmful and dangerous goods.
  • Ships that have manoeuvred in a manner presenting a risk to persons, property or the environment.
  • Ships for which information from a reliable source has shown that their risk parameters differ from the registered parameters and that the risk level is therefore higher.
  • Top priority factors mean the following:
  • Ships that have, for safety reasons, been suspended or withdrawn from their class since the latest inspection in the Community or in the Paris MoU region.
  • Ships for which another member State has made a report or notice.
  • Ships that cannot be identified in the inspection database.
  • Ships that have been involved in a collision, grounding or stranding on their way to port.
  • Ships that have been accused of contravening the provisions on the discharge of harmful substances or waste water.
  • Ships that have manoeuvred in an irregular manner or in a manner that is not appropriate in terms of safety so that routeing measures adopted by the IMO or safe navigation practice and procedures have not been observed.​

Source: dma


Port State Control is the means by which a nation exercises authority over foreign merchant vessels that are within waters subject to its jurisdiction. Maritime Authorities who are signatories to the PSC MOU operating in their region agree to maintain an effective system of PSC to confirm that foreign ships calling, or anchoring off, its ports or off-shore installations comply with the applicable international standards. These standards are laid down in the “relevant instruments” of the MOU. The Cayman Islands is a signatory to the Caribbean MOU on PSC. PSC Officers based in George Town carry out inspections of visiting foreign flag vessels.

Purpose

PSC aims to verify whether foreign flagged vessels comply with applicable international conventions on safety, pollution prevention and crew living and working conditions. Where vessels are not found to be in substantial compliance, the PSC system imposes actions to ensure they are brought into compliance.

Inspections are targeted at vessels of most concern and/or most likely to be substandard, based on identified risk factors.

Authority Used for Inspection

PSC activity must be based on the control authority provided under national laws. For example, there must be laws that permit the inspection of foreign ships within the jurisdiction of the port state, laws to apply the relevant instruments to those ships and laws to enable enforcement actions to be taken against ships that do not comply.

When applying the relevant instruments, the Port State Control Officers (PSCOs) must carefully check that any action taken is authorised under a convention or its applicable law. For older vessels, in particular, PSCOs must ensure the applicability of the requirements. The requirements of new conventions may not  apply to existing ships and, in some cases, the ships may be exempt or have equivalent provisions.

Memoranda of Understanding (MOU)

To facilitate coordination of PSC activities, IMO has encouraged the establishment of regional PSC organisations and agreements. Several Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) are now in operation between regions including:

  • Europe and the North Atlantic (Paris MOU)
  • Asia and the Pacific (Tokyo MOU)
  • Latin America (Acuerdo de Viña del Mar)
  • Caribbean (Caribbean MOU)
  • West and Central Africa (Abuja MOU)
  • Black Sea Region (Black Sea MOU)
  • Mediterranean (Mediterranean MOU)
  • Indian Ocean (Indian Ocean MOU);
  • Arab States of the Gulf (GCC MoU or Riyadh MoU).

In addition to these MOUs, the United States Coast Guard also operates its own PSC regime.

Contacting Cayman Island Shipping Registry

The Safety & Compliance Section at Cayman Registry is available to provide assistance and guidance in the case of any PSC intervention on board Cayman registered vessels and can be contacted at the numbers provided in Guidance Note No.: 2013_01_CIGN.

Source: cishipping


Are you prepared for the next port state control inspection? Or what do you do if your vessel is detained and cannot continue on schedule? You need a reliable partner who supports you when you need it, anywhere in the world.

Our long-standing, high port state control (PSC) performance is testimony to the quality of our services and good cooperation with our customers.

Whether you need support upon detention or want to prevent off-hire due to detention, call on us and we’ll be at your side – regardless of where you are in the world.

Rely on us when detained:

  • We rapidly organise a surveyor to assist you on board
  • We are more familiar with local PSC authorities and can speed up the process

As the world’s largest classification society, we are able to conduct extensive research and constant analysis to evaluate the lessons learned from detentions. This enables us to provide a range of services that support you in keeping your vessel in compliance – so you are best prepared for PSC inspections worldwide at all times.

