The University of Oldenburg is taking part in an EU research project aimed at sustainable transportation of goods. The AVATAR project will investigate whether autonomous, zero-emission ships could be cost-effective on small inland waterways.

Many cities in the North Sea region are criss-crossed by canals which in the past were used for inland transport of goods and people in and around urban environments. Nowadays, however, this mode of transport is for the most part no longer economically viable, mainly due to high crewing costs. The AVATAR project (“Sustainable urban freight transport with autonomous zero-emission vessels”), in which the University of Oldenburg is also participating, will now investigate whether autonomous transport systems could be cost-effective on small inland waterways. Led by computer scientist Prof. Dr.-Ing. Axel Hahn, the Oldenburg team is developing a control centre to monitor the robot ship traffic.

The total budget for the project is approximately 1.9 million euros over the next three years, around half of which is being provided by the Interreg Europe North Sea Region programme. Seven partners from Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium are involved, with the Development Agency East-Flanders in Ghent (Belgium) as lead partner.

The project is investigating the economic potential of zero-emission urban freight vessels powered by renewable energies. The aim is to establish to what extent these vehicles could replace road transportation and thus help to reduce noise levels and exhaust emissions. The main focus In the Oldenburg sub-project is on safety concepts and communication with the robot ships.

Hahn’s team is working on so-called fallback solutions. “In critical situations, it must be possible to take over control of the vessels from a control centre,” Hahn explains. The researchers are investigating what data the control centre would require to be able to control a ship remotely. The system is to be housed in a container that can be set up at different locations for testing purposes. The “Maritime Connectivity Platform”, a communication system for maritime shipping which is currently under development, could be used for communication. It allows for the electronic exchange of data between vessels, ports, authorities and service providers.

The participants in AVATAR are mainly concerned with the “last mile” – the last leg of the journey in freight transport. In the future, robot ships could for example bring palletised goods from central transhipment points to inner city locations and carry waste away from them. Hamburg, Delft (the Netherlands), Ghent and Leuven (Belgium) are the pilot cities.

 

Source: idw-online


Big picture benefits
“Our e-Navigation mission has always been to simplify operational tasks, while enhancing efficiency, safety and business performance,” said Svanes. “This may be a new arena for NAVTOR, but its built on those same principles and utilizes our proven technology, infrastructure and expertise to deliver huge benefits for shipowners targeting improved ship management.

“Using our cyber-secure certified gateway, NavBox, and cloud computing resources we can enable remote teams to work as one – accessing data relating to, for example, vessel sensors, weather, passage planning, route optimization, engines and fuel consumption, in real-time. In this way, users have a simplified interface where everything is connected, enabling them to see the ‘big picture’ rather than working to gather and analyze separate data streams in isolation. This unlocks smarter shipping for everyone… and the benefits of that are almost unlimited.”

Performance optimization is a key NavFleet selling point, with the ability to benchmark, troubleshoot, refine and share best practices across fleets, while solving individual vessel issues.

For example, if a shoreside team knew what rpm should produce a speed of 10knots in good weather conditions, vessel engines could be set accordingly and ongoing speed monitored. If speed doesn’t meet expectations a hull performance issue could be identified, with bio-fouling producing frictional drag, hampering performance, and impacting on fuel consumption and efficiency. NavFleet would deliver this insight.

But, Svanes notes, that is really just the tip of the iceberg. The new awareness also enables easier compliance, alongside simplified reporting and administration, with the ability to automate key reports. Amongst these will be the mandated EU MRV/IMO DCS reports, which can be produced at the touch of a NavFleet button from later in 2021. A new approach to operational report handling will allow reports (e.g. noon reports) to be sent directly from vessels, but accessed from anywhere through the application.

In addition, NavFleet’s real-time monitoring capabilities will help office-based teams determine if vessels are falling short of KPIs or deviating from passage plans, facilitating swift remedial action. This ability makes it easier for owners to adhere to the covenants in charter party agreements, potentially avoiding performance claims and strengthening working relationships.

Smart shipping
“We’ve listened to our customers and the officers on the thousands of vessels we deliver services to and tailored a solution that helps them tackle some of their most pressing everyday challenges,” Svanes concludes. “It is powerful, flexible and will constantly evolve as we develop new functionality and refinements to meet the changing demands of this dynamic industry.

“We see this as a natural progression for NAVTOR and a further means of translating some of the principal benefits we’ve brought to e-Navigation into the context of overall fleet and business management. This is a new chapter for our company and, we believe, an essential application for enabling smarter, more sustainable and profitable shipping organizations.”

Since opening its doors in Egersund, Norway in 2011, NAVTOR now operates a global network of eight full-time offices and has more than 20 international distributors, supporting customers in more than 60 countries, with products and services onboard around 7,000 individual vessels.

 

Source: maritimeglobalnews


“This standard will help protect the environment in the port. Not only that, it will also help every organisation that is part of this process by raising the minimum standard of cleaning several notches higher and ensure that the end result is both a clean ship, and safe working practice,” says David Loosley, BIMCO secretary general.

The standard and the accompanying approval procedure is now available on the BIMCO and ICS websites.