Our range of comprehensive PSC services includes:

  • PSC Planner web application: Available for all customers via VERACITY by DNV GL, overview of ones fleet’s PSC performance, helps to prepare for upcoming PSC inspections with ship specific short checklists
  • Pro-active PSC risk profiling for your fleet – send inquiry
  • One-day interactive PSC workshop or tailor-made trainings via DNV GL Academy
  • Ad-hoc PSC seminars and training courses on request
  • PSC news, additional guidance on technical topics from a PSC inspection view
  • Support for preparation on Concentrated Inspection Campaigns (CIC):
    • Paris MOU and Tokyo MOU will carry out a joint CIC from August – September 2019 on “Emergency Systems and Procedures”
    • This CIC will also be joined by Black Sea MoU, Med MoU, Indian MoU, Riyadh MoU and Vina del Mar MoU
    • DNV GL will offer detailed information about the topic during a smart-up session annual in August – next webinar will be in August 2020 for the CIC in 2020
    • Recordings of previous CIC smart-up can be found below under Videos and Downloads
    • Further guidance on actual and previous CICs can be found under PSC news

With PSC support from DNV GL, you’re always in good hands:

  • Be prepared for smooth PSC inspections to minimise the risk of deficiencies, saving you time and money
  • Profit from surveyors who can discuss directly with PSC officers on board and most likely in the local language
  • Know exactly which actions have to be taken to achieve the quickest possible rectification of deficiencies and/or the release of your ship

Source: dnvgl


For the purpose of providing more transparent information on activities of the Tokyo MOU, the Port State Control Committee decided to publish the PSC inspection data on the web-site. The inspection database under this section has been developed for providing the facilities to make search and view of the results of inspections conducted by the member Authorities of the Tokyo MOU.

In order to ensure accuracy and correctness of the Tokyo MOU PSC data, should there be a question regarding inspection data, parties or individuals concerned are requested to contact the relevant port State Authority directly for verification or correction. The information displayed in the database reflects the situation at the time of inspection. The Secretariat of the Tokyo MOU is not in the position to amend any records in the database.


All ships sailing in international waters are required to comply with the international codes and conventions put forth by the maritime authorities. For this, ships should be maintained at a particular standard by the combined efforts of flat states, shipping company, and ship’s master.

In order to ensure that the condition of foreign ships is well above the excepted level, inspections are done on the ships when they visit international ports. This inspection of foreign ships is known as port state control (PSC).

Port State Control

Representation Image – Credits: lr.org

The regulation of port state control was brought in by the formation of Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU), which also put forth the general criteria for inspection procedures of all types of ships.

Know more about the Paris Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) and the 8 PSC regimes in operation worldwide

Paris memorandum of understanding (MOU) laid down few general rules for the inspection of foreign vessels. They are as follows:

  • Inspection would be carried out on ships coming to a port for the first time or after an absence of 12 months of more
  • Inspection would be carried out of ships which have been permitted to leave the port of a state with deficiencies to be rectified
  • Inspection would be carried out of ships which have been reported as being deficient by pilots or port authorities
  • Ships whose certificates are not in order would be inspected
  • Ships which has been involved in any kind of accident such as grounding, collision or stranding on the way to a port will be inspected
  • Inspection of ship which are carrying dangerous or polluting goods and have failed to report relevant information would be inspected
  • Ships which have been suspended from the class in the preceding 6 months would be inspected
  • Ships which have been subject of a report or notification by another authority would be inspected
  • Inspection of ships which are accused of an alleged violation of the provision of IMO as to pose a threat to the ship’s crew, property, or environment would be inspected

A ship is allowed to leave a port only on condition that the deficiencies found will be rectified before the departure or at the next port or within 14 days.

What all things are checked during port state control (PSC) inspection?

A port state control inspection involves checking of several aspects of the ship in both deck and engine departments of the ship.

 

The survey involves checking of important shipping documents, technical details, and structural elements of the ship.

Documents that are checked during port state control (PSC)

Important things that can be checked in the engine room during a port state control (PSC)

A ship is detained mainly when she is found to be dangerously unsafe to the safety of the ship, its crew and to marine environment. She can also be detained when the condition and standard of the ship is in complete contravention with the regulations put forth by the IMO and other maritime authorities.

The data collected from port state inspections of all the ships is stored in an information system called the “Equasis.

Find out more about Equasis here.

After the inspection, it is the duty of the master to report to the company regarding the outcome of the inspection.


Port State Control (PSC) is the inspection of foreign ships in national ports to verify that the condition of the ship and its equipment comply with the requirements of international regulations and that the ship is manned and operated in compliance with these rules.

 

Many of IMO’s most important technical conventions contain provisions for ships to be inspected when they visit foreign ports to ensure that they meet IMO requirements.

These inspections were originally intended to be a back up to flag State implementation, but experience has shown that they can be extremely effective. The Organization adopted resolution A.682(17) on Regional co-operation in the control of ships and discharges promoting the conclusion of regional agreements. A ship going to a port in one country will normally visit other countries in the region and it can, therefore, be more efficient if inspections can be closely coordinated in order to focus on substandard ships and to avoid multiple inspections.

This ensures that as many ships as possible are inspected but at the same time prevents ships being delayed by unnecessary inspections. The primary responsibility for ships’ standards rests with the flag State – but port State control provides a “safety net” to catch substandard ships.
Nine regional agreements on port State control – Memoranda of Understanding or MoUs – have been signed: Europe and the north Atlantic (Paris MoU); Asia and the Pacific (Tokyo MoU); Latin America (Acuerdo de Viña del Mar); Caribbean (Caribbean MoU); West and Central Africa (Abuja MoU); the Black Sea region (Black Sea MoU); the Mediterranean (Mediterranean MoU); the Indian Ocean (Indian Ocean MoU); and the Riyadh MoU. The United States Coast Guard maintain the tenth PSC regime.
IMO hosted six Workshops for PSC MoU/Agreement Secretaries and Database Managers. The Workshops were funded by the IMO Technical Cooperation Fund and aimed to provide support to regional port State control regimes by establishing a platform for cooperation and also providing a forum for the people involved to meet and exchange ideas and experiences. They also aimed to encourage harmonization and coordination of PSC activities and the development of practical recommendations which can be forwarded to IMO for further examination by the Organization’s relevant Committees and Sub-Committees.
The reports of the six past workshops are available on IMODOCS under “meeting documents/others/PSCWS”.
Source: imo

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is the biggest shake-up to data protection laws in Europe in over twenty years. GDPR came into force on 25 May 2018 and is designed to create a single set of requirements across Europe that give individuals more rights and control over how organisations can process and store their personal information.

At Bupa Global we take privacy and data protection seriously. Part of our vision statement is to respect everyone’s individuality, culture, privacy and dignity. As part of this, we consider information to be key to our business and understand that customers trust us to keep their personal information safe.

We’ve set out below a few FAQs that we have received about Bupa Global’s preparations for GDPR.

How has Bupa Global been preparing for GDPR?

We take privacy and data protection very seriously at Bupa Global. In line with our Bupa Code we respect everyone’s individuality, culture, privacy and dignity. As part of this, we consider information to be key to our business and understand that our customers and our people trust us to keep their personal information safe.

To make sure the business continuously improves, Bupa Global has been preparing for the GDPR for some time by running a readiness programme which brings together privacy, IT, legal and compliance expertise to review our business processes, IT and organisational controls, customer literature, and third party arrangements against the new requirements. Our preparations continue to respond to the evolving regulatory environment and the guidance we expect over the coming months from privacy regulators in Europe and beyond. We see privacy as something that goes beyond GDPR and is a part of business as usual at Bupa Global.