The organisms growing on the ship increases its drag through the water and can reduce fuel efficiency of the ship by as much as 35%, leading to higher fuel bills and higher CO2 emissions. It is therefore important to remove the growths every couple of years.

A number of countries and regions have put biofouling management high on the agenda, with regional and national regulation on the drawing board or already in place. This includes the USA, Australia, the Baltic Sea region, New Zealand, Hawaii and California.

John Stawpert, Manager (Environment and Trade) at the International Chamber of Shipping added: “This new industry standard establishes a benchmark for safe and environmentally sound underwater hull cleaning, an issue that is of increasing concern to the international community. We hope that this first step by industry bodies will allow cleaning companies to demonstrate that their products protect the marine environment, and that shipowners can be confident that their ships are cleaned to a safe and effective level around the world. With these industry standards port authorities can also have confidence that underwater hull cleaning can be completed with minimal risk to the environment by independently approved cleaning companies working to proven high standards.”

According to the industry standard, at least 90% of the macro fouling must be captured by the cleaning company, and effluent water coming back into the sea will have removed organisms and materials down to a microscopic size (0.000001 metres).

Rigorous testing

For BIMCO and the partners involved, the next step is to implement the standard on a small scale and several shipping companies have already signed up to participate.

“It is one of the typical, long term, unglamorous, behind the scenes efforts that the industry undertakes, which will hopefully have a wide-reaching positive impact on the marine environment and the industry,” Loosley says.

The industry will now work to implement the standards with a number of stakeholders, including of paint manufacturers, in-water cleaning companies, shipowners, ports, and classification societies. These stakeholders will have to update their procedures, which will lead to successful cleanings, and ultimately – BIMCO and ICS hopes – to a general wide-spread acceptance of the standard and associated certification and in more ports allowing in-water cleaning.

The standard details planning, the documentation and assessment part of the operation, as well as the actual cleaning, the management of the effluent – the water involved in the cleaning – including the capture of particles, before it is released back into the sea.

The standard also includes:

  • Criteria for the cleanliness of water pumped back to sea
  • Methods to help shipowners act before the biofouling growth and coverage become severe
  • An approval procedure for cleaning companies
  • Minimum reporting requirements
  • Minimum requirements for an inspection, service and cleaning reports

The standard was developed by a coalition of companies and organisations including:

Akzo Nobel, BIMCO, C-Leanship, CMA Ships, DG Diving Group, Fleet Cleaner, Hapag-Lloyd, Hempel, HullWiper, International Association of Classification Societies, International Chamber of Shipping, Minerva Shipping, Portland Port (UK), Port of Rotterdam and PPG Coatings.

 

Source: bimco


Roboat is a 5-year research project and collaboration between the Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Metropolitan Solutions and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. In developing the world’s first fleet of autonomous floating vessels for the city of Amsterdam, it investigates the potential of self-driving technology to change our cities and their waterways.

Roboat is a new kind of on-demand infrastructure: autonomous platforms will combine together to form floating bridges and stages, collect waste, deliver goods, and transport people, all while collecting data about the city. How can we re-imagine urban infrastructures with cutting-edge technologies? Join MIT Senseable City Lab and AMS Institute newsletters to receive news about Roboat.

 

Source: roboat


Autonomous surface vehicles are gaining increasing attention worldwide due to the potential benefits of improving safety and efficiency. This has raised the interest in developing methods for path planning that can reduce the risk of collisions, groundings, and stranding accidents at sea, as well as costs and time expenditure. In this paper, we review guidance, and more specifically, path planning algorithms of autonomous surface vehicles and their classification. In particular, we highlight vessel autonomy, regulatory framework, guidance, navigation and control components, advances in the industry, and previous reviews in the field. In addition, we analyse the terminology used in the literature and attempt to clarify ambiguities in commonly used terms related to path planning. Finally, we summarise and discuss our findings and highlight the potential need for new regulations for autonomous surface vehicles.

Introduction

Research into path planning and collision avoidance (COLAV) algorithms for autonomous surface vehicles (ASVs) is motivated by continuing efforts to optimise operations and improve operational safety and performance. The general premise is that introducing higher levels of autonomy can reduce accidents, fuel costs, and operational costs (including crew), and improve regularity by reducing the frequency and consequence of human errors. To illustrate, the Annual Overview of Marine Casualties and Incidents 2019 [1] developed by the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) states that in 2011–2018, more than 54% of all casualties with ships were navigational casualties—a combination of contact (15.3%), collision (26.2%) and grounding/stranding (12.9%) accidents. Moreover, from a total of 4104 accident events analysed during the investigations, 65.8% were attributed to human erroneous actions. Statistics also show that 41.7% of all casualties took place in port areas, followed by 27.4% in the coastal areas (territorial sea). These numbers indicate an increased collision risk when navigating in congested waters with several static and dynamic obstacles. The aforementioned high percentage of navigational casualties (54.4%) and attribution to human erroneous actions (65.8%) for human-controlled ships can likely be reduced by introducing autonomy in the operation of surface vessels. In addition, autonomous vessels are well suited for missions in dangerous and rough sea environments, for example by better real-time decision-making or in the case of unmanned vessels, removing the risk of human lives. On the other side, increased autonomy is also associated with several important challenges related to operation in open, coastal, and congested waters, energy consumption, environmental abnormalities, personnel requirements, and national security issues that need to be considered.