Although the GDPR is European legislation, the changes we are making will in some cases have effect for our customers, suppliers, partners and brokers beyond the UK and Europe.

Does GDPR apply to Bupa Global’s brokers?

It may do.

GDPR applies to data controllers and data processors and can apply to those based within the European Union and outside the European Union. The GDPR will apply to businesses established in the European Union and businesses based outside of the European Union that offer goods or services in the EU or monitor the behaviour of EU citizens, irrespective of whether the business has a presence in Europe.

Under GDPR, is Bupa Global acting as a data processor for its brokers?

Bupa Global cannot provide an absolute answer as arrangements may differ. Bupa Global provides a wide range of services to both individuals and companies. In privacy terms, Bupa Global is generally acting as a data controller when delivering these services, rather than as a data processor.

In order for Bupa Global to provide international private medical insurance services, Bupa Global determines what personal information it requires about individual members. This includes determining the personal information that is required to provide the services and how it is used (e.g. what personal information is used to price premiums and underwrite, how personal information is used to manage claims and provide benefits). When Bupa Global is making these decisions, Bupa Global is acting as a data controller.

We consider that brokers will generally also be data controllers. This is because brokers are usually making decisions about personal information they collect, the purposes for which personal information is processed and the way in which it is processed.

Brokers act as agents of the insured party. Generally, each broker determines what personal information they need to collect prior to providing such personal information to Bupa Global in order to arrange an insurance policy. The broker will retain the personal information and continue to control how it is used (e.g. to send marketing to individuals). On this basis, the broker would also be a data controller.

What does it mean if Bupa Global and a broker are each data controllers?

Under GDPR, where Bupa Global and a broker each act as data controllers, each party has responsibilities for the ways in which we collect, use, store and delete personal information. We each need to determine for ourselves how the law applies to us and what we need to do. For our brokers, this may mean that they need to make some changes to the ways in which they operate, review their current processes and consider their privacy culture.

At Bupa Global, we see compliance with GDPR as part of doing the right thing for customers, rather than just compliance with a legal obligation.

Will Bupa Global be changing its agreements with brokers?

Yes, Bupa Global will be updating our agreements with our brokers as required in order to reflect changes to privacy law under GDPR. This does not mean that all of our brokers will immediately receive new agreements, as we may already have GDPR-ready terms in place.

Will Bupa Global be updating its Privacy Notice?

Yes, we have updated our privacy notice available on our website and are updating all of our guides and other materials in line with GDPR requirements.

Will Bupa Global complete broker’s GDPR readiness questionnaires?

As Bupa Global generally acts as a data controller for the provision of our services, we will not complete questionnaires that are designed to carry out due diligence on data processors. When processing personal information as a data controller Bupa Global has direct legal obligations for compliance with relevant data protection laws as well as complying with our internal privacy standards. We recognise, however, that our customers wish to ensure that all of their service providers are committed to safeguarding information to the highest standard. We are happy to discuss specific areas of concern, and brokers should raise any such issues with their usual Bupa Global contact.

What frameworks are in place to ensure that Bupa effectively manages privacy issues?

Bupa Global’s privacy framework is built out of Bupa’s enterprise level privacy, information security and risk policies.

Bupa Global’s policy and governance structures relating to privacy are designed with the accountability principle of the GDPR in mind.

Our enterprise level policies on information risk and privacy govern the approach Bupa Global takes to ensuring that privacy issues are effectively managed within the business. Regular risk assessments are carried out, which feed into our broader risk registers and committees, ultimately reporting to the Bupa Board Risk Committee.

 

Source: bupaglobal


The EU Network and Information Security Directive (NIS) requires maritime transport and other essential services to demonstrate that they have implemented ‘appropriate and proportionate’ cyber security measures. The NIS will come into force on 6 May 2018 and the Government has just published a consultation paper on the implementation of the NIS in the UK. The largest port or harbour authorities and maritime transport companies headquartered in the UK will be directly impacted by these new provisions and there will inevitably be a trickle-down effect on small companies that contract with those organisations. The penalties for breach of the new laws will be substantial – 4% of global turnover or £17 million, whichever is the greater. These measures will be in addition to the other new cyber laws, such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which are about to come into effect.

Over the last 18 months, the maritime sector has worked hard to focus its response to the growing cyber risk that it undoubtedly faces. In June 2017, we saw updated cyber security guidelines from the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) Safety Committee. These guidelines are tied into the ISM Code. Although the guidelines are currently“recommendatory”, they require cyber risk to be appropriately addressed in safety management systems no later than the first annual verification of a company’s “document of compliance” after 1 January 2021.

Network and Information Security Directive (NIS)

The latest development for UK-based maritime organisations comes with the publication of a Government consultation paper on the implementation of the Network and Information Security Directive (NIS) (EU 2016/1148). This EU Directive, which was approved in 2016, requires “essential services” to develop certain standards of cyber security. The NIS leaves it to individual EU member states to decide how to implement its requirements in their own domestic law. The recent consultation paper sets out the UK’s proposals in that regard.

Maritime transport is listed as one of the “essential services” to which the NIS will apply. Not all operators in this sector, however, will be affected directly by the current proposals that are intended to apply only to the largest operations with headquarters in the UK.

In the UK context, that will mean harbour authorities and ports with annual passenger numbers greater than 10 million or with 15% of the UK’s Ro-Ro or Lo Lo traffic or that account for 10% of UK liquid bulk or 20% of UK bio-mass fuel. Under the Government proposals, the NIS will also impact “water transport companies” that handle more than 30% of freight at any UK port in scope and five million tonnes of annual freight in UK ports as a whole. They will also apply to companies with 30% of annual passenger numbers at any individual UK port in scope and more than two million passengers at all UK ports. As at September 2017, the term “water transport companies” has not been defined.

Despite these limitations on the direct application of the NIS, it seems inevitable that its adoption by large organisations will have a knock on effect on smaller companies that work with or supply those organisations. This is because contracts for the supply of goods and services to the large organisations are likely to be amended to make small organisations responsible for any malware or other breach of cyber security that may be passed up the supply chain.

In addition, the Government is proposing to retain a reserve power to include within the scope of the NIS specific operators that do not meet the thresholds set out above, but which are still considered to provide an essential service.

Failure to comply with the NIS will, it is proposed, expose companies to very significant financial penalties of up to £17 million or 4% of global turnover, whichever is the greater.

Companies will be exposed to those fines if they “fail to implement appropriate and proportionate security measures”.  These requirements are in addition to other provisions relating, for example, to GDPR.

The consultation paper does not set out in any detail the measures that the Government will expect to see implemented. Rather, the Government proposes to:

“… set out the high level security principles which will be complimented by more detailed guidance, that will be either generic or sector specific. … These principles describe the mandatory security outcomes that all operators will be required to achieve”. 

The Government’s view is that operators of essential services are responsible for managing their risks and will need to implement security measures in line with the high level principles established for the purposes of NIS, having regard to the more detailed sector-specific and generic guidance to be published by the relevant NIS competent authorities. It is clear, however, that the new rules will cover governance, risk management, asset management and supply chain issues. In addition, there will be a mandatory incident reporting regime (that will be additional to existing reporting requirements and recommendations).

The consultation closes on 30 September 2017 and the Government will issue its further directives thereafter, with the intention that the scheme should go live from May 2018.

Although NIS is an EU Directive, its implementation by the UK Government will not be affected materially by the UK’s departure from the European Union.

 

Source: incegd


Two years to go. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) encourages ship owners and managers to have incorporated cyber risk management into ship safety by the 1st of January 2021. But what does that mean? And how to address maritime cyber risks?