The autonomous ship market is expected to grow at a fast rate in the near future. According to Global Autonomous Ship and Ocean Surface Robot Market: Analysis and Forecast, 2018–2028, a market intelligence report by BIS Research [2], “the autonomous ship market in terms of volume is expected to grow at the rate of 26.7% during the period 2024–2035 and cumulatively generate a revenue of $3.48 billion by 2035.” Hence, we expect to see an increased demand for the development of autonomous systems technology in the maritime industry, and for ships in particular.

To enable safer systems on waters with increased autonomy requires development of improved and reliable guidance, navigation and control (GNC) systems. The focus of this paper is on guidance systems, and more precisely on path planning and collision avoidance algorithms. Looking at the research done in the field so far, it is of our interest to address the ambiguities in the terminology, investigate the regulatory framework associated with autonomous vessels, and decompose the GNC system of an ASV to review different types of path planning algorithms. Our research aims at summarising the main components that need to be considered when developing a path planning and/or collision avoidance algorithm, based on information available up to date. Whereas much of what we present is general across vessel size, other considerations will differ whether the vessel is a small boat or a large ship. In such cases, the reader should note that larger ships are our main focus.

The three main contributions of this paper can be summarised as follows: (i) an elucidation and clarification of terminology related to surface vessels and guidance systems; (ii) an analysis of the existing regulatory framework for ASVs; and (iii) a suggestion for classifying path planning algorithms. Thus, our work should be of interest for investigators and developers of intelligent algorithms for path planning and collision avoidance for ASVs. Indeed, in an accompanying article in this journal [3], we extend the classification scheme presented here, and analyse and classify algorithms presented in 45 different peer-reviewed scientific papers.

The remainder of this paper is organised as follows: Sect. 2 presents advantages, challenges, and current development of ASVs, defines terminology used within this scope, and provides an overview of previous survey papers. Section 3 details regulatory guidelines that define autonomy and control safety of ASVs. Section 4 presents the authors’ view on the GNC modules for ASV navigation, from the perspective of path planning and collision avoidance. Section 5 provides our proposed classification of path planning algorithms. Section 6 contains a discussion, and finally, some concluding remarks are drawn in Sect. 7.

Background

This section presents advantages and challenges of ASVs and recent advances in the industry, clarifies some of the terminology used in the literature, and provides an overview of previously published review papers in the field.

Advantages and challenges of ASVs

ASVs have the potential to outperform traditional vessels with regard to safety. An increased adoption of ASVs could lead to a reduction in accidents caused by human erroneous actions, which currently contribute to a large share of ship casualties. However, the advantages of ASVs are not limited only to the safety aspect. Below, we identify some current, and potential future, advantages of ASVs:

  • Reduced, or eliminated, need for human control and hence, human errors.
  • Longer duration performance and enabling more hazardous missions than manned vehicles.
  • Improved reliability compared to remotely controlled unmanned surface vehicles (USVs) that demand highly reliable and secure communication means, and for which failure of communication may lead to a loss of navigation, accidents, or disaster.
  • Enhanced controllability and deployability, in addition to increased flexibility in sophisticated environments, including so-called dirty, dull, harsh, and dangerous missions.
  • Reduced personnel costs and improved personnel safety and security, when no crew is onboard and collision avoidance intelligence is implemented.
  • Extended operational capabilities, functionality, and precision, which also make ASVs increasingly required in many fields, e.g., scientific research, environmental and hydrographic surveys, ocean resource exploration, military operations, and other applications.
  • Reduced risks of piracy, including elimination or kidnapping of crew members.
  • Increased available space and tonnage for cargo by eliminating the need for life support systems and crew facilities (hotel, catering, and sanitary rooms).
  • Reduced design constraints from not having humans operating the vessel.
  • Removed need for a traditional navigation bridge by placing sensors optimally anywhere on the vessel.

Importantly, autonomy is the means to ensure these advantages and not a goal in itself. Moreover, ASVs are still facing several challenges before global commercialisation and operations in international waters. Some of these issues are identified below:

  • Regulatory framework. Legislation regulating ASVs is still unclear. Significant international cooperation is required in order to set up navigation and safety regulations as well as the design standards.
  • Liability. There are many legal challenges that arise if there is no captain onboard, e.g., who is liable for the actions being made.
  • Cyber-security. A big concern for all autonomous systems, cyber-security is of vital importance. A flaw in software may give unauthorised access to hackers who could take control of a ship.
  • Safety in navigation. A vessel sailing in open waters faces many risks including harsh weather conditions, obstacles, especially dynamical or underwater, or even risks related to third parties. Special attention should be brought to obstacles that cannot be detected by the automatic identification system (AIS), such as people in water, recreational vessels, small water equipment, or sea animals. An autonomous ship must be able to handle such challenges by itself without human control.
  • Reliability and maintenance. To operate at deep-sea for extended periods of time it is crucial to have good condition monitoring systems, maintenance plans, and redundancy. If there are no engineers onboard, the planned maintenance must take place at port. This may require longer stays in port, and vessel off-hire is expensive. Furthermore, to achieve satisfactory reliability, it may be required to redesign many of the ship systems to improve the mean time between failure (MTBF) and add redundancy.
  • Connectivity. Even though there is an increasing number of satellites in orbit, there is a varying degree of coverage and bandwidth depending on vessels’ location. Areas at high latitudes have poor coverage and are particularly challenging since most satellites are geostationary above the equator. In addition, a vessel could lose connectivity due to weather, damage to crucial equipment (such as antennas), and interference.
  • Piracy. Even if the ASV is unmanned, the cargo and the ship itself have a high value and is subject to hijacking. An unmanned ship may also be easier to seize.

Recent advances in the industry

Nowadays, leading shipbuilding companies already have a vision of a future with mostly autonomous vessels on waters. In what follows, we present some recent advances and future predictions among important actors in the industry.

In their €6.6 million project, Advanced Autonomous Waterborne Applications Initiative (AAWA) (2015–2017), Rolls-Royce anticipated having ocean-going autonomous ships by 2025 [4]. Moreover, in 2017, Rolls-Royce, in cooperation with Svitzer, demonstrated project Sisu—the world’s first remotely operated commercial vessel [5]. Subsequently, in 2018, Rolls-Royce in cooperation with Finferries started the collaboration project Safer Vessel with Autonomous Navigation (SVAN) to test the findings of the AAWA project [6]. The aim of the project is to develop solutions to optimise the safety and efficiency of ships. So far, they have succeeded in designing and commercialising components for automatic operations such as autocrossing systems, which resulted in “the world’s first fully autonomous ferry” FalcoFootnote1 (see Fig. 1) successfully demonstrated in 2018 [7]. Furthermore, in another joined collaboration with Intel, Rolls-Royce is trying to make autonomous ships a reality by providing new technologies, intelligent awareness systems, and other products to enhance the operational safety of ASVs [8]. Finally, it is worth mentioning that the Rolls-Royce division mainly involved with autonomous ships, Rolls-Royce Commercial Marine, recently was acquired by Kongsberg Gruppen [9].

 

Source: link


– The Global Autonomous Ships Market has witnessed strong growth owing to the growing sea-borne trade across the globe, coupled with the lack of professional sailors. Moreover, the growing adoption of connected smart ships as they offer various benefits such as vessel traffic management data and fleet health monitoring data is also driving the market growth.

JERSEY CITY, N.J.Feb. 4, 2021 /PRNewswire/ — Verified Market Research recently published a report, “Autonomous Ships Market” by Type (Fully Autonomous, Remote Operations, and Partial Automation), by Application (Commercial and Military), by Geography. According to Verified Market Research, the Global Autonomous Ships Market was valued at USD 6.39 Billion in 2020 and is projected to reach USD 10.02 Billion by 2027, growing at a CAGR of 6.64 % from 2021 to 2027.

 

Source: prnewswire


LabTest is the industry leader in assisting manufacturers in acquiring approvals for marine products.

Our friendly and knowledgeable staff will provide you with the knowledge and assessments you need to get your marine products approved for your intended market.

Our extensive network and experience in the marine industry offers our clients easy access to CE Marking, Classification Agency Type Approval, and the Wheel Mark for the Marine Equipment Directive.

At LabTest, we favor a single test plan.

This proven approach provides you with a One-Stop-Solution for your product approvals. For your next marine equipment approval, let us assist you with the approval process.

We can make it an easy, efficient, and affordable experience.

LabTest is a recognized Testing Laboratory for the Recreational Craft Directive by IMCI for the following ISO standards: 8846, 8847, 8848, 8849, 9097, 10133, 10239, 10240, 10592, 11105, 11192, 12216, 13297, 13929, 14895, 15083 & 29775

Type Approvals

LabTest’s approach to Type Approval is with a Single Test Plan, thereby reducing your time to market and your testing costs. With our established network of classification agencies, we can help you get your desired classification (Type Approval). Here is a list of Classification Agencies we work with:

Wheel Mark

Products within the scope of the Marine Equipment Directive (96/98/EC) shall apply as equipment for use on board ships:

(a) a new Community ship whether or not the ship is situated within the Community at the time of construction;marine product testing wheel mark

(b) an existing Community ship
— where such equipment was not previously carried on board
or
— where equipment which was previously carried on board the ship is replaced, except where international conventions permit otherwise, whether or not the ship is situated within the Community when the equipment is placed on board.

Coast Guard

Canadian Coast Guard

LabTest evaluates products in accordance to CSA Standards and TP Specifications, as required by the Canadian Coast Guard.Canadian Coast Guard

United States Coast Guard

LabTest evaluates products in accordance to the ABYC Standards and the CFR Specifications, as required by the US Coast Guard.US Coast Guard

Recreational Craft Directive

LabTest evaluates products in accordance to the standards published in the Official Journal of the European Union, as per the Recreational Craft Directive. LabTest is listed as a Recognized Testing Facility by the International Marine Certification Institute for the Recreational Craft Directive.

Source: labtestcert


The shipping industry, like many others, continues to suffer as a result of the global spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Whilst hope remains that the outbreak can be managed and brought under control, the spread of the pandemic may stimulate or accelerate the adoption of autonomous technology onboard vessels and drive interest in the commercial use of MASS. During lockdown, we have been approached by numerous owners and charterers to advise on the impact of COVID-19 on conventional shipping, including issues regarding crew changes, repatriation, interpretation of force majeure clauses and the doctrine of frustration, insurance coverage issues, completion of the sale and purchase of vessels, ship building issues, refit and repair contracts and navigational restrictions. Whilst all of these issues will also be relevant for autonomous vessels, some MASS are, by design, insulated from the current crewing challenges facing the conventional shipping industry.

The impact of COVID-19 on crews should not be understated. The International Chamber of Shipping has estimated that every month roughly 100,000 seafarers reach the end of their employment contract and need to be repatriated. However, most jurisdictions have implemented restrictive rules for seafarers transiting their jurisdiction, either to return home or to join a vessel. Guy Platten, the International Chamber of Shipping’s Secretary-General, recently warned that there are “currently 1.2 million seafarers at sea … limitations on crew changes have potential to cause serious disruption to the flow of trade”.

Depending on the level of autonomy displayed by a MASS, these crewing issues are less likely to impact the vessel’s operational performance and, with the uncertainty surrounding when a worldwide vaccine will become available, we expect that there is likely to be increasing interest in MASS.

The spread of COVID-19 has also forced shipping companies to implement remote working and digital technologies for business continuation and fleet optimisation. For example, suppliers of unmanned aerial vehicles and remote-control services have found new markets in ship inspections. Further, shipping companies and original equipment manufacturers are using artificial intelligence for predictive maintenance, intelligent scheduling, real-time analytics and improving performance. Digitalisation has also opened new services and connectivity for class. For example, DNV GL now issues an e-certificate every four minutes and 80% of its customers have indicated they would use a digital tool for smart survey bookings. DNV GL has completed 17,400 remote surveys since 2018, over half of which have taken place in the past 6 months, with DNV GL conducting on average 300 remote surveys per week since coronavirus-restricted travel was implemented.

COVID-19 has, however, caused a number of MASS-related projects to be put on hold. Regular readers of our bulletins will recall that we have reported previously on the Yara Birkeland. The hull was launched in Romania in February 2020 and was expected to arrive at the Vard Brevik shipyard in Norway in May where it was due to be fitted with control and navigation systems and undergo testing. As a result of the pandemic and the change in the global shipping outlook, Yara International has paused further construction. We may see other projects being put on hold until the economic impact of COVID-19 is fully understood.

MASRC20

At the 5th annual MASRC, held at the UK Chamber of Shipping on 15-16 January 2020, stakeholders discussed the opportunities and issues associated with MASS, including costs, growth and performance. Despite there being more than 1,000 autonomous vessels operating in international waters, together accumulating tens of thousands of incident-free days at sea, there were differing views as to just how successful MASS will be. Operators of small autonomous vessels were optimistic. However, larger shipping operators were more sceptical, for example as to the reliability of software and systems, and the costs of modifying conventional vessels to enable autonomous capabilities.

The event featured a number of presentations, covering a range of aspects in relation to autonomous shipping. These included presentations on the IMO’s Regulatory Scoping Exercise, cyber risks and autonomous navigation. In a keynote speech, Nusrat Ghani MP discussed the UK Government’s Maritime 2050 strategy, which aims to make the UK a global maritime leader and grow the industry over the next few decades. The speech focussed on technology, digitalisation and the environment, with clear support being expressed for autonomous maritime technologies. It is unclear if the financial issues caused by the current pandemic will impact this plan.

Advantages of autonomy on the transport modes

A recent TT Club online forum broached the subject of ‘Drones and autonomous vehicles: The future… now?’. During the forum, the panel examined the barriers to growth of autonomous freight transport. Speakers included Svilen Rangelov (Co-Founder and CEO at Dronamics); Pranav Manpuria (CEO of autonomous truck developer, Flux Auto) and Hussain Quraishi (Strategic Innovation Manager at Wärtsilä).

The panellists suggested that increased automation at sea would lead to improved safety and voyage optimisation (which had already been realised). In the medium-term, reduced crewing was expected to impact upon coastal trade the most as crew expense forms a greater percentage of operating costs.

The lack of uniform regulation across national governments and even within countries was described as a major block to autonomous vehicle and drone deployment. The level of investment required was not, however, high on the list of obstacles.

Environmental hazards (such as bad weather affecting autonomous ships) were seen as challenges that technology could cope with, while the avoidance of human error will improve safety. However, the forum concluded that vulnerability to cyber-attack was perceived to increase with the use of computer-controlled vehicles and was therefore a strong disincentive to adoption.

Investments in MASS projects

Some stakeholders see significant market potential in autonomous vessels, with such vessels expected to promote safe, efficient and sustainable operations around the world. An example is Kongsberg, which has designed a project to test and develop a wide range of autonomous technologies in collaboration with a number of partners. This includes navigation and intelligent machinery systems, self-diagnostics, prognostics and operation scheduling capabilities, and communication technology. The project will receive a €20.1m grant from the EU’s Horizon 2020 programme to equip two vessels with such technologies, so that they can be autonomous and controlled remotely.

Separately, Kongsberg has recently announced that, as part of a collaboration with Bastø Fosen and the Norwegian Maritime Authority (NMA), the world’s first adaptive ferry can demonstrate automatic control. By integrating autonomous technology onto the Bastø Fosen VI, the vessel is able to transport passengers and vehicles between docks, and is also able to perform all docking and crossing functions to a high degree of accuracy. However, it remains manned by a full crew and is currently not fully autonomous. For example, in the event that the vessel is on a collision course, an alarm will sound to signal that human intervention is required to avoid objects or other vessels. Nevertheless, the benefits of the technology are clear, and include optimised fuel consumption, operational cost savings, improved timekeeping and higher customer satisfaction. A six-month trial period is currently underway, and an anti-collision system is expected to be installed and tested later this year. Although regulations will need to keep pace, it is encouraging that bodies such as the NMA are facilitating developments in the autonomous shipping space.

A 27m harbour tug owned and operated by PSA Marine has also been equipped with technology (made by Wärtsilä) to enable it to navigate autonomously. Initial sea trials were successfully completed in Singapore in mid-March 2020, having commenced in September 2019, and work will continue throughout 2020. It was confirmed that the technology is capable of avoiding obstacles, including both real-life moving vessels and virtual obstacles. A smart navigation system allowed for routes to be planned in real time, also sending track and speed commands to Wärtsilä’s dynamic positioning system that sailed the vessel at varying speeds. The trials represent a first for commercial MASS using the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore’s regulatory sandbox, and are part of an initiative to promote the development of MASS.

A Japanese consortium consisting of Marubeni Corporation, Tryangle, Mitsui E&S Shipbuilding, and the City of Yokosuka is to launch a pilot project that will aim to establish the technology for autonomous ship operation in Yokosuka City. A pilot project is being trialled on a voyage route between Mikasa Pier and Sarushima Island in Yokosuka City. The autonomous ship technology, which is being developed by Mitsui E&S Shipbuilding, is to be retrofitted onto an existing small-sized passenger boat operated by Tryangle. Autonomous ship operations will include berthing and unberthing. The ship crew will, however, remain onboard. The retrofitting will be completed by the end of 2021, and the autonomous operation will start before the end of March 2022.

The Royal Navy has begun trials of an autonomous model of the Pacific 24, a rigid inflatable vessel which has been in service for 25 years. The autonomous model has been developed by Navy X, the Royal Navy’s innovation wing, and BAE Systems. The Pacific 24’s control system and sensors have been upgraded and the Royal Navy will be able to programme the vessel to fulfil an order. The vessel will then be able to calculate the best way to carry out the task.

Wärtsilä have announced that they will provide a high-speed, high-resolution K-band radar system designed to provide high levels of situational awareness – especially in densely populated marine environments to the Mayflower autonomous vessel. As discussed in our January bulletin, the Mayflower will undertake the same voyage as its namesake during which it will conduct oceanographic research. The Mayflower is 15 metres long and weighs 5 tonnes. Sea trials began in March 2020 and the transatlantic voyage is scheduled to take place in April 2021.

A consortium made up of C-Job Naval Architects, LISA, seazip Offshore Service, Sea Machines, MARIN, and el-Tec elektrotechnologie has released a concept design for an autonomous guard vessel (AGV). These vessels are designed to protect offshore windfarms and the ships trying to navigate around them. By removing the vessels’ crew, the design is smaller and lighter than current guard vessels allowing it to be battery powered. When other vessels approach the asset protected by an AGV, the AGV is designed to take action to secure the area in order to avoid collisions and damage to the offshore infrastructure. The AGV can communicate with an intruding vessel, send information on how to safely navigate the area and also physically escort intruding vessels away from the site while recording the encounter to provide video footage in case of any incident.

Abu Dhabi Ports has begun to work with naval architects at Robert Allan to develop autonomous port vessels, including tugs for unmanned towage and harbour operations. The vessels will be capable of remote control operations and could potentially become fully unmanned, enabling the vessels to operate in more adverse weather conditions.

South Korea has announced the launching of a project to develop MASS by 2025. The aim is to build vessels with the third level of autonomy as defined by the IMO (i.e. Remotely controlled without seafarers on board). The Korean Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy and the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries have set up a specific working group and have allocated 160 billion won (US$132 million) to the project. The project’s aim is to capture 50% of the market share of the global autonomous vessel market by 2023.

India-based Cochin Shipyard Ltd (CSL) has signed contracts for the construction and supply of two autonomous electric freight ferries for Norway-based ASKO Maritime AS, a subsidiary group of Norges Gruppen ASA, with an option to build two more identical vessels. The 67-metre long vessels will initially be delivered as fully-electric transport ferries, powered by an 1,846 kwh capacity battery. The ferries are being built with the help of NOK119m ($12.8m) in Norwegian Government funding as part of a project to provide emissions-free transportation of goods across the Oslo Fjord. They will be operated by Massterly AS, a joint venture between Kongsberg and Wilhelmsen. Massterly was set up to take technical management and operate autonomous vessels. After commissioning of autonomous equipment and field trials in Norway, the vessels will operate as fully autonomous ferries, able to transport 16 fully loaded standard EU trailers in one trip across the Fjord.

South Korea-based shipbuilder Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) has signed an agreement with the Port of Rotterdam Authority to develop ship-related smart technologies.

The two companies will study how to develop smart ships suitable for digitalised ports over the next three years with a significant focus on autonomous operations.

At the recent Netherlands Forum for Smart Shipping, Kotug International, Rotortug and tech start-up Captain AI demonstrated a novel piece of dispatch planning software which enables real-time optimised route planning for autonomous vessels. The system uses AIS data and artificial intelligence, connected to the autonomous tug’s autopilot. The software, Captain AI Route Planner, acts as a “Google Maps for waterways” and plans the route which the tug follows autonomously, using the Captain AI Autopilot software. By using the software, autonomous vessels are anticipated to save fuel and reduce CO2 emissions by following the optimal route. The software builds on Kotug International and Rotortug’s 2018 demonstration of a tug in the Port of Rotterdam being operated remotely from Marseille, France.

Regulatory and software developments

The Russian Maritime Register of Shipping has published guidelines on the classification of MASS. The guidelines address the survey of MASS under design and construction stages, conversion into MASS and manufacturing of materials and products for MASS. The focal areas include the situational awareness systems, radio and data communication, navigation and manoeuvring, and propulsion. The document also specifies the track marking and remote control centre that play an important role in the MASS monitoring and safe navigation.

A UK based company called Windward has released Maritime Artificial Intelligence Analytics (MAIA) 4.0 which it describes as software that is capable of screening, searching and analysing dynamic maritime data to connect data and discover potential risks and “questionable business partners”. The intention is that the software will use dynamic predictive intelligence based on a vessel’s identity, cargo, location and voyage patterns (amongst other data) and then link this to patterns and profiles. One aspect that the software has been designed to spot is voyage irregularities. Windward hopes that its software will be able to profile activity in the shipping market so that stakeholders will be able to easily ascertain whether they are dealing with businesses that are compliant with the latest regulations.

Data sharing

Solis Marine and maritrace have developed an online platform to demonstrate how complex datasets derived from a multitude of sources at a single port can be consolidated into one distribution system. The platform is part of the UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency’s (MCA) marlab project, and allows MASS to access data collected from the test site, Portland Harbour in Dorset, on demand. The datasets cover, for example, information regarding maritime traffic, seabed and weather conditions. It is hoped that the sharing of data between the MCA and other organisations will further the development of MASS, such as in relation to the programming of MASS. However, Dr. Katrina Kemp from the MCA has said that the UK needs a clear regulatory pathway for MASS.

In January 2020, the project team had invited stakeholders to test the prototype, in order to provide marlab with valuable feedback. A five month period of testing at Portland Harbour enabled the development of a technology stack to demonstrate how multiple data sources from a single port could be consolidated into a single location for MASS operators to then access the data on demand.

HFW involvement

HFW had been intending to participate in a number of events, such as the Autonomous Ship and Technology Symposium, but some of these have been postponed until next year.

Notwithstanding this, HFW have been asked by BIMCO to take part in a project to adapt SHIPMAN 2009 to provide third party management services for autonomous ships. The drafting sub-committee includes Massterly, NYK, Anglo Eastern, Gard and HFW. The project is ongoing, with meetings taking place remotely and good progress has been made.

Finally, certain events have been moved online and HFW have recently been involved with the Swansea Colloquium at Swansea University in which Paul Dean gave a paper on Autonomous Systems and looked at the impact of cyber risks and seaworthiness of MASS. The paper examined recent cyber security breaches and provided an insight as to how the courts are likely to consider an owner’s failure to adequately prevent a cyber-attack.

Conclusion

Since our last bulletin, the continuing development of MASS has proven to be resilient, albeit not immune, to the challenges of COVID-19. While the pandemic continues, one can see MASS becoming increasingly attractive, if only to avoid the crewing challenges caused by the pandemic. However, it is the fear of another virus – cyber – which remains one of the biggest obstacles facing the development of MASS. HFW continues to advise in this area, including drafting one of the first bespoke cyber insurance policies and playing a key role in the BIMCO drafting sub-committee for the BIMCO Cyber Security Clause 2019.

Source: lexology


Captain Ben Moore will enter service between Norwalk and Huntington, NY, to deliver food and other cargo faster, more reliably and more affordably than truck transportation to East Norwalk’s Harbor Harvest food market, while also reducing regional highway congestion. Comparable trucking services require a near nine-hour round trip to deliver within this location. First Harvest Navigation completes the terminal-to-terminal voyage in approximately 35 to 45 minutes.

“Part of our transportation goals are to develop autonomous, hybrid catamarans to move farm products across Long Island Sound. The Sea Machines SM300 autonomous navigation system will help us achieve many of our goals because it enables shipping movements to be completed very reliably and efficiently in a seamless and sustainable delivery system,” said Bob Kunkel, president, First Harvest Navigation. “Shifting cargo from streets and highways also alleviates the growing congestion, lower emissions and reestablishes our waterways as a viable and cost-efficient alternative to land-based transport.”

“Sea Machines and First Harvest Navigation are aligned in our commitments to innovation to bolster the U.S. marine highway system and in our support of family farms,” said Michael G. Johnson, founder and CEO, Sea Machines. “The SM300 ensures predictable and performance-based vessel operations while providing a 24/7 crew support system that is always on watch. It often takes determined entrepreneurial leaders like First Harvest Navigation to move an industry into new waters and Sea Machines is pleased to support the achievement of their goals.”

The hybrid vessel can carry approximately 28 pallets, 10 of which are positioned in a fully refrigerated and protected walk-in space. The remaining cargo spaces are open and covered according to customer requirements. It is powered by a pair of Cummins QSB 6.7 diesels, generating 104 kW each at 2,400 kW, and lithium batteries connected to a pair of BAE Systems HybriDrive electric motors.


Harbor Harvest & First Harvest Navigation
Harbor Harvest is dedicated to developing the relationship between farmer, harbor and customer. Their mission is to provide convenient access to healthy, nutritious food sourced from local and regional farms and artisans at a price that supports the local community. First Harvest Navigation and Harbor Harvest are providing new regional transportation, warehousing and retail marketing for family farms, local business and artisan products within New York and New England areas. More: www.harborharvest.com

About Sea Machines Robotics
Headquartered in the global tech hub of Boston and operating globally, Sea Machines is the leader in pioneering autonomous command and control systems for the marine and maritime industries. Founded in 2015, the company builds autonomous vessel software and systems, which increases the safety, efficiency and performance of ships, workboats and other commercial vessels.

Source: sea-machines


Advancements in sensor technologies for environmental monitoring, improved navigation, object detection, and collision avoidance, image processing algorithms, and machine vision have created opportunities for marine shipping companies to integrate a wide range of solutions for autonomous vessels.

Sensors are expected to be pivotal in the development of connected and autonomous ships. Apart from devices communicating with each other, future autonomous ships will interact with the environment around, thereby leading to various forms of business opportunities with the collected data.

This research service focuses on capturing emerging technologies enabling autonomous ships, industries best practices and use cases. Growth opportunity assessment was done to assess the pathway of sensor technology development, which will lead to making autonomous ships a reality.

Key questions addressed in the research service:

  • What are the various types of sensor technologies enabling autonomous ships?
  • What are the benefits and applications of the technology?
  • What are the key innovations and who are the innovators impacting autonomous ship development?
  • What are the use case scenarios in the autonomous shipping arena?
  • What is the impact of COVID-19 on autonomous ships?
  • What are future growth opportunities?

Key Topics Covered

1. Executive Summary
1.1 Research Scope
1.2 Research Methodology
1.3 Research Methodology Explained
1.4 Summary of Key Findings

2. Marine Autonomous Ships – An Overview
2.1 Marine Autonomous Ships – A Sneak Preview
2.2 Technologies Encouraging Development of Autonomous Ships
2.3 Satellite Communication and Space-based Sensors Aid in Garnering Information from Above the Ship
2.4 Sensor Fusion, Image Sensors, and UAVs Aid in Environmental Monitoring for Autonomous Ships
2.5 Echosounder, Side-scan Sonar, Forward-looking Sonar, and UUVs Play a Vital Role in Underwater Assessment for Autonomous Ships

3. Assessment of Industry Best Practices and Recent Initiatives
3.1 Strategic Partnership Paves the Way for Development of Autonomous Ship
3.2 International Maritime Organization Aids in the Framework for Marine Autonomous Surface Ships
3.3 Guidelines Lay Out Risk Mitigating Approaches and Autonomous Shipping Concepts
3.4 Regulatory Bodies for Ships Define Degrees of Autonomy

4. Implementation Case Scenario of Autonomous Ships
4.1 Demonstrations of Autonomous Cargo Indicate Reduced Fuel Consumption
4.2 Autonomous Ferry Demonstration Lays the Foundation for Development of Autonomous Ships
4.3 Demonstrations of Autonomous Vessels Indicate the Capabilities of Remotely Operated Marine Vessels to Gather Sea Data

5. Companies to Action
5.1 Stakeholder Initiatives – Rolls Royce Leads Various Initiatives in the Autonomous Ships Arena
5.2 Stakeholder Initiatives – Enabling Technologies for Autonomous Ships
5.3 Stakeholder Ecosystem – Demonstrations and Upcoming Autonomous Ship Projects in 2020

6. Impact of COVID19 on Autonomous Shipping
6.1 Impact of COVID-19 on the Global Shipping Industry and Advancements in Autonomous Shipping

7. Growth Opportunities of Emerging Technologies for Autonomous Ships
7.1 Growth Opportunities of Autonomous Ships Across Potential Applications
7.2 Growth Opportunity 1: Disruptive Potential of Autonomous Ships
7.3 Growth Opportunity 2: R&D Partnerships of Autonomous Ships

8. Industry Contacts
8.1 Key Industry Contacts

Source: globenewswire


Company DETAILS

SHIP IP LTD
VAT:BG 202572176
Rakovski STR.145
Sofia,
Bulgaria
Phone ( +359) 24929284
E-mail: sales(at)shipip.com

ISO 9001:2015 CERTIFIED