Digitalization

The maritime sector is on the verge of a digital disruption. Digitalization is increasingly considered one of the key solutions to the many significant challenges the sector is facing, ranging from overcapacity, low margins, regulatory pressure, and lack of efficiency, to new digital demands from customers. Although digital transformation of the maritime sector is still in its infancy, it’s safe to assume that digitalization will have a major impact on operations and existing business models in the years to come.

But fast-moving changes do not come without risk. Industrial automation and control systems that were once isolated and deemed secure, are increasingly being connected to corporate networks and the Internet. Individual devices across enterprise Information Technology (IT) and Operational Technology (OT) networks – from smart digital equipment and tools to navigation, engines and more – will present potential new pathways to cyber attacks and incidents on vessels.

First steps towards regulation

This has driven IMO to issue the Resolution on Cyber Risk Management. The resolution “encourages administrations to ensure that cyber risks are appropriately addressed in safety management systems” by 2021.

While that does not sound too obligatory, potential implications of inappropriate cyber risk management are obvious, as it may lead to, for example:

  • Increased (unforeseen) expenses;
  • Operational loss due to incidents;
  • Safety and personnel damage;
  • Limited competitive edge.

But potentially, consequences are more widespread. Lack of compliance with these requirements may also lead to increased insurance fees, port access denial and even detention of ships, again meaning huge financial losses for their owners.

It is expected that, though for now just a recommendation, the IMO Guidelines can become the GDPR for the maritime sector: that regulation where noncompliance potentially affects your license to operate – and that regulation that seems difficult to get a grip on.

As cyber security may not be the core business of most maritime organisations, proper guidance on efficiently incorporating cyber risk management is needed. This is where KPMG offers its global expertise on cyber security advisory and digital risk management for the maritime sector.

Addressing cyber risk

KPMG’s solutions aim at letting maritime organisations manage cyber risk in the way that is intended in, for example, the IMO Guidelines on Maritime Cyber Risk Management and the BIMCO Guidelines on Cyber Security Onboard Ships. This includes:

  • Identify: To be able to identify and manage risks and turn them into business advantages, you first need to understand your connected landscape and identify the most relevant threats and highest risks for your environment.
  • Protect: Once you understand your maritime IT and OT landscape and the impact and risks of the different systems within, you can take appropriate measures to protect it where relevant.
  • Detect: Having identified and designed the controls and measures to protect your environment, it is important to monitor them. By monitoring network traffic, logs and end-points, you can better detect cyber incidents.
  • Respond: When an incident happens, getting back to business as usual is key for your business continuity and safety. Hence, cyber response processes should be ‘second nature’ for your organization.
  • Recover: After the heat of the incident is over, and business is as usual, it is time to gain an understanding of the situation and evaluate the current security measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. At this stage you will need to answer stakeholder questions about the incident and identify lessons learned.

Sailing high wind with cyber security will enable you to harvest benefits from digitalization and reduce unnecessary costs. Today’s cyber risk posture in the maritime sector, as well as upcoming regulations, demand a strong approach towards identifying those cyber risks that matter most, and addressing them in the most cost-effective way. This asks for scalable and data-driven solutions to automatically identify and address risks.

 

Source: linkedin


Introduction

The EU General Data Protection regulation (GDPR) was approved by the EU parliament on 14 April 2016 and comes into force on 25 May 2018. This piece of legislation introduces a new data protection framework to be applied to all the EU member states. This new regime – indeed much more severe and cogent than the existing one – aims to provide a greater amount of rights on individuals in relation to their data. As a result, the amount of obligations upon the organizations with regard to storage, collection, and treatment of personal data will definitely increase. One of the key changes is certainly the consequences in case of GDPR breaches. Fines for non-compliance, in fact, may reach up to either Euro 20 million or 4 % of the annual turnover (whichever is higher) for serious breaches.

 

What is Personal Data?

Pursuant to article 4 of the GDPR, personal data means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person, so-called data subject. A natural person can be identified by an identifier such as a name, identification number, location data or through factors specific to social identity. Further to this, Special Category personal data is data revealing racial or ethnic origins, political opinions, religious or philosophical beliefs, genetic and medical information. Organizations are subject to additional obligations while processing these special data.

 

When does an organization “Process” Personal Data?

Processing personal data means to perform an operation related to certain personal data; for example, by using, deleting, amending or disclosing such personal data.

 

Why the Shipping Industry will be affected by the GDPR?

Shipping companies store and handle a great amount of personal data, for instance passenger information, crew member details, travel documents, training records, bank details and other information gathered in the ordinary course of business. Moreover, shipping companies are likely to share this information with third parties such as port agents and P&I clubs.

Not only shipping companies will be subject to the GDPR. Brokers, surveyors, agents, correspondents, external services providers, very often deal with personal data, sometimes also sensitive ones. For instance, a personal injury claim or a claim involving a minor; in this case, the claimant – i.e. the data subject – will enjoy the right conferred by the GDPR.

 

To whom the GDPR applies to?

The GDPR applies to people of all nationalities when their personal data is processed by an organization established in EU. Also, the GDPR applies to non-EU organizations when they process personal data of people who are based in EU.

 

What are the consequences of failing to comply with the GDPR?

Indeed, the GDPR introduces draconian punishments. Fines for non-compliance may reach up to either Euro 20 million or 4 % of the annual turnover (whichever is higher) for serious breaches. For less serious offences, fines can reach up to Euro 10 million or 2% of turnover.

Apart from pecuniary punishments, non-compliance with the GDPR might keep the faulty organization away from important business opportunities in the future. Indeed, without mentioning the reputational consequences of a data breach, the GDPR compliance might become a paramount requirement for the companies in order to take part to the EU public contract tender, or in order to contract with companies siting in EU.

 

What should an organization do?

In order to comply with the GDPR, an organization should follow these 8 practical and essential steps:

  1. Awareness: be aware that the law is changing to the GDPR. All the people of an organization must understand the impact of this new piece of legislation.
  2. Information audit: assess what personal data the organization holds, where it comes from and who it is shared with. The audit is usually conducted by a legal team or professional firms with expertise in privacy matters.
  3. Draft privacy notice: after the audit is concluded, it is possible to draft a tailor-made privacy policy according to the types of personal data that the organization process. Certain organizations are advised to draft several privacy policies, for example, one which contains specific wording where special category data is collected, another one for commercial use, and another one for HR purposes.
  4. DPO: where appropriate, appoint a Data Protection Officer (DPO). An organization is required to appoint a DPO – i.e. someone to take responsibility for data protection compliance – where carries out the regular and systematic monitoring of individuals on a large scale or, carries out the large-scale processing of special categories of data such as health records, or information about criminal conviction. A competent external DPO can bring technical expertise and help to save time.
  5. Consent: review how the organization obtains, records and manages consent. Consent must be specific, granular, clear, prominent, properly documented and easily withdrawn.
  6. Individuals’ rights: check the procedure and be sure that they cover all the rights that individuals have. According to the GDPR, individuals have the right to: be informed, access, rectification, erasure, object and restrict processing. Therefore, the organization, for instance, should be ready to react if someone asks to have their personal data delated or modified.
  7. Data Breaches: make sure that the right procedures are in place to detect, report and investigate a personal data breach, so-called Incident Report Plan. Authorities must be notified of any breach of the regulations within 72 hours of the event.
  8. Training: ensure that organization personnel is trained about the GDPR compliance. A GDPR crash course along with periodic training would be appropriate in certain circumstances.

 

Will the GDPR affect the data that a ship uses and shares?

Yes, in so far as such data is considered Personal Data pursuant to article 4 of the GDPR.

 

Is a commercial data (B/L, Data of Vessel) subject to GDPR?

No, unless commercial data includes personal data.

 

Are the GDPR fines excluded from a P&I cover?

No. However, cover for such fine would indeed requires that all the reasonable steps to avoid the breach had been taken.

 


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